Agenda, 28.9MB - Town of Georgina

1. MOMENT OF MEDITATION:
2. ROLL CALL:
THE CORPORATION OF THE
TOWN OF GEORGINA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
Monday, June 17, 2013
(9:00 a.m.)
3. COMMUNITY SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS:
4. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM ITEMS AND DEPUTATIONS:
5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
6. DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST:
7. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES:
Pages 1-13
7.1 Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting held on June 3, 2013.
8. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES:
9. DETERMINATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION:
10. ADOPTION OF ITEMS NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION:
10.1 Matters not subject to individual conflicts
10.2 Matters subject to individual conflicts
11. DEPUTATIONS: None.
12. PRESENTATIONS:
12.1 Paul Zamodits from Bousfields Inc. presenting the Urban and Architectural Design
Guidelines on behalf of Greengate Village Limited.
(Advisement: to be heard in conjunction with Report No. PB-2013-0054, Item No. 17.3.1 of this agenda)

June 17, 2013 A (COW) 2 2013-06-17
12. PRESENTATIONS cont’d:
12.2 Doug Leitch, President of Georgina Green Energy Cooperative (GGEC), updating
Council on its progress in bring renewable energy to Georgina.
12.3 Rebecca Mathewson, Director of Administrative Services and Treasurer,
presenting the Audited 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements of the
Corporation.
(Advisement: Refer to Report No. DAS-2013-0024, Item No. 17.6.5 of this agenda)
13. CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION:
14. PUBLIC MEETINGS: None.
15. COMMUNICATIONS:
15.1 Matters for Routine:
Page 14
15.1.1 Routine Correspondence
(Advisement: please advise the Town Clerk prior to the meeting if you would like an item
discussed, so that it can be made available at the meeting)
15.2 Matters for Disposition:
Pages 15-16
15.2.1 Downtown Sutton Merchant’s Association requesting permission to
temporarily close Market Square during the “Festival On High” event
on Saturday, July 27 th from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Pages 17-18
15.2.2 The Greater Toronto CivicAction Alliance (CivicAction) requesting
Council support a better regional transportation system and
sustainable ways to pay for it.
Pages 19-21
15.2.3 North Middlesex requesting support and endorsement of its position
to not be a willing host community for Industrial Wind Turbine
Projects.
(Advisement: Removed from the Routine Correspondence Listing on the May 21 st Committee of
the Whole agenda for Council consideration)
Page 22
15.2.4 Holly Morgan and Tyler Bristow requesting an exemption from the
Noise By-law during their engagement party at 342 Hollywood Drive
on Saturday, June 22 nd .

June 17, 2013 A (COW) 3 2013-06-17
15. COMMUNICATIONS cont’d:
Page 23
15.2.5 North Gwillimbury Forest Alliance offering to meet to discuss an
exchange of development approvals to protect the forest and permit
Metrus to build in an appropriate location.
16. PETITIONS:
(Advisement: Referred to Director of Planning and Building’s report scheduled for June 24, 2013)
Page 24
15.2.6 BDO Canada LLP, Chartered Accountants, letter to Town
management regarding the audit of the Town’s financial statements
for the 2012 fiscal year.
(Advisement: Draft pending Council’s adoption of the financial statements)
Pages 25-28
15.2.7 BDO Canada LLP, Chartered Accountants, concerning its audit of
the financial statements of the Georgina Public Library Board for the
2012 fiscal year.
(Advisement: at the request of the Treasurer, BDO has authorized the publication of this
correspondence on the public agenda. Draft pending Council’s adoption of the financial
statements)
Pages 29-33
15.2.8 BDO Canada LLP, Chartered Accountants, concerning its audit of
the consolidated financial statements of the Town of Georgina for the
2012 fiscal year.
(Advisement: at the request of the Treasurer, BDO has authorized the publication of this
correspondence on the public agenda. Draft pending Council’s adoption of the financial
statements)
Page 34
15.2.9 Kathleen Wynne, Premier of Ontario, acknowledging receipt of
correspondence from the Town of Georgina advising her office of the
interest arbitration award for the Georgina Professional Fire Fighter’s
Association.
17. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND STAFF REPORTS:
17.1 Report from the Economic Development Division:
Pages 35-36
17.1.1 Approval of Grant Funding and a Request to Fill a Vacancy on the
Economic Development Committee
Report No. ED-2013-0014

June 17, 2013 A (COW) 4 2013-06-17
17. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND STAFF REPORTS cont’d:
Recommendation:
A. That Report ED-2013-0014 prepared by the Economic Development
and Tourism Division, dated June 17, 2013 regarding the approval of
a grant application and a request to fill a vacancy on the Economic
Development Committee be received.
B. That Council approve the disbursement of the following grant:
Downtown Sutton Merchants Association $1,750.00
C. That the Town Clerk commence the process to fill the vacancy on
the Economic Development Committee for the balance of the
2010-2014 term of office and; that such individual be selected from
the general public.
17.2 Report from the Recreation and Culture Department:
Pages 37-38
17.2.1 2013 Special Olympics Ontario Summer Games Update
Report No. RC-2013-0024
Recommendation:
1. That Report RC-2013-0024 presented on June 17, 2013 regarding
2013 Special Olympics Ontario Summer Games Update be received.
17.3 Reports from the Planning and Building Department:
Pages 39-84
17.3.1 Request for Approval of Urban and Architectural Design Guidelines
for Draft Plan of Subdivision
19T-04G03 – Lowndes Avenue, Keswick
Part Lot 6, Concession 3 (NG)
Landowner; Greengate Village Limited
Report No. PB-2013-0054
Recommendation:
A. That Report PB-2013-0054 prepared by the Planning Division dated
June 17, 2013 respecting a request for approval of Urban and
Architectural Design Guidelines for the Greengate Village Limited
Subdivision located on Lowndes Avenue be received.
B. That the Urban and Architectural Design Guidelines dated May, 2013
prepared by Bousfields Inc. in order to satisfy conditions 17 through
19 of draft Plan 19T-04G03, be approved.
(Advisement: to be heard in conjunction with Item No. 12.1 of this agenda)

June 17, 2013 A (COW) 5 2013-06-17
17. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND STAFF REPORTS cont’d:
Pages 85-152
17.3.2 Extension of Draft Plan Approval
Draft Plan of Subdivision 19T-07G01
Draft Plan of Condominium 19CDN-07G02
1084466 Ontario Ltd. (c/o A&T Homes)
PB-2013-0055
Recommendation:
A. That Report PB-2013-0055 prepared by the Planning Division dated
June 17, 2013 respecting a request for extension of Draft Plan
Approval submitted by 1084466 Ontario Ltd. for a 16 unit Plan of
Subdivision and Plan of Condominium located at the intersection of
High Street and Burke Street in Sutton be received.
B. That pursuant to Section 51(33) of The Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990,
c.p.13, as amended, an extension to the approval of Draft Plan of
Subdivision 19T-07G01 and Draft Plan of Condominium
19CDM-07G02 be granted to July 15, 2014.
C. That pursuant to Section 51(44) of The Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990,
c.p.13, as amended, the lapsing provision applied to the conditions
of draft plan approval for both the Plan of Subdivision and the Plan
of Condominium be amended to read “pursuant to The Planning Act,
R.S.O., 1990, c.p.13, as amended, approval of this Plan of
Subdivision and Plan of Condominium shall lapse if final approval
for registration has not been given by July 15, 2014, unless approval
has been sooner withdrawn or the Town of Georgina has extended
the duration of the approval.”
D. That pursuant to Section 51(44) of The Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990,
c.p.13, as amended, Council approve the revised conditions of draft
plan approval applied to draft Plan of Subdivision 19T-07G01 and
Draft Plan of Condominium 19CDM-07G02, attached as Schedule ‘11’
to Report PB-2013-0055.
E. That pursuant to Section 51(47) of The Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990,
c.p.13, as amended, written notice shall not be given as the changes
to the conditions of draft plan approval as noted in D. above are
considered to be minor.
F. That the removal of lands described as Lots 1 and 2, and Block 7
(site triangle) from the draft approved Plan of Subdivision 19T-07G01
and Draft Plan of Condominium 19CDM-07G02, as a redline revision
thereto, be approved.
G. That planning staff forward the revised conditions of draft plan
approval to the applicant, its agent, the York Region Director of the
Community Planning Branch of the Transportation and Community
Planning Department, and to all other agencies which have imposed
their respective conditions of approval.

June 17, 2013 A (COW) 6 2013-06-17
17. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND STAFF REPORTS cont’d:
Pages 153-166
17.3.3 Application for Deeming By-law Approval
Anatoly & Irina Ber
Lots 22 & 23, Plan 205
848 Crescent Beach Road, Crescent Beach
Report No. PB-2013-0056
Recommendation:
A. That Report PB-2013-0056 prepared by the Planning Division dated
June 17, 2013 respecting an application for Deeming By-law
submitted by Anatoly & Irina Ber, as it affects Lots 22 & 23, Plan 205,
be received.
B. That Council approve the application submitted by Anatoly & Irina
Ber to Deem lots 22 & 23, Plan 205 not to be lots on a Registered
Plan of Subdivision for the purposes of Section 50(3) and in
accordance with Section 50(4) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990.
17.4 Reports from the Operations and Engineering Department:
17.4.1 Award of Tender Contract OED-2013-025
Asphalt Resurfacing, Road Improvements and an Overlay of The
ROC Parking Lot
Report No. OED-2013-0024
(Advisement: Report to follow under separate cover)
Pages 167-170
17.4.2 Reduction in Speed Limit
Old Shiloh Road
Report No. OED-2013-0032
Recommendation:
1. That Report No. OED-2013-0032 dated June 17, 2013 with respect to
the reduction in speed limit on Old Shiloh Road be received for
information.
2. That a by-law be passed to amend the Traffic By-law to establish a 60
kilometre per hour speed zone on Old Shiloh Road from Victoria
Street West to Bridge No. 4.

June 17, 2013 A (COW) 7 2013-06-17
17. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND STAFF REPORTS cont’d:
17.5 Report from the Emergency Services Department:
Pages 171-172
17.5.1 Clarification of Council Direction on Resolution No. CW-2013-0116
Report No. DES-2013-0005
Recommendation:
1. That Report No. DES-2013-0005 prepared by the Emergency
Services Department dated June 17, 2013 respecting clarification of
Council direction on Resolution No. CW-2013-0116 be received; and
2. That Council provide clarification of staff direction on Report
DES-2013-003 ‘Regional Fire Consolidation’
17.6 Reports from the Administrative Services Department:
Pages 173-185
17.6.1 2012 Audited Financial Statements of the Georgina Public Library
Board
Report No. DAS-2013-0019
Recommendation:
1. That Report No. DAS-2013-0019 dated June 17 th , 2013 regarding the
2012 Audited Financial Statements of the Georgina Public Library
Board be received.
2. That Council adopt the Audited Financial Statements of the
Georgina Public Library Board for the 2012 fiscal year.
Pages 186-191
17.6.2 2012 Audited Financial Statements of the Town of Georgina Trust
Funds
Report No. DAS-2013-0021
Recommendation:
1. That Report No. DAS-2013-0021 dated June 17 th , 2013 regarding the
2012 Audited Financial Statements of the Town of Georgina Trust
Funds be received; and
2. That Council adopt the Audited Financial Statements of the Town of
Georgina Trust Funds for the 2012 fiscal year.

June 17, 2013 A (COW) 8 2013-06-17
17. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND STAFF REPORTS cont’d:
Pages 192-199
17.6.3 2012 Audited Financial Statements of the Briar Hill Cemetery Board
Report No. DAS-2013-0022
Recommendation:
1. That Report No. DAS-2013-0022 dated June 17 th , 2013 regarding the
2012 Audited Financial Statements of the Briar Hill Cemetery Board
be received.
2. That Council adopt the Audited Financial Statements of the Briar Hill
Cemetery Board for the 2012 fiscal year.
Pages 200-219
17.6.4 2012 Financial Statements of the Georgina Boards and Committees
(unaudited)
Report No. DAS-2013-0023
Recommendation:
1. That Council receive Report No. DAS-2013-0023 dated June 17 th ,
2013 regarding the 2012 Financial Statements of the Town of
Georgina Boards and Committees (unaudited); and
2. That Council adopt the financial statements (unaudited) for the 2012
fiscal year for each of the following boards and committees:
• Belhaven Community Hall Board (attachment #1)
• Egypt Community Hall Board (attachment #2)
• Port Bolster Community Hall Board (attachment #3)
• Udora Community Hall Board (attachment #4)
• Cooke’s Cemetery Board (attachment #5)
• Keswick Cemetery Board (attachment #6).
Pages 220-253
17.6.5 Audited 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation
of the Town of Georgina
Report No. DAS-2013-0024
Recommendation:
1. That Report No. DAS-2013-0024 regarding the Audited 2012
Consolidated Financial Statements be received.

June 17, 2013 A (COW) 9 2013-06-17
17. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND STAFF REPORTS cont’d:
2. That Council adopt the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
of the Corporation of the Town of Georgina for the 2012 fiscal year
(attached).
(Advisement: Refer to Item No. 12.3, presentation by Rebecca Mathewson, Director of
Administrative Services and Treasurer)
Pages 254-263
17.6.6 Proposed Council/Committee Structure and Procedural By-law
Update
Report No. DAS-2013-0025
Recommendation:
1. That Report No. DAS-2013-0025 dated June 17, 2013 entitled
Proposed Council/Committee Structure and Procedural By-law
Update be received by Council;
2. That Council authorize staff to proceed towards implementation of a
hybrid Council/Committee meeting structure with an implementation
target of Fall 2013;
3. That Council authorize staff to prepare and present for
consideration, an updated procedural by-law;
4. That Council authorize staff to notify the public of intent to
implement changes, receive public comments and report same for
Council consideration before implementation.
17.7 Report from the Chief Administrative Officer:
Pages 264-266
17.7.1 Branding Public Engagement
Report No. CAO-2013-0012
Recommendation:
A. That Report CAO-2013-0012 prepared by the Communications and
Economic Development Divisions and dated June 17, 2013,
respecting an opportunity for additional public consultation and
input into the branding strategy be received.
B. That Council direct staff to hold three (3) design charrettes with
members of the public to create logo concepts and advertise these
charrettes through all available means, including outreach to local
organizations.
C. That staff report to Council with the outcomes of the design
charrettes.

