tau - Particle Data Group
tau - Particle Data Group tau - Particle Data Group
Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) and 2011 partial update for the 2012 edition (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) 4.7 ±0.5 ±0.8 530 6 SCHMIDKE 86 MRK2 E ee cm =29GeV 5.6 ±0.4 ±0.7 5 FERNANDEZ 85 MAC E ee cm =29GeV 6.2 ±2.3 ±1.7 BEHREND 84 CELL E ee cm = 14,22 GeV 1 BEHREND 90 value is not independent of BEHREND 90 B(3h ντ ≥ 1neutrals)+ B(5-prong). 2 ALBRECHT 87L measure the product of branching ratios B(3π ± π 0 ν τ )B((e ν orμν orπ orK orρ)ν τ )=0.029 and use the PDG 86 values for the second branching ratio which sum to 0.69 ± 0.03 to get the quoted value. 3 BURCHAT 87 value is not independent of SCHMIDKE 86 value. 4 Contributions from kaons and from >1π 0 are subtracted. Not independent of (3-prong +0π 0 ) and (3-prong + ≥ 0π 0 )values. 5 Value obtained using paper’s R =B(h − h − h + ντ )/B(3-prong) and current B(3-prong) =0.143. 6 Not independent of SCHMIDKE 86 h − h − h + ντ and h − h − h + ( ≥ 0π 0 )ν τ values. Γ ( h − h − h + ≥ 1π 0 ν τ (ex. K 0 ) ) /Γ total Γ 64 /Γ Γ 64 /Γ = (Γ 70 +Γ 77 +Γ 78 +Γ 89 +Γ 94 +0.226Γ 126 +0.226Γ 128 +0.888Γ 150 + 0.9101Γ 152 )/Γ Data marked “avg” are highly correlated with data appearing elsewhere in the Listings, and are therefore used for the average given below but not in the overall fits. “f&a” marks results used for the fit and the average. VALUE (%) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 5.08 ±0.06 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 5.10 ±0.12 OUR AVERAGE •••We use the following data for averages but not for fits. ••• 5.106±0.083±0.103 avg 10.1k 1 ABDALLAH 06A DLPH 1992–1995 LEP runs 5.09 ±0.10 ±0.23 avg 2 AKERS 95Y OPAL 1991–1994 LEP runs •••We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. ••• 4.95 ±0.29 ±0.65 570 DECAMP 92C ALEP Repl. by SCHAEL 05C 1 See footnote to ABDALLAH 06A Γ(τ − → h − ντ )/Γ total measurement for correlations with other measurements. 2 Not independent of AKERS 95Y B(h − h − h + ≥ 0neutralsντ (ex. K 0 S → π+ π − )) and B(h − h − h + ≥ 0neutralsν τ (ex. K 0 ))/B(h − h − h + ≥ 0neutralsν τ (ex. K 0 S → π + π − )) values. Γ ( h − h − h + π 0 ) ν τ /Γtotal Γ 65 /Γ Γ 65 /Γ = (0.3431Γ 40 +0.3431Γ 42 +Γ 70 +Γ 89 +Γ 94 +0.226Γ 128 +0.888Γ 150 + 0.017Γ 152 )/Γ VALUE (%) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 4.75±0.06 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2. •••We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. ••• 4.45±0.09±0.07 6.1k 1 BUSKULIC 96 ALEP Repl. by SCHAEL 05C 1 BUSKULIC 96 quote B(h − h − h + π 0 ντ (ex. K 0 )) = 4.30 ± 0.09 ± 0.09. We add 0.15 to remove their K 0 correction and reduce the systematic error accordingly. HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 40 Created: 6/16/2011 12:05
Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) and 2011 partial update for the 2012 edition (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) Γ ( h − h − h + π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ) ) /Γ total Γ 66 /Γ Γ 66 /Γ = (Γ 70 +Γ 89 +Γ 94 +0.226Γ 128 +0.888Γ 150 +0.017Γ 152 )/Γ VALUE (%) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 4.56 ±0.06 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2. 4.45 ±0.14 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2. 4.545±0.106±0.103 8.9k 1 ABDALLAH 06A DLPH 1992–1995 LEP runs 4.23 ±0.06 ±0.22 7.2k BALEST 95C CLEO E ee cm ≈ 10.6 GeV 1 See footnote to ABDALLAH 06A Γ(τ − → h − ντ )/Γ total measurement for correlations with other measurements. Γ ( h − h − h + π 0 ν τ (ex. K 0 , ω) ) /Γ total VALUE (%) DOCUMENT ID 2.79±0.08 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2. Γ 67 /Γ = (Γ 70 +Γ 89 +Γ 94 +0.226Γ 128 )/Γ Γ ( π − π + π − π 0 ) ν τ /Γtotal Γ 68 /Γ = (0.3431Γ 40 +Γ 70 +0.888Γ 150 +0.017Γ 152 )/Γ VALUE (%) DOCUMENT ID 4.61±0.06 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.1. Γ ( π − π + π − π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ) ) /Γ total Γ 69 /Γ = (Γ 70 +0.888Γ 150 +0.017Γ 152 )/Γ VALUE (%) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 4.48 ±0.06 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 4.55 ±0.13 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6. 