The Satanic Bloodlines - WordPress.com

The Freeman Bloodline
The amazing thing about this family is that it is not a family that people would have thought
of as being one of the top thirteen; however, for me as a researcher of the elite and the
Satanic hierarchy, the name pops up with surprising frequency. For instance, Stephen M.
Freeman runs the Legal Affairs Dept. of the Civil Rights Division of the Anti-Defamation
League (which is a daughter of the B’nai B’rith). The ADL is a dangerous organization
controlled by the hierarchy. The illuminati drug money to fund this organization. Another
Freeman is Walter Freeman who introduced the lobotomy into the U.S. with James W. Watts
in 1936. The frontal lobotomy was a brutal method of mind control, that has been permitted
to be done to us, under the disguise that it is of benefit to humanity. Then there was Simon
Freeman an important intelligence officer. And the list goes on of people that are in key
places with the Freeman name. But the most important position of all which removes all
doubt that the family is at the top is that the late Grand Master of the Prieure de Sion was
Gaylord Freeman.
Independent discoverers of The PRIEURE DE SION
What is the Prieure de Sion? Are we sure it exists? How does this relate to the hierarchy?
The Prieure de Sion (Priory of Zion) was unknown to the general public until 1982 when a
book co-authored by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln came out. The book
was entitled Holy Blood, Holy Grail and it offered historical proof that an organization called
the Prieure de Sion was powerful and had existed since the time of the early crusades (1099
A.D.). In 1991, I came out a little more information on the Prieure de Sion. The organization
is so little known to even my readership, that we need to stop and really examine the
Prieure de Slon.
In trying to figure out the mysteries surrounding this organization, Lincoln, Leigh and
Baigent’s research led them to conclude that the holy bloodline that the Prieure de Sion
guarded was the bloodline of Jesus. This immediately made all their research anathema
(condemned and disliked) by the most of Christendom. I watched to see if Christians would
refute the unbiblical parts of their research, but besides a couple of short articles (Christian
Century, 9/1-8/82, - "Raiders of the Lost Grail" and Christianity Today, 9/3/82 - "Holy
Blood, Holy Grail - holy mackerel") in Christian periodicals (in addition to this was a small
book in England- The Holy Grail Revealed) which simplistically claimed that the book was of
no value because obviously it was erroneous, no one even pretended to try to refute the
book (as far as I know except for that English book which did pretend but didn’t refute
anything.) The authors went on to write two more popular historical exposes concerning the
Prieure de Sion and Freemasonry (The Messianic Legacy and The Temple and The Lodge).
Actually to be fair to the Christians, if I hadn’t already known from my research that much
of the European information in Holy Blood. Holy Grail was correct, the wild religious
speculation about Jesus in Part 3 may have caused me to doubt the book too. The first
Christian author to pick up on the Prieure de Sion was J.R. Church who wrote Guardians of
the Grail which built on Holy Blood. Holy Grail’s research in a constructive way and put more
pieces of the puzzle together. At last a book was out that challenged some of the false ideas
of Holy Blood, Holy Grail without blindly throwing their excellent research. While the public
at large had never heard of the Prieure de Sion until Holy Blood. Holy Grail came out, the
organization was written about in high level military intelligence briefings years before the
book. Some of the men in high level intelligence have become concerned with the direction
this nation is going. It is through such men that independent confirmation had leaked out
even before the book. The information did get to some researchers. I came out with my Be
Wise As Serpents book in 1991, which among other things covered the Prieure de Sion,
after I had concluded that the evidence verified its existence.
54