Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline Fisheries Gilman, E., N. Brothers, G. McPherson, P. Dalzell. 2006d. Review of cetacean interactions with longline gear. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 8(2): 215-223. Gilman, E., Brothers, N., and Kobayashi, D. 2005. Principles and approaches to abate seabird bycatch in longline fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 6(1): 35-49. Gilman, E., and Freifeld, H. 2003. Seabird mortality in north Pacific longline fisheries. Endangered Species Update 20, 35-46. Gilman, E., C. Boggs, and N. Brothers. 2003. Performance assessment of an underwater setting chute to mitigate seabird bycatch in the Hawaii pelagic longline tuna fishery. Ocean and Coastal Management 46(11-12): 985-1010. Gilman, E., P. Gandini, C. Carboneras, G. Balogh, D. Leadbitter, and T. Neves. 2002. Incentive Instruments for Sustainable Bycatch of Sensitive Species in Longline Fisheries. IN Proceedings of the Incentives Session, Second International Fishers’ Forum, 19-22 November 2002. U.S. Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council: Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. 11 pp. Gilman, E. 2001. Integrated management approach to address incidental mortality of seabirds in longline fisheries. Aquatic Conservation 11, 391-414. Hall, M.A., Alverson, D.L., and Metuzals, K.I. 2000. By-catch: problems and solutions. Marine Pollution Bulletin 41(1-6), 204-219. Haward, M., Bergin, A., and Hall, H.R. 1998. International legal and political bases to the management of the incidental catch of seabirds. pp. 255-66 In Albatross Biology and Conservation, Robertson G and Gales R (eds). Surrey Beatty and Sons: Chipping Norton, Australia. 300 pp. Heberer, C.F., McCoy, M.A. 1997. Overview of Pacific Fishing Agencies and Institutions Collecting Shark Catch Data. Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, Honolulu, 128 pp. Hobday,A.,Stobutzki, I., and Webb, H. (2004) Draft ecological Risk Assessment of Effects of fishing: Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery (V7). In Hobday, A., Smith, A.D.M., and Stobutzki, I. Ecological Risk Assessment for Australian Commonwealth Fisheries. Final Report-Stage 1. Hazard identification and preliminary risk assessment. Report to the Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Canberrs, Australia. Ito, R., Machado, W. 1999. Annual Report of the Hawaii-based Longline Fishery for 1998. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Honolulu Administrative Report H-99-06, Honolulu, HI, USA. IUCN. 1996a. Fisheries By-catch, Resolution 1.16. Adopted at the First World Conservation Congress, Montreal, Canada, October 13-23, 1996. World Conservation Congress, International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN): Gland, Switzerland. IUCN. 996b. Incidental Mortality of Seabirds in Longline Fisheries, Resolution 1.15. Adopted at the First World Conservation Congress, Montreal, Canada, October 13-23, 1996. World Conservation Congress, International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN): Gland, Switzerland. IUCN. 2000a. Pirate Fishing and Seabird Mortality from Longlining in the Southern Ocean and Adjacent Waters, Resolution CGR2.66. Adopted at the Second World Conservation Congress, Amman, Jordan, 4-11 October 2000. World Conservation Congress, International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN): Gland, Switzerland. IUCN. 2000b. Incidental Capture of Marine Turtles by Pelagic Longline Fisheries, Resolution 2.65. Adopted at the Second World Conservation Congress, Amman, Jordan, 4-11 October 2000. World Conservation Congress, International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN): Gland, Switzerland. Kelleher, G. 1999. Guidelines for Marine Protected Areas. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas: Gland, Switzerland. 107 pp. Kleiber, P., Takeuchi Y., Nakano, H. 2001. Calculation of plausible maximum sustainable yield (MSY) for blue sharks (Prionace glauca) in the North Pacific. Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Administrative Report H-01-02. Kotas, J.E., Santos, S., de Azevedo, V., Gallo, B., and Barata, P. 2004. Incidental capture of loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea) sea turtles by the pelagic longline fishery off southern Brazil. Fishery Bulletin 102: 393-399. Lawson, T. 2001. Predation of Tuna by Whales and Sharks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. 14th Meeting of the Standing Committee on Tuna and Billfish, Working Paper SWG-6. Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Noumea, New Caledonia. Martin, S., Gilman, E., Dalzell, P. 2006. Meeting Hawaii longline industry needs to reduce fisheries bycatch through cooperative research. Pp. 197-203 IN Read, A.N., Hartley, T.W. (Eds.). Partnerships for a Common Purpose: Cooperative Fisheries Research and Management. Proceedings of the American Fisheries Society/Sea Grant Symposium 52. American Fisheries Society 135th Annual Meeting, 11-15 September 2005, Anchorage, Alaska. