Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate
Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate
Elliptic Monge–Ampère Equation in Dimension Two 55 this direction is to approximate the least-squares problem (LSQ). To achieve this goal, we approximate the sets Q and Q f by and Q h = {q | q =(q ij ) 1≤i,j≤2 , q 21 = q 12 , q ij ∈ V 0h } (45) Q fh = {q | q ∈ Q h ,q 11 (P k )q 22 (P k ) −|q 12 (P k )| 2 = f h (P k ), ∀k =1, 2,...,N 0h }, (46) respectively, the function f h in (46) (and in (E-MA-D) h ) being a continuous approximation of f. Next, we approximate the least-squares functional j(·, ·) (defined by (3) in Section 2) by j h (·, ·) defined as follows: with j h (ϕ, q) = 1 2 ‖D2 hϕ − q‖ 2 h, ∀ϕ ∈ V h , q ∈ Q h , (47) D 2 hϕ =(Dhij(ϕ)) 2 1≤i,j≤2 , (48) ((S, T)) h = 1 ∑N 0h A k S(P k ) :T(P k ) 3 k=1 ( = 1 ∑N 0h ) A k (s 11 t 11 + s 22 t 22 +2s 12 t 12 )(P k ) , ∀S, T ∈ Q h , (49) 3 k=1 and then ‖S‖ h =((S, S)) 1/2 h , ∀S ∈ Q h. (50) From the above relations, we approximate the problem (LSQ) by the following discrete least-squares problem: { {ψh , p h }∈V gh × Q fh , (51) j h (ψ h , p h ) ≤ j h (ϕ, q), ∀{ϕ, q} ∈V gh × Q fh . 6.4 On the Solution of the Problem (51) To solve the minimization problem (51), we shall use the following discrete variant of the algorithm (9)–(11): {ψ 0 , p 0 } = {ψ 0 , p 0 }. (52) Then, for n ≥ 0, {ψ n , p n } being known, compute {ψ n+1 , p n+1 } via the solution of p n+1 =argmin [ 1 2 (1 + τ)‖q‖2 h − ((p n + τD 2 hψ n ] , q)) h , (53) q∈Q fh
56 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski and ⎧ ⎪⎨ ⎪ ⎩ ψ n+1 ∈ V gh , where we have (△ h [(ψ n+1 − ψ n )/τ], △ h ϕ) h +((D 2 h ψn+1 , D 2 h ϕ)) h =((p n+1 , D 2 h ϕ)) h, ∀ϕ ∈ V 0h , (54) (1) △ h ϕ = Dh11(ϕ)+D 2 h22(ϕ), 2 ∀ϕ ∈ V h , (55) (2) (ϕ 1 ,ϕ 2 ) h = 1 ∑N 0h A k ϕ 1 (P k )ϕ 2 (P k ), ∀ϕ 1 ,ϕ 2 ∈ V 0h , (56) 3 k=1 the associated norm being still denoted by ‖·‖ h . The constrained minimization sub-problems (53) decompose into N 0h three-dimensional minimization problems (one per internal vertex of T h ) similar to those encountered in Section 4, concerning the solution of the problem (10). The various solution methods (briefly) discussed in Section 4 still apply here. For the solution of the linear sub-problems (54), we advocate the following discrete variant of the conjugate gradient algorithm (23)–(29) (Algorithm 1): Algorithm 2 Step 1. u 0 is given in V gh . Step 2. Solve ⎧ ⎪⎨ gh 0 ∈ V 0h, (△ h g ⎪⎩ 0 , △ h ϕ) h =(△ h u 0 , △ h ϕ) h + τ((D 2 h u0 , D 2 h ϕ)) h − L h (ϕ), ∀ϕ ∈ V 0h , (57) and set w 0 = g 0 . (58) Step 3. Then, for k ≥ 0, assuming that u k ,g k and w k are known with the last two different from 0, solve ⎧ ⎪⎨ ḡ k ∈ V 0h , (△ h ḡ ⎪⎩ k , △ h ϕ) h =(△ h w k , △ h ϕ) h + τ((D 2 hw k , D 2 hϕ)) h , (59) ∀ϕ ∈ V 0h , and compute ρ k =(△ h g k , △ h g k ) h /(△ h ḡ k , △ h w k ) h , (60) u k+1 = u k − ρ k w k , (61) g k+1 = g k − ρ k ḡ k . (62)
- Page 15 and 16: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods Vive
- Page 17 and 18: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 5 2
- Page 19 and 20: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 7 g
- Page 21 and 22: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 9 (
- Page 23 and 24: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 11 3
- Page 25 and 26: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 13 3
- Page 27 and 28: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 15 W
- Page 29 and 30: Let a h and b h denote the bilinear
- Page 31 and 32: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 19 t
- Page 33 and 34: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 21 l
- Page 35 and 36: Table 1. Primal DG for transport Di
- Page 37 and 38: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 25 [
- Page 39 and 40: Mixed Finite Element Methods on Pol
- Page 41 and 42: Mixed FE Methods on Polyhedral Mesh
- Page 43 and 44: Mixed FE Methods on Polyhedral Mesh
- Page 45 and 46: Mixed FE Methods on Polyhedral Mesh
- Page 47 and 48: 4 Hybridization and Condensation Mi
- Page 49 and 50: Mixed FE Methods on Polyhedral Mesh
- Page 51 and 52: is symmetric and positive definite,
- Page 53 and 54: with some coefficient α ∈ R wher
- Page 55 and 56: 44 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski so fa
- Page 57 and 58: 46 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski 2 A L
- Page 59 and 60: 48 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski S:T=
- Page 61 and 62: 50 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski minim
- Page 63 and 64: 52 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski 6 On
- Page 65: 54 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski Fig.