4.598±0.057±0.064 16k 1 SCHAEL 05C ALEP 1991-1995 LEP runs 4.19 ±0.10 ±0.21 2 EDWARDS 00A CLEO 4.7 fb −1 E ee cm =10.6 GeV 1 SCHAEL 05C quote (4.590± 0.057± 0.064)%. We add 0.008% to remove their correction for τ − → π − π 0 ων τ → π − π 0 π + π − ν τ decays. See footnote to SCHAEL 05C Γ(τ − → e − ν e ν τ )/Γ total measurement for correlations with other measurements. 2 EDWARDS 00A quote (4.19 ± 0.10) × 10 −2 with a 5% systematic error. Γ ( π − π + π − π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ,ω) ) /Γ total Γ 70 /Γ VALUE (%) DOCUMENT ID 2.70±0.08 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2. Γ ( h − ρπ 0 ) ( ν τ /Γ h − h − h + π 0 ) ν τ VALUE EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ 71 /Γ 65 •••We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. ••• 0.30±0.04±0.02 393 ALBRECHT 91D ARG E ee cm =9.4–10.6 GeV Γ ( h − ρ + h − ) ( ν τ /Γ h − h − h + π 0 ) ν τ VALUE EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ 72 /Γ 65 •••We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. ••• 0.10±0.03±0.04 142 ALBRECHT 91D ARG E ee cm =9.4–10.6 GeV Γ ( h − ρ − h + ) ( ν τ /Γ h − h − h + π 0 ) ν τ VALUE EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT Γ 73 /Γ 65 •••We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. ••• 0.26±0.05±0.01 370 ALBRECHT 91D ARG E ee cm =9.4–10.6 GeV HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 41 Created: 6/16/2011 12:05
- Page 1 and 2: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 3 and 4: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 5 and 6: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 7 and 8: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 9 and 10: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 11 and 12: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 13 and 14: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 15 and 16: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 17 and 18: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 19 and 20: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 21 and 22: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 23 and 24: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 25 and 26: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 27 and 28: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 29 and 30: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 31 and 32: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 33 and 34: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 35 and 36: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 37 and 38: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 39: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 43 and 44: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 45 and 46: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 47 and 48: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 49 and 50: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 51 and 52: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 53 and 54: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 55 and 56: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 57 and 58: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 59 and 60: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 61 and 62: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 63 and 64: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 65 and 