Integrating MEG, EEG and fMRI data

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Passive listening to sounds from different locations (example of simple superposition and of dipole seeding) MEG allowed identification of a bilateral activation in the Heschl’s gyrus, but no reliable localizations for the superior temporal gyrus and the supramarginal gyrus were obtained (sources too close) The last two areas were identified by constraining the sources in a cube with 4 mm side centered in the corresponding fMRI activation.
Passive listening to sounds from different locations (time course results) MEG permitted identification of the time sequence of activation for the three sources: 1.Heschl’s gyrus (m. latency 138 ms) 2.superior temporal gyrus (156 ms) 3.supramarginal gyrus (162 ms) thus suggesting a hierarchical structure for the processing of sound localization features
Page 1 and 2: MEG/EEG Brain Mapping Course HBM200
Page 3 and 4: MEG and fMRI equipment at ITAB - Un
Page 5 and 6: fMRI - MEG (EEG) relationship fMRI
Page 7 and 8: Basic methods
Page 9 and 10: How can we integrate MEG, EEG, and
Page 15 and 16: Integration of fMRI-EEG (MRP) with
Page 17 and 18: Exp.1 - Effect of stimulus intensit
Page 19 and 20: Exp.2 - identification of anterior
Page 21 and 22: Results • Evidence for a spatial
Page 23 and 24: Identification of anterior and post
Page 25 and 26: Results Mean Latencies ms 90 88 86
Page 27: Passive listening to sounds from di
Page 31 and 32: A MEG coherence study on the same g
Page 33 and 34: Pyramidal neurons: only 1% of these
Page 35 and 36: Neural plasticity after stroke MEG

Integrating MEG, EEG and fMRI data

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?