- Page 69 and 70: 58 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski 7 Num
- Page 71 and 72: 60 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski Fig.
- Page 73 and 74: 62 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski Assum
- Page 75 and 76: Higher Order Time Stepping for Seco
- Page 77 and 78: u n+1 h Optimal Higher Order Time D
- Page 79 and 80: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 81 and 82: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 83 and 84: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 85 and 86: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 87 and 88: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 89 and 90: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 91 and 92: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 93 and 94: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 95 and 96: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 97 and 98: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 99 and 100: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 101 and 102: Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
- Page 103 and 104: 96 I. Sazonov et al. To provide a p
- Page 105 and 106: 98 I. Sazonov et al. In the first s
- Page 107 and 108: 100 I. Sazonov et al. Fig. 1. An ex
- Page 109 and 110: 102 I. Sazonov et al. H z 1 exact F
- Page 111 and 112: 104 I. Sazonov et al. (a) (b) Fig.
- Page 113 and 114: 106 I. Sazonov et al. Scattering Wi
- Page 115 and 116: 108 I. Sazonov et al. 6.4 Scatterin
Elliptic Monge–Ampère Equation in Dimension Two 55<br />
this direction is to approximate the least-squares problem (LSQ). To achieve<br />
this goal, we approximate the sets Q <strong>and</strong> Q f by<br />
<strong>and</strong><br />
Q h = {q | q =(q ij ) 1≤i,j≤2 , q 21 = q 12 , q ij ∈ V 0h } (45)<br />
Q fh = {q | q ∈ Q h ,q 11 (P k )q 22 (P k ) −|q 12 (P k )| 2 = f h (P k ),<br />
∀k =1, 2,...,N 0h }, (46)<br />
respectively, the function f h in (46) (<strong>and</strong> in (E-MA-D) h ) being a continuous<br />
approximation of f. Next, we approximate the least-squares functional j(·, ·)<br />
(defined by (3) in Section 2) by j h (·, ·) defined as follows:<br />
with<br />
j h (ϕ, q) = 1 2 ‖D2 hϕ − q‖ 2 h, ∀ϕ ∈ V h , q ∈ Q h , (47)<br />
D 2 hϕ =(Dhij(ϕ)) 2 1≤i,j≤2 , (48)<br />
((S, T)) h = 1 ∑N 0h<br />
A k S(P k ) :T(P k )<br />
3<br />
k=1<br />
(<br />
= 1 ∑N 0h<br />
)<br />
A k (s 11 t 11 + s 22 t 22 +2s 12 t 12 )(P k ) , ∀S, T ∈ Q h , (49)<br />
3<br />
k=1<br />
<strong>and</strong> then<br />
‖S‖ h =((S, S)) 1/2<br />
h , ∀S ∈ Q h. (50)<br />
From the above relations, we approximate the problem (LSQ) by the following<br />
discrete least-squares problem:<br />
{<br />
{ψh , p h }∈V gh × Q fh ,<br />
(51)<br />
j h (ψ h , p h ) ≤ j h (ϕ, q), ∀{ϕ, q} ∈V gh × Q fh .<br />
6.4 On the Solution of the Problem (51)<br />
To solve the minimization problem (51), we shall use the following discrete<br />
variant of the algorithm (9)–(11):<br />
{ψ 0 , p 0 } = {ψ 0 , p 0 }. (52)<br />
Then, for n ≥ 0, {ψ n , p n } being known, compute {ψ n+1 , p n+1 } via the solution<br />
of<br />
p n+1 =argmin<br />
[ 1<br />
2 (1 + τ)‖q‖2 h − ((p n + τD 2 hψ n ]<br />
, q)) h , (53)<br />
q∈Q fh