Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate
Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate
162 G. Bencteux et al. Table 2. Wall clock time as a function of the number of processors for a molecule of type P 3,withn m = 3300 (128 blocks). 8 MDD iterations are necessary to achieve convergence up to 5 × 10 −8 in energy and 3 × 10 −3 in the density matrix (for the semi-norm (21)). Number of processors 1 2 4 8 16 Wall clock time (s) 4300 2400 1200 580 360 Speedup 1.8 3.6 7.4 12 Efficiency 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.75 Table 3. Wall clock time as a function of the number of processors for a molecule of type P 3,withn m = 13300 (512 blocks). 7 MDD iterations are necessary to achieve convergence up to 5 × 10 −8 in energy and 3 × 10 −3 in the density matrix (for the semi-norm (21)). Number of processors 1 4 8 16 Wall clock time (s) 18460 4820 2520 1275 Speedup 3.8 7.3 14.5 Efficiency 0.96 0.92 0.91 Table 4. Scalability of the MDD algorithm for a molecule of type P 3. The convergence thresholds are 2.5 × 10 −7 in energy and 4 × 10 −3 in density matrix (for the semi-norm (21)). Number of processors 1 4 8 16 Wall clock time with 200 atoms (8 blocks) per processor (s) 167 206 222 253 Wall clock time with 800 atoms (32 blocks) per processor (s) 1249 1237 1257 1250 Note that the calculations reported in this article have been performed with minimal basis sets. It is the subject of ongoing works to test the efficiency of the MDD algorithm for larger basis sets. Let us finally mention that our parallel implementation of the MDD algorithm allows to solve (2) for a polyethylene molecule with 106 530 atoms (372 862 basis functions) on 16 processors, in 90 minutes. 6 Conclusion and Perspectives In its current implementation, the MDD algorithm allows to solve efficiently the linear subproblem for linear molecules (polymers or nanotubes). The following issues will be addressed in a near future: • Still in the case of 1D systems, we will allow blocks to have more than two neighbors. This should increase the flexibility and efficiency of the MDD
Domain Decomposition Approach for Computational Chemistry 163 algorithm. For instance, this should render calculations with large basis sets including diffuse atomic orbitals affordable. • We plan to implement the MDD algorithm in the framework of 2D and 3D molecular systems. Note that even with minimal overlap a given block has typically 8 neighbors in 2D and 26 neighbors in 3D. • The MDD algorithm will be extended to the cases of the nonlinear Hartree– Fock and Kohn-Sham problems. • The present version of the MDD algorithm is restricted to insulators (i.e. to matrices H with a sufficiently large gap). The possibility of extending the MDD methodology to cover the case of metallic systems is a challenging issue that will be studied. Acknowledgement. EC and CLB acknowledge financial support from the French Ministry for research under contract grant “Nouvelles Interfaces des Mathématiques” SIMUMOL, and from Electricité de France under contract EDF-ENPC. WH acknowledges support from US National Science Foundation under grants 0203370, 0620286, and 0619080. References [AHLT05] P. Arbenz, U. L. Hetmaniuk, R. B. Lehoucq, and R. S. Tuminaro. A comparison of eigensolvers for large-scale 3D modal analysis using AMGpreconditioned iterative methods. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 64:204–236, 2005. [Bar05] M. Barrault. Développement de méthodes rapides pour le calcul de structures électroniques. Thèse, l’Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, 2005. [BCHL] G. Bencteux, E. Cancès, W. W. Hager, and C. Le Bris. Work in progress. [BCHL07] M. Barrault, E. Cancès, W. W. Hager, and C. Le Bris. Multilevel domain decomposition for electronic structure calculations. J. Comput. Phys., 222(1):86–109, 2007. [BMG02] D. Bowler, T. Miyazaki, and M. Gillan. Recent progress in linear scaling ab initio electronic structure theories. J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 14:2781–2798, 2002. [CDK + 03] E. Cancès, M. Defranceschi, W. Kutzelnigg, C. Le Bris, and Y. Maday. Computational quantum chemistry: a primer. In C. Le Bris, editor, Handbook of Numerical Analysis, Special volume, Computational Chemistry, Vol. X, pages 3–270. North-Holland, 2003. [FTS + 98] M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B. Stefanov, G. liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Kpmaromi, G. Gomperts, R. L.
- Page 115 and 116: 108 I. Sazonov et al. 6.4 Scatterin
- Page 117 and 118: 110 I. Sazonov et al. (a) (b) Fig.
- Page 119 and 120: 112 I. Sazonov et al. [MHP96] K. Mo
- Page 121 and 122: 114 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall I R
- Page 123 and 124: 116 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall imp
- Page 125 and 126: 118 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall alo
- Page 127 and 128: 120 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall (a)
- Page 129 and 130: 122 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall D C
- Page 131 and 132: 124 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall 8.6
- Page 133 and 134: 126 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall 0.3
- Page 135 and 136: 128 R. Sanders and A.M. Tesdall [TR
- Page 137 and 138: 132 S. Lapin et al. Ω R γ Ω 2 Γ
- Page 139 and 140: 134 S. Lapin et al. ∫ ∂ 2 ∫
- Page 141 and 142: 136 S. Lapin et al. Ω R γ Fig. 3.
