Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate
Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate
[CIL92] [CKO99] [DG03] [DG04] Elliptic Monge–Ampère Equation in Dimension Two 63 M. G. Crandall, H. Ishii, and P.-L. Lions. User’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 27(1):1–67, 1992. L. A. Caffarelli, S. A. Kochenkgin, and V. I. Oliker. On the numerical solution of reflector design with given far field scattering data. In L. A. Caffarelli and M. Milman, editors, Monge-Ampère Equation: Application to Geometry and Optimization, pages 13–32. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999. E. J. Dean and R. Glowinski. Numerical solution of the two-dimensional elliptic Monge–Ampère equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions: an augmented Lagrangian approach. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 336(9):779–784, 2003. E. J. Dean and R. Glowinski. Numerical solution of the two-dimensional elliptic Monge–Ampère equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions: a least-squaresapproach. C.R.Math.Acad.Sci.Paris,339(12):887–892,2004. [DG05] E. J. Dean and R. Glowinski. On the numerical solution of a twodimensional Pucci’s equations with Dirichlet boundary conditions: a leastsquares approach. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 341(6):375–380, 2005. [DG06a] E. J. Dean and R. Glowinski. An augmented Lagrangian approach to the numerical solution of the Dirichlet problem for the elliptic Monge–Ampère equation in two dimensions. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal., 22:71–96, 2006. [DG06b] E. J. Dean and R. Glowinski. Numerical methods for fully nonlinear elliptic equations of the Monge–Ampère type. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 195(13–16):1344–1386, 2006. [DGP91] E. J. Dean, R. Glowinski, and O. Pironneau. Iterative solution of the stream function-vorticity formulation of the Stokes problem. Applications to the numerical simulation of incompressible viscous flow. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 87(2–3):117–155, 1991. [DS96] J. E. Dennis and R. Schnabel. Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1996. [Glo84] [Glo03] [GP79] [GT01] [Jan88] R. Glowinski. Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Variational Problems. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984. R. Glowinski. Finite element methods for incompressible viscous flow. In P. G. Ciarlet and J.-L. Lions, editors, Handbook of Numerical Analysis, Vol. IX, pages 3–1176. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2003. R. Glowinski and O. Pironneau. Numerical methods for the first biharmonic equation and for the two-dimensional Stokes problem. SIAM Rev., 17(2):167–212, 1979. D. Gilbarg and N. Trudinger. Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001. R. Jansen. The maximum principle for viscosity solutions of fully nonlinear second order partial differential equations. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 101:1–27, 1988. [OP88] V. I. Oliker and L. D. Prussner. On the numerical solution of the equation (∂ 2 z/∂x 2 )(∂ 2 z/∂y 2 )−((∂ 2 z/∂x∂y)) 2 = f and its discretization, I. Numer. Math., 54(3):271–293, 1988. [Pir89] O. Pironneau. Finite Element Methods for Fluids. Wiley, Chichester, [Urb88] 1989. J. I. E. Urbas. Regularity of generalized solutions of Monge–Ampère equations. Math. Z., 197(3):365–393, 1988.
Higher Order Time Stepping for Second Order Hyperbolic Problems and Optimal CFL Conditions J. Charles Gilbert and Patrick Joly INRIA Rocquencourt, BP 105, 78153 Le Chesnay, France Jean-Charles.Gilbert@inria.fr Patrick.Joly@inria.fr Summary. We investigate explicit higher order time discretizations of linear second order hyperbolic problems. We study the even order (2m) schemes obtained by the modified equation method. We show that the corresponding CFL upper bound for the time step remains bounded when the order of the scheme increases. We propose variants of these schemes constructed to optimize the CFL condition. The corresponding optimization problem is analyzed in detail and the analysis results in a specific numerical algorithm. The corresponding results are quite promising and suggest various conjectures. 1 Introduction We are concerned here with a very classical problem, namely the numerical approximation of second order hyperbolic problems, more precisely problems of the form d 2 u + Au =0, (1) dt2 where A is a linear unbounded positive self-adjoint operator in some Hilbert space V . This appears to be the generic abstract form for a large class of partial differential equations in which u denotes a function u(x, t) fromΩ ⊂ R d × R + in R N and A is a second order differential operator in space, of elliptic nature. Such models are used for wave propagation in various domains of application, in particular, in acoustics, electromagnetism, and elasticity [Jol03]. During the past four decades, a considerable literature has been devoted to the construction of numerical methods for the approximation of (1). The most recent research deals with the construction of higher order in space and conservative methods for the space semi-discretization of (1) (see, for instance, [Coh02] and the references therein). These methods lead us to consider a family (indexed by h>0, the approximation parameter which
- Page 23 and 24: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 11 3
- Page 25 and 26: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 13 3
- Page 27 and 28: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 15 W
- Page 29 and 30: Let a h and b h denote the bilinear
- Page 31 and 32: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 19 t
- Page 33 and 34: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 21 l
- Page 35 and 36: Table 1. Primal DG for transport Di
- Page 37 and 38: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 25 [
- Page 39 and 40: Mixed Finite Element Methods on Pol
- Page 41 and 42: Mixed FE Methods on Polyhedral Mesh
- Page 43 and 44: Mixed FE Methods on Polyhedral Mesh
- Page 45 and 46: Mixed FE Methods on Polyhedral Mesh
- Page 47 and 48: 4 Hybridization and Condensation Mi
- Page 49 and 50: Mixed FE Methods on Polyhedral Mesh
- Page 51 and 52: is symmetric and positive definite,
- Page 53 and 54: with some coefficient α ∈ R wher
- Page 55 and 56: 44 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski so fa
- Page 57 and 58: 46 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski 2 A L
- Page 59 and 60: 48 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski S:T=
- Page 61 and 62: 50 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski minim
- Page 63 and 64: 52 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski 6 On
- Page 65 and 66: 54 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski Fig.