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Matsunaga, H., Nakano, H. 1999. Species composition and CPUE of pelagic sharks caught by Japanese longline research and training vessels in the Pacific Ocean. Fisheries Science 65: 16-22. Matsushita, Y., Matsunaga, H. 2001. Species Composition and CPUE of Pelagic Sharks Observed by Japanese Observers for Tuna Longline Fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean. International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. ICCAT Collective Volume of Scientific Papers, 54: 1371-1380. McCaughran, D. A. 1992. Standardized nomenclature and methods of defining bycatch levels and implications. Proceedings of the National Industry Bycatch Workshop, Newport, Oregon, February 4-6, 1992. Seattle, WA: Natural Resources Consultants. McCoy, M., H. Ishihara. 1999. The Socioeconomic Importance of Sharks in the U.S. Flag Areas of the Western and Central Pacific. Gillett, Preston and Associates, Inc., Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, and U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Region Administrative Report AR-SWR-00-01, La Jolla, CA, USA. 117 pp. Megalofonou P., Yannopoulos C., Damalas D., De Metrio G., Deflorio M., de la Serna J.M., Macias D., 2005. Incidental catch and estimated discards of pelagic sharks from the swordfish and tuna fisheries in the Mediterranean Sea. Fish. Bull., 103 (4): 620-634. Murray, K.T., Read, A.J., and Solow, A.R. 2000. The use of time/area closures to reduce bycatches of harbour porpoises: lessons from the Gulf of Maine sink gillnet fishery. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 2: 135-141. Musick, J.A. 2005. Introduction. Pp. 1-3 IN Fowler, S., Cavanagh, R., Camhi, M., Burgess, G., Cailliet, G., Fordham, S., Simpfendorfer, C., Musick, J. (Eds.). Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras: The Status of the Chondrichthyan Fishes. IUCN, the World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland. X + 461 pp. Musick, J.A., Burgess, G.H., Camhi, M., Cailliet, G., Fordham, S. 2000. Management of sharks and their relatives (Elasmobranchii). Fisheries 25(3): 9-13. Nakano, H. and S. Clarke. 2006. Filtering method for obtaining stock indices by shark species from species-combined logbook data in tuna longline fisheries. Fisheries Science 72: 322-332. 34
References Neves dos Santos, M., Garcia, A., Pereira, J.G. 2001. A Historical Review of the By-Catch from the Portuguese Surface Long-Line Swordfish Fishery: Observations on Blue Shark (Prionace glauca) and Short-Fin Mako (Isurus oxyrinchus). International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. ICCAT Collective Volume of Scientific Papers, 54: 1333-1340. PROMPEX, Comision para la Promocion de Exportaciones. On-line information. May 2006. www.prompex.gob.pe. Rago, PJ, KA Sosebee, JKT Brodziak, SA Murawski, ED Anderson. 1998. Implications of recent increases in catches on the dynamics of northeast Atlantic spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias). Fish. Res. 39(2): 165-181. Rey, J.C., Munoz-Chapuli, R. 1991. Relation between hook depth and fish efficiency in surface longline gear. Fishery Bulletin 89(4): 729-732. Reyes, J.C., 1993. Reintroduction of Longlines in the Peruvian Shark Fishery: An Alternative to Reduce Small Cetacean Mortality. Final report for the Cetacean Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources IUCN, and the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society WCS. 30 pp. Ripley, WE. 1946. The soupfin shark and the fishery. California Department of Fish and Game Fisheries Bulletin 64: 7-37. Rose, C., and McLaughlin, K. (2001) Review of shark finning in Australian fisheries, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, Australia Sarmiento, C. 2004. Assessing market transfer effects generated by court rulings in the Hawai’i longline fishery. Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. Sciarrotta, T.C., Nelson, D.N. 1977. Diel behavior of the blue shark, Prionace glauca, near Santa Catalina Island, Californa. Fisheries Bulletin, 75: 519-528. Shotton, R. 1999. Species Identification Practices of Countries Reported Landings of Chnodrichthyan Fishes in the FAO Nominal Catches and Landings Database. Pp. 904-920 IN SHotton, R. (Ed.). Case Studies of the Management of Elasmobranch Fisheries FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 378, Part 2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Simpfendorfer, C.A., R.E. Hueter, U. Bergman, and S.M.H. Connett. 2002. Results of a fishery-independent survey for pelagic sharks in the western North Atlantic, 1977-1994. Fish. Res. 55: 175-192. Sisneros, J.A., and D.R. Nelson. 2001. Surfactants as chemical repellants: past, present, and future. Env. Biol. Fish. 60: 117-129. Smith, S.E., Au, D., Snow, C. 1998. Intrinsic rebound potentials of 26 species of Pacific sharks. Mar. Freshw. Res. 49: 663-678. Smith Jr., L.J. 1991. The effectiveness of sodium lauryl sulphate as a shark repellent in a laboratory test situation. Journal of Fish Biology 38 (1): 105–113. Stevens, J.D., Walker, T., Cook, S., Fordham, S. 2005. Threats faced by Chondrichthyan Fish. Pp. 48-57 IN Fowler, S., Cavanagh, R., Camhi, M., Burgess, G., Cailliet, G., Fordham, S., Simpfendorfer, C., Musick, J. (Eds.). Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras: The Status of the Chondrichthyan Fishes. IUCN, the World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland. X + 461 pp. Stone, H.H., Dixon, L.K. 2001. A comparison of catches of swordfish, Xiphias gladius, and other pelagic species from Canadian longline gear configured with alternating monofilament and multifilament nylon gangions. Fish. Bull. 99: 210-216. Strasburg, D., W. 1958. Distribution, abundance, and habits of pelagic sharks in the Central Pacific Ocean. U.S. Fishery Bulletin 138: 335-361. Swamy, K. 1999. Shark Fisheries in Fiji: Their Management and Issues for Future Concern. IN FAO. Case Studies of the Management of Elasmobranch Fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper,No. 378, part 1, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. U.S. Congress. 2000. Shark Finning Prohibition Act. 16 USC 1822, Public Law 106-557. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2001. Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion: Authorization of Pelagic Fisheries under the Fishery Management Plan for the Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2002. Fisheries off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Implementation of the Shark Finning Prohibition Act. Federal Register 67(28): 6194-6202. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2005. 2005 Report to Congress Pursuant to the Shark Finning Prohibition Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-557). U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 52 pp. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2001. United States National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks. National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, MD, USA, 89 pp. Ward, P., Meyers, R.A. 2005. Shifts in open-ocean fish communities coinciding with the commencement of commercial fishing. Ecology 86: 835-847. Watson, J., Foster, D., Epperly, S., Shah, A. 2005. Fishing methods to reduce sea turtle mortality associated with pelagic longlines. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62. Wessells, C., Johnston, R., and Donath, H. 1999. Assessing consumer preferences for ecolabeled seafood: the influence of species, certifier, and household attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(5): 1084-1089. Williams, P.G. 1997. Shark and Related Species Catch in Tuna Fisheries of the Tropical Western and Central Pacific Ocean. Prepared for the Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations for the 23-27 April 1998 meeting of the Technical Working Group on Sharks. Noumea, New Caledonia: South Pacific Commission, 22 pp. Yokota, K., H. Minami and M. Kiyota. 2006a. Measurement-points examination of circle hooks for pelagic longline fishery to evaluate effects of hook design. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Agency 17: 83-102. Yokota, K., M. Kiyota and H. Minami. 2006b. Shark catch in a pelagic longline fishery: Comparison of circle and tuna hooks. Fisheries Research 81: 337- 341. Stevens, J. 2002. A Review of Australian Elasmobranch Fisheries. Pp. 122- 126 IN Fowler, S., Reed, T., Dipper, F. (Eds.). Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management. IUCN, Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland. 35
Page 3 and 4: Shark Depredation and Unwanted Byca
Page 5: Shark Depredation and Unwanted Byca
Page 9 and 10: Contents Summary and Conclusions 1
Page 11 and 12: Contents Appendix 3. Fiji Pelagic L
Page 13: Contents Appendix 8. USA Hawaii Lon
Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1 Introduction and Methods
Page 21 and 22: Introduction and Methods 1.2. Metho
Page 23 and 24: Fishing Gear and Operational Charac
Page 25 and 26: Fishing Gear and Operational Charac
Page 27 and 28: Shark Catch Rates and Disposition T
Page 29 and 30: Chapter 4 National and Internationa
Page 31 and 32: National and International Measures
Page 33 and 34: Economic, Practical, Ecological and
Page 35 and 36: Economic, Practical, Ecological and
Page 37 and 38: Chapter 6 Industry Attitudes and Pr
Page 39 and 40: Industry Attitudes and Practices Lo
Page 41 and 42: Industry Attitudes and Practices Fi
Page 43 and 44: Chapter 7 Potential of Deterrents,
Page 45 and 46: Potential of Deterrents, Hotspot Av
Page 47: References Campana, S.E., L. Marks,
Page 99 and 100:
Appendix 5 Japan Pelagic Longline F
Page 101 and 102:
Japan Pelagic Longline Fisheries Fi
Page 103 and 104:
Japan Pelagic Longline Fisheries mo
Page 105 and 106:
Japan Pelagic Longline Fisheries Ta
Page 107 and 108:
Japan Pelagic Longline Fisheries is
Page 109 and 110:
Japan Pelagic Longline Fisheries ta
Page 111 and 112:
Japan Pelagic Longline Fisheries In
Page 113 and 114:
Japan Pelagic Longline Fisheries A5
Page 115 and 116:
Appendix 6 Peru Artisanal Mahimahi
Page 117 and 118:
Peru Artisanal Mahimahi And Shark L
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Appendix 7 South Africa Pelagic Lon
Page 129 and 130:
South Africa Pelagic Longline Tuna
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Appendix 8 USA Hawaii-based Pelagic
Page 137 and 138:
USA Hawaii-based Pelagic Longline S
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Appendix 9 USA Atlantic, Gulf of Me
Page 149 and 150:
USA Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico and Ca
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
show all

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?