Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate

Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate Partial Differential Equations - Modelling and ... - ResearchGate

24.02.2014 Views

Electromagnetic Scattering 109 Scattering Width, dB Co-volume /120 Co-volume /15 uniform FETD /120 FETD /15 uniform FETD /15 refined Viewing Angle, degrees Fig. 12. Simulation of scattering of a plane TE wave by a PEC NACA0012 aerofoil of length λ showing a comparison between the computed and benchmark scattering width distributions. Table 4. Simulation of scattering of a plane TE wave by a PEC NACA0012 aerofoil of length λ. Mesh FETD Co-volume Speed up resolution spc time, s E SW spc time, s E SW ratio Uniform 59 12. 6.00 46 0.4 0.9 30 Refined 97 20. 2.14 99 0.6 0.5 33 shown in Fig. 13(a). The simulations are advanced for 150 cycles and the typical distribution of the contours of the computed total magnetic field in the domain, excluding the PML, is shown in Figure 13(b). A comparison of the computed scattering width distributions is given in Figure 14. Also shown on this figure is the scattering width distribution computed using a high order finite element frequency domain (FEFD) simulation [LMHW02]. The number ofstepspercycleis57fortheco-volumeschemeand59fortheFETDmethod and, for this example, the co-volume scheme requires 31 seconds of cpu time, while the FETD method requires 1980 seconds. This represents a speed-up of a factor of 65.

110 I. Sazonov et al. (a) (b) Fig. 13. Simulation of scattering of a plane TE wave by a PEC cavity showing (a) the unstructured mesh employed, (b) the computed total magnetic field after 150 cycles. Scattering Width, dB Viewing Angle, degrees Fig. 14. Simulation of scattering of a plane TE wave by a PEC cavity showing a comparison of the scattering width distributions computed, after 150 cycles, by FETD, the co-volume scheme and a FEFD method. 7 Conclusions The numerical performance of an explicit unstructured mesh co-volume time domain scheme and a standard finite element time domain method has been compared for a number of electromagnetic wave propagation and scattering examples. To ensure the efficiency of the co-volume approach, the smooth Delaunay–Voronoï dual meshes that are used are generated using a stitching method. The numerical examples that have been considered show that the co-volume method is 30–60 times faster than the finite element method for two-dimensional scattering problems. In addition, the co-volume method

Electromagnetic Scattering 109<br />

Scattering Width, dB<br />

Co-volume /120<br />

Co-volume /15 uniform<br />

FETD /120<br />

FETD /15 uniform<br />

FETD /15 refined<br />

Viewing Angle, degrees<br />

Fig. 12. Simulation of scattering of a plane TE wave by a PEC NACA0012 aerofoil<br />

of length λ showing a comparison between the computed <strong>and</strong> benchmark scattering<br />

width distributions.<br />

Table 4. Simulation of scattering of a plane TE wave by a PEC NACA0012 aerofoil<br />

of length λ.<br />

Mesh FETD Co-volume Speed up<br />

resolution spc time, s E SW spc time, s E SW ratio<br />

Uniform 59 12. 6.00 46 0.4 0.9 30<br />

Refined 97 20. 2.14 99 0.6 0.5 33<br />

shown in Fig. 13(a). The simulations are advanced for 150 cycles <strong>and</strong> the<br />

typical distribution of the contours of the computed total magnetic field in<br />

the domain, excluding the PML, is shown in Figure 13(b). A comparison of<br />

the computed scattering width distributions is given in Figure 14. Also shown<br />

on this figure is the scattering width distribution computed using a high order<br />

finite element frequency domain (FEFD) simulation [LMHW02]. The number<br />

ofstepspercycleis57fortheco-volumescheme<strong>and</strong>59fortheFETDmethod<br />

<strong>and</strong>, for this example, the co-volume scheme requires 31 seconds of cpu time,<br />

while the FETD method requires 1980 seconds. This represents a speed-up of<br />

a factor of 65.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!