- Page 143 and 144: 138 S. Lapin et al. 4 Energy Inequa
- Page 145 and 146: 140 S. Lapin et al. 5 Numerical Exp
- Page 147 and 148: 142 S. Lapin et al. Fig. 6. Contour
- Page 149 and 150: 144 S. Lapin et al. Fig. 9. Obstacl
- Page 151 and 152: Domain Decomposition and Electronic
- Page 153 and 154: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 155 and 156: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 157 and 158: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 159 and 160: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 161 and 162: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 163 and 164: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 165: Domain Decomposition Approach for C
- Page 169 and 170: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 171 and 172: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 173 and 174: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 175 and 176: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 177 and 178: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 179 and 180: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 181 and 182: so that |u| 2 1,ω h ≤ 2 Numerica
- Page 183 and 184: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 185 and 186: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 187 and 188: Numerical Analysis of a Finite Elem
- Page 189 and 190: 188 A. Bonito et al. of the model a
- Page 191 and 192: 190 A. Bonito et al. Fig. 1. The sp
- Page 193 and 194: 192 A. Bonito et al. 3 1 16 4 1 1 1
- Page 195 and 196: 194 A. Bonito et al. ∫ v n+1 h
- Page 197 and 198: 196 A. Bonito et al. −pn +2µD(v)
- Page 199 and 200: 198 A. Bonito et al. each of its pa
- Page 201 and 202: 200 A. Bonito et al. The normal vec
- Page 203 and 204: 202 A. Bonito et al. with initial c
- Page 205 and 206: 204 A. Bonito et al. Fig. 8. Jet bu
- Page 207 and 208: 206 A. Bonito et al. References [AM
- Page 209 and 210: 208 A. Bonito et al. [Set96] J. A.
- Page 211 and 212: 210 J. Hao et al. due to shear flow
- Page 213 and 214: 212 J. Hao et al. The backward reac
- Page 215 and 216: 214 J. Hao et al. where u and p den
Domain Decomposition Approach for Computational Chemistry 163<br />
algorithm. For instance, this should render calculations with large basis<br />
sets including diffuse atomic orbitals affordable.<br />
• We plan to implement the MDD algorithm in the framework of 2D <strong>and</strong><br />
3D molecular systems. Note that even with minimal overlap a given block<br />
has typically 8 neighbors in 2D <strong>and</strong> 26 neighbors in 3D.<br />
• The MDD algorithm will be extended to the cases of the nonlinear Hartree–<br />
Fock <strong>and</strong> Kohn-Sham problems.<br />
• The present version of the MDD algorithm is restricted to insulators (i.e. to<br />
matrices H with a sufficiently large gap). The possibility of extending the<br />
MDD methodology to cover the case of metallic systems is a challenging<br />
issue that will be studied.<br />
Acknowledgement. EC <strong>and</strong> CLB acknowledge financial support from the French<br />
Ministry for research under contract grant “Nouvelles Interfaces des Mathématiques”<br />
SIMUMOL, <strong>and</strong> from Electricité de France under contract EDF-ENPC. WH acknowledges<br />
support from US National Science Foundation under grants 0203370,<br />
0620286, <strong>and</strong> 0619080.<br />
References<br />
[AHLT05] P. Arbenz, U. L. Hetmaniuk, R. B. Lehoucq, <strong>and</strong> R. S. Tuminaro. A<br />
comparison of eigensolvers for large-scale 3D modal analysis using AMGpreconditioned<br />
iterative methods. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg.,<br />
64:204–236, 2005.<br />
[Bar05] M. Barrault. Développement de méthodes rapides pour le calcul de structures<br />
électroniques. Thèse, l’Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées,<br />
2005.<br />
[BCHL] G. Bencteux, E. Cancès, W. W. Hager, <strong>and</strong> C. Le Bris. Work in progress.<br />
[BCHL07] M. Barrault, E. Cancès, W. W. Hager, <strong>and</strong> C. Le Bris. Multilevel domain<br />
decomposition for electronic structure calculations. J. Comput. Phys.,<br />
222(1):86–109, 2007.<br />
[BMG02] D. Bowler, T. Miyazaki, <strong>and</strong> M. Gillan. Recent progress in linear scaling<br />
ab initio electronic structure theories. J. Phys. Condens. Matter,<br />
14:2781–2798, 2002.<br />
[CDK + 03] E. Cancès, M. Defranceschi, W. Kutzelnigg, C. Le Bris, <strong>and</strong> Y. Maday.<br />
Computational quantum chemistry: a primer. In C. Le Bris, editor,<br />
H<strong>and</strong>book of Numerical Analysis, Special volume, Computational Chemistry,<br />
Vol. X, pages 3–270. North-Holl<strong>and</strong>, 2003.<br />
[FTS + 98] M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A.<br />
Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, R. E.<br />
Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D. Daniels,<br />
K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi,<br />
R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski,<br />
G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D.<br />
Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B.<br />
Stefanov, G. liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Kpmaromi, G. Gomperts, R. L.
Change language