- Page 67 and 68: 56 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski and
- Page 69 and 70: 58 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski 7 Num
- Page 71 and 72: 60 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski Fig.
- Page 73: 62 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski Assum
- Page 77 and 78: u n+1 h Optimal Higher Order Time D
- Page 79 and 80: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 81 and 82: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 83 and 84: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 85 and 86: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 87 and 88: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 89 and 90: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 91 and 92: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 93 and 94: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 95 and 96: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 97 and 98: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 99 and 100: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 101 and 102: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 103 and 104: 96 I. Sazonov et al. To provide a p
- Page 105 and 106: 98 I. Sazonov et al. In the first s
- Page 107 and 108: 100 I. Sazonov et al. Fig. 1. An ex
- Page 109 and 110: 102 I. Sazonov et al. H z 1 exact F
- Page 111 and 112: 104 I. Sazonov et al. (a) (b) Fig.
- Page 113 and 114: 106 I. Sazonov et al. Scattering Wi
- Page 115 and 116: 108 I. Sazonov et al. 6.4 Scatterin
- Page 117 and 118: 110 I. Sazonov et al. (a) (b) Fig.
- Page 119 and 120: 112 I. Sazonov et al. [MHP96] K. Mo
- Page 121 and 122: 114 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall I R
- Page 123 and 124: 116 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall imp
Higher Order Time Stepping for Second Order<br />
Hyperbolic Problems <strong>and</strong> Optimal CFL<br />
Conditions<br />
J. Charles Gilbert <strong>and</strong> Patrick Joly<br />
INRIA Rocquencourt, BP 105, 78153 Le Chesnay, France<br />
Jean-Charles.Gilbert@inria.fr<br />
Patrick.Joly@inria.fr<br />
Summary. We investigate explicit higher order time discretizations of linear second<br />
order hyperbolic problems. We study the even order (2m) schemes obtained by<br />
the modified equation method. We show that the corresponding CFL upper bound<br />
for the time step remains bounded when the order of the scheme increases. We<br />
propose variants of these schemes constructed to optimize the CFL condition. The<br />
corresponding optimization problem is analyzed in detail <strong>and</strong> the analysis results in<br />
a specific numerical algorithm. The corresponding results are quite promising <strong>and</strong><br />
suggest various conjectures.<br />
1 Introduction<br />
We are concerned here with a very classical problem, namely the numerical<br />
approximation of second order hyperbolic problems, more precisely problems<br />
of the form<br />
d 2 u<br />
+ Au =0, (1)<br />
dt2 where A is a linear unbounded positive self-adjoint operator in some Hilbert<br />
space V . This appears to be the generic abstract form for a large class of partial<br />
differential equations in which u denotes a function u(x, t) fromΩ ⊂ R d × R +<br />
in R N <strong>and</strong> A is a second order differential operator in space, of elliptic nature.<br />
Such models are used for wave propagation in various domains of application,<br />
in particular, in acoustics, electromagnetism, <strong>and</strong> elasticity [Jol03].<br />
During the past four decades, a considerable literature has been devoted<br />
to the construction of numerical methods for the approximation of (1). The<br />
most recent research deals with the construction of higher order in space<br />
<strong>and</strong> conservative methods for the space semi-discretization of (1) (see, for<br />
instance, [Coh02] <strong>and</strong> the references therein). These methods lead us to<br />
consider a family (indexed by h>0, the approximation parameter which