24.02.2014 Views

Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate

Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate

Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

250 J.-M. Brun <strong>and</strong> B. Mohammadi<br />

one would like for the transport. As an example, the flow will be described<br />

probably by less than one point by several square kilometers. We consider<br />

the near to ground flow field built from observation data as solution of the<br />

following system:<br />

u = ∇φ, −∆φ = ∑<br />

i=1,..,n obs<br />

‖∇φ(x i ) − u obs (x i )‖, (5)<br />

where φ is a scalar potential <strong>and</strong> n obs the number of observation points. The<br />

observations are close to the ground at z = H <strong>and</strong> this construction gives a<br />

map of the flow near the ground. This is completed in the vertical direction<br />

using generalized wall functions for turbulent flows [MP94, MP06]:<br />

(u · τ ) + =(u · τ )/u τ = f(z + )=f(zu τ /ν),<br />

where τ = u H /‖u H ‖ is the local tangent unit vector to the ground in the<br />

direction of the flow <strong>and</strong> we assume (u · n(z = H) =0)ifn is the normal<br />

to the ground. This is a non-linear equation giving u τ , the friction velocity,<br />

knowing (u · τ ) H <strong>and</strong> is used, in turn, to define the horizontal velocity u · τ =<br />

u τ f(z + )forz>H. This construction gives two components of the flow <strong>and</strong><br />

the divergence free condition implies the third component is constant <strong>and</strong>,<br />

therefore, it vanishes as it is supposed zero at z = H. This construction can<br />

be improved but we find it sufficient for the level of accuracy required. In<br />

presence of ground variations, the flow is locally rotated to remain parallel to<br />

the ground (see also Section 2.2 for ground variation modelling).<br />

Calculation of Migration Times<br />

As we said, our approach aims to provide the solution at a given point without<br />

calculating the whole solution. Being in point B, one needs an estimation<br />

of the migration time from the source in A to B using the construction in<br />

Section 2.2.<br />

We avoid the construction of characteristics using an iterative polynomial<br />

definition for a characteristic s(t) =(x(t),y(t),z(t)), t ∈ [0, 1], starting from<br />

a third-order polynomial function verifying for each coordinate:<br />

P n (0) = x A , P n (1) = x B , P ′ n(0) = u 1 A, P ′ n(1) = u 1 B (same for y <strong>and</strong> z).<br />

If P ′ n(ζ) ≠ u 1 (x = P n (ζ)) this new point should be assimilated by the construction<br />

increasing by one the polynomial order. ζ ∈]0, 1[ is chosen r<strong>and</strong>omly.<br />

The migration time is computed over this polynomial approximation of<br />

the characteristic. Here we make the approximation B ⊥ = B which means<br />

the characteristic passing by A passes exactly by B which is unlikely. In a<br />

uniform flow, this means we suppose the angle between the central axis <strong>and</strong><br />

AB is small (cosine near 1). One introduces, therefore, a correction factor of<br />

2/3 =0.636 on the calculated times. This is the stochastic averaged cosine

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!