Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate
Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate
184 B. Maury The source term g is, therefore, a single layer distribution supported by ∂O, with weight −λ · n = −∂u/∂n (where n is the outward normal to ∂O). Note that it is in H 1/2 (∂O). Remark 7. Note that letting ε go to 0 for any h>0 leads to an estimate for a fictitious domain method (à laGlowinski, i.e. based on the use of Lagrange multiplier). In [GG95], an error estimate is obtained for such a method; it relies on two independent meshes for the primal and dual components of the solution (conditionally to some compatibility conditions between the sizes of the two meshes). We recover this estimate in the situation where the local mesh is simply the restriction of the covering mesh to the obstacle (to the reduced obstacle O h , to be more precise). Remark 8. The approach we presented can be extended to other situations, like the one we already considered in Example 2, as soon as a H 1 -penalty is used. The functional to minimize is then J ε (v) = 1 ∫ ∫ |∇v| 2 − fv + 1 ∫ ( u 2 + |∇u| 2) , 2 2ε Ω Ω so that B identifies to the restriction operator from H 1 0 (Ω) toH 1 (O). The discrete inf-sup condition, as well as the approximation properties, are essentially the same as in the case we considered here. Concerning the original problem of simulating fluid-particle flows, an extra difficulty lies in the fact that two constraints of different types must be dealt with (global incompressibility and local rigid motion). It raises additional issues which shall be addressed in the future. Ω References [ABF99] Ph. Angot, Ch.-H. Bruneau, and P. Fabrie. A penalization method to take into account obstacles in incompressible viscous flows. Numer. Math., 81(4):497–520, 1999. [AR] Ph. Angot and I. Ramière. Convergence analysis of the Q1-finite element method for elliptic problems with non boundary-fitted meshes. Submitted. [Bab73] I. Babuška. The finite element method with penalty. Math. Comp., 27:221–228, 1973. [BF91] F. Brezzi and M. Fortin. Mixed and hybrid finite element methods, volume 15 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer- Verlag, New York, 1991. [DP02] S. Del Pino. Une méthode d’éléments finis pour la résolution d’EDP dans des domaines décrits par géométrie constructive. PhD thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 2002. [DPP03] S. Del Pino and O. Pironneau. A fictitious domain based general PDE solver. In E. Heikkola, editor, Numerical Methods for Scientific Computing, Barcelona, 2003.
Numerical Analysis of a Finite Element/Volume Penalty Method 185 [ff3] [FFp] [GG95] [JLM05] [JT96] [lif] [Mau99] [Mau01] [PG02] [RAB06] [RPVC05] [SMSTT05] [VCLR04] freeFEM3D (http://www.freefem.org/ff3d/). freeFEM++ (http://www.freefem.org/). V. Girault and R. Glowinski. Error analysis of a fictitious domain method applied to a Dirichlet problem. Japan J. Indust. Appl. Math., 12(3):487–514, 1995. J. Janela, A. Lefebvre, and B. Maury. A penalty method for the simulation of fluid-rigid body interaction. In CEMRACS 2004—mathematics and applications to biology and medicine, volume 14 of ESAIM Proc., pages 115–123 (electronic). EDP Sci., Les Ulis, 2005. A. A. Johnson and T. E. Tezduyar. Simulation of multiple spheres falling in a liquid-filled tube. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 134(3-4): 351–373, 1996. LifeV (http://www.lifev.org/). B. Maury. Direct simulations of 2D fluid-particle flows in biperiodic domains. J. Comput. Phys., 156(2):325–351, 1999. B. Maury. A fat boundary method for the Poisson problem in a domain with holes. J. Sci. Comput., 16(3):319–339, 2001. T.-W. Pan and R. Glowinski. Direct simulation of the motion of neutrally buoyant circular cylinders in plane Poiseuille flow. J. Comput. Phys., 181(1):260–279, 2002. I. Ramière, Ph. Angot, and M. Belliard. A fictitious domain approach with spread interface for elliptic problems with general boundary conditions. Comput. Methods App. Mech. Engrg., 196(4–6):766–781, 2007. T. N. Randrianarivelo, G. Pianet, S. Vincent, and J. P. Caltagirone. Numerical modelling of solid particle motion using a new penalty method. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 47:1245–1251, 2005. J. San Martín, J.-F. Scheid, T. Takahashi, and M. Tucsnak. Convergence of the Lagrange-Galerkin method for the equations modelling the motion of a fluid-rigid system. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 43(4):1536–1571 (electronic), 2005. S. Vincent, J.-P. Caltagirone, P. Lubin, and T. N. Randrianarivelo. An adaptative augmented Lagrangian method for three-dimensional multimaterial flows. Comput. & Fluids, 33(10):1273–1289, 2004.
- Page 135 and 136: 128 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall [TR
- Page 137 and 138: 132 S. Lapin et al. Ω R γ Ω 2 Γ
- Page 139 and 140: 134 S. Lapin et al. ∫ ∂ 2 ∫
- Page 141 and 142: 136 S. Lapin et al. Ω R γ Fig. 3.
