Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate

More documents

Recommendations

Info

244 P. Neittaanmäki and D. Tiba 4 Conclusions The shape optimization problem (1), (2) is transformed in this way into the optimal control problem ∫ Min H(g)j(x, y(x)) dx (38) g∈C D subject to (15)–(17) which, in turn, may be approximated by (19)–(21) or, equivalently, by (36)–(37). To obtain good differentiability properties with respect to g in the optimization problem (38), one should replace H by H ε , some regularization of H, as previously mentioned. Analyzing further approximation properties and the gradient for (38) is a nontrivial task. However, the application of evolutionary algorithms is possible since it involves just the values of the cost (38) and no computation of the gradient with respect to g. As initial population of controls g for the genetic algorithm, corresponding to the finite element mesh in D, one may use the basis functions for the piecewise linear and continuous finite element basis. In case some supplementary information is available on the desired shape (for instance, coming from the constraints), this should be imposed on the initial population. Then, standard procedures specific to evolutionary algorithms [Hol75] are to be applied. References [Hol75] J. R. Holland. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. TheUniversity of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 1975. [Lio68] J.-L. Lions. Contrôle optimal des systèmes gouvernées par des equations aux dérivées partielles. Dunod, Paris, 1968. [MP01] B. Mohammadi and O. Pironneau. Applied shape optimization for fluids. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001. [NPT07] P. Neittaanmäki, A. Pennanen, and D. Tiba. Fixed domain approaches in shape optimization problems with Dirichlet boundary conditions. Reports of the Department of Mathematical Information Technology, Series B, Scientific Computing B16/2007, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, 2007. [NST06] P. Neittaanmäki, J. Sprekels, and D. Tiba. Optimization of elliptic systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. [NT95] P. Neittaanmäki and D. Tiba. An embedding of domains approach in free boundary problems and optimal design. SIAM J. Control Optim., 33(5):1587–1602, 1995. [Pir84] O. Pironneau. Optimal shape design for elliptic systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984. [Roc70] R. T. Rockafellar. Convex analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970. [Tib92] D. Tiba. Controllability properties for elliptic systems, the fictitious domain method and optimal shape design problems. In Optimization, optimal control and partial differential equations (Iaşi, 1992), number 107 in Internat. Ser. Numer. Math., pages 251–261, Basel, 1992. Birkhäuser. [Yos80] K. Yosida. Functional analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980.
Reduced-Order Modelling of Dispersion Jean-Marc Brun 1 and Bijan Mohammadi 2 1 CEMAGREF/ITAP, FR-34095 Montpellier, France jean-marc.brun@cemagref.fr 2 I3M-Univ. Montpellier II, CC051, FR-34095 Montpellier, France bijan.mohammadi@univ-montp2.fr Summary. We present low complexity models for the transport of passive scalars for environmental applications. Multi-level analysis has been used with a reduction in dimension of the solution space at each level. Similitude solutions are used in a non-symmetric metric for the transport over long distances. Model parameters identification is based on data assimilation. The approach does not require the solution of any PDE and, therefore, is mesh free. The model also permits to access the solution in one point without computing the solution over the whole domain. Sensitivity analysis is used for risk analysis and also for the identification of the sources of an observed pollution. Key words: Reduced order modelling, source identification, risk analysis by sensitivity, non-symmetric geometry. 1 Introduction Air and water contamination by pesticides is a major preoccupation for health and environment. One aims to model pesticide transport in atmospheric flows with very low calculation cost making assimilation-simulation and statistic risk analysis by Monte Carlo simulations realistic. In this problem available data is incomplete with large variability and the number of parameters involved large. Solution space reduction and reduced order modelling appear, therefore, as natural way to proceed. Our contribution is to build a multi-level approach where a given level provides the inlet condition for the level above. In each level one aims to use a priori information in the definition of the search space for the solution and avoid the solution of partial differential equations. More precisely, a near field (to the injection device) search space is build using experimental observations. Once this local solution known, the amount of specie leaving the atmospheric sub-layer is evaluated. This quantity is candidate for long distance transport using similitude solutions for mixing layers and plumes [Sim97]. These are known in Cartesian metrics. An original
Page 1 and 2:
Partial Differential Equations
Page 3 and 4:
Partial Differential Equations Mode
Page 5 and 6:
Dedicated to Olivier Pironneau
Page 7 and 8:
VIII Preface computers has been at
Page 9 and 10:
Contents List of Contributors .....
Page 11 and 12:
List of Contributors Yves Achdou UF
Page 13 and 14:
List of Contributors XV Claude Le B
Page 15 and 16:
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods Vive
