24.02.2014 Views

Oral Antidiabetic Agents - Luzimar Teixeira

Oral Antidiabetic Agents - Luzimar Teixeira

Oral Antidiabetic Agents - Luzimar Teixeira

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

398 Krentz & Bailey<br />

2.3 Indications and Contraindications breast-feeding are traditionally regarded to be contraindications<br />

for all oral antidiabetic drugs, mainly<br />

An α-glucosidase inhibitor may be used as because of a lack of safety data rather than evidence<br />

monotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes that is of detrimental effects.<br />

inadequately controlled by nonpharmacological<br />

measures. Because α-glucosidase inhibitors target 2.4 Efficacy<br />

postprandial hyperglycaemia, they can be a useful<br />

An α-glucosidase inhibitor can reduce peak confirst-line<br />

treatment in patients who have a combinacentrations<br />

of blood glucose and reduce interprandition<br />

of only slightly raised basal glucose concentraal<br />

troughs. Used as monotherapy to patients who<br />

tions and more marked postprandial hyperglycomply<br />

appropriately with dietary advice, an α-<br />

caemia. A recent multicentre clinical trial (STOPglucosidase<br />

inhibitor will typically reduce postpran-<br />

NIDDM [Study TO Prevent NonInsulin-Dependent<br />

dial glucose concentrations by 1–4 mmol/L. The<br />

Diabetes Mellitus]) confirmed the utility of acarbose<br />

incremental area under the postprandial plasma gluin<br />

preventing the transition from impaired glucose<br />

cose curve can be more than halved in some individtolerance<br />

to diabetes [32] (see section 2.4). Acarbose<br />

uals. There seems to be a ‘carry-over’ effect that<br />

can be used in combination with other antidiabetic<br />

may produce a reduction in basal glycaemia up to<br />

agents. When starting therapy with an α-glucosidase<br />

1 mmol/L. The decrease in HbA1c is usually about<br />

inhibitor it is said to be important to ensure that the<br />

0.5–1.0%, provided that a high dose of the drug is<br />

patient is taking a diet rich in complex carbohytolerated<br />

and dietary compliance is maintained.<br />

drates, as opposed to simple sugars. Acarbose<br />

[33]<br />

There may be a trivial alteration in the gastrointestishould<br />

be taken with meals, starting with a low dose,<br />

nal absorption of other oral antidiabetic agents when<br />

for example 50 mg/day, and slowly titrating up over<br />

used in combination therapy. In general, the extra<br />

several weeks. Monitoring of glycaemic control,<br />

benefit to glycaemic control achieved by addition of<br />

particularly postprandially, may be helpful. The<br />

an α-glucosidase inhibitor to another antidiabetic<br />

postprandial action of these agents would not be<br />

agent is additive. In the recently published multicenexpected<br />

to induce hypoglycaemia, at least when<br />

tre STOP-NIDDM trial acarbose reduced the risk of<br />

they are used as monotherapy. The maximum dosprogression<br />

from impaired glucose tolerance to type<br />

age of α-glucosidase inhibitors may be limited by<br />

2 diabetes (relative hazard 0.75; 95% CI 0.63, 0.90;<br />

gastrointestinal symptoms; this is certainly our exp<br />

= 0.0015). [32] This study randomised 1429 patients<br />

perience with acarbose (see section 2.5). Intuitively,<br />

with impaired glucose tolerance to acarbose 100mg<br />

patients experiencing gastrointestinal adverse efthree<br />

times daily or placebo, of whom data were<br />

fects with metformin may not be the best candidates<br />

available for a modified intention-to-treat analysis<br />

in whom to add an α-glucosidase inhibitor. A hisin<br />

1368 patients. Glucose tolerance was determined<br />

tory of chronic intestinal disease serves as a – largeusing<br />

a 75g oral glucose tolerance test. Intriguingly,<br />

ly theoretical – contraindication to acarbose and<br />

new cases of hypertension and major cardiac events,<br />

other agents in this class. High dosages of acarbose<br />

including overt and clinically silent myocardial incan<br />

occasionally increase liver enzyme concentrafarction,<br />

were also reduced by acarbose therapy.<br />

tions, and it is recommended that transaminase con-<br />

[34]<br />

The latter were not primary endpoints of the study, a<br />

centrations are measured at intervals in patients relimitation<br />

acknowledged by the investigators.<br />

ceiving the maximum dosage (200mg three times<br />

[34]<br />

The results of ongoing trials using acarbose and<br />

daily in the UK, a dosage rarely attained in practice<br />

other agents in this class are awaited.<br />

for the aforementioned reasons). If liver enzymes<br />

[35]<br />

are raised, the dosage of acarbose should be reduced<br />

to a level at which normal enzyme concentrations<br />

2.5 Adverse Effects<br />

are re-established. Alternative causes of hepatic dys- The most common problems with α-glucosidase<br />

function should be considered. Pregnancy and inhibitors are gastrointestinal adverse effects. In the<br />

© 2005 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved. Drugs 2005; 65 (3)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!