June 17, 2013 A (COW) 10 2013-06-17
17. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND STAFF REPORTS cont’d:
D. That Council direct staff and the design consultant, subsequent to
the design charrettes and reporting to Council, to hold two (2) focus
groups to review the publicly-created designs and the top three
consultant-generated designs with the goal of identifying the top six
(6) logo designs and advertise these focus groups through all
available means.
E. That upon conclusion of focus groups, the consultant be directed to
prepare the top six (6) designs as determined by the focus groups
for consideration by Council and the subsequent street and online
testing (web survey).
F. That staff report to Council with the test results.
18. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
19. REGIONAL BUSINESS:
20. MOTIONS:
21. NOTICES OF MOTION:
22. OTHER BUSINESS:
23. RECESS COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AND RESOLVE INTO CLOSED SESSION:
Be it resolved that the Committee of the Whole Meeting recess at this time and move into
a closed session pursuant to Section 239 of The Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, to
consider:
I) A PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF LAND BY
THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD – SECTION 239 (2) (c), MA
- Offer of donated land
II)
ADVICE THAT IS SUBJECT TO SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, INCLUDING
COMMUNICATIONS NECESSARY FOR THAT PURPOSE – SECTION 239 (2)
(F), MA
- Consideration of Interim Control By-law – Udora
24. RISE AND REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION:
25. ADJOURNMENT:

1
THE CORPORATION OF THE
TOWN OF GEORGINA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
MINUTES
Monday, June 3, 2013
(9:07a.m.)
Staff in attendance:
Winanne Grant, Chief Administrative Officer
Steve Richardson, Director of Emergency Services/Fire Chief
Robin McDougall, Director of Recreation and Culture
Harold Lenters, Director of Planning and Building
Mary Baxter, Director of
Karyn Stone, Economic Development Officer
Kelan Jylha, Business Retention and Expansion Coordinator
Dan Murnaghan, Manager of Parks and Facilities
Laura Diotte, Senior Planner- Policy
Brian Jordan, Purchasing Manager
Phil Rose-Donahoe, Manager of Culture
Jordan Redshaw, Communications Coodinator
Yvonne Aubichon, Town Clerk
Carolyn Lance, Council Services Coordinator
Others
Karen Wolfe, Pefferlaw Post
Doug MacMillan, President, The Letter M
1. MOMENT OF MEDITATION:
A moment of meditation was observed.
2. ROLL CALL:
The Town Clerk gave the roll call and the following Committee Members were present:
Mayor Grossi
Councillor Davison
Councillor Szollosy
Regional Councillor Wheeler
Councillor Hackenbrook
Regrets:
Councillor Craig
Councillor Smockum

2
June 3, 2013 M (COW) 2 2013-06-03
3. COMMUNITY SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS:
The Committee Members were advised of a number of community events taking place.
4. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM ITEMS AND DEPUTATIONS:
4.1 Item ·17.6.5 was removed from the agenda
5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Moved by Councillor Davison, Seconded by Councillor Szollosy
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0127
That the agenda, with the following addendum item, be approved:
5.1 Item 17.6.5 was removed from the agenda
Carried.
6. DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST: None.
7. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES:
Moved by Councillor Szollosy, Seconded by Regional Councillor Wheeler
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0128
That the following minutes be adopted as presented;
Committee of the Whole Meeting held on May 21, 2013.
Carried.
8. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES: None.
9. DETERMINATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION:
The following items were identified for separate discussion:
15.2,
17.3. 1,
17.4.1,
17.5. 1,
17.6. 1,
various matters for disposition
Report No. Official Plan Review Consultant Selection Committee'
Report No. RC-2013-0020 entitled 'Former Sutton Public School Project
Coordinator Funding Approval'
Report No. CA0-2013-0010 entitled 'Branding Report on Initial Evaluation'
Report No. OED-2013-0026 entitl3ed 'Olympia Leveling System'

3
June 3, 2013 M (COW) 3 2013-06-03
9. DETERMINATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION cont'd:
17.6.2,
17.6.3,
17.6.4,
Report No. OED-2013-0028 entitled 'Georgina Safe Streets Committee,
Amendments to Terms of Reference and Step 2 Initiatives - Local
Improvements'
Report No. OED-2013-0029 entitled 'Beach Volleyball Court Sand for The
ROC'
Report No. OED-2013-0030 entitled 'Portable Toilet Rentals and Servicing'
10. AGOPTION OF HEMS NOT REQbJI.RING SEPARATE QISGYSSIGN:
10.1 Matters not subject to individual conflicts
Moved by Councillor Hackenbrook, Seconded by Councillor Szollosy
That the following recommendations respecting the matters listed as 'Items Not Requiring
Separate Discussion' be adopted as submitted to Council and staff be authorized to take
all necessary action required to give effect to same:
Routine:
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0129
That the Routine Correspondence be received, as listed;
i) Keswick Cemetery Board Minutes of April 11, 2013
ii) Ministry of Ontario News Release respecting the government's commitment to
extend Highway 427 to Major Mackenzie Drive, connecting communities and
supporting thousands of jobs throughout York Region.
iii) AMO Communications Watch File respecting various issues including;
a) Bill 73, Fair and Open Tendering Act, 2013,
b) Cost Allocation Policy for Unmetered Loads,
c) Proposed regulation for Landfill Gas Power Generating Facilities,
d) AMO's Personal Responsibilities Workshop,
e) Heads of Council Training,
f) Zero Waste
Reports:
17.1.1 Jackson's Point Village Association- Business Improvement Area­
Appointment to the Board of Management
Report No. ED-2013-0011

4
June 3, 2013 M (COW) 4 2013-06-03
10. ADOPTION OF ITEMS NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION cont'd:
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0130
A. That Report ED-2013-0011 prepared by the Economic Development and Tourism
Division and dated June 3, 2013 respecting the appointment of the Board of
Management for the Jackson's Point Village Association be received.
B. That the following individuals be appointed to the Board of Management for the
Jackson's Point Villa§e Asseeiatien:
Helen Antonopoulos
Haroon Latif
C. That the by-Jaw attached as Schedule '1' be adopted by Council.
17.2.1 Funding for Ladies of the Lake 2013 Splash Festival
Report No. DAS-2013-0020
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0131
1. That Council receive Report No. DAS-2013-0020 dated June 3'd, 2013 regarding
funding for Ladies of the Lake 2013 Splash Festival.
2. That Council authorize the Treasurer to draw $20,000 from Town's reserve for
green initiatives to fund the approved grant for the Splash Festival in 2013.
Carried.
10.2 Matters subject to individual conflicts: None
11. DEPUTATIONS: None.
12. PRESENTATIONS None.
14. PUBLIC MEETINGS: None.

5
June 3, 2013 M (COW) 5 2013-06-03
13. CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION cont'd:
17. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND STAFF REPORTS cont'd:
17.3 Report from the Planning and Building Department:
17.3.1 Official Plan Review Consultant Selection Committee
Report No. PB-2013-0053
Moved by Councillor Szollosy, Seconded by Councillor Davison
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0132
A. That Report PB-2013-0053 prepared by the Planning Division dated June 3, 2013
respecting the Official Plan Review Consultant Selection Committee be received.
B. That Regional Councillor Wheeler, Councillor Davison and Councillor Smockum
be appointed to participate in the interview process for the selection of the retained
consultant(s) to undertake the Official Plan Review.
Carried.
17.4 Report from the Recreation and Culture Department:
17.4.1 Former Sutton Public School Project Coordinator Funding Approval
Report No. RC-2013-0020
Moved by Regional Councillor Wheeler, Seconded by Councillor Szollosy
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0133
1. That Report RC-2013-0020 prepared by the Recreation and Culture Department
dated June 3, 2013 respecting the former Sutton Public School Project Coordinator
Funding Approval be received
2. That Mayor and Council approve the expenditure of $15,365.25 from the Sutton
Youth Centre reserve to match funds received from Southlake Community Futures
Development Corporation pending grant application approval
Carried.

6
June 3, 2013 !\.~ (CQ\f\1) 6 2013-06-03
13. CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION cont'd
17. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND STAFF REPORTS cont'd:
17.6.2 Georgina Safe Streets Committee
Amendments to Terms of Reference and Step 2 Initiatives - Local
Improvements
Report No. OED-2013-0028
Moved by Councillor Szollosy, Seconded by Councillor Davison
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0133
That Report No. OED-2013-0028 dated June 3'd, 2013 respecting amendments to the
Terms of Reference of the Georgina Safe Streets Committee, and Step 2 Initiatives -
Local Improvements Policy, be referred back to staff to make the requested changes to
the Terms of Reference and the Policy for Council's reconsideration.
Carried.
17.6 Reports from the Operations and Engineering Department:
17.6.1 Olympia Leveling System
Report No. OED-2013-0026
Moved by Councillor Szollosy, Seconded by Councillor Hackenbrook
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0134
1. That Report No. OED-2013-0026 dated June 3, 2012, respecting the purchase of
the Olympia Leveling System from Resurfice Corporation, be received.
2. That Council approve the purchase of the Olympia Leveling System from Resurfice
Corporation as they are currently the sole source provider for this item.
3. That Council authorize the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order to
Resurface Corporation accordingly.
Carried.

7
June 3, 2013 M (COW) 7 2013-06-03
13. CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION cont'd:
17. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND STAFF REPORTS cont'd:
17.6.3 Beach Volleyball Court Sand for The ROC
Report No. OED-2013-0029
Moved by Councillor Szollosy, Seconded by Regional Councillor Wheeler
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0135
1. That Report No. OED-2013-0029 dated June 3, 2013, respecting the purchase of
Beach Volleyball Court Sand for The ROC from Hutcheson Sand and Mixes as per
Tender OED2013-026 be received.
2. That Council approve the purchase of Beach Volleyball Court Sand for The ROC
from Hutcheson Sand and Mixes as per Tender OED2013-026.
3. That Council authorize the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order according
to the terms and conditions of Tender OED2013-026.
Carried.
17.6.4 Portable Toilet Rentals and Servicing
Report No. OED-2013-0030
Moved by Councillor Szollosy, Seconded by Councillor Davison
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0136
1. That Report No. OED-2013-0030 dated June 3, 2013 regarding Portable Toilet
Rentals and Services be received.
2. That Council approve the acceptance of Portable Toilet Rentals Inc. as the
provider of the rental, delivery and servicing of portable toilets based on terms and
conditions of RFP OED2013-022.
3. That Council authorize the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order according
to Proposal OED2013-022.
Carried.
The Chief Administrative Officer was requested to review the current policy for tender
circulation with staff and determine if there may be other opportunities to expand the
coverage of tenders to the public.

8
June 3, 2013 M (COW) 8 2013-06-03
13. CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION cont'd:
17. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND STAFF REPORTS cont'd:
17.5 Report from the Chief Administrative Officer:
17.5.1 Branding Report on Initial Evaluation
Report No. CA0-2013-0010
Moved by Councillor Szollosy, Seconded by Councillor Davison
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0137
That Report CA0-2013-0010 prepared by the Communications Division and dated June
3, 2013, respecting Branding Report on Initial Evaluation be received and referred back to
staff for further discussion and report.
Carried.
15. COMMUNICATIONS:
15.2 Matters for Disposition:
15.2.1 Ministry of Infrastructure advising of an anticipated opening of the
Highway 404 extension to Ravenshoe Road in fall of 2014.
Moved by Councillor Szollosy, Seconded by Councillor Wheeler
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0138
That correspondence from the Ministry of Infrastructure advising of an anticipated
opening of the Highway 404 extension to Ravenshoe Road in fall of 2014 be received.
Carried.
15.2.2 2014 Election Committee recommending that voting count tabulators
be used for the 2014 election and that staff be authorized to issue a
tender for this purpose.

9
June 3, 2013 M (COW) 9 2013-06-03
13. CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION cont'd:
15. COMMUNICATIONS cont'd:
Moved by Councillor Davison, Seconded by Regional Councillor Wheeler
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0139
That correspondence from the 2014 Election Committee recommending that voting count
ta.Q[JJ

10
June 3, 2013 M (COW) 10 2013-06-03
20. MOTIONS: None.
21. NOTICES OF MOTION: None.
22. OTHER BUSINESS: None.
23. RECESS COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AND RESOLVE INTO CLOSED SESSION:
Moved by Councillor Szollosy, Seconded by Councillor Davison
Be it resolved that the Committee of the Whole Meeting recess at this time and move into
a closed session pursuant to Section 239 of The Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, to
consider: at 10:31 a.m.
I) MINUTES OF MAY 21 AND MAY 27, 2013
II)
Ill)
IV)
A PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF LAND BY
THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD- SECTION 239 (2) (c), MA
- Potential uses of Town Owned Recreational Property
A PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF LAND BY
THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD- SECTION 239 (2) (c), MA
- Proposed Lease of Space in Keswick
A PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF LAND BY
THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD- SECTION 239 (2) (c), MA
- Offer of donated land
V) PERSONAL MATTER ABOUT AN IDENTIFIABLE INDIVIDUAL, INCLUDING
MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL BOARD EMPLOYEES;
- Georgina Public Library Board Personnel Request
VI)
A PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF LAND BY
THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD- SECTION 239 (2) (c), MA
- Proposed divestiture of Property
Carried.
24. RISE AND REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION:
The Committee of the Whole Members rose from the Closed Session at 11:55 a.m. with
report.

11
June 3, 2013 M (COW) 11 2013-06-03
24. RISE AND REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION cont'd:
II)
A PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF LAND BY
THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD- SECTION 239 (2) (c), MA
Potential uses of Town Owned Recreational Property
Moved by Councillor Szollosy, Seconded by Councillor Davison
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0141
--------- ------ --------------- ---
A. That Report ED-2013-0012 prepared by the Economic and Tourism Development
Office and dated June 3, 2013 regarding 481 Lake Drive East, be received.
B. That staff be directed to schedule a public consultation session to obtain input on
the future use of 481 Lake Drive East (Former Sedore-Reed Farm).
C. That staff be directed to have options 2 through 5 and the option provided by
Joanne Henderson presented at the public consultation session.
D. That staff process the lease documents necessary for Ravencrest Farms to farm
Part 2 for the 2013 year.
Carried.
Ill)
A PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF LAND BY
THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD- SECTION 239 (2) (c), MA
Proposed Lease of Space in Keswick
Moved by Councillor Szollosy, Seconded by Councillor Hackenbrook
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0142
1. That Report RC3013-0022 presented on June 3, 2013 regarding the Ice Palace
Sign- Tenant Panels be received.
2. That the Mayor and Council;
Carried.
a) authorize staff to offer the two Ice Palace lease holders (Rogers and Gen
Sports) a tenant panel on the Ice Palace sign
b) authorize two panels to host the logos of the four major sports groups that
consider the Ice Palace their home, namely Georgina Minor Hockey
Association (GMHA), Georgina Girls Hockey Association
(GGHA), Georgina Ice Junior C Hockey Club, and Georgina Skating Club
(GSC).

12
June 3, 2013 M (COW) 12 2013-06-03
24. RISE AND REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION cont'd:
IV)
A PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF LAND BY
THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD- SECTION 239 (2) (c), MA
Offer of donated land
Moved by Councillor Hackenbrook, Seconded by Councillor Szollosy
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0143
That the Chief Administrative Officer be directed to report back with supplemental
information.
Carried.
V) PERSONAL MATTER ABOUT AN IDENTIFIABLE INDIVIDUAL, INCLUDING
MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL BOARD EMPLOYEES;
Georgina Public Library Board Personnel Request
Moved by Councillor Davison, Seconded by Councillor Hackenbrook
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0144
1. That Report No. GLB-2013-01 prepared by the Georgina Public Library Board
dated June 3, 2013 be received; and
2. That Council receive the Library Board's intention to re-classify Children's Services
Coordinator (CSC) from a union position to management classification.
3. That the position continue in the 2014 operation budget
Carried.
VI)
A PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF LAND BY
THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD- SECTION 239 (2) (c), MA
Proposed divestiture of Property
Moved by Councillor Davison, Seconded by Councillor Szollosy
RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0145
That the Chief Administrative Officer be directed to negotiate terms of the divestiture and
report back.
Carried.

13
June 3, 2013 M (COW) 13
2013-06-03
25. ADJOURNMENT:
Moved by Councillor Szollosy, Seconded by Councillor Davison
That the meeting adjourn at 12:02 p.m.
Carried.
Robert Grossi, Mayor
Yvonne Aubichon

14
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mayor Grossi
Members of Council
MEMORANDUM
Yvonne Aubichon, Town Clerk
Routine correspondence
File #06-01
DATE: June 17, 2013
Please notifY the Clerk's office if you wish to have any of these items placed on the
agenda for discussion:
i) Teny Young, Vice President, Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO),
providing a copy of the IESO 2012 Annual Report; 'Changing Perspectives for
Ontario's Electricity Grid', highlighting the efforts of the IESO and industry
partners to move toward a more sustainable and diverse power system.
:ya

15
.29!.>~7 C1v1c Centre Rd.
LLlP JGl
DP;;ar cnotyn La nce,
RQ! M:~rk~t Square Road Closure Saturday July 27, 2013
1 Jm writing to you as the Cha1r of the Downtown Sutton Merchant's Associat ion (DSMA) to reque:;t
Council to temporary close Market Square for the duration of the Festival on High taking place on July
ntr• trom 9.00am to 6.00pm.
The Downtown Sutton Merchant's Association (DSMA) will be hostmg an event on Saturday July 27,
2013 called tht' Festival on High. The event will be a celebration on the street 111 Sutton attracting mJny
loco I residents and tounsts to the area The concept of the event is a street festival w1th ltve music and
bemh. gre;jt food

17
CivicAct1on
Greater Toronto CivicAction • All iance
May 16, 2013
His Worship Robert Grossi
Mayor, Town of Georgina
26557 Civic Centre Road
Keswick, Ontario L4P 3G1
Dear Mayor Grossi,
On April 17, 2013, the Greater Toronto CivicAction Alliance (CivicAction) brought together senior and
rising leaders to accelerate transportation investment for the prosperity of the Greater Toronto and
Hamilton Area (GTHA).
After a day at the CivicAction Forum: Our Region, Our Move, these regional and international leaders
from business, labour, academia, not-for-profit and other sectors had this advice for Metrolinx and
governments at all levels: Get on with it, make the most of it, and take better care of our money
while you're at it.
1. Implement revenue tools now with five principles in mind
2. Maximize social and economic benefits by collaborating with communities and stakeholders
3. Accountability and transparency are not optional
4. Build support and trust through communication that "makes it real" and shows us how we will
get the biggest bang for our buck. ·
The attached report conveys the views of these leaders. They want their views to inform the Metrolinx
Investment Strategy to fund the rest of The Big Move regional transportation plan, and to guide
elected officials as they act on the strategy once it is submitted by June 1, 2013. Other cities in
Canada and internationally, from Vancouver, to Los Angeles, to New York, to London, are tapping a
range of new, sustainable sources to build better transportation systems.
Now it's our turn.
With new investment in our transportation system, we can build healthy and vibrant communities,
compete globally, and stop eroding the time we have to do the things that matter most -like eating
well, spending time with friends and family, and watching our kids grow up.
Right now, if you haven't already, you can demonstrate to your constituents that you are committed to
investing in a better transportation system by visiting your32.com and joining over 1000 residents and
nearly 50 elected officials who have already pledged their support.
And as you move forward with new investment, we urge you to act on these recommendations. Let's
get on with building our future.
Sincerely,
Mitzie Hunter
Chief Executive Officer
John Tory
Chair
11 0 Yonge Street, Suite 1800, Toronto, Ontario, M5C 1 T6 • (416) 309-4480
www .civicaction .ca

