tau - Particle Data Group
tau - Particle Data Group tau - Particle Data Group
Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) and 2011 partial update for the 2012 edition (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) 18.4 ±0.8 ±0.4 644 BEHREND 90 CELL E ee cm =35GeV 16.3 ±0.3 ±3.2 JANSSEN 89 CBAL E ee cm =9.4–10.6 GeV 18.4 ±1.2 ±1.0 AIHARA 87B TPC E ee cm =29GeV 19.1 ±0.8 ±1.1 BURCHAT 87 MRK2 E ee cm =29GeV 16.8 ±0.7 ±0.9 515 5 BARTEL 86D JADE E ee cm = 34.6 GeV 20.4 ±3.0 +1.4 −0.9 17.8 ±0.9 ±0.6 390 5 ASH 85B MAC E ee cm =29GeV 18.2 ±0.7 ±0.5 6 BALTRUSAIT...85 MRK3 E ee cm =3.77 GeV ALTHOFF 85 TASS E ee cm = 34.5 GeV 13.0 ±1.9 ±2.9 BERGER 85 PLUT E ee cm = 34.6 GeV 18.3 ±2.4 ±1.9 60 BEHREND 83C CELL E ee cm =34GeV 16.0 ±1.3 459 7 BACINO 78B DLCO E ee cm = 3.1–7.4 GeV 1 Correlation matrix for SCHAEL 05C branching fractions, in percent: (1) Γ(τ − → e − ν e ν τ )/Γ total (2) Γ(τ − → μ − ν μ ν τ )/Γ total (3) Γ(τ − → π − ν τ )/Γ total (4) Γ(τ − → π − π 0 ν τ )/Γ total (5) Γ(τ − → π − 2π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ))/Γ total (6) Γ(τ − → π − 3π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ))/Γ total (7) Γ(τ − → h − 4π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ,η))/Γ total (8) Γ(τ − → π − π + π − ν τ (ex.K 0 ,ω))/Γ total (9) Γ(τ − → π − π + π − π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ))/Γ total (10) Γ(τ − → h − h − h + 2π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ))/Γ total (11) Γ(τ − → h − h − h + 3π 0 ν τ )/Γ total (12) Γ(τ − → 3h − 2h + ν τ (ex.K 0 ))/Γ total (13) Γ(τ − → 3h − 2h + π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ))/Γ total (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (2) -20 (3) -9 -6 (4) -16 -12 2 (5) -5 -5 -17 -37 (6) 0 -4 -15 2 -27 (7) -2 -4 -24 -15 20 -47 (8) -14 -9 15 -5 -17 -14 -8 (9) -13 -12 -25 -30 4 -2 16 -15 (10) 0 -2 -23 -14 4 10 13 -6 -17 (11) 1 0 -5 1 4 6 0 -9 -2 -11 (12) 0 1 9 4 -8 -4 -6 9 -5 -4 -2 (13) 1 -4 -3 -5 3 2 -4 -3 -1 4 1 -24 2 The correlation coefficient between this measurement and the ACCIARRI 01F measurement of B(τ − → μ − ν μ ν τ )is0.08. 3 The correlation coefficients between this measurement and the ANASTASSOV 97 measurements of B(μν μ ν τ ), B(μν μ ν τ )/B(e ν e ν τ ), B(h − ν τ ), and B(h − ν τ )/B(e ν e ν τ ) are 0.50, −0.42, 0.48, and −0.39 respectively. 4 Not independent of ALBRECHT 92D Γ(μ − νμ ν τ )/Γ(e − ν e ν τ ) and ALBRECHT 93G Γ(μ − ν μ ν τ ) × Γ(e − ν e ν τ )/Γ 2 total values. HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 18 Created: 6/16/2011 12:05
Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) and 2011 partial update for the 2012 edition (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) 5 Modified using B(e − νe ν τ )/B(“1 prong”) and B(“1 prong”) ,= 0.855. 6 ( Error correlated with BALTRUSAITIS 85 Γ μ − ) νμ ν τ /Γtotal . 