Page 17 and 18:
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 5 2
Page 19 and 20:
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 7 g
Page 21 and 22:
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 9 (
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 15 W
Page 29 and 30:
Let a h and b h denote the bilinear
Page 31 and 32:
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 19 t
Page 33 and 34:
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 21 l
Page 35 and 36:
Table 1. Primal DG for transport Di
Page 37 and 38:
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods 25 [
Page 39 and 40:
Mixed Finite Element Methods on Pol
Page 41 and 42:
Mixed FE Methods on Polyhedral Mesh
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
4 Hybridization and Condensation Mi
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
is symmetric and positive definite,
Page 53 and 54:
with some coefficient α ∈ R wher
Page 55 and 56:
44 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski so fa
Page 57 and 58:
46 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski 2 A L
Page 59 and 60:
48 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski S:T=
Page 61 and 62:
50 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski minim
Page 63 and 64:
52 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski 6 On
Page 65 and 66:
54 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski Fig.
Page 67 and 68:
56 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski and
Page 69 and 70:
58 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski 7 Num
Page 71 and 72:
60 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski Fig.
Page 73 and 74:
62 E.J. Dean and R. Glowinski Assum
Page 75 and 76:
Higher Order Time Stepping for Seco
Page 77 and 78:
u n+1 h Optimal Higher Order Time D
Page 79 and 80:
Optimal Higher Order Time Discretiz
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
96 I. Sazonov et al. To provide a p
Page 105 and 106:
98 I. Sazonov et al. In the first s
Page 107 and 108:
100 I. Sazonov et al. Fig. 1. An ex
Page 109 and 110:
102 I. Sazonov et al. H z 1 exact F
Page 111 and 112:
104 I. Sazonov et al. (a) (b) Fig.
Page 113 and 114:
106 I. Sazonov et al. Scattering Wi
Page 115 and 116:
108 I. Sazonov et al. 6.4 Scatterin
Page 117 and 118:
110 I. Sazonov et al. (a) (b) Fig.
Page 119 and 120:
112 I. Sazonov et al. [MHP96] K. Mo
Page 121 and 122:
114 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall I R
Page 123 and 124:
116 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall imp
Page 125 and 126:
118 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall alo
Page 127 and 128:
120 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall (a)
Page 129 and 130:
122 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall D C
Page 131 and 132:
124 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall 8.6
Page 133 and 134:
126 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall 0.3
Page 135 and 136:
128 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall [TR
Page 137 and 138:
132 S. Lapin et al. Ω R γ Ω 2 Γ
Page 139 and 140:
134 S. Lapin et al. ∫ ∂ 2 ∫
Page 141 and 142:
136 S. Lapin et al. Ω R γ Fig. 3.
Page 143 and 144:
138 S. Lapin et al. 4 Energy Inequa
Page 145 and 146:
140 S. Lapin et al. 5 Numerical Exp
Page 147 and 148:
142 S. Lapin et al. Fig. 6. Contour
Page 149 and 150:
144 S. Lapin et al. Fig. 9. Obstacl
Page 151 and 152:
Domain Decomposition and Electronic
Page 153 and 154:
Domain Decomposition Approach for C
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
so that |u| 2 1,ω h ≤ 2 Numerica
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
188 A. Bonito et al. of the model a
Page 191 and 192: 190 A. Bonito et al. Fig. 1. The sp
Page 193 and 194: 192 A. Bonito et al. 3 1 16 4 1 1 1
Page 195 and 196: 194 A. Bonito et al. ∫ v n+1 h
Page 197 and 198: 196 A. Bonito et al. −pn +2µD(v)
Page 199 and 200: 198 A. Bonito et al. each of its pa
Page 201 and 202: 200 A. Bonito et al. The normal vec
Page 203 and 204: 202 A. Bonito et al. with initial c
Page 205 and 206: 204 A. Bonito et al. Fig. 8. Jet bu
Page 207 and 208: 206 A. Bonito et al. References [AM
Page 209 and 210: 208 A. Bonito et al. [Set96] J. A.
Page 211 and 212: 210 J. Hao et al. due to shear flow
Page 213 and 214: 212 J. Hao et al. The backward reac
Page 215 and 216: 214 J. Hao et al. where u and p den
Page 217 and 218: 216 J. Hao et al. * * * * * * * * *
Page 219 and 220: 218 J. Hao et al. and solve for V n
Page 221 and 222: 220 J. Hao et al. Table 2. The calc
Page 223 and 224: 222 J. Hao et al. References [ASS80
Page 225 and 226: Computing the Eigenvalues of the La
Page 227 and 228: Eigenvalues of the Laplace-Beltrami
Page 233 and 234: A Fixed Domain Approach in Shape Op
Page 235 and 236: Shape Optimization Problems with Ne
Page 241: Shape Optimization Problems with Ne
Page 245 and 246: Reduced-Order Modelling of Dispersi
Page 255 and 256: Calibration of Lévy Processes with
Page 263 and 264: We have proved Calibration of Lévy
Page 271 and 272: Note that p ∗ satisfies Calibrati
Page 275 and 276: 280 S. Ikonen and J. Toivanen the p
Page 277 and 278: 282 S. Ikonen and J. Toivanen Merto
Page 279 and 280: 284 S. Ikonen and J. Toivanen For H
Page 281 and 282: 286 S. Ikonen and J. Toivanen and {
Page 283 and 284: 288 S. Ikonen and J. Toivanen 1.6 1
Page 285 and 286: 290 S. Ikonen and J. Toivanen 8 Con
Page 287: 292 S. Ikonen and J. Toivanen [Mer7
show all

Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?