''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses
''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses ''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses
- 148 - only lead to disaster. Being lost in a world of images, he is in the end even physically blinded to the finite realm and reality of "mere mortals"87 to which he has been morally blind all along. It is ironical that recognition of the truth should come to him only "in the dark-room of his blindness"88 but it must not be forgotten that, strictly speaking, it does not even "come" to him (Albinus, unlike Humbert, never becomes aware of things himself), but that the truth is revealed to him by his brother-in-law. Humbert Is blindness seems to be very much like Albinus', but whereas Albinus ends up in total darkness, Humbert becomes seeing in the end. From the conventional point of view, Humbert is guilty of continually abusing a child to satisfy his perverse sexual desire. In terms of his metaphysical obsession he is guilty of seeing in Lolita not the little girl she is, but one of those "chosen creatures I propose to designate as 'nymphets"', whose "true nature... is not human, but nymphic (that is, demoniac)" (L, 18). From the start, then, Humbert denies that Lolita's true nature is human. In a way, this adds to the comedy of their relationship. Lolita has been seen as incongruous and comic in her role of the cruel be- loved mistress, La Belle Dame Sans Merci. Now there is the additional incongruity between Humbert's idealized, unearthly version of her, and the very human, very terrestrial Lolita, who constantly inter- feres with, and threatens to destroy, Humbert's own reality. 89
- 149 - But Humbert's view of Lolita also adds another tragic dimension to their story, for from the start it is clear that he does not love her as she is, but as he sees her, as that fanciful, semi-divine being, a creation of his own mind (based on one of her qual- ities, namely her youthful beauty and loveliness), who comes between him and the real child. I knew I had fallen in love with Lolita for ever; but I also knew she would not be for ever Lolita... The words 'for ever' referred only to my own passion, to the eternal Lolita as reflected in my blood (65-66). Even on that memorable Sunday What I had madly possessed was not she, but my own creation, another, fanciful Lolita - perhaps, more real than Lolita; overlapping, encasing her; floating between me and her, and having no will, no consciousness - indeed, no life of her own. The child knew nothing. I had done nothing to her (62). He has possessed his own creation, more real to him than the child before him, and the child -a being apart - knows nothing. Later, of course, the child does not remain ignorant, but Humbert's attitude does not change. In his preoccupation with the fanciful nymphet in whom he senses and worships and wants to grasp some mysterious and otherwise unattainable beauty, Lolita and her soul and wonder elude him. He says he can !' "visualize , Lolita with hallucinational lucidity"; he says that he is "always 'with Lolita' as a woman is 'with child'" (107). Craving to attain the unattainable, he wishes he could "turn
- Page 103 and 104: - 97 - standing of a "truly human b
- Page 105 and 106: - 99 - eternal beauty, and his conv
- Page 107 and 108: - 101 - One luckless early critic w
- Page 109 and 110: - 103 - says "well-read" Humbert Hu
- Page 111 and 112: - 105 - surface, into the initial m
- Page 113 and 114: - 107 - age. She was the "initial g
- Page 115 and 116: - 109 - and implies in the parody t
- Page 117 and 118: - 111 - He is equally inaccurate in
- Page 119 and 120: - 113 - with Quilty; and, of course
- Page 121 and 122: - 115 - or to hold her on his knee
- Page 123 and 124: - 117 - ations ) (98). And he descr
- Page 125 and 126: - 119 - a strident, harsh high voic
- Page 127 and 128: - 121 - When Humbert talks of his d
- Page 129 and 130: - 123 -- could victimize her poor d
- Page 131 and 132: - 125 - this twelve-year-old girl s
- Page 133 and 134: - 127 - done her morning duty" (161
- Page 135 and 136: - 129 - experience, up to a certain
- Page 137 and 138: - 131 - her: "... -a life full of t
- Page 139 and 140: - 133 - Looking at it for a moment
- Page 141 and 142: - 135 - and Axel Rex delightful. Bu
- Page 143 and 144: - 137 - critics have made her, and
- Page 145 and 146: - 139 - not record images of the sy
- Page 147 and 148: - 141 - ous hallucination" (287). 6
- Page 149 and 150: - 143 - No hereafter is acceptable
- Page 151 and 152: - 145 - be possible for him to be t
- Page 153: - 147 - and it is also appropriate
- Page 157 and 158: - 151 - the truth of the theory dev
- Page 159 and 160: - 153 - part of it. Even with the i
- Page 161 and 162: - 155 - THE REAL LIFE OF SEBASTIAN
- Page 163 and 164: - 157. - consistent set of characte
- Page 165 and 166: - 159 - gathered from various sourc
- Page 167 and 168: - 161 - a very close one, and it se
- Page 169 and 170: - 163 - tiously follows all the mov
- Page 171 and 172: - 165 - go about it), behaving as i
- Page 173 and 174: - 167 - infinite trouble what he co
- Page 175 and 176: - 169 - What were the things that r
- Page 177 and 178: - 171 share", as a good biographer
- Page 179 and 180: - 173 - seems to him too colourless
- Page 181 and 182: 175 - parody of what Stegner calls
- Page 183 and 184: - 177 - that lead to it, he is sing
- Page 185 and 186: - 179 - the time during which he li
- Page 187 and 188: - 181 - France. He is tormented by
- Page 189 and 190: - 183 - on the last page of the nov
- Page 191 and 192: - 185 - what he wants to find, that
- Page 193 and 194: - 187 - would not see him. Somewhat
- Page 195 and 196: - 189 - he falls back on passages f
- Page 197 and 198: - 191 - ticism as one possible way
- Page 199 and 200: - 193 - The passages betray not onl
- Page 201 and 202: - 195 - This "mental jerk" grants k
- Page 203 and 204: - 197 - clear, and the harmony and
-<br />
148 -<br />
only lead to disaster. Being lost in a world of<br />
images, he is in the end even physically blinded to<br />
the finite realm and reality of "mere mortals"87 to<br />
which he has been morally blind all along. It is<br />
ironical that recognition of the truth should come<br />
to him only "in the dark-room of his blindness"88<br />
but it must not be <strong>for</strong>gotten that, strictly speaking,<br />
it does not even "come" to him (Albinus, unlike Humbert,<br />
never becomes aware of things himself), but that the<br />
truth is revealed to him by his brother-in-law.<br />
Humbert Is blindness seems to be very much like<br />
Albinus', but whereas Albinus ends up in total darkness,<br />
Humbert becomes seeing in the end. From the<br />
conventional point of view, Humbert is guilty of<br />
continually abusing a child to satisfy his perverse<br />
sexual desire. In terms of his metaphysical obsession<br />
he is guilty of seeing in Lolita not the little girl<br />
she is, but one of those "chosen creatures I propose<br />
to designate as 'nymphets"', whose "true nature... is<br />
not human, but nymphic (that is, demoniac)" (L, 18).<br />
From the start, then, Humbert denies that Lolita's<br />
true nature is human. In a way, this adds to the<br />
comedy of their relationship. Lolita has been seen<br />
as incongruous and comic in her role of the cruel be-<br />
loved mistress, La Belle Dame Sans Merci. Now there<br />
is the additional incongruity between Humbert's<br />
idealized, unearthly version of her, and the very<br />
human, very terrestrial Lolita, who constantly inter-<br />
feres with, and threatens to destroy, Humbert's own<br />
reality.<br />
89