7 BACINO 78B value comes from fit to events with e ± and one other nonelectron charged prong. Γ ( μ − ) ( ν μ ν τ /Γ e − ) ν e ν τ Standard Model prediction including mass effects is 0.9726. VALUE EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 0.9762±0.0031 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.1. Γ 3 /Γ 5 0.979 ±0.004 OUR AVERAGE 0.9796±0.0016±0.0036 731k 1 AUBERT 10F BABR 467 fb −1 E ee cm = 10.6 GeV 0.9777±0.0063±0.0087 2 ANASTASSOV 97 CLEO E ee cm =10.6 GeV 0.997 ±0.035 ±0.040 ALBRECHT 92D ARG E ee cm =9.4–10.6 GeV 1 Correlation matrix for AUBERT 10F branching fractions: (1) Γ(τ − → μ − ν μ ν τ )/Γ(τ − → e − ν e ν τ ) (2) Γ(τ − → π − ν τ )/Γ(τ − → e − ν e ν τ ) (3) Γ(τ − → K − ν τ )/Γ(τ − → e − ν e ν τ ) (1) (2) (2) 0.25 (3) 0.12 0.33 2 The correlation coefficients between this measurement and the ANASTASSOV 97 measurements of B(μν μ ν τ ), B(e ν e ν τ ), B(h − ν τ ), and B(h − ν τ )/B(e ν e ν τ ) are 0.58, −0.42, 0.07, and 0.45 respectively. Γ ( e − ν e ν τ γ ) /Γ total Γ 6 /Γ VALUE (%) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 1.75±0.06±0.17 1 BERGFELD 00 CLEO E ee cm =10.6 GeV 1 BERGFELD 00 impose requirements on detected γ’s corresponding to a τ-rest-frame energy cutoff E ∗ > 10 MeV. γ Γ ( h − ≥ 0K 0 L ν ) τ /Γtotal Γ 7 /Γ Γ 7 /Γ = (Γ 9 +Γ 10 + 1 2 Γ 35 + 1 2 Γ 37 +Γ 47 )/Γ Data marked “avg” are highly correlated with data appearing elsewhere in the Listings, and are therefore used for the average given below but not in the overall fits. “f&a” marks results used for the fit and the average. VALUE (%) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 12.13±0.07 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 12.2 ±0.4 OUR AVERAGE 12.47±0.26±0.43 f&a 2967 1 ACCIARRI 95 L3 1992 LEP run 12.4 ±0.7 ±0.7 f&a 283 2 ABREU 92N DLPH 1990 LEP run 12.1 ±0.7 ±0.5 f&a 309 ALEXANDER 91D OPAL 1990 LEP run •••We use the following data for averages but not for fits. ••• 11.3 ±0.5 ±0.8 avg 798 3 FORD 87 MAC E ee cm =29GeV HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 19 Created: 6/16/2011 12:05
- Page 1 and 2: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 3 and 4: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 5 and 6: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 7 and 8: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 9 and 10: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 11 and 12: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 13 and 14: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 15 and 16: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 17: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 21 and 22: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 23 and 24: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 25 and 26: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 27 and 28: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 29 and 30: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 31 and 32: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 33 and 34: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 35 and 36: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 37 and 38: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 39 and 40: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 41 and 42: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 43 and 44: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 45 and 46: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 47 and 48: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 49 and 50: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 51 and 52: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 53 and 54: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 55 and 56: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 57 and 58: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 59 and 60: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 61 and 62: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 63 and 64: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 65 and 66: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