- Page 143 and 144: 138 S. Lapin et al. 4 Energy Inequa
- Page 145 and 146: 140 S. Lapin et al. 5 Numerical Exp
- Page 147 and 148: 142 S. Lapin et al. Fig. 6. Contour
- Page 149 and 150: 144 S. Lapin et al. Fig. 9. Obstacl
- Page 151 and 152: Domain Decomposition and Electronic
- Page 153 and 154: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 155 and 156: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 157 and 158: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 159 and 160: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 161 and 162: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 163 and 164: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 165 and 166: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 167 and 168: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 169 and 170: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 171 and 172: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 173 and 174: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 175 and 176: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 177 and 178: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 179 and 180: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 181 and 182: so that |u| 2 1,ω h ≤ 2 Numerica
- Page 183 and 184: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 185: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 189 and 190: 188 A. Bonito et al. of the model a
- Page 191 and 192: 190 A. Bonito et al. Fig. 1. The sp
- Page 193 and 194: 192 A. Bonito et al. 3 1 16 4 1 1 1
- Page 195 and 196: 194 A. Bonito et al. ∫ v n+1 h
- Page 197 and 198: 196 A. Bonito et al. −pn +2µD(v)
- Page 199 and 200: 198 A. Bonito et al. each of its pa
- Page 201 and 202: 200 A. Bonito et al. The normal vec
- Page 203 and 204: 202 A. Bonito et al. with initial c
- Page 205 and 206: 204 A. Bonito et al. Fig. 8. Jet bu
- Page 207 and 208: 206 A. Bonito et al. References [AM
- Page 209 and 210: 208 A. Bonito et al. [Set96] J. A.
- Page 211 and 212: 210 J. Hao et al. due to shear flow
- Page 213 and 214: 212 J. Hao et al. The backward reac
- Page 215 and 216: 214 J. Hao et al. where u and p den
- Page 217 and 218: 216 J. Hao et al. * * * * * * * * *
- Page 219 and 220: 218 J. Hao et al. and solve for V n
- Page 221 and 222: 220 J. Hao et al. Table 2. The calc
- Page 223 and 224: 222 J. Hao et al. References [ASS80
- Page 225 and 226: Computing the Eigenvalues of the La
- Page 227 and 228: Eigenvalues of the Laplace-Beltrami
- Page 229 and 230: Eigenvalues of the Laplace-Beltrami
- Page 231 and 232: Eigenvalues of the Laplace-Beltrami
- Page 233 and 234: A Fixed Domain Approach in Shape Op
- Page 235 and 236: Shape Optimization Problems with Ne
184 B. Maury<br />
The source term g is, therefore, a single layer distribution supported by ∂O,<br />
with weight −λ · n = −∂u/∂n (where n is the outward normal to ∂O). Note<br />
that it is in H 1/2 (∂O).<br />
Remark 7. Note that letting ε go to 0 for any h>0 leads to an estimate for<br />
a fictitious domain method (à laGlowinski, i.e. based on the use of Lagrange<br />
multiplier). In [GG95], an error estimate is obtained for such a method; it<br />
relies on two independent meshes for the primal <strong>and</strong> dual components of the<br />
solution (conditionally to some compatibility conditions between the sizes of<br />
the two meshes). We recover this estimate in the situation where the local<br />
mesh is simply the restriction of the covering mesh to the obstacle (to the<br />
reduced obstacle O h , to be more precise).<br />
Remark 8. The approach we presented can be extended to other situations,<br />
like the one we already considered in Example 2, as soon as a H 1 -penalty is<br />
used. The functional to minimize is then<br />
J ε (v) = 1 ∫ ∫<br />
|∇v| 2 − fv + 1 ∫ (<br />
u 2 + |∇u| 2) ,<br />
2<br />
2ε<br />
Ω<br />
Ω<br />
so that B identifies to the restriction operator from H 1 0 (Ω) toH 1 (O). The discrete<br />
inf-sup condition, as well as the approximation properties, are essentially<br />
the same as in the case we considered here.<br />
Concerning the original problem of simulating fluid-particle flows, an extra<br />
difficulty lies in the fact that two constraints of different types must be dealt<br />
with (global incompressibility <strong>and</strong> local rigid motion). It raises additional<br />
issues which shall be addressed in the future.<br />
Ω<br />
References<br />
[ABF99] Ph. Angot, Ch.-H. Bruneau, <strong>and</strong> P. Fabrie. A penalization method<br />
to take into account obstacles in incompressible viscous flows. Numer.<br />
Math., 81(4):497–520, 1999.<br />
[AR] Ph. Angot <strong>and</strong> I. Ramière. Convergence analysis of the Q1-finite element<br />
method for elliptic problems with non boundary-fitted meshes.<br />
Submitted.<br />
[Bab73] I. Babuška. The finite element method with penalty. Math. Comp.,<br />
27:221–228, 1973.<br />
[BF91] F. Brezzi <strong>and</strong> M. Fortin. Mixed <strong>and</strong> hybrid finite element methods,<br />
volume 15 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer-<br />
Verlag, New York, 1991.<br />
[DP02] S. Del Pino. Une méthode d’éléments finis pour la résolution d’EDP<br />
dans des domaines décrits par géométrie constructive. PhD thesis,<br />
Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 2002.<br />
[DPP03] S. Del Pino <strong>and</strong> O. Pironneau. A fictitious domain based general PDE<br />
solver. In E. Heikkola, editor, Numerical Methods for Scientific Computing,<br />
Barcelona, 2003.