66: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 67 and 68: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 69 and 70: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 71 and 72: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 73 and 74: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 75 and 76: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 77 and 78: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 79 and 80: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 81 and 82: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 83 and 84: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 85 and 86: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 87: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (<strong>Particle</strong> <strong>Data</strong> <strong>Group</strong>), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) and 2011 partial update for the 2012 edition (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov)<br />
4.7 ±0.5 ±0.8 530 6 SCHMIDKE 86 MRK2 E ee<br />
cm =29GeV<br />
5.6 ±0.4 ±0.7 5 FERNANDEZ 85 MAC E ee<br />
cm =29GeV<br />
6.2 ±2.3 ±1.7 BEHREND 84 CELL E ee cm = 14,22 GeV<br />
1 BEHREND 90 value is not independent of BEHREND 90 B(3h ντ ≥ 1neutrals)+<br />
B(5-prong).<br />
2 ALBRECHT 87L measure the product of branching ratios<br />
B(3π ± π 0 ν τ )B((e ν orμν orπ orK orρ)ν τ )=0.029 and use the PDG 86 values<br />
for the second branching ratio which sum to 0.69 ± 0.03 to get the quoted value.<br />
3 BURCHAT 87 value is not independent of SCHMIDKE 86 value.<br />
4 Contributions from kaons and from >1π 0 are subtracted. Not independent of (3-prong<br />
+0π 0 ) and (3-prong + ≥ 0π 0 )values.<br />
5 Value obtained using paper’s R =B(h − h − h + ντ )/B(3-prong) and current B(3-prong)<br />
=0.143.<br />
6 Not independent of SCHMIDKE 86 h − h − h + ντ and h − h − h + ( ≥ 0π 0 )ν τ values.<br />
Γ ( h − h − h + ≥ 1π 0 ν τ (ex. K 0 ) ) /Γ total Γ 64 /Γ<br />
Γ 64 /Γ = (Γ 70 +Γ 77 +Γ 78 +Γ 89 +Γ 94 +0.226Γ 126 +0.226Γ 128 +0.888Γ 150 +<br />
0.9101Γ 152 )/Γ<br />
<strong>Data</strong> marked “avg” are highly correlated with data appearing elsewhere in the Listings,<br />
and are therefore used for the average given below but not in the overall fits. “f&a”<br />
marks results used for the fit and the average.<br />
VALUE (%) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT<br />
5.08 ±0.06 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.1.<br />
5.10 ±0.12 OUR AVERAGE<br />
•••We use the following data for averages but not for fits. •••<br />
5.106±0.083±0.103 avg 10.1k 1 ABDALLAH 06A DLPH 1992–1995 LEP runs<br />
5.09 ±0.10 ±0.23 avg 2 AKERS 95Y OPAL 1991–1994 LEP runs<br />
•••We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. •••<br />
4.95 ±0.29 ±0.65 570 DECAMP 92C ALEP Repl. by SCHAEL 05C<br />
1 See footnote to ABDALLAH 06A Γ(τ − → h − ντ )/Γ total measurement for correlations<br />
with other measurements.<br />
2 Not independent of AKERS 95Y B(h − h − h + ≥ 0neutralsντ (ex. K 0 S → π+ π − ))<br />
and B(h − h − h + ≥ 0neutralsν τ (ex. K 0 ))/B(h − h − h + ≥ 0neutralsν τ (ex. K 0 S →<br />
π + π − )) values.<br />
Γ ( h − h − h + π 0 ) ν τ /Γtotal Γ 65 /Γ<br />
Γ 65 /Γ = (0.3431Γ 40 +0.3431Γ 42 +Γ 70 +Γ 89 +Γ 94 +0.226Γ 128 +0.888Γ 150 +<br />
0.017Γ 152 )/Γ<br />
VALUE (%) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT<br />
4.75±0.06 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2.<br />
•••We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. •••<br />
4.45±0.09±0.07 6.1k 1 BUSKULIC 96 ALEP Repl. by SCHAEL 05C<br />
1 BUSKULIC 96 quote B(h − h − h + π 0 ντ (ex. K 0 )) = 4.30 ± 0.09 ± 0.09. We add 0.15<br />
to remove their K 0 correction and reduce the systematic error accordingly.<br />
HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 40 Created: 6/16/2011 12:05