Preface
On April 17, 2013, 300 civic leaders from across the Greater
Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHAl convened at the C1vicAction
Forum: Our Region, Our Move. The event marked a milestone
in CivicAction's Your32 campaign and in our region's efforts to
tackle its traffic congestion cris1s.
We're at a critical moment. Transportation in the GTHA has
been chronically underfunded for decades and we have
reached a breaking pomt. The time for talk is over. There are
actions we can take to reduce congestion, such as spending
existing tax dollars wisely, making work hours flexible, and
car-pooling. We also need to invest significantly more in
increased service and road, transit, cycling, and pedestrian
infrastructure.
From politicians to CEOs and labour leaders, from college
presidents to students and community leaders, delegates
are affected by the state of our current system and therefore
highly motivated to make it better. They, along with members
of CivicAction's Regional Transportation Champions Council
an d Regional Co-Captains, pushed to accelerate the investment
we need under the terms that are acceptable to GTHA
residents.
The event took place at a historic window of opportunity in the
weeks leading up to June 1, 2013. That's the date by which
Metrolinx must submit its recommendations to the Province
and heads of GTHA municipal councils on how to pay for the
rest of The Big Move- the approved 25-year, $50 billion plan
that will dramatically improve how people and goods move
across the GTHA.
18
Governments at all levels- munic ipal, provincial, and
federal- will need to collaborate to ensure that our region
has the transportation service and infrastructure 1t needs to
continue to grow and prosper. To help our elected officials
move forward on the path to action, CivicAction has launched
the "pledge to get a move on," which calls on civic leaders,
residents, and elected officia ls to support new funding sources
that are dedicated, efficient, transparent & accountable,
regional, fair, and sustainable.
At CivicAction's your32.com, residents can pledge to be part
of the solution and challenge their political leaders to do the
same.
Nobody wa nts to write a blank cheque. Governments need
to assure the public that their money will be spent on
transportation, and spent well. With unprecedented investment
comes extraordinary opportunity. We need to ensure our
transportation investment delivers the maximum social and
economic impact for dolla rs spent.
This report captures the recommendations that CivicAction
Forum delegates want Metrolinx, governments, and elec ted~
officials to heed as they move to build the transportation
system we so urgently need.
We all need to be champions for better transportation in our
region.
It's our region, our move. So let's get moving.
With this report, CivicAction presents delegates' feedback to
Metrolinx and GTHA elected officials as outlined in four key
recommendations:
D
D
D
Accountability and transparency are not
opti~nal
Implement revenue tools now with five
principles in mind
Maximize social and economic benefits
by collaborating with communities and
stakeholders
Build support and trust through
communication that "makes it real"
Report from the CivicAct!on Forum I Preface

North~
Middlesex
19
May 8, 2013
Premier Kathleen Wynne
Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 1A1
Dear Ms. Wynne:
Re: Motion of "Not a Willing Host Community" for IWT Projects
Please be advised that the Council of thE~ Municipality of North Middlesex has
unanimously passed the attached motion that we are "Not a Willing Host" community for
Industrial Wind Turbine Projects.
We are one of the many Ontario communities that have had no choice in the
matter of whether we are willing and equipped to undertake having these mega projects
invade and forever change the rural landscape of our community. Our municipality
already has limited financial resources for maintaining our aging infrastructure and now
we are being forced into straining these resources even further with having to hire
solicitors, engineers and project co-ordinators, as small municipalities of our size do not
have the human or economic resources to adequately deal with these highly technical
projects in order to ensure our citizens are properly protected now and in the future.
These projects are being forced onto communities with no regard on how this will
impact these resources and more importantly the health and safety issues that are
attributed to these IWT's.
We are forwarding our motion to all Ontario municipalities, local M.P.P., Monte
McNaughton and local M.P., Bev Shipley, as well as Ontario Progressive Conservative
Leader, Tim Hudak and Ontario NOP Leader, Andrea Howarth for their support and
endorsement.
229 Parkhill Main Street, PO Box 9 Parkhill, ON NOM 2KO
P: 519.294.6244 F; 519.294.0573

20
MUNICIPALITY OF NORTH MIDDLESEX
MOTION
DATE: MAY 6, 2013
MOVED BY COUNCILLOR CORNELISSEN
SECONDED BY COUNCILLOR MCUNCHEY
WHEREAS the Premier o'f Ontario has recently conveyed the Governments desire to
limit Industrial Wind Turbine (IWT) Projects to communities that are willing hosts;
AND WHEREAS Council for the Municipality of North Middlesex has received a clear
message from its residents that they are not willing to host to IWTs in North Middlesex;
AND WHEREAS Council for the Municipality of North Middlesex applauds the position
taken by the Premier and the Government;
AND WHEREAS Council represents all citizens within the Municipality, both those in
favour of wind projects and those opposed. As a result, Council needs to maintain a fair
and balanced viewpoint;
AND WHEREAS council is very concerned that the Green Energy Act has substantially
changed the rules for municipalitiE~s with respect to wind farm developments by
removing municipal control over development applications through the traditional zoning
rer

21
THEREFORE based on the consistent position of Council for the Municipality of North
Middlesex and the input received from the community regarding IWf's, the Province of
Ontario and specifically thl~ Ministry of Environment be now advised that the
Municipality of North Middlesex is "NOT A WILLING HOST" for IWT's;
AND THAT this resolution be circulated to Premier Kathleen Wynne, as well as to the
Minister of Environment, Minister of Energy, Minister of Rural Affairs and to all Ontario
municipalities for their support and endorsement.
Mayor

22
Carolyn Lance
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Holly Morgan <
Monday, June 10, 2013 1:45 PM
Carolyn Lance
Noise exemption
To whom this may concern,
Hi there I am asking for a Noise Exemption for my engagement party on June 22nd 2013 at 342 Hollywood
Drive Keswick. The party will start at 2pm. There will be approximately 34 family and friends. There will NOT
be any live music, bands, instruments, or professional sound systems. We have music on a regular house hold
stereo system for most of the party. We have also informed our close neighbours of this event and will again the
day before.
Thank you
-Holly Morgan & Tyler Bristow
1

23
North Gwillimbury Forest Alliance
160 John Street, Suite 300
Toronto MSV 2ES
Jack@SaveNGForest.org
June 7, 2013
By Email
Mr. Michael Bigioni
Town Solicitor
Town of Georgina
26557 Civic Centre Road
Keswick, Ontario
L4P 3Gl
Dear Mr. Bigioni:
Re:
Maple Lake Estates
Further to my letter of April 5, 2013 and the Town's May 29 1 h information update on Maple Lake Estates,
the North Gwillimbury Forest Alliance would be pleased to meet with any or all of the Town, the Region
of York, the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, the Province of Ontario and Metrus
Developments Inc. to discuss an exchange of development approvals that would protect the North
Gwillimbury Forest and permit Metrus to build a high quality residential community in an appropriate
location.
Yours sincerely,

24
June 24, 2013
Ms. Rebecca Mathewson, CGA, Director of Administrative Services
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
26557 Civic Centre Road
Keswick Ontario L4P 3G1
Dear Ms. Mathewson:
Re: Management Letter ·
·.
The Corporation of the, Town of Georgina
The objective of an audit is to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements
are free of any material misstatemen~ - qnd it is not designed to identify matters that may be of
interest to management in discharging its responsibilities. Accordingly an audit would not
usually identify all such matters. ·' / .
... .... ~:···
During the course of our audit of the finan~~al statements of The Corporation of the Town of
Georgina for the year ended December 3'1 ,' ·2012, we did not encounter any significant matters
which we believe should be brought to your ·attenti_on .
... ·.
This communication is prepared solely for the info~m?tjon of management and is not intended
for any other purposes. We accept no responsibility t9. .. a third party who uses this
communication. ···
'- -
We would like to express our appreciation for the cooperatiop.and assistance which we received
during the course of our audit from Darlene Carson-Hildebrand, _c:md staff.
We shall be pleased to discuss with you further any matters mentioned in this report at your
convenience.
Yours truly,
-'
Partner
BOO Canada LLP
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants

25
Private & Confidential
June 24, 2013
Chair and Members of the Corporation of the Town of Georgina Public Library Board
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina Public Library Board
26557 Civic Centre Road
Keswick Ontario L4P 3G1
Dear Sir/Madam:
, j,
I I
' c 11 1·1
~-u•i l•
•••• l )
Re: Audit of the Finantrpi 1 ~~a~ements of The Corporation of the Town of Georgina Public
Library Board · ~' ,w
I
For the year ended Defember 31, 2012
.,,
' f'j.
The purpose of this report is to sumina'r;i±j certain aspects of the audit that we believe would be
of interest to the Chair and Members. 1 :r.tti,~ ,t~port should be read in conjunction with the draft
financial statements and our report ther~ont 1 ~nd it is intended solely for the use of the Chair
and Members and should not be distributed•~q·~rternal parties without our prior consent. We
accept no responsibility to a third party who 1
1.Jsr.~·f~;s communication.
Independence
r'
1
,i•:
•I , •• l
At the core of the provision of external audit services 1 1~ t~~.c;pncept of independence. We are
communicating matters that, in our professional judgme~, m;~X reasonably be thought to have
influenced our independence during the audit engagement;· ,,~:.
•/,,, j
,.
In determining which relationships to report, we have conside~~~:t~~ applicable legislation and
relevant rules of professional conduct and related interpretations.prpscribed by the appropriate
provincial institute/ordre covering such matters as the following:r1i'l·'l:.
'·· (·l
• holding of a financial interest, either directly or indirectly in a client;
• holding a position, either directly or indirectly, that gives the right or responsibility to exert
significant influence over the financial or accounting policies of a client;
. • personal or business relationships of immediate family, close relatives, partners or retired
partners, either directly or indirectly, with a client;
• economic dependence on a client; and
• provision of services in addition to the external audit engagement.
We have prepared the following comments to facilitate our discussion with you regarding
independence matters arising since December 6, 2012, the date of our last letter.

26
We are not aware of any relationships between the Library board and us that, in our professional
judgment, may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence to date.
We hereby confirm that we were independent with respect to The Corporation of the Town of
Georgina Public Library Board within the meaning of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario as of June 24, 2013.
Audit Findings
l·
There are a number Gfi~a~ers that arose during the audit that we would like to bring to your
attention, although no'ne•clf. them resulted in a qualified opinion. Each of these matters is
summarized briefly beloW~,'~:Ef would be happy to discuss any of these items in more detail at
our upcoming meeting. .,,, ,w·1
.,. lr
I ~ I
Ukely Aggregate Misstatements ~ , .
Uncorrected misstatements aggrega\~J·~~ring the audit that were determined by management
to be immaterial amounted to $2,395. ~~~ 1sup1mary of the statement of likely aggregate
misstatements is attached to this letter~ ('' 1 )1. ,
··' ,,.
I • ' , ..
After considering both quantitative and qu~li{~t) Y.e factors with respect to the likely aggregate
misstatements attached, we agree with managJm~~t that the financial statements are not
materially misstated.
t' ',,•:
•! ,••
Disagreements with Management 1.) ,
J I·
There were no disagreements with management during tHe.a~dft .
·1' l•
·-' , j''• ,..)
Emphasis of Matters Paragraph or Other Matter Paragraprrst'' ,l!
•'.,,, l ,..
The financial statements of The Corporation of the Town of Georgi~a- .Pl.Jblic Library Board for
the year ended December 31, 2011 were audited by another auditcir\.tnd expressed an
unmodified opinion on June 25, 2012.
...,\
Management Representations
During the course of the audit, management made many representations to us. These
representations were verbal or written and therefore explicit, or they were implied through the
financial statements. Management provided representations in response to specific queries from
us, as well as unsolicited representations. Such representations were part of the evidence
gathered by us to be able to draw reasonable conclusions on which to base the audit opinion.
These representations were documented by including in the audit working papers memoranda of
discussions with management and written representations received from management.
2

27
Management's representations included, but were not limited to:
• matters communicated in discussions with us, whether solicited or unsolicited;
• matters communicated electronically to us;
• schedules, analyses and reports prepared by the entity, and management's notations and
comments thereon, whether or not in response to a request by us;
• internal and external memoranda or correspondence;
h
• minutes of meettqgs' of 1
the Board of Directors or similar bodies such as audit committees and
compensation com'm~ll'!es;
., .. ,:.
• a signed copy of the firt~~i9,l statements; and
I. 1H I
• a representation letter f~j11 1 fnanagement.
'I.
w_e wish to e~press our appreciation f9r'f~e co-operatic~ we rec.eived duri ng the audit fr~m the.
Llbrary boards management. We WQH~ pe pleased to d1scuss w1th you any matters ment10ned m
this letter, as well as any other matter~'~a~amay be of interest to you.
I
I •'!J
I I
Yours truly,
Michael Jones
Partner
"',,i•
···' 11\t
.. l''l
1.. ,,:
I'
,.•:
•l ,,•·l
BOO Canada LLP
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
l
··'
3

Georgina Public Library Board
Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements
December 31, 2012
Description of the
Misstatement
Identified
Misstatement
Overstatement of 2,395
library IT assets
Likely Aggregate 2,395
Misstatements Before Effect
of Previous Year's Errors
and Estimates
Effect of Previous Year's
Errors, Net of Tax Effects
Tax Effect
Likely Aggregate
Misstatements
Projected
Assets
Misstatement Estimates Dr(Cr)
- - 2,395
- - 2,395
-
-
2,395
Pre-Tax Proposed Adjustments
Liabilities Opening RIE Income
Dr(Cr) Dr(Cr) Dr(Cr)
- - (2,395)
- - (2,395)
- - -
- - -
- - (2,395) I
I
I
Details of why no adjustment has been made to the financial statements for the above items:
Minor difference
28

29
Private ft Confidential
June 24, 2013
Mayor and Members of Council
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
26557 Civic Centre Road
Keswick Ontario L4P 3G1
,,l\
' ,, l
Dear Sirs/Mesdames: 1 ,
Re:
1 1
'"',, I· ,,
' t , .
Audit of the ConsotrpJ~ndtinancial Statements of The Corporation of the Town of
Georgina
'I' ,, lr
For the year ended Dec€mber 31, 2012
' I .
The purpose of this report is to sum{fl~i.t-e certain aspects of the audit that we believe would be
of interest to the Mayor and Council."'j;Wi·~ report should be read in conjunction with the draft
financial statements and our report thert!~;· and it is intended solely for the use of the Mayor
and Council and should not be distributed.td 1 ¢ernal parties without our prior consent. We
accept no responsibility to a third party wtld ' ~ ~~~~. ~his communication.
Independence
1.. ,,r:
I.
,,
.••.
At the core of the provision of external audit servic~~\s ~he concept of independence . We are
communicating matters that, in our professional judgmen~ ··' l' m.aY reasonably be thought to bear
on our independence for the audit of the municipality.
1 ( .1·,
'·· ,1'
•1 ' ,l•
In determining which relationships to report, we have cons id~~e~,the applicable legislation and
relevant rules of professional conduct and related interpretatio~~~ ~rescribed by the appropriate
provincial institute/ordre covering such matters as the following: 1 11 r 1
y·1 1'·' ·
I, I 1(' 1
• holding of a financial interest, either directly or indirectly in Ia 'client;
• holding a position, either directly or indirectly, that gives the right or responsibility to
exert significant influence over the financial or accounting policies of a client;
• personal or business relationships of immediate family, close relatives, partners or
re tired partners, either directly or indirectly, with a client;
• economic dependence on a client; and
• provision of services in addition to the external audit engagement.
We have prepared the following comments to facilitate our discussion with you regarding
independence matters arising since December 6, 2012, the date of our last letter.

