24.02.2014 Views

Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate

Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate

Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reduced-Order <strong>Modelling</strong> of Dispersion 251<br />

value for a white noise for angles between 0 <strong>and</strong> π. Onced is calculated by this<br />

procedure one needs to define d ⊥ E which is unknown as B⊥ is unknown. We<br />

make the approximation d ⊥ E ∼ d E(B,B ∗ )whereB ∗ is the projection of B over<br />

the vector u, the averaged velocity along the polynomial characteristic. This<br />

approach gives satisfactory results for smooth atmospheric flow fields which<br />

is our domain of interest as no phyto treatments is, in principle, applied when<br />

the wind is too strong or if the temperature is too high (e.g., for winds stronger<br />

than 20 km/h <strong>and</strong> air temperature more than 30 ◦ C). This also makes that the<br />

polynomial construction above gives satisfaction with low order polynomials.<br />

Ground Variations<br />

At this point one accounts for the topography or ground variations ((x, y) →<br />

ψ(x, y)) in the prediction model above. These are available from digital terrain<br />

models (DTM) [Arc06]. Despite this plays an important role in the dispersion<br />

process, it is obviously hopeless to target direct simulation based on a detailed<br />

ground description. One should mention that ground variations effects are implicitly<br />

present in observation data for wind <strong>and</strong> transport as mentioned in<br />

Section 2.2. However, as we said, observations are quite incomplete <strong>and</strong> to<br />

improve the predictive capacity of the model one needs to model the dependency<br />

between ground variations <strong>and</strong> migration time. Therefore, in addition<br />

to the mentioned assimilation problem, one scales the migration times used<br />

for transport over large distances by a positive monotonic decreasing function<br />

f(φ) with f(0) = 1 where<br />

φ =(∇ x,y ψ · u H )/‖u H ‖.<br />

Here u H is the ‘close to ground’ constructed flow field based on the assimilated<br />

observations.<br />

3 Parameter <strong>and</strong> Source Identification<br />

Two types of inverse problems have been treated. The first inverse problem<br />

is for parameter identification in the model above assimilating either local<br />

experimental data (as described in Section 2.1) or partial data available on<br />

wind u obs <strong>and</strong> transported species c obs measured by localized apparatus. In<br />

particular, the unknown parameters in our global transport model comes from<br />

the solution of a minimization problem for:<br />

J(p, u obs ,c obs )=‖c(p, u(p, u obs )) − c obs ‖, (6)<br />

where p gathers all unknown independent parameters in Section 2.2. ‖·‖ is<br />

a discrete L 2 -norm over the measurement points. u(p) is the completion of<br />

available wind measurements (u obs ) over the domain described in Section 2.2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!