here - Election Law Blog
here - Election Law Blog
here - Election Law Blog
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6:09-cv-01022-HFF Date Filed 04/16/2009 Entry Number 1 Page 10 of 19<br />
36. As to party primary elections, S.C. Code Section 7-13-15(B)(2)(c) prohibits<br />
the Greenville County Republican Party from conducting and paying for<br />
the partisan primaries for countywide and less than countywide offices,<br />
because the primary elections “must by conducted by the State <strong>Election</strong><br />
Commission and the county election commissions.”<br />
37. The Greenville County Republican party is able and willing to conduct and<br />
pay for primaries for countywide and less than countywide offices (on<br />
terms established by the Party).<br />
38. T<strong>here</strong> is no provision in the S.C. Code which allows for a “firehouse<br />
primary” or a primary conducted by the Party for countywide and less than<br />
countywide offices.<br />
39. Pursuant to the decision in Miller vs. Brown, 503 F.3d 360, 362 (4 th Cir.<br />
2007), States that have government run open primaries must also allow<br />
for the alternatives of a “firehouse primary” or primaries conducted by the<br />
Party.<br />
40. The Defendant prohibits Plaintiffs Harms and Mitchell from voting in a<br />
“firehouse primary” or a primary conducted by the Party, for statewide<br />
office, federal office, the state Senate and the state House of<br />
Representatives.<br />
41. The Defendant discriminates between Greenville County registered<br />
electors (Samuel Harms) who can only vote in an open primary conducted<br />
by the government, versus Greenville County registered electors (Billy<br />
Mitchell) who live in the City of Greenville, who can vote in a municipal<br />
primary conducted by the Party.<br />
- 10 -