14.02.2014 Views

2009 PROCEEDINGS - Public Relations Society of America

2009 PROCEEDINGS - Public Relations Society of America

2009 PROCEEDINGS - Public Relations Society of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RQ 3: To what extent are the types investing information sought associated with<br />

the sources <strong>of</strong> information individual investors prefer?<br />

RQ 4: To what extent are the qualities <strong>of</strong> investing information sought associated<br />

with the sources <strong>of</strong> information individual investors prefer?<br />

From these research questions and the literature, three hypotheses have been<br />

derived for subsequent testing.<br />

H1: The more that individual investors seek details about a company’s products<br />

and management, the more likely they will consider information from a company<br />

to be useful (as opposed to news media and individual sources).<br />

H2: The more that individual investors seek investing information that has a<br />

comprehensive quality, the more <strong>of</strong>ten they will consider information from<br />

corporate information sources to be useful.<br />

It is generally expected that the third-party objectivity <strong>of</strong> the news media would<br />

make them a more preferred source than corporate public relations materials. However, it<br />

is plausible that the angle <strong>of</strong> a news media story may be narrowly focused on one type <strong>of</strong><br />

information and that corporate communications provides more sought-after detail and<br />

other types <strong>of</strong> information. This is likely especially true for investors, for whom a focus<br />

on one particular type <strong>of</strong> content, e.g. financial performance, does not satisfy their<br />

interest in other types <strong>of</strong> information, such as corporate reputation and details about<br />

products and management mentioned above. Previous research has shown that investors<br />

prefer to educate themselves using a variety <strong>of</strong> information (Mezick, 2001), which<br />

specifically suggests H1. Furthermore, recent research has shown that individual<br />

investors behave rationally and seek to exploit private information when buying stock<br />

(Kaniel et al., 2008). Gaining a unique insight to exploit would necessarily require<br />

information more comprehensive than what is commonly available in mainstream and<br />

business news media, and this information is best available from an individual company,<br />

which suggests H2. Neither Mezick nor Kaniel et. al. explored where investors got their<br />

information, which is the contribution <strong>of</strong> this study.<br />

H3: The more <strong>of</strong>ten individual investors seek investing information with the<br />

qualities <strong>of</strong> being objective, credible, timely, easy to access, and brief/relevant,<br />

the more <strong>of</strong>ten they will consider information from a media information source to<br />

be useful.<br />

One form <strong>of</strong> variance among individual investors is their investing strategy or the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> effort they put into the task. In other words, some investors are more actively<br />

engaged in seeking information, studying opportunities, and making stock purchases than<br />

others. Cameron (1992) tested the situational theory <strong>of</strong> publics—which segments active<br />

and passive publics—in an investor relations context and found that “investors”<br />

(undergraduates were subjects) who were more active and involved subjects processed<br />

information more actively. While Cameron was interested in recall and recognition<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!