- Page 67 and 68: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Parti
Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (<strong>Particle</strong> <strong>Data</strong> <strong>Group</strong>), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) and 2011 partial update for the 2012 edition (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov)<br />
18.4 ±0.8 ±0.4 644 BEHREND 90 CELL E ee cm =35GeV<br />
16.3 ±0.3 ±3.2 JANSSEN 89 CBAL E ee cm =9.4–10.6 GeV<br />
18.4 ±1.2 ±1.0 AIHARA 87B TPC E ee cm =29GeV<br />
19.1 ±0.8 ±1.1 BURCHAT 87 MRK2 E ee cm =29GeV<br />
16.8 ±0.7 ±0.9 515 5 BARTEL 86D JADE E ee<br />
cm = 34.6 GeV<br />
20.4 ±3.0<br />
+1.4<br />
−0.9<br />
17.8 ±0.9 ±0.6 390 5 ASH 85B MAC E ee<br />
cm =29GeV<br />
18.2 ±0.7 ±0.5 6 BALTRUSAIT...85 MRK3 E ee<br />
cm =3.77 GeV<br />
ALTHOFF 85 TASS E ee cm = 34.5 GeV<br />
13.0 ±1.9 ±2.9 BERGER 85 PLUT E ee cm = 34.6 GeV<br />
18.3 ±2.4 ±1.9 60 BEHREND 83C CELL E ee cm =34GeV<br />
16.0 ±1.3 459 7 BACINO 78B DLCO E ee<br />
cm = 3.1–7.4 GeV<br />
1 Correlation matrix for SCHAEL 05C branching fractions, in percent:<br />
(1) Γ(τ − → e − ν e ν τ )/Γ total<br />
(2) Γ(τ − → μ − ν μ ν τ )/Γ total<br />
(3) Γ(τ − → π − ν τ )/Γ total<br />
(4) Γ(τ − → π − π 0 ν τ )/Γ total<br />
(5) Γ(τ − → π − 2π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ))/Γ total<br />
(6) Γ(τ − → π − 3π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ))/Γ total<br />
(7) Γ(τ − → h − 4π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ,η))/Γ total<br />
(8) Γ(τ − → π − π + π − ν τ (ex.K 0 ,ω))/Γ total<br />
(9) Γ(τ − → π − π + π − π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ))/Γ total<br />
(10) Γ(τ − → h − h − h + 2π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ))/Γ total<br />
(11) Γ(τ − → h − h − h + 3π 0 ν τ )/Γ total<br />
(12) Γ(τ − → 3h − 2h + ν τ (ex.K 0 ))/Γ total<br />
(13) Γ(τ − → 3h − 2h + π 0 ν τ (ex.K 0 ))/Γ total<br />
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)<br />
(2) -20<br />
(3) -9 -6<br />
(4) -16 -12 2<br />
(5) -5 -5 -17 -37<br />
(6) 0 -4 -15 2 -27<br />
(7) -2 -4 -24 -15 20 -47<br />
(8) -14 -9 15 -5 -17 -14 -8<br />
(9) -13 -12 -25 -30 4 -2 16 -15<br />
(10) 0 -2 -23 -14 4 10 13 -6 -17<br />
(11) 1 0 -5 1 4 6 0 -9 -2 -11<br />
(12) 0 1 9 4 -8 -4 -6 9 -5 -4 -2<br />
(13) 1 -4 -3 -5 3 2 -4 -3 -1 4 1 -24<br />
2 The correlation coefficient between this measurement and the ACCIARRI 01F measurement<br />
of B(τ − → μ − ν μ ν τ )is0.08.<br />
3 The correlation coefficients between this measurement and the ANASTASSOV 97 measurements<br />
of B(μν μ ν τ ), B(μν μ ν τ )/B(e ν e ν τ ), B(h − ν τ ), and B(h − ν τ )/B(e ν e ν τ )<br />
are 0.50, −0.42, 0.48, and −0.39 respectively.<br />
4 Not independent of ALBRECHT 92D Γ(μ − νμ ν τ )/Γ(e − ν e ν τ ) and ALBRECHT 93G<br />
Γ(μ − ν μ ν τ ) × Γ(e − ν e ν τ )/Γ 2 total values.<br />
HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 18 Created: 6/16/2011 12:05