''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses

''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses ''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
28.02.2014 Views

-5- times cruel. "21 L. L. Lee, on the other hand, defends Fyodor, stating that "he does appreciate Chernyshevs- ki's risks, his courage, and, for that matter, his goodness"22, and that his work "makes Chernyshevski a truly sympathetic, if foolish, man and rescues him from politics in the sense that he becomes human and not a symbol. " 23 What is more interesting in this context, however, is the way in which Nabokov treats, not Chernyshevskii the man, but his theory of art. As one biographer says of Chernyshevskii: ".:. [he] denied serious attention to any theory of art or criticism that confined dis- cussion to the relative merits of works of art and avoided more fundamental questions. "24 Concerning himself with such "fundamental questions", Chernyshevs- kii decided that the "mission" of art was "to repro- duce, to explain, to judge, and to teach. "25 Briefly and simply stated, this implies that art should re- produce reality, which he considered as superior to art. 26 By calling attention to objects through repro- ducing them, art could fulfil its function to explain, by making these objects' significance clear and "[: forcing] people to understand life better. " - "Though art might resemble a learned statement, it would more easily be absorbed and comprehended. " 27 Chernyshevskii's conviction that art had the func- tion to judge entailed his "theory of art's social mission. "28 He expected that, if a writer was aware of, and alive to, what was going on around him, "then consciously or not, his work pronounced judgements

-6- on the aspects of life that interested him. 29 He puts it in a way that suggests that a work of art may in fact contain more than the author intentionally puts into it. His convictions and opinions may flow into his art without him being aware of it, so that, even though he does not write in order to pass judgements, the judgements may be there, implicitly. Nabokov, of course, must have known this; hence his statements about his own novels, like the two quoted above, which anticipate and refute any attempt to read either conscious or unconscious judgements of the kind that Chernyshevskii has in mind into his work. Chernyshevskii even went a step further determining what a writer should be interested in. Every age had its own particular problems, on which every member of society must necessarily have views. It was impossible and inadmissible that an artist should not be con- cerned with them. Chernyshevskii went so far as to "deny the right of an artist to consider his artistic work apart from the problems of the age. From [his] point of view, art could not be removed from life. "30 31 "Any human activity had to serve mankind", and art was no exception. The artist neglected his duty and "supported existing social injustice"32 if he insisted on "pure art", removed from life's concerns. Only if the underlying idea, the content;, was "correct", that is, "compatible with the needs of could a work of art be created:, for [the] Artistry consists in the correspondence of form with idea; therefore to discern the artistic value of a work, one must, time", 33

-6-<br />

on the aspects of life that interested him.<br />

29<br />

He puts it in a way that suggests that a work of<br />

art may in fact contain more than the author intentionally<br />

puts into it. His convictions and opinions<br />

may flow into his art without him being aware of it,<br />

so that, even though he does not write in order to<br />

pass judgements, the judgements may be there, implicitly.<br />

Nabokov, of course, must have known this; hence<br />

his statements about his own novels, like the two<br />

quoted above, which anticipate and refute any attempt<br />

to read either conscious or unconscious judgements of<br />

the kind that Chernyshevskii has in mind into his work.<br />

Chernyshevskii even went a step further determining<br />

what a writer should be interested in. Every age had<br />

its own particular problems, on which every member of<br />

society must necessarily have views. It was impossible<br />

and inadmissible that an artist should not be con-<br />

cerned with them. Chernyshevskii went so far as to<br />

"deny the right of an artist to consider his artistic<br />

work apart from the problems of the age. From [his]<br />

point of view, art could not be removed from life. "30<br />

31<br />

"Any human activity had to serve mankind", and<br />

art was no exception. The artist neglected his duty<br />

and "supported existing social injustice"32 if he<br />

insisted on "pure art", removed from life's concerns.<br />

Only if the underlying idea, the content;, was "correct",<br />

that is, "compatible with the needs of<br />

could a work of art be created:, <strong>for</strong><br />

[the]<br />

Artistry consists in the correspondence<br />

of <strong>for</strong>m with idea; there<strong>for</strong>e to discern<br />

the artistic value of a work, one must,<br />

time",<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!