30
We are aware of the following relationships between the municipality and us that, in our
professional judgment, may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence. The following
relationships represent matters that have occurred from December 6, 2012 to June 24, 2013.
• We have provided advice and comments to management regarding several financial
statement measurement, presentation and disclosure matters. These matters resulted
in management's recognition of the following:
Description of Adjustment
,~.
Amount
Adjustment to show ·ga~ tj.x grant from accumulated surplus to $1,954, 163
deferred revenue '•• • 11 I·
... ,,
Reallocation of item from!r~!:!j.ble capital assets to expense $534,278
1. j1 I
• We, therefore, reqUfrj31:rthat the following safeguards be put in place related to the
above:
'·
'I.
• Management provided , uf~.ith a trial balance and draft financial statements,
including notes, prior\olsQlmpletion of our audiL
•
~I I) I J
Management reviewed an~ aPi;>roved all journal entries prepared by us, as well as
1
changes to financial statemerl~ i presentation and disclosure.
'··'',l'i:J
.. ,..
)
We hereby confirm that we were independent ~i~~'respect to The Corporation of the Town of
Georgina within the meaning of the Rules of Professipnal Conduct of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of Ontario as of June 24, 2013 . ' (l
...
~~ · ·· \
Audit Findings
1 1 .1·,
• .. ,,,
·I' ,)•
There are a number of matters that arose during the audit th~ -~~ would like to bring to your
attention, although none of them resulted in a qualified opinion:,E~h of these matters is
summarized briefly below. We would be happy to discuss any of trt~~ 1items in more detail at
our upcoming meeting. t;\·',;.
. 1.: 1
Likely Aggregate Misstatements
Uncorrected misstatements aggregated during the audit that were determined by management
to be immaterial amounted to $41 ,323. A summary of the statement of likely aggregate
misstatements is attached to this letter.
After considering both quantitative and qualitative factors with respect to the likely aggregate
misstatements attached, we agree with management that the financial statements are not
materially misstated.
2

31
Djsagreements wjth Management
There were no disagreements with management during the audit.
Emphasjs of Matters Paragraph or Other Matter Paragraphs
The consolidated financial statements of The Corporation of the Town of Georgina for the year
ended December 31 , 2011 were audited by another auditor who expressed an unmodified opinion
on June 25, 2012. As parl,of our audit of the 2012 consolidated financial statements we also
audited the adjustmept~ ~~scribed in Note 2 that were applied to amend the 2011 financial
statements. In our opini00~1 .such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied .
We were not engaged to· ay#t.~, review or apply any procedures to the 2011 consolidated
financial statements other 1 1i~fHwjth respect to the adjustments and, accordingly, we do not
express an opinion or any ot~r.,lorm of assurance on the 2011 consolidated financial statements
taken as a whole. t.
'I.
Management Representations
, rl·
'·• /
I~ I I I l I' I
,, l
c
.. l., I
During the course of an audit, managemef)tJ~~1e many representations to us. These
representations were verbal or written and tHer~fpre explicit, or they were implied through the
financial statements. Management provided repre~ntations in response to specific queries from
us, as well as unsolicited representations. Such r~pre~f'lntations were part of the evidence
gathered by us to be able to draw reasonable concltl~~·oT on which to base the audit opinion.
These representations were documented by including in the audit working papers memoranda of
discussions with management and written representation,~ l fec'~Jved from management.
'I . '
• .. ,,.
Management's representations included, but were not limite~ , t~; .
•
•
•
,:·,;,•.
. ,11
matters communicated in discussions with us, whether $b 1 ibted or unsolicited·,
,I I''
r'i'·' 1 '
matters communicated electronically to us; • . .l (I
schedules, analyses and reports prepared by the entity, and management's notations
and comments thereon, whether or not in response to a request by us;
• internal and external memoranda or correspondence;
• minutes of meetings of the Board of Directors or similar bodies such as audit
committees and compensation committees;
• a signed copy of the financial statements; and
• a representation letter from management.
3

32
Management Letter
We have submitted a no issue management letter on internal controls as there were no issues
noted during the audit.
We wish to express our appreciation for the co-operation we received during the audit from the
municipality's management. We would be pleased to discuss with you any matters mentioned in
this letter, as well as any other matters that may be of interest to you.
Yours truly,
Michael Jones
Partner
,h
'•''' ' ,I't
' ,, ,,
'••t I·
t ,.
,,.. I
., 1. •' I l ''' \ I
.,, lr
•''
'I.
..
1
• I ) .
BOO Canada LLP \ ., I·
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Publfl:: ,Acpountants
.,, •''l
I I
••• i-
1
I
····',1•::,
.. r'' l
1.. ,•:
I ~
,, I .'
1..'
•! , •. l
4

The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements
December 31, 2012
Description of the
Misstatement
Identified
Misstatement
Amounts missing from 41 ,323
vacation accrual listing
Likely Aggregate 41,323
Misstatements Before Effect
of Previous Year's Errors
and Estimates
Effect of Previous Year's
Errors
Likely Aggregate
Misstatements
Projected
Assets
Misstatement Estimates Dr(Cr)
- - -
- - -
-
-
Proposed Adiustments
Liabilities Opening Fund Income
Dr(Cr) Balance Dr(Cr)
Dr(Cr)
(41 ,323) - 41,323 '
(41 ,323) - 41,323
- - -
(41 ,323) - 41,323
'
Details of why no adjustment has been made to the financial statements for the above items:
not material
33

The Premier
of Ontario
Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 1A1
34
La premiere ministre
de !'Ontario
Edifice de I'Assemblee legislative
Queen's Park
Toronto (Ontario)
M7A tAt
~~~
~"~
Ontario
May29, 2013
Ms. Carolyn Lance
Council Services Coordinator
Town of Georgina
26557 Civic Centre Road
RR2
Keswick, Ontario
L4P 3Gl
Dear Ms. Lance:
Thank you for your letter providing me with a copy of council's motion and report regarding an
interest arbitration award for the Georgina Professional Fire Fighter's Association. I appreciate
your informing me of council's activities.
I note that you have sent a copy of council's resolution to my colleague the Honourable Yasir
Naqvi, Minister ofLabom. I trust that the minister will also take council's views into
consideration.
Thank you again for the infonnation. Please accept my best wishes.
Sincerely,
Kathleen Wynne
Premier
c: The Honomable Yasir Naqvi

35
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT ED-2013-0014
FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JUNE 17, 2013
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF GRANT FUNDING AND A REQUEST TO FILL A
VACANCY ON THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
1. RECOMMENDATIONS:
2. REPORT:
A. THAT REPORT ED-2013-0014 PREPARED BY THE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM DIVISION, DATED JUNE 17,
2013 REGARDING THE APPROVAL OF A GRANT
APPLICATION AND A REQUEST TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE BE RECEIVED.
B. THAT COUNCIL APPROVE THE DISBURSEMENT OF THE
FOLLOWING GRANT:
DOWNTOWN SUTTON MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION $1,750.00
C. THAT THE TOWN CLERK COMMENCE THE PROCESS TO FILL
THE VACANCY ON THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
COMMITTEE FOR THE BALANCE OF THE 2010-2014 TERM OF
OFFICE AND; THAT SUCH INDIVIDUAL BE SELECTED FROM
THE GENERAL PUBLIC.
On June 3, 2013, the Economic Development Committee (EDC) considered
and endorsed one additional grant application received during the Spring
2013 intake period. This application was received from the Downtown
Sutton Merchants Association and is to assist with the costs associated with
hosting the "Festival on High" event that will be held on July 27, 2013.
Upon consideration of this application , the Committee endorsed a grant of
$1 ,750.00.
At this same EDC meeting , the Committee received a letter of resignation
from one of the members, Mr. Larry Brenner. Mr. Brenner has been a very
committed and valuable resource to the Committee, however due to

36
-Page 2 of Report No. ED-2013-0014-
additional work commitments, Mr. Brenner has indicated that he is unable to
dedicate the time necessary to fulfill his obligations to the Committee. The
writer will be sending a letter on behalf of the Town to Mr. Brenner thanking
him for his contributions to the Committee.
Staff request Council's final approval of the grant endorsed by the EDC on
June 3, 2013 and noted in Table 1 below.
TABLE 1
APPLICANT Funding Funding Endorsed by
Request
EDC
Sutton Merchants "Festival $1 ,750.00 $1 ,750.00
on High"
Staff also request that the Clerks Division be directed to proceed with the
necessary steps to fill the vacancy on the Economic Development
Committee. Staff note that in accordance with the Terms of Reference for
the EDC, Mr. Brenner was appointed as a 'public member' of the
Committee and did not represent a specific organization . In this regard, the
vacancy should be filled by an individual from the general public, as
opposed to an individual who represents the interests of a specific
organization.
3. CONCLUSIONS:
This report is being provided on behalf of the Economic Development
Committee to advise Council of the EDC's disposition on the request for
funding received from the Downtown Sutton Merchants Association and , to
request that the Clerks Division begin the process to fill the recent vacancy
on the EDC.
Prepared by:
ar I . enters, M.Sc.PI. , MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning and Building
Approved by:
Winanne Grant, B.A., AMCT, CEMC.
Chief Administrative Officer
June 6, 2013

37
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT RC-2013-0024
FOR CONSIDERATION OF
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
MONDAY, JUNE 17,2013
SUBJECT: 2013 SPECIAL OLYMPICS ONTARIO SUMMER GAMES
UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION:
1 THAT REPORT RC-2013-0024 PRESENTED ON JUNE 17,2013 REGARDING
2013 SPECIAL OLYMPICS ONTARIO SUMMER GAMES UPDATE BE
RECEIVED.
BACKGROUND
Council was presented a letter of request from York Regional Police to support the 2013
Special Olympics Ontario Summer Games. As per Council request (Resolution #C-2013-
0099), staff was asked to provide a report outlining Georgina's support of medal presentations,
sponsorship for lunches, promotion of 'Adopt an Athlete' program and declaration of May 16th
as 'Special Olympics Day'.
The 2013 Special Olympics Ontario Summer Games "Champions Celebrating Champions" will
be hosted by the York Regional Police and the Regional Municipality of York and held
throughout York Region during July 11 -14, 2013. The competition venues and athletes' village
will be located in each of York Region's nine municipalities. The Games are comprised of five
sports; Rhythmic Gymnastics, Track & Field, Softball, Soccer and Golf. More than 900
athletes, coaches, families and supporters from across Ontario are expected to attend the
Games.
The Town of Georgina will be hosting the Rhythmic Gymnastics event scheduled on July 12-
13, 2013 with the official practice on July 11th. The event will be held at Our Lady of the Lake
(OLL) Catholic School (185 Glenwoods Avenue, Keswick, ON). All competitions are open to
the public and tickets are not required.
The Recreation & Culture Department on behalf of the Town of Georgina will be welcoming
and supporting the athletes in the Rhythmic Gymnastics through a variety of projects.
Date Time Project Brief Outline
Thursday July 11 3:15 pm Welcoming from - Fire!YRP honour guard
(at the Georgina - Athletes to be marched in procession
completion of - Town pins for athletes
official - Welcoming remarks from Mayor,
practice)
Games Manager and/or Sport Lead
Posted prior to July 11 , 201 3:
- Banners advertising the event
positioned throughout Georgina
- Banners onsite welcoming the
athletes/coaches/parents
I
I

38
Page 2 of Report RC-2013-0024
Friday July 12 12:00 pm Providing Lunch Town supplied:
(BBQ style) - Hamburger/hot dogs
- Caesar salad
- Pop/water/juice
Friday July 12 1:05pm Craft Activities for - Town's Recreation staff will facilitate
athletes
the activities
Saturday July 13 11 :15 am Providing Lunch Town supplied:
(Cold cut style) - Subway 24 foot long (variety)
- Veggie Tray
- Fruit Tray
- Pop/water/juice
Saturday July 13 12:05 pm Craft Activities for - Town's Recreation staff will facilitate
athletes
the activities
Saturday July 13 3:00pm Medal presentations - Location at OLL
- Mayor to present
- 4 local children will be the medal
bearers (YRP to assign)
Members of Council are welcome and encouraged to attend any portion of the event.
The monetary contribution to support the above mentioned projects will be managed through
the Recreation & Culture operating budget. We will be in search of potential sponsorships and
donations in order to help offset costs. In recognition of our support and contribution we will be
named as an official sponsor of the event and be recognized as sponsoring 5 athletes in the
Adopt an Athlete program.
Completed Initiatives:
The Town of Georgina participated in providing awareness of the Games by declaring May 16th
as 'Special Olympics Day' and sold red shoe laces at several locations throughout Georgina in
support of the initiative of painting the Region red . The Town was able to raise $200.00.
Recommended by:
LPatti White, s.A.
Manager of Recreation Services
II, B.A . KINE, DPA
reation and Culture
Approved by:
(A)(u(lln{
Winanne Grant, B.A., AMCT, CEMC
Chief Administrative Officer

39
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT NO. PB-2013-0054
FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JUNE 17, 2013
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF URBAN AND ARCHITECTURAL
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
19T-04G03- LOWNDES AVENUE, KESWICK
PART LOT 6, CONCESSION 3 (NG)
LANDOWNER: GREENGATE VILLAGE LIMITED
1. RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. THAT REPORT PB-2013-0054 PREPARED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION
DATED JUNE 17, 2013 RESPECTING A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF
URBAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE
GREENGATE VILLAGE LIMITED SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON LOWNDES
AVENUE BE RECEIVED.
B. THAT THE URBAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES DATED
MAY 2013 PREPARED BY BOUSFIELDS INC. IN ORDER TO SATISFY
CONDITIONS 17 THROUGH 19 OF DRAFT PLAN 19T-04G03, BE
APPROVED.
2. INFORMATION:
APPLICANT/ OWNER:
Greengate Village Limited
c/o AI Allendorf
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
FILE NUMBERS:
(Refer to Schedules '1' and '2')
Part Lot 6, Concession 3 (NG)
Roll Nos.: 146-533, 146-660 & 146-660-50
01 .113 Plan of Subdivision 19T-04G03
03.933 Zoning By-law Application
3. BACKGROUND I PROPOSAL
Greengate Village Limited is in the process of fulfilling the conditions of draft plan
approval in order to register its approved Draft Plan of Subdivision 19T-04G013.
On June 9, 2008, Council considered Report PB-2008-0059 respecting the

40
-Page 2 of Report No.PB-2013-0054-
above noted lands and approved the aforementioned 57 lot draft plan of
subdivision and associated zoning by-law amendment applications submitted by
1646182 Ontario Inc., the landowner at that time. The approved Draft Plan and
conditions of approval of the draft plan are attached hereto as Schedules '2' and
'3' respectively.
On May 9, 2011 , Council considered Report PB-2011-0035 and approved a
request by the current landowner, Greengate Village limited, for an extension to
the draft plan approval review period from June 24, 2011 to June 24, 2014.
The landowner's consultant, Bousfields Inc., has prepared and submitted a report
entitled, "Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines" dated May 2013
which was received as a consolidated document. The guidelines have been
prepared in order to fulfill conditions 17 through 19 of the draft plan of subdivision
and the intent is to establish urban design and architectural design objectives
and performance standards for the subdivision. In consultation with the Town's
peer reviewer, Planning staff have been working with the applicant and their
consultant to finalize the guidelines.
Further, in accordance with condition 33, the landowner has prepared and
submitted a draft amending zoning by-law and Planning staff have worked with
them to finalize the by-law which will be presented to Council for passing at the
next Council meeting. This matter is further discussed in Section 5.1 below.
The purpose of this report is to seek Council's approval of the Urban and
Architectural Design Guidelines dated May 2013, attached hereto as Schedule
'4'. Staff note that the applicant's consultant will be giving a PowerPoint
presentation of the guidelines during the Committee of the Whole meeting.
Furthermore, in light of the timeframe that has lapsed since Council's approval of
Zoning By-law Amendment Application 03.933 submitted to implement the
subdivision, Section 5.1 below provides a summary of the zoning matters and
presents a final draft amending zoning by-law for Council's information (see
Schedule '5').
4. DISCUSSION:
4.1 Urban and Architectural Design Guidelines:
In accordance with draft plan approval conditions 17 through 19, the applicant is
required to submit an Urban Design Report and Architectural Design Guidelines
for Council's review and approval. Additionally, the applicant is required to enter
into a subdivision agreement with the Town setting out that all development will
proceed in accordance with Urban and Architectural Design Guidelines approved
by Town Council. Further, the landowner is responsible for retaining a Design

41
-Page 3 of Report No.PB-2013-0054-
Control Architect to ensure compliance with same prior to building permit
issuance (see Schedule '3').
The Urban Design section of the report addresses matters relating to: (i) the
overall neighbourhood structure (i.e. open space, the built form, parking
standards and locations; (ii) the public realm streetscape and landscaping,
fencing, street fixtures/poles/signs, utility boxes, vaults and service pedestals;
and (iii) architectural elements such as architectural styles, special treatment for
corner lots and high exposure rear/side elevations, setbacks from the streetline,
massing and clustering, exterior colours and materials and driveways. Also
addressed in the report is the implementation of the guidelines through the
builder's Design Control Architect at the building permit stage.
Planning staff retained an outside consultant to undertake a peer review of the
Guidelines against the policies of the Keswick Secondary Plan and the
associated Urban Design Guidelines appended thereto. The consultant
recommended several changes to the Guidelines, including revisions with
respect to the architectural care and treatment of corner lot models, upgrades for
high exposure rear/side elevations for lots backing onto the open space/walkway
(i.e. include bay windows, porch feature), front fa

42
-Page 4 of Report No.PB-2013-0054-
site specific provisions, and to apply an Open Space (OS) zone to the remainder
of the lands.
The 'R1-138' zone is proposed for the 12 m frontage lots located on the south
and northeast sides of Tim Jacobs Drive (proposed internal subdivision road)
while the 'R1-139' zone is proposed for the 15 m frontage lots on the north and
northwest sides of the road. The amending by-law outlines the special standards
for development in accordance with urban and architectural control guidelines,
including provisions with respect to the minimum lot area, garage projections,
fencing, porches, lot coverage and a reduced setback from the hypotenuse of the
sight triangle on corner lots etc. (see Schedule '5').
The Open Space (OS) zone will apply to the proposed stormwater management
facility and park linkages; being the areas identified as Blocks 58, 59, 60 and 61
on the draft approved plan (see Schedule '2'). Additional lands included in the
OS zone are the existing stormwater channel/pedestrian channel which was
conveyed to the Town as part of the subdivision process. Said lands are
identified as Town Owned Land on Schedule '1' attached hereto. The OS zone
permits a limited range of uses including conservation and forestry, park,
refreshment booth and accessory buildings, structures and uses to any permitted
use.
As already mentioned, the draft amending zoning by-law will be brought forward
for adoption at the next Council meeting.
Prepared by:
&vi ~
Barbtrl Mugabe, MCIP, RPP
Planner
Reviewed by:
Velvet L. Ross, MCIP, RPP
Manager of Planning
Harold W . Lenters, M.Sc.PI, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning and Building
7 June 2013
Approved by:
lA ){n trant
Winanne Grant, B.A. AMCT, CEMC
Chief Administrative Officer

43
~-----~ trTl I I
fr-r---r---1 \ J
II I II 11111 1\ \ ~

l.ANO USE SCHEDULE
...... ,. ~ Cll "\M
UiM>... t.or &IUD ... ...,. .IIIIP o-1
OO'If:OAL£
f
-..,... ,_., '-'' N J.IIOM
~~- o-c.. ·
...............
......1(
POIIIIII...nJII~I'OO·I
/
rr
il
I
I
" •/ /
. ~·
t~••J
. : . .;,;,no-r I,// ~ ~< / .
I
3•'-
_4 - _5 _6 __ 7 II _ 12,13 . ,~ 1~
1~00 1~00 1~00 1$.00 1$.00 t&.OO ' t i..CIO ... 00
.,..
llOOI 11001 11"!' I llOOI I>,'"J ·"~ 1 11001 11001 1100 ! 11 00! 11aol 11ao huo
I .J • ..,
50 49 4& 47
,,
' \
,. I
;;
....
~
'- ·"-
23 8
22
~
l!!
~ !2?-/7. li:l;! 1:
- ' • 1 f g15:7
ro ~ a:11
ao
L
:i OTHE:R LANDS OI+N£0
BY APPUCANT
I
.
I
.
·'
r
~
:
"'7TlSJ

DRAFT APPROVED PLAN
DATED MAY 14, 2006
f
.... --·- ,..,.
LAND USE SCHEOULE illlWC ,. tMJ~~W .,.. ,......
~S'!QitloiWII1Ut~fO
S'OI!Iol•lUI~f'(M)It
UJf a&JICJl ... I.WIS
NV. (""t
I ,_....BLOCK 63
.....- NlVRt M:SJDOfnAL.
I O.OJ ltw:t
:i
- • • - Bounc!OI')' o f Droll Pkln of SubdM~o11
OWNER'S __________
Al/THORIZAnDN
~~-=-~~~-=:--
SURVEYOR'S C£Rnf1CATE
...... ---
----
~~": ::...'"':"::'.::.': ."'::.
~:::...
;;;--
45
VI
n
:I:
m
0
I ..
c
r-
m
N
~
~
N
/
,..... loi}')'Ja'
Port 3 TOWN OWN ED LAND a 6!
,/ / / .I
"''"
1:UO -"·- lol6&'49"!10•t ·--
"""'
I~
"''"
·~ ~
g, 2
:
~ OTHER LANDS OKN£0
BY APPUCANT
=
§
&
i
Sub)C.clto the conditions, if an~ .e l f.2._rth jnEr
leiter d11tcd :::ru, I y 4
:.d. CO
tbe draft Pl3u is apprOYt:d undc ... Sc cl i o.2S~~~
the Plann ul&An~O. 1990, thes-' - . -
cbyor . Line
1
20C' f.
----
------
INfORW.TlON REOUIA:EO UN DER
~5~~7) or TH£
= =..e.
=·.....,.-·--· =~- .......
a.m.condaras associates inc.
consuHing engineers
&400 JoN tl., tult• 203. COtiCOtd Oftl UK 4l8
(105)138-0043 f"u.: (905)738- 9461
[Mol: t:MOort'leol.oom.
1646182 Onlano Inc
PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
LOWNDES AVENUE
PART OF LOT 6. CONCESSION 3
TOWN OF GEORGIN'
ftE@OHAl MUtbCIP"l.rTV OF V()fU(
:.:z.::-··
.-. ... ...----;.;,·-
-~:::.- _
t.J\ick{ 5~
ra:r:: ..::r
fl'i..ANMII'G COW.Sut TANT$
Dn'Ht»>IENT CCIOIIrOWATORS tro.
706{)()

46
REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-04G03 (REVISIONS NOTED IN BOLD)
Page 1
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL AND THE RELEASE FOR
REGISTRATION OF DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-04G03:
1. Approval shall relate to Draft Plan of Subdivision 19T-04G03 dated March 2003 and
revised May 14, 2006, prepared by Michael Smith Planning Consultants;
Development Coordinators Ltd. (Drawing No. 706-00).
Corporation of the Town of Georgina
2. The Owner shall agree to enter into a Subdivision Agreement and agree to satisfy
all conditions, financial and otherwise, of the Town of Georgina; prior to final
approval, the Town shall confirm that the Subdivision Agreement will be registered
by the municipality against the lands to which it applies, pursuant to the Planning
Act.
3. The road allowance within this draft plan of subdivision shall be conveyed to the
Town and dedicated as public highway without monetary consideration and free
of any encumbrances.
4. The road shall be designed and constructed by the Owner at his expense, all to the
satisfaction of the Director of Engineering and Public Works.
5. The road allowance included within the draft plan of subdivision shall be named to
the satisfaction of the Town and the Regional Municipality of York Planning and
Development Services Department.
6. Public highways, including permanent and any temporary turning circles, expanded
bulbs, daylighting triangles and 0.3m reserves shall be designed, laid out and
constructed by the Owner, all to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering and
Public Works of the Town.
7. Any dead-end roads shall be terminated in a temporary turning circle and/or a 0.3m
reserve, which are to be conveyed to the Town without monetary consideration and
free of all encumbrances, to be held by the Town until required for future road
allowances or development of adjacent lands.
8. The Owner shall convey Block 63 (indicated as Future Road Extension) to the Town
without monetary consideration and free of encumbrance to be dedicated as public
highway for the purpose of extending Dovedale Drive.
9. The extension of Dovedale Drive shall be designed, laid out and constructed by the
SCHEDULE 3 PAGE 1

47
REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-04G03 (REVISIONS NOTED IN BOLD)
Page 2
Owner between its existing terminus on Registered Plan 65M-3384 and the east
limit of Block 63 all at his expense and all to the satisfaction of the Director of
Engineering and Public Works. This will include the watermain, sanitary and storm
sewers and all improvements necessary to construct the proposed stormwater
channel together with the covered crossing of Dovedale Drive and the connection of
the proposed stormwater channel to the Glenwoods Creek.
10. The Owner shall design and construct the municipal water distribution and
sanitary sewage collection systems including water booster stations, sanitary
sewage pumping stations and forcemains both permanent and temporary, and
any external servicing required to connect the subject lands to the existing
municipal system, all to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering and Public
Works for the Town.
11 . The Owner shall submit complete and detailed engineering drawings and
accompanying reports, designed in accordance with the current Town Municipal
Development Design Criteria in effect at the time development occurs, for review
by the Director of Engineering and Public Works for the Town and agree in the
Subdivision Agreement to construct all works at the Owner's expense to the
satisfaction of the Director of Engineering and Public Works for the Town.
12. The Owner shall convey to the Town any easements as may be required for
water, storm and/or sanitary sewer purposes, stormwater management or other
municipal utility purposes without monetary consideration and free of all
encumbrances.
13. The Owner shall submit a report prepared by a qualified professional confirming
that all lands to be conveyed to the Town are clear of contaminants, noxious or
deleterious substances.
14. The Owner shall, at his expense, provide an overall lot grading and drainage
plan together with a Stormwater Management Report for review by the Director
of Engineering and Public Works. The report shall deal with any external
contributing area as required.
15. The Owner shall submit a report prepared by a qualified professional outlining
the results of detailed site specific geotechnical and hydrogeological subsurface
explorations, respecting the installation of municipal services on the subject
lands as well as the construction of buildings all to the satisfaction of the Town.
16. The Owner shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement, in wording satisfactory to
the Town, to carry out or cause to be carried out the recommendations and
measures contained within the report approved under Condition 15 above.
SCHEDULE 3 PAGE 2

48
REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-04G03 (REVISIONS NOTED IN BOLD)
Page 3
17. The Owner shall submit an Urban Design Report prepared by a qualified
professional for review and approval by the Council of the Town of Georgina, and
agree in the Subdivision Agreement to carry out or cause to be carried out the
recommendations and measures contained within the approved Urban Design
Report.
18. The Owner shall submit Architectural Design Guidelines prepared by a qualified
profession for review and approval by the Council of the Town of Georgina, and
agree in the Subdivision Agreement to carry out or cause to be carried out the
recommendation and measured contained within the approval Architectural Design
Guidelines.
19. The Owner shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement that:
a) All development shall proceed in accordance with the Council approved
Urban Design and Architectural Design Guidelines.
b) A control architect shall be retained at the cost of the Owner(s) with the
concurrence of the Town of Georgina to ensure compliance with the
approved Urban Design and Architectural Design Guidelines. Where
possible the control architect shall be the same architect that prepared the
Architectural Design Guidelines.
c) Prior to the submission of the individual building permit applications, the
control architect shall have stamped and signed the drawings certifying
compliance with the Urban and Architectural Design Guidelines, and
d) The Town of Georgina may undertake periodic reviews to ensure compliance
with the Urban and Architectural Design Guidelines. Should inadequate
enforcement be evident, the Town of Georgina may cease to accept
drawings stamped by the control architect and retain another control
architect, all at the expense of the Owner.
20. The Owner shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement to provide the owners of Lots
30, 31 and 32, Plan 64M-3462 the option of having a privacy fence constructed
along the rear lot lines of these properties, given that they will abut multiple lots
within the proposed draft plan.
21 . The Owner shall submit a detailed fence plan showing all required fencing; privacy,
acoustical and security and shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement to erect such
fencing all to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering and Public Works for the
Town.
22. The Owner shall be required to satisfy all prov1s1ons of the Regional Forest
Conservation By-law and the Town's Development Design Criteri a respecting
preservation and protection of trees and vegetation. W here trees are lost through
development, the Owner shall agree to compensate the Town through additional
tree planting and shall submit a detailed landscaping and tree planting plan for
SCHEDULE 3 PAGE 3

49
REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-04G03 (REVISIONS NOTED IN BOLD)
Page 4
review by the Director of Engineering and Public Works and the Director of Leisure
Services for the Town and agree to carry out the planting in the Subdivision
Agreement.
23. That the Owner shall be required to conduct an assessment of the health of
any mature trees located within the rear yard of the abutting residential lots to the
north prior to the commencement of any construction taking place on the subject
land.
24. The Owner shall agree to pay all reasonable costs incurred by the municipally
retained peer review consultants in relation to the peer review of submitted reports
and studies.
25. The Owner shall convey the blocks identified as "Stormwater Management Pond"
and "Proposed Stormwater Channel" identified as Blocks 60 and 61 respectively to
the Town for stormwater management purposes and Blocks 58 and 59 for the
purpose of providing a pathway system without monetary consideration, free and
clear of all encumbrances, together with lands as deemed necessary by the Director
of Engineering and Public Works for access.
26. The Owner shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement that no building permits will be
applied for or issued until the Town is satisfied that adequate road access,
municipal water supply, sanitary sewers, and storm drainage facilities are available
to service the proposed development.
27. The Owner shall submit to the Town, the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation
Authority and the Regional Forester for review and approval during the design
phase, a Tree Assessment Study and Preservation Plan prepared by a qualified
arborist or landscape architect and agree in the Subdivision Agreement to carry out
or cause to be carried out the recommendations and measures contained within the
approved Tree Assessment Study and Preservation Plan. The Owner will be
required to satisfy all provisions of the Regional Forest Conversation By-law and the
Town's Development Design Criteria respecting preservation and protection of trees
and vegetation.
28. The Owner shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement not to remove or damage
(leading to the destruction of) those trees identified in the approved Tree
Assessment Study and Preservation Plan without the prior written approval of the
Town. The Owner shall deposit security in the form of a Letter of Cred it, in an
amount to be determined by the Town , to ensure compliance with the tree
preservation requirements.
29 . The Owner shall submit a detailed Master Landscaping and Tree Planting Plan
prepared by a qualified professional for review and approval by the Town for all
SCHEDULE 3 PAGE 4

50
REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-04G03 (REVISIONS NOTED IN BOLD)
Page 5
lands within the plan of subdivision and that portion of the Glenwoods Channel and
pedestrian pathway located between the subject lands and Lowndes Avenue. The
Owner shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement to carry out or cause to be carried
out the recommendations and measures contained within the approved Master
Landscaping and Tree Planting Plan.
30 . The Owner shall prepare and submit a composite utility distribution plan in
consultation with all responsible authorities to the satisfaction of the Town.
31. The Owner shall agree that it will permit any telephone or telecommunications
service provider to locate its plant within the proposed subdivision prior to the plan
registration provided the telephone or telecommunications service provider has
executed a Municipal Access Agreement with the Town. The Owner shall ensure
that any such service provider will be permitted to install its plant so as to permit
connection to individual dwelling units within the subdivision as and when each
dwelling is constructed .
32. The Owner shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement to display plans it its sales
office or pavilion and identify in its sales literature all phases of development, the
location of municipal and utility infrastructure including but not limited to sidewalks,
ponds, pumping and booster stations, parks, transformers, pedestals, streetlights,
mailboxes, lands for other development and future phases of the subject
development.
33. The lands within this draft plan of subdivision shall be appropriately zoned by a
zoning by-law that has come into force and effect in accordance with the provisions
of the Planning Act.
34. The Council of the Town of Georgina shall pass a by-law or resolution authorizing
the allocation of municipal water supply and sanitary sewage servicing capacity to
the subject lands for 57 units (165.3 p.e.).
35 . The Town of Georgina shall confirm in writing through a clearance letter that
Conditions 1 to 34 inclusive have been satisfied .
Enbridge Gas:
36. Streets are to be constructed in accordance with composite utility plans
previously submitted and approved by all utilities.
37. The developer shall grade all streets to final elevation prior to the installation of
the gas lines and provide Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. with the necessary field
survey information for the installation of the gas lines.
SCHEDULE 3 PAGE 5

51
REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-04G03 (REVISIONS NOTED IN BOLD)
Page 6
38. It is understood that the natural gas distribution system will be installed within the
proposed road allowance. In the event that this is not possible, easements will
be provided at no cost to Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc.
· 39. En bridge requests that the Owner/developer contact the Regional Sales
Development Department at their earliest convenience to discuss installation and
clearance requirement for main, service and metering facilities.
40. Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning and
Building Department in writing through a clearance letter that Conditions 36 to 39
inclusive have been satisfied .
Rogers Cable:
41. To reduce congestion in the boulevard right-of-way, the Developer will utilize jointuse
trench construction to be shared by the shallow utilities, Hydro, Bell and Cable.
42. To ensure a comprehensive telecommunications installation that is designed to
harmonize with the other infra structure and municipal services, the Developer will
supply all related development drawings, including the Composite Utility Plans.
43. To ensure Rogers Cable rights of plant ownership and our ability to maintain our
plant for the future home owners, the Developer will be responsible for securing all
necessary easement/right-of-ways over subdivision property at no expense to the
Utilities. All costs associated to plant relocations caused directly or indirectly by this
development shall be born by the Developer.
44. Rogers Communications Inc. shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning and
Building Department in writing through a clearance letter that Conditions 41 to 43
inclusive have been satisfied.
Hydro One:
45. The Owner must provide a fu ll size detailed copy of the project showing the existing
pole locations to allow Hydro One to determine potential conflict and resolution with
respect to the 3 phase overhead line running west from Woodbine Avenue cross
country to the existing dead end of Dovedale Drive.
46. Confirmation from Hydro One that accommodation has been made via registered
easement or inclusion in the proposed development system plan, to maintain Hydro
One's existing service capabilities at this locale.
47. Hydro One shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning and Build ing Department in
writing through a clearance letter that conditions 45 and 46 inclusive have been
SCHEDULE 3 PAGE 6

52
REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-04G03 (REVISIONS NOTED IN BOLD)
Page 7
satisfied.
Canada Post:
48. The Owner/developer agrees to include on all offers of purchase and sale, a
statement, which ad vi ses the prospective purchaser that mail delivery will be from a
designated Community Mailbox.
49. The owner/developer will be responsible for notifying the purchaser of the exact
Community Mailbox location prior to the closing of any home sale.
50. The Owner/developer will consult with Canada Post Corporation to determine
suitable locations for the placement of Community Mailbox and to indicate these
locations on the appropriate servicing plans.
51. The Owner/developer will provide the following for each Community Mailbox site
and include these requirements on the appropriate servicing plans:
-An appropriately sized sidewalk section (concrete pad ) as per municipal
standards, to place the Community Mailboxes on.
-Any required walkway across the boulevard, as per municipal standards.
52 . The Owner/developer further agrees to determine and provide a suitable temporary
Community Mailbox location(s), which may be utilized by Canada Post until the
curbs, sidewalks and final grading have been completed at the permanent
Community Mailbox location. This will enable Canada Post to provide delivery to
the new residences as soon as the homes are occupied .
53. Canada Post shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning and Building Department
in writing through a clearance letter that conditions 48 to 52 inclusive have been
satisfied.
Regional Municipality of York:
54 . Prior to final approval, the Region shall confirm that adequate water supply and
sewage servicing capacity are available and have been allocated by the Town of
Georgina for the development proposed within this draft plan of condominium or any
phase thereof. Prior to final approval the Town and Region of York shall confirm
that there is adequate north-south road capacity in the Leslie Street/Woodbine
Avenue corridor to serve the proposed development.
55 . The Owner shall enter into an agreement with Region of York, agreeing to satisfy all
conditions, financial and otherwise, of the Regional Corporation; Regional
Development Charges are payable prior to final approval in accordance with By-law
SCHEDULE 3 PAGE 7

53
REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-04G03 (REVISIONS NOTED IN BOLD)
Page 8
DC-0005-2003-050.
56. The Owner shall agree in the subdivision agreement to construct sidewalks along at
least one side of Street 'A' to provide access to the York Region Transit route on
Lowndes Avenue.
57 . The York Region Planning and Development Services Department shall advise the
Town of Georgina Planning and Building Department in writing through a clearance
letter that Conditions 5 and 54 to 56 inclusive have been satisfied.
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority:
58. That prior to final approval and any major site alteration, the following shall be
prepared to the satisfaction of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation
Authority:
• A detailed Stormwater Management Report I Plan that conforms to
provincial (Lake Simcoe Protection Plan/MOE 2003 SWM Planning and
Design Manual), regional/watershed (LSRCA), and local standards and
guidelines. (Note: provisions must be made to locate detention facilities
above elevation of the 1:100 year floodline);
• A detailed Erosion/Sediment Control Plan;
• A detailed Grading Plan;
• A Geotechnical Report for stormwater management pond;
• A Planting Plan for the stormwater management pond.
59. That the Owner shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement, to carry out or
cause to be carried out the recommendations and measures within the plans
and reports set out above.
60. That prior to any site alteration, proper erosion and sediment control
measures must be in place. All stormwater management facilities and
sediment and erosion controls must be in place prior to the creation of
impervious areas such as roads and buildings.
61. That the Owner shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement to engage a
qualified professional to certify in writing that the works were constructed in
accordance with the plans, reports and specifications, as approved by the
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority.
62. That the draft M-Pian be submitted which has references to "Future
Residential" removed from Blocks 62 and 63 and that these Blocks remain in
the Rural zone.
SCHEDULE 3 PAGE 8

54
REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-04G03 (REVISIONS NOTED IN BOLD)
Page 9
63. That Blocks 58, 59, 60 and 61 be placed in an environmental protection
zoning category and conveyed to the Town.
64. That prior to final approval, the owner agree to obtain permits under Ontario
regulation 179/06 from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority.
65. That prior to final plan approval, the Owner agrees to pay all development
fees to the Conservation Authority as required in accordance with the
LSRCA's Fees Policy, under the powers of the Conservation Authorities Act.
66. That the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority shall advise the Town
of Georgina Planning and Building Department in writing through a clearance
letter that Conditions 58 to 65 inclusive have been satisfied.
Ministry of Culture:
67. That written confirmation be received from the Ministry of Culture that the required
archeological assessments have been completed and that the Ministries
requirements respecting any significant archeological resources have been
addressed.
68. That the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Recreation shall advise the Town of
Georgina Planning and Building Department in writing through a clearance letter
that Condition 67 has been satisfied; the clearance letter shall include a brief
statement detailing how the condition has been met.
ORIGINAL ISSUED at the TOWN OF GEORGINA on the 24th day of June, 2008.
REVISED at the TOWN OF GEORGINA ON THE 21 sr day of July, 2008 to include
conditions 67 and 68.
REVISED AND REISSUED at the Town of Georgina on May 9, 2011
Velvet L. Ross, MCIP., RPP.
Manager of Planning
NOTE:
PURSUANT TO THE PLANN ING ACT, R.S.O., 1990, AS AMENDED, APPROVAL
OF THIS PLAN OF SUBDIVISION SHALL LAPSE IF FINAL APPROVAL FOR
REGISTRATI ON HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN BY JUNE 24, 2014, UNLESS
APPROVAL HAS BEEN SOONER W ITHDRAWN OR THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
HAS EXTENDED THE DURATION OF THE APPROVAL.
SCHEDULE 3 PAGE 9

55
Schedule 4

19T-04G03- Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Community Concept
1.2 Design Vision
1.3 Guideline Objectives
3
3
4
4
2.0
NEIGHBOURHOOD STRUCTURE
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Housing
2.3 Entry
2.4 Street Pattern
2.5 Open Space
2.7 Built Form
2.8 Parking Standards and Locations
5
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
3.0
PUBLIC REALM STREETSCAPE
3.1 Streetscape Landscaping
3.2 Fencing
3.3 Street Fixtures, Poles and Signs
3.4 Utility Boxes, Vaults and Service Pedestals
8
8
8
9
9
56
4.0
PRIORITY LOCATIONS
4.1 Corner Lot Dwellings
4 .2 High Exposure Rear/Side Elevations
10
10
10
5.0
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA
5.1 Architectural Styles
5.2 Community Safety
5.3 Main Entrances, Porches,
Verandahs and Entrance Features
5.4 Window Style
5.5 Houses With Integral Front Garages
12
12
12
13
13
14
9/b BOUS FI ELDS INC.
1

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
6.0 SITING OF DWELLINGS
6.1 Elevation Variety
6.2 Building Setbacks From The Streetline
6.3 Massing and Clustering
6.4 Exterior Colours and Materials
6.5 Driveways
7.0 DESIGN REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Preliminary Review
7.3 Responsibilities of the Builder
7.3.1 Design Review Contacts
7.3.2 Engineering Design
7.3.3 Landscape Architect
7.4 Review Process
7.5 Approvals
15
15
15
15
16
17
18
18
18
18
18
19
19
19
19
/
FIGURES
57
1.
2.
Context Plan
Priority Lot Plan
3
6
91& BOUSFI ELDS IN C.
2

19T-04G03- Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
.' c::J Subject Lands (19T-04G03) t
~ Other Lands Owned by ~
Applicant ~i
Fig 1. Location Map
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Intent of Guidelines
These Guidelines apply to residential
subdivision 19T-04G03 - Part Lot 6, Con
3 (NG) in the Community of Keswick, as
established in the Keswick Secondary Plan
in the Town of Georgina. Their intent is to
establish urban design and architectural
design objectives and performance standards
for residential development which:
1) Help to implement the goals of the
Keswick Secondary Plan (Official Plan
Amendment 93) including:
•To provide an efficient, healthy, and
safe community for the present and
future residents of Keswick.
• To promote and strengthen
community identity.
•To ensure that new development is
integrated with existing land uses in a
logical, orderly and efficient manner.
2) Incorporate the Keswick Urban Design
Guidelines, prepared for the Town of
Georgina by The Planning Partnership, in
August 2003, where possible, having regard
for the existing built form context and the
established road pattern.
In addition to addressing architectural
treatment within the private realm, these
Design Guidelines address public realm design
issues such as:
The creation of a sense of identity for
the lands within the plan of subdivision.
Connecting with the abutting lands to the
north and east and ensuring compatibility
between existing and planned subdivisions.
The Developer and Builders shall comply
with these Guidelines throughout the design,
marketing and building process and shall only
offer for sale those dwelling designs given
approval by the Control Architect. Approvals
by the Control Architect do not release the
Builder from complying with the requirements
of the Project Engineer, the Town of Georgina
or any other approval agency.
1.1 COMMUNITY CONCEPT
The new residential area comprises the
subdivision located east of The Queensway,
south of Dovedale Avenue and north of
Glenwoods Avenue with access directly off
Lownes Avenue and contains a mix of single
detached dwellings.
Other elements of the subdivision include:
open spaces comprised of Blocks 58 and
59 (see Figure 2);
a stormwater management pond on Block
61 between lots 33 and 34 (see Figure 2);
58
cj:; BOUSFI E LDS INC.
3

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
a storm water channel on Block 60 at the
southeast corner of the site; and
a future road extension (i.e. Dovedale
Avenue) directly north of lot 26 on Block
64.
tree-lined streets and an integrated network of
open space areas.
1.3 GUIDELINE OBJECTIVES
Existing residential uses lie to the immediate
north and west of the draft plan. Lands to the
immediate east are vacant and are owned by
the applicant.
Other uses in the immediate area include an
Open Space/SWM facility directly to the south
of the site. Further south, on the south side
of the proposed storm water channel is an
existing school property.
1.2 DESIGN VISION
The design vision for this development is
to create an efficient, attractive, healthy
and safe residential neighbourhood which
creates a sense of identity through the
design of housing, streets and open space
that residents and visitors can recognize as
characteristics of the community.
The design and construction of new housing
should integrate a variety of housing forms,
and encourage the use of front yards and
building facades to facilitate social interaction
on the street and security within the
community. Pedestrian comfort and amenity
should be addressed through the provision of
The following objectives will be encouraged
and articulated throughout these Guidelines to
reinforce the community design vision:
to provide an attractive enclave of
detached homes situated on a street well
integrated within the existing framework of
streets;
to provide attractive, high quality and
pedestrian friendly streetscapes through
attention to the design of the public realm,
built form, architectural detailing and the
appropriate siting of buildings;
to provide an appropriate integration with
the existing character of the Keswick
Community, particularly the residential
development adjacent to the morth;
to ensure a harmonious variety of
architectural styles, building materials and
colouring within the draft plan area;
to identify specific design requirements for
buildings located in high priority locations
such as adjacent to open space areas;
to provide sufficient flexibility within the
Guidelines to promote innovation and
variety; and
to establish the requirements for a timely
and fair implementation process.
59

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
2.0 NEIGHBOURHOOD STRUCTURE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The structure of the residential enclave, has
been established in draft plan 19T-04G03, as
shown on Figure 2, Context Map which lays
out the street pattern, lotting pattern and the
distribution of land uses within the existing
framework of streets and open spaces.
The opportunity for strengthening the existing
neighbourhood can be realized through the
implementation of the following urban design
objectives:
2.2
conserving natural land forms;
providing attractive streetscapes through
attention to the relationship between public
and private spaces, the design within the
public spaces, and the identification of
priority private lots where appropriate;
establishing landscaping and design
principles for the public realm.
HOUSING
These guidelines are intended to encourage
the provision of a variety of housing types,
reduced front yard setbacks to reinforce the
street edge, and garages located to minimize
their impact on the streetscape.
a varied streetscape. The architectural style
of the dwellings should be compatible but
should allow variation in height, side and
front yard setbacks, massing and the roofline.
Buildings should have front walls parallel to
the street to create a consistent view. Priority
Lot unit designs should have special features
emphasizing their role.
2.3 ENTRY
There are two points of entry into the
subdivision, one from Lowndes Avenue to the
west and one from Dovedale Avenue to the
north.
2.4 STREET PATTERN
A new road (shown as Street 'A' on Figure
2) having a 20 m right-of-way provides a
vehicular connection between Lowndes
Avenue to the west and Dovedale Avenue
to the north. Lots 1 and 57 include frontages
along Lowndes Avenue while lots 25 and 26
include frontages along Dovedale Avenue.
The new roads, including a future extension of
Dovedale Avenue within the draft plan will be
designed in accordance with Town of Georgina
municipal standards, recognizing the overall
streetscape design proposed for the draft plan.
60
Dwellings are to be sited so as to promote
'/:> BOUSFIELDS INC.
5

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
----··t ·------- -----------l
~C'I'Cl[CilaltALJH)
DOVE ALE AVENUE r ··- ··--·."7 ·---·
-7 I'U'NAE ROAD EX'I"EM9

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
2.5 OPEN SPACE
The draft plan of subdivision includes open
space blocks (i.e. Block 58 and 59). The
natural features of these blocks are to be
preserved as required by the Lake Simcoe
Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA).
Any future design work to these blocks will be
in consultation with the LSRCA and the Town
of Georgina.
Further, storm water management areas shall
be designed in a manner that is safe and
contributed to the overall design and appeal of
the open space areas and neighbourhood.
i. On-Street Parking
On-street parking shall be permitted on all local
roads:
- to allow for an efficient use of the
public infrastructure;
- to provide a separation between
pedestrians and vehicular traffic;
- to act as a traffic calming device;
- to provide convenience for residents
and visitors.
It should be noted that the Town does have
a Parking By-law which contains regulations
respecting time limits on parking.
2.6 BUILT FORM
The built form plays a role in re-inforcing the
community structure and in addressing the
design objectives for the community. How to
achieve these objectives varies depending on
location and building type. Guidelines for built
form are set out in the following sections.
ii. Driveway Parking
Although driveway parking is an essential
part of the operation of a low density, groundoriented
home, the intent of the urban design
guidelines is to minimize the impact of
driveways and garages on the streetscape.
The following design guidelines are
established for driveway parking.
62
2.7 PARKING STANDARDS and
LOCATIONS
The intent is to allow and provide for sufficient
parking for residents and visitors within
residential areas while minimizing the impact
of driveways, parking areas and dominant
garages to the streetscape.
pairing of driveways is encouraged on
adjacent lots, where appropriate and
feasible;
adjacent to open space blocks driveways
shall be located, away from the open
space;
the maximum driveway width on freehold
lots shall not exceed 55% of the frontage at
c:j:; BOUSFI.ELDS INC.
7

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
the curb, except in special situations such
as angle bends, street elbows and cui-desacs.
3.0 PUBLIC REALM STREETSCAPE
for hardiness, diversity, seasonal colour,
texture and canopy width as well as for the
use of indigenous species;
identification of the frontage of the
neighbourhood parks and the open space
blocks which abut the public streets.
The guiding principles for streetscape
design include:
3.2
FENCING
the creation of a safe, distinct and high
quality streetscape realm;
acknowledging through design and
landscaping, the role of streets as areas
for recreation and socializing as well as for
vehicular and pedestrian movement;
providing views to natural features and
important architectural features; and
The design of the streetscape shall be
generally in accordance with the street
cross sections as shown in the Keswick
Urban Design Guidelines.
3.1 STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPING
Streetscape landscaping should include:
maintaining a consistent form of street
tree;
trees to be planted at a minimum 1Om
interval;
minimum caliper size in accordance with
the Town of Georgina Standards;
the variety and species being selected
Fences help distinguish the edge of the private
realm, contribute to the landscape quality of
the neighbourhood, and identify the path to the
front door.
They should be low enough to maintain a
view of the street from the front windows and
porches.
Enhanced fencing shall be provided around
that portion of the rear and side yard which
is adjacent to and/or highly visible from the
street and public open space/park area. The
enhanced rear yard fencing on all corner
lots shall be of a privacy fence construction
and shall be attached to the rear wall of the
dwelling. Fencing is to be constructed by the
builder and shown on the Master Landscape
Plan.
The maximum fence height shall be in
accordance with Town Standards in the
rear yard, as well as in the interior side
yard to the mid point of the interior sidewall
of the dwelling. The maximum height of
63

19T-04G03- Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
fencing in all other yards (front, exterior,
and front portion of interior side yard) shall
be 0.9 metres and shall be open structure
and decorative in nature.
All fencing shall be on private property.
screened through planting;
utility meters should be screened from view
and incorporated into the overall design of
housing unit;
note that hydro meters will be located on
interior sideyards of housing.
3.3 STREET FIXTURES, POLES AND
SIGNS
Street fixtures, poles and signs are important
elements in the streetscape. Therefore, every
effort should be made to ensure that they are
co-ordinated in their design and placement.
Character street lighting may be utilized.
3.4 UTILITY BOXES, VAULTS AND
SERVICE PEDESTALS
64
Above ground utility boxes and equipment
should be located in unobtrusive areas to
reduce their visual impact.
Along residential streets, wherever possible:
it may be necessary for Utility Companies
to purchase lands from the developer
for any large structures that are not
appropriate in the boulevard;
transformers should be located at least 1m
from the curb, 1.5m from the sidewalk and
at a minimum 6m from the building wall;
note, where possible, transformers will be
~ BOUSFIELD$ INC.
9

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
4.0 PRIORITY LOCATIONS
Priority locations are usually identified as lots
which are located in positions of high public
visibility within the public realm, or which have
special requirements such as corner lots and
lots adjacent to parks, walkways or open
spaces.
4.1 CORNER LOT DWELLINGS
There are four corner lots within the
development. The quality of the unit design
on these lots should be reflective of the
importance of their location. All elevations
visible from public roads should have
consistent level of articulation, window
detailing and use of materials.
the location of the main entrance or
entrance feature, which is encouraged to
be located on the flanking street;
distinctive architectural features such as
wrap around porches, recessed porches,
turrets or bay windows
providing rear elevations which are
consistent with the front and flanking
elevations in terms of materials, detail and
design;
privacy fencing shall be provided in
accordance with Section 3.2;
the provision of compatible architectural
styles, elements and details for buildings
on opposite corners;
fencing should not be returned too
far along the side elevation so as to
obstruct architectural features on flanking
elevations.
65
Built form at the corners should be
emphasized through variation in massing,
window style and/or use of wrap-around
porches.
The use of design elements such as bay
windows facing the street is encouraged.
The design of corner lot dwellings shall have
regard for:
architectural detailing, height and massing;
the provision of generous windows,
preferably into habitable rooms, on the
flanking elevation;
4.3
HIGH EXPOSURE REAR/SIDE
ELEVATIONS
Dwellings which are located on reverse
frontage lots, flank an open space block, or
a pedestrian walkway enjoy a similar visual
prominence as conventional corner lots.
To ensure that the design of the dwellings
contributes to the overall attractiveness of the
subdivision, the design of the units identified as
required upgraded rear and side architecture
on Figure 2 shall have regard for the following:
~ BOUSFIELDS IN C.
10

19T-04G03- Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
the provision of generous windows,
preferably into habitable rooms, on the
flanking elevation;
distinctive architectural features such as
wrap around porches, recessed porches,
turrets or bay windows
the provision of rear elevations which
are consistent with the front and flanking
elevations in terms of materials, details and
design; and
the provision of privacy fencing which
reinforces the importance of the lots in
accordance with the relevant sections of
these Guidelines;
rear upgrades of lots backing onto the
open space/walkway will be requ ired .
Upgrades will include consistent materials
and window styles with front elevation,
frieze board beneath roof soffit and roof
gable details (pg.6);
where possible plane changes and bay
windows are encouraged on the rear
elevation;
lots flanking the SWMP should provide a
porch feature of architectural detail (bay
or box out window) that addresses this
feature.
66
~ BOUSFIELDS INC.
11

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
5.0 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
CRITERIA
5.1 ARCHITECTURAL STYLES
The design of housing for the subdivision is
expected to show the identifiable influence of
traditional architectural styles compatible with
those in the general vicinity. These guidelines
are intended to assist the builder's architect
to design products that are compatible and
attractive in appearance, and are not intended
to impose any particular built form or historical
style.
The following objectives related to
architectural style should be taken into
consideration in the design of units:
traditional architectural styles that
should influence the character of the
neighbourhood include, but are not limited
to, Georgian, Colonial, Victorian (Queen
Anne, Old Ontario, Gothic Revival)
ltalianate and Tudor Revival;
the design of individual buildings
should have characteristics of a single
architectural style on all elevations - the
mixing of dominant architectural styles
shall not be permitted;
detailing appropriate to a specific
architectural style includes details for all
visual elements such as front entrance
designs, porch elements and dormer
structures;
projecting elements such as bay, bow,
box bay windows, entry stoops, porches,
porticos, roof dormers, alcoves and
balconies should provide detail and
articulation appropriate to the architectural
style;
regardless of architectural style there
should be a greater proportion of detailing
and building elements (doors, windows,
porches) on the elevations which are
exposed to public view;
a variety of elevation treatments should be
provided between unit types and alternate
elevations including symmetrical and
asymmetrical elevations;
minimum main roof slopes shall be 6:12
front to back and on hip roofs the side
slopes shall be 10:12. Lower roof slopes
will be considered where appropraite to the
architectural style;
porch roof slopes may be a lower pitch
minimum of4:12; and
roofs should display a variety of
architectural embellishments (dormers,
gables) and these embellishments shall
have soffit trim consistent with the style of
the proposed architecture. Further, roofs
should have frieze boards on exposed
elevations with 1.2 metre return or to a wall
plane change.
5.2 COMMUNITY SAFETY
In order to promote a secure, pedestrian
67
~ BOUSFIELD$ tNC.
12

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
_j UJUD 1
__.--··---
~ - ----===---===-~==
-
i '
[
co!urnrs
~
acci, uave [
"'o i l;'IOS
I
steps 1 II
c.::.-.:
j
\ l -
, ..
I
v v'v' Jv' ;·..;vv-vv'vv-v-v·v·s'
.>'V'"'v"'v"'v":/"v"'v""vvv"v"v v' BOUSFIELDS INC.
13

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
5.5 HOUSES WITH INTEGRAL FRONT
GARAGES
The following objectives related to integral
front garages should be taken into
consideration in the design of units in order
to minimize the impact of the impact of the
garage on the streetscape:
a variety in the unit massing should
be provided along all neighbourhood
streetscapes; and
the dwelling mass should be located closer
to the street line in order to provide more
"eyes on the street".
the ground and second floor front wall of
dwelling shall be no greater than 3 metres
behind the face of the garage;
second floor over garage portion of the
house must cover a minimum of 75% of
the garage width;
where the face of a garage is situated in
front of a dwelling, a porch or entry feature
shall be provided that is flush with or
forward of the garage;
while it is intended that only attached
garages are to be constructed in this
development, where detached garages are
constructed they shall be in the rear yard
and shall be of the same architectural style
and building material as the companion
dwelling;
builders will be requ ired to prepare plans
for single car garage housing types, as an
option for all detached lots. This is in order
to provide the public with a choice in the
marketplace;
the garage mass should be integrated
within the mass of the dwelling;
porches shall be a useable depth with a
minimum 1.5 metre;
69
'I> BOUSFIELD$ INC.
14

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
6.0 SITING OF DWELLINGS
6.1 ELEVATION VARIETY
permit, in order to provide visual relief in the
streetscape. Setback objectives for single
detached units are that:
To ensure the development of streetscapes
with a variety of designs, alternative unit
designs shall be offered, providing different
elevations for each floor plan layout.
repeating popular elevations/models is not
acceptable because it does not encourage
variety nor promote neighbourhood
identity;
the siting of identical elevations side by
side is not allowed;
identical elevations shall be separated
by a minimum of 2 dwellings and can not
comprise more than 30% of a street block
or be sited more than 3 times within any
row of 1 0 dwellings;
alternative architectural styles should
provide different elevation massing, roof
lines, front entry treatments, fenestration,
detailing and building materials; and
where certain models are popular,
additional elevation treatments shall be
offered and sited to maintain streetscape
variety.
purposeful variations in setbacks should
be applied to both sides of the street,
simultaneously, where circumstances
permit;
variations in setbacks shall have regard for
creating a continuous vis ual featu re along
the street (rather than unrelated setback
variations);
increases in setback will be sought for
dwellings on the outside of street elbows
and curves unless constrained by lot depth;
a minimum front yard setback of 5.0 metres
is appropriate provided a minimum 6.0
metre setback is provided between the
face of the garage and the streetline; and
front yard setbacks should be within a
consistent range and be complementary to
the immediate neighbours. In this regard,
the houses located on Dovedale Avenue
and Lowndes Avenue shall be setback so
that there is a gradual transition in front
yard set backs between adjacent lots.
6.3 MASSING AND CLUSTERING
70
6.2 BUILDING SETBACKS FROM THE
STREETLINE
Variety among dwelling setbacks from the
street will be encouraged, where lot depths
The arrangement of houses within a street
block is a key component in providing a
pleasant streetscape. The overall impression
created by the grouping and massing of
dwellings within a block will have a greater
'i{6 BOUSFIELD$ tNc.
15

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
impact than the detailing of the individual
dwelling. The following design objectives shall
be observed to ensure harmonious massing
within the streetscape:
6.4
compatibility in height and massing
between adjacent dwellings and dwellings
on the opposite side of the street is to be
provided;
where bungalows or 1 1/2 storey dwellings
are sited beside two storey dwellings, they
shall:
- comprise groupings of at least 2
adjacent units;
- employ raised front facades, steeper
roof pitches and increase roof
massing (side gables, dormers) to
provide an acceptable transition
between these house types;
2 storey dwellings sited among bungalows
shall comprise groupings of at least 2
adjacent units.
EXTERIOR COLOURS AND
MATERIALS
The total streetscape shall be considered and
co-ordinated when determining the colour
and material scheme for individual lots. The
selection of materials and colours shall
be compatible with the architectural styles
selected. A variety of colour packages shall
be offered to avoid monotony.
identical colour packages shall be
separated by a minimum of 3 dwellings/
lots and shall not be sited on lots directly
opposite from each other;
compatible material colours are required
within each colour package;
garage door colours should harmonize with
the main cladding colour and should not be
dominant;
roof colour should complement the colour
of wall cladding colour; and
compatible colour packages shall be
considered when providing transitional
variations between buildings within the
streetscape.
Brick wall cladding is proposed as the
primary wall cladding material on dwellings.
Brick wall cladding must:
-be used on all four elevations to a
minimum height of the 1st floor
- include brick detail such as arched
lintels and headers, decorative brick
banding, soldier coursing, and
decorative brick detailing
-use stone/precast window sills (no
brick).
Brick wall cladding is encouraged to
include:
- the use of complementary material
such as stone as an accent, plinth or
full cladding for some models
- contrasting materials such as stucco,
wood trim, or siding which is used only
71
91:> BOUSFIELDS INC.
16

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urba n Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
as an accent, and does not dominate
the entire elevation
- stone/precast in window and door
surrounds, lintels, and keystones.
open space blocks should be located as far
as possible from these uses.
Any accessory buildings and structures
constructed by purchasers of the individual
lots shall be of residential design. No metal
clad Quonset hut design structures are
permitted. Builder must notify homeowner
of condition.
6.5 DRIVEWAYS
A mix of paired and unpaired driveway
combinations is often desirable to contribute
visual interest along the street and also helps
to provide sufficient space for boulevard trees.
72
driveway locations shall be predetermined
on the landscape and site servicing
drawings and shall be approved by the
Town;
the Project Engineer shall co-ordinate
all driveway locations with the Control
Architect and the Landscape Architect;
the slope of the driveway between
the garage and the street shall be
in accordance with approved Town
standards, and shall be minimized to the
greatest extent possible;
driveways should be located as far
as possible from transit stops and
intersections; and
driveways on lots adjacent to park and
9P BOUSFIELDS I N C.
17

19T-04G03- Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
7.0
7.1
DESIGN REVIEW AND A PPROVAL
PROCESS
INTRODUCTION
This privately administered Design Review
Process co-ordinates the site planning,
streetscape, housing, engineering and
landscape design for the lands within the
residential subdivision 19T-04G03.
7.2 PRELIMINARY REVIEW
All design elements as previously
noted, must be reviewed and approved
by the Design Control Architect and
Project Engineer (where noted) prior
to submission of a building permit
application to the Town. The Design
Control Architect shall have the authority
to make interpretations of these guidelines
to provide the necessary flexibility at the
implementation stage, while ensuring that
the stated goals and objectives are met.
Where possible the control architect shall
be the same architect that prepared the
architectural design guidelines.
Approvals by the above parties do not release
the Builder from compliance with other
approval agencies. The Builder is responsible
for ensuring compliance with:
municipal zoning requirements;
municipal development engineering
standards;
the Ontario Building Code regulations; and
lot grading requirements as set out by the
project engineer
7.3 RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE
BUILDER
The builder is responsible for each of the
following items:
"Preliminary" approval of plans, elevations,
sitings, streetscapes and colours is
required prior to the marketing or sales of
houses (including models);
Builders selling houses or specifying
colours prior to Design Review Approval,
do so with the understanding that sa les
are subject to change by the Design
Control Architect.
Builders must build and the Builder's real
estate representatives must market in
compliance with approvals and guideline
requirements.
7.3.1 Design Review Contacts
The Design Control Architect for the residential
subdivision 19T-04G03 will be retained by the
developer/builder, in consultation with the Town
of Georgina.
73
~ BOUSFIELD$ INC.
18

19T-04G03 - Lowndes Avenue
Urban Design and Architectural Control Guidelines
The Town may undertake periodic reviews
to ensure compliance with the Urban Design
and Architectural Control Guidelines should
inadequate enforcement be evident; the Town
may cease to accept drawings stamped by
the control architect and may retain another
control architect at the expense of the owner.
7.3.2 Engineering Design
An engineer for individual developments within
the residential subdivision 19T-04G03 will be
retained by the developer.
7.3.3 Landscape Architect
A Landscape Architect for the residential
subdivision 19T-04G03 will be retained by
the developer/builder, in consultation with the
Town of Georgina.
The Design Control Architect will be
responsible for reviewing all drawings to
confirm compliance with the Urban Design and
Architectural Design Guidelines. Drawings
submitted to and approved by the Design
Control Architect will include:
Building plans and elevations;
Site Plans;
Exterior materials and colours;
Landscape plans; and
Signage (where required)
The Design Control Architect, or the
Landscape Architect where it pertains to
the Master Landscape Plan, will indicate
compliance with the guidelines by "stamping"
(with a stamp for this specific purpose and
not a seal of practice) and sign the site plan
as approved. Building permit applications will
only be processed when a stamp and signed
site plan is submitted to the Town of Georgina.
74
7.4 REVIEW PROCESS
The Design Review Process deals only with
the external visual appearance of the units
and their relationship to the streetscape. Floor
plans are provided for information only and as
a guide in assessing the exterior treatment.
7.5 APPROVALS
BOUSFIELD$ INC.
19

75
By-Law Number 500-2012-????
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
IN THE
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
BY~LAW NUMBER 500-2010-0013
A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NUMBER 500, BEING A BY·LAW TO
REGULATE THE USE OF LANDS AND THE CHARACTER, LOCATION AND
USE OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN THE TOWN OF GEORGINA.
Pursuant to Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990, the Council of the Town of
Georgina
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. That Map 2, Schedule 'A' to Zoning By-law Number 500, as amended, is hereby
further amended by changing the zone symbol from Rural 'RU' to Residential
'R1 -135', 'R1-136',and OS-84 on lands described as Part of Lots 6 and 7,
Concession 3 (N .G.), shown in heavy outline and designated 'R1 -135', 'R1 -136',
and OS-84 in Schedule 'A' attached hereto.
2. That Section 7.5 SPECIAL PROVISIONS of Zoning By-law Number 500 as
amended, is hereby further amended by adding after Subsection 7 .5.1 01 , the
following:
Page 1 of 6
Schedule 5

76
By-Law Number 500-2012-????
"7.5.102 PT. LOTS 6 & 7, CON 3 (N.G.) 'R1-135' and 'R1-136' LOWNDES AVE.
(Map2)
a) Notwithstanding Sections 6.1 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), and (i), the following
requirements shall apply on lands shown in heavy outline and designated 'R 1-
135', and 'R1-136' in Schedule 'A' attached hereto:
ZONE R1-135 R1-136
Lot Frontage Per Unit (Minimum)
Interior Lot 12.0 metres 15.0 metres
Corner Lot 16.0 metres 18.5 metres
Lot Area Per Unit (Minimum)
Interior Lot 394m 2 525 m 2
Corner Lot 520m 2 750m 2
Front Yard (Minimum)
To Attached Garage 6.0 metres (i) 6.0 metres (i)
To Dwelling 5.0 metres (i) 5.0 metres (i)
Exterior Side Yard I Minimum)
3.5 (ii) 3.5 (ii)
Rear Yard (Minimum) 7.5 metres 7.5 metres
Interior Side Yard (Minimum) 1.2 metres plus 1.2 metres plus
0.5 metres for each 0.5 metres for each
additional or partial additional or partial
storey above the storey above the
second (iii)
second (iii)
Lot Coverage (Maximum)
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
(i) The minimum setback for the main wall of a dwelling to a sight triangle which forms part of
the street shall be 2 .5 metres, and the minimum setback for any other building or structure to a
sight triangle which forms part of the street shall be 0.6 metres .
(ii) Pursuant to By-law Number 2004-0076 (PW0-2), as amended, no entrance shari be
permitted to provide access to the exterior flankage of a corner lot.
(iii) Where there is a detached garage in the rear yard of a lot, the minimum interior side yard
on the side providing access to a detached garage shall be 3 5 metres.
Page 2 of 6

77
By-Law Number 500-2012-????
b) Notwithstanding Sections 5.28 (h) and (i) , and any other provisions to the contrary,
the following additional requirements shall apply to garages, driveways , and parking
areas:
i) Every lot shall provide a garage.
ii) No attached garage shall project into the front yard more than 1 metre beyond
the most distant point of any wall of the dwelling facing the street at the ground
floor level, or more than 2.0 metres beyond the most distant point of any wall
of the dwelling facing the street at the ground floor level where there is a
covered unenclosed porch or entry feature. In no case shall an attached
garage project forward beyond a covered unenclosed porch or entry feature
adjacent to the attached garage.
iii) In the case of a dwelling with an attached garage, no part of any driveway or
parking area in the front yard shall be located closer than 0.6 metres from a
sight triangle and 0.9 metres from a side lot line. Furthermore, the maximum
width of a driveway or parking area in the front yard shall be the interior width
of the attached garage on the lot, plus 0.5 metres.
iv) In the case of a lot with a detached garage in the rear yard, no part of any
driveway or parking area shall be located closer than 0.9 metres from a side
lot line. Furthermore, the minimum width of a driveway leading to a parking
area and a detached garage in the rear yard shall be 2.5 metres, and the
maximum width of a driveway or parking area in the front yard shall be 3.0
metres.
c) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5.12, the erection of fences on residential
lots shall be subject to the following:
i) Fences not exceeding 2.0 metres in height are permitted in the rear yard, as
well as within the back half of the interior side yard . Such fences are exempt
from the minimum yard requirements. Any fence within the above noted yards
that exceeds 2.0 metres in height must be erected in compliance with the
minimum yard requirements for the appropriate zone.
ii) Fences are permitted in the front and exterior side yards, as well as the front
half of the interior side yard, provided such fence does not exceed 0.9 metres
in height. Such fences are exempt from the minimum yard requirements of the
by-law
iii) Notwithstanding ii) above, where the front yard abuts the rear yard or back half
of the interior side yard of an abutting residential lot, fences not exceeding 2.0
metres in height are permitted along the common lot line.
c) Notwithstanding Section 5.35 in the area zoned 'R1-136' on schedule A hereto,
where local street lines intersect,
i) a 5 metre sight triangle shall be required to be maintained in accordance with
Page 3 of 6

78
By-Law Number 500-2012-????
the provisions of Section 5.35 (b)
d) Notwithstanding Section 5.45 (a) as it applies to yard encroachments for
Unenclosed Porches and Steps in the required front and exterior side yard areas,
i) unenclosed porches are permitted to encroach 1.5 metres into any required
front yard or exterior side yard with an additional 0.5 metre encroachment
permitted for steps. All other yard encroachments as provided in Section 5.45
(a) within. By-law Number 500, as amended, continue to apply."
3. That Section 27.5 SPECIAL PROVISIONS of Zoning By-law Number 500 as
amended, is hereby further amended by adding after Subsection 27.5.83, the
following :
"27.5.84 PART OF LOTS 6 & 7. CONCESSION 3 (N.G.) 'OS-84'
LOWNDES AVE (Map 2)
Notwithstanding Section 27.2, on lands shown in heavy outline and designated 'OS-84' in
Schedule 'A' attached hereto, only conservation, storm water management facility and
passive recreation uses shall be permitted. Furthermore, only buildings and structures
associated with these uses shall be permitted.
READ a first, second and third time and finally passed this day of , 2013.
Robert Grossi, Mayor
Roland Chenier, Town Clerk
Page 4 of 6

79
By-Lay.; Number 500-2012-?7??
EXPLANATORY NOTE TO BY-LAW NUMBER 500-2010-0013
(Greengate Village Limited- Lowndes Ave Subdivision.) (Town File No.: ??? and
???)
Zoning By-law Number 500-2013-??? amends Zoning By-law No. 500, as
amended, as it applies to the subject lands. More specifically, it has the effect of
changing the zoning of the subject lands from "Rural (RU to "Low Density Urban
Residential (R1-135, and R1 -136)", and "Open Space (OS-84)" as shown in
Schedule 'A' to the amending bylaw.
2 The amending by-law serves to rezone lands within proposed Draft Plan of
Subdivision 19T-04G03 and to provide additional site specific zoning standards for
the subject lands.
3 Zoning By-law Number 500-2013-??? conforms to the Keswick Secondary Plan.
4 A LOCATION MAP showing the general location of the land to which By-law
Number 500-2013-???? applies is attached hereto:
I

80
PART OF LOTS 6 and 7 CONCESSION 3
TOWN OF GEORGINA
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
\ \ \ ~-~-~~
\ I \ ____-:::::-~~-~
I \ I
\ \ ll ~~
\ ' ~ -~------
.--------!.' '~-;;~ ~ (\:,S
----~~~ c II (-
--~~- '/Eo"l.E ~
---~- 0 0 -~~-"'\ \ \ ~-~
~,1' ,,, \ ..--
--... (~~\ \ \1\ \ \ \ \ -\_.\-~\ ~~~
-~~- ~~-r-n , , I
,
i... \ ~\-\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ -~
! o0-\\ : I \ \\\\I\ \ ~,,,,,,,_ '--'-~(\1----
I f ' \ I \.---\'~ \ ' I
:!, ~~~~i~~~..-~,- '/i 11 E tl 0 "I.E-~\\~\ \
~, -.;-\\-~,-~c\, \ .. , \ . ·~
">1 "\'-\' \1 \
---, ... r· ,,\,.\
)
\~ \ \ \ l__....oOI.--r
\~
\
\
\ \
)
I
-~~~--~
84 / ~-~-~~- THIS IS SCHEDULE 'A' TO
~~ BY-LAW 500-2013-0000
\ PASSED THIS RD DAY OF
\ JUNE, 2013.
\
\
I
\
I
t
MAYOR
CLERK

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS
URBAN DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL GUIDELINES APRIL 2011-MAY 2013
II'
n
:r
('!)
c..
s::::
('!)
C'\
Section Peer Review Comments Original Guidelines Revised Guidelines I
April2011 May 2013 I
General Comment Key lots that will require architectural Priority Lot Plan on Page 6 of No change required respecting
care and upgrading include corner lot the Guidelines is a lotting plan Lots 17, 18 and 19.
I
models, side elevations on lots 17, 18, which also identifies the lots
19, 33 and 34 as well as the rear requiring special treatment (i.e. In addition to side elevation I
I
elevation upgrades on Lots 26 Lots 1, 25, 26 and 57). upgrades, rear upgrades have
through 57, which will be highly Upgrades to the side been included for Lots 33 and 34
exposed to the public. elevations are proposed to and rear upgrades only have been 1
both sides of Lot 18 and included for Lots 26-32 inclusive
I
Respecting Lots 17 and 19, upgraded respecting Lots 33 and 34, and Lots 35-57 inclusive.
side elevations are required only for
the exposed sides.
only for the side elevations
visible from the proposed
stormwater management pond.
2.7.ii In the second bullet, replace the Adjacent to open space blocks
Parking Standards words 'will' with 'shall' and delete the driveways will be located, Revised accordingly.
and Locations - words 'wherever possible'. wherever possible, away from
Driveway Parking
the open space.
3.1 Streetscape In the second bullet, an 8.0 m or .. . Street tree spacings at Trees to be planted at a minimum
Landscaping closer tree spacing interval is regular intervals. 1Om interval.
recommended.
3.2 4 1 n paragraph - it is questioned The maximum fence height The maximum fence height shall
Fencing whether the proposed 2 metre rear shall be 2 metres in the rear be in accordance with Town
and interior side yard fence is yard, as well as in the interior standards in the rear yard, as well
consistent with the Town standard. side yard to the mid-point of as in the interior side yard to the
the interior sidewall of the mid-point of the interior sidewall of
dwelling.
the dwelling.
3.4 Add the following to the second bullet Transformers should be Revised Accordingly.
Utility Boxes, Vaults - where possible, transformers will be located at least 1 . 0 m from the
and Service screened through planting. curb, 1.5 m from the sidewalk
Pedestals
and at a minimum 6.0 m from
the building wall
I
81
Page 1 of 4

3.4 Add the following to the third bullet . .. Utility metres should be Revised Accordingly.
Utility Boxes, Vaults hydro metres will be located on screened from view and
and Service interior side yards of housing. incorporated into the overall
Pedestals
design of the housing unit.
4.1 Corner Lot Add a bullet at the end of the last N/A Revised Accordingly.
Dwellings
bullet - Fencing should not be
returned too far along the side
elevation so as to obstruct
architectural features on flanking
elevations.
4.3 Add the following three bullets at the N/A Revised accordingly.
High Exposure Rear I end of the last bullet:
Side Elevations -Rear upgrades of lots backing onto
the open space I walkway will be
required. Upgrades will include
consistent materials and window
styles with front elevation, frieze board
beneath roof soffit and roof cable
details (page 6)
-Where possible plane changes and
bay windows are encouraged on the
rear elevation.
Lots flanking the stormwater
management pond should provide a
porch feature or architectural detail
(bay or box cut window) that
addresses this feature.
5.1 In the last bullet, delete the first -Roof lines should be pitched Revised accordingly.
Architectural Styles sentence and immediately after, add with slopes between 30 and 60
the following two bullets:
degrees'
82
-Minimum main roof slopes shall be
6:12 front to back and hip roofs the
side slopes shall be 10:12. Lower roof
slopes will be considered where
appropriate to the architectu@!_st~ . _
- -
Page 2 of 4

-Porch roof slopes may be a lower
pitch minimum of 4:12.
At the end of the last sentence of the
last bullet- replace 0.9 with 1.2 m
and at the end of the sentence add
the words 'or to a wall plane change'.
5.2 Third bullet- it is questioned whether Front porches are encouraged Revised accordingly such that the
Community Safety the Town is satisfied with not having design of all dwellings will
porches on all units. If so, models
incorporate front porches.
without porches shall have detailed
doorway surrounds and the garage
shall be recessed.
5.3 Second bullet - the 5% minimum The front wall of the house The front wall of the house should
Main Entrances, window on the front fac;:ade is too low. should have windows of a have windows of a traditional
Porches, Verandahs traditional proportion (higher) proportion (higher) than they are
and Entrance than they are wide) and wide) and occupy between 15%
Features occupy between 5% and 50% and 50% of the front fac;:ade.
of the front facade.
5.3 Fourth bullet- add the following at the Where the face of a garage is Where the face of a garage is
Main Entrances, end of the sentence, ' .. . and shall be situated in front of a dwelling, a situated in front of a dwelling, a
Porches, Verandahs flush with the garage face'. porch or entry feature shall be porch or entry feature shall be
and Entrance provided. provided and shall be flush with
Features
the garage face.
5.3 Add the following two bullets at the N/A Revised accordingly.
Main Entrances, end of the section
Porches, Verandahs -Porches shall be a useable depth I
and Entrance with a minimum 1.5m
Features -Porch columns shall be a minimum 8
inches (200 mm) in diameter.
5.5 First bullet - replace with the following The ground floor and second Revised accordingly.
Houses with Integral two bullets: floor wall of a dwelling shall be
front Garages -Ground and second floor front wall of no greater than 3.0 metres
dwelling shall be no greater than 3 behind the face of an attached
metres behind the face of the garage. garage.
'------- -
-Second floor front wall face shall be a
83
Page 3 of 4

maximum 2.5 m behind the face of the
garage and shall cover a minimum of
75% of the garage width.
I
i
'
5.5 Sixth bullet - delete. See new bullet Useable porches should be Porches shall be a useable depth
Houses with Integral under Section 5.3 above. encouraged. with a minimum 1.5 metre
Front Garages
6.4 First paragraph- add the following N/A Added.
Exterior Colours and immediately after the paragraph:
Materials
-Identical colour packages shall be
separated by a minimum of 3
dwellings/lots and shall not be sited
on lots directly opposite from each
other.
7.2 First paragraph - add the following N/A No change.
Preliminary Review after the last sentence, 'The design
architect cannot be one and the same
as the design control architect'.
Draft plan condition 19(b) states,
'A control architect shall be
retained at the cost of the
Owner( s) with the concurrence of
the Town of Georgina to ensure
compliance with the approved
Urban Design and Architectural
Design Guidelines. Where
possible the control architect shall
be the same architect that
prepared the Architectural Design
Guidelines'.
84
The peer reviewer's suggestion
would be contrary to the above
draft plan condition; therefore no
change is required.
Page 4 of 4

85
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT NO. PB-2013-0055
FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JUNE 17, 2013
SUBJECT:
1. RECOMMENDATIONS:
EXTENSION OF DRAFT PLAN APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
1084466 ONTARIO LTD. (C/0 A & THOMES)
A. THAT REPORT PB-2013-0055 PREPARED BY THE PLANNING
DIVISION DATED JUNE 17, 2013 RESPECTING A REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF DRAFT PLAN APPROVAL SUBMITTED BY 1084466
ONTARIO L TO. FOR A 16 UNIT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND PLAN
OF CONDOMINIUM LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF HIGH
STREET AND BURKE STREET IN SUTTON BE RECEIVED.
B. THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 51(33) OF THE PLANNING ACT,
R.S.O., 1990, C.P.13, AS AMENDED, AN EXTENSION TO THE
APPROVAL OF DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02 BE GRANTED TO
JULY 15, 2014.
C. THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 51(44) OF THE PLANNING ACT,
R.S.O., 1990, C.P.13, AS AMENDED, THE LAPSING PROVISION
APPLIED TO THE CONDITIONS OF DRAFT PLAN APPROVAL FOR
BOTH THE PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND THE PLAN OF
CONDOMINIUM BE AMENDED TO READ "PURSUANT TO THE
PLANNING ACT, R.S.O., 1990, C.P.13, AS AMENDED, APPROVAL OF
THIS PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM SHALL
LAPSE IF FINAL APPROVAL FOR REGISTRATION HAS NOT BEEN
GIVEN BY JULY 15, 2014, UNLESS APPROVAL HAS BEEN SOONER
WITHDRAWN OR THE TOWN OF GEORGINA HAS EXTENDED THE
DURATION OF THE APPROVAL"
D. THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 51(44) OF THE PLANNING ACT,
R.S.O., 1990, C.P.13, AS AMENDED, COUNCIL APPROVE THE
REVISED CONDITIONS OF DRAFT PLAN APPROVAL APPLIED TO
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND DRAFT PLAN OF

86
- Page 2 of Report No. PB-2013-0055 -
CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02, ATTACHED AS SCHEDULE '11' TO
REPORT PB-2013-0055.
E. THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 51(47) OF THE PLANNING ACT,
R.S.O., 1990, C.P.13, AS AMENDED, WRITTEN NOTICE SHALL NOT
BE GIVEN AS THE CHANGES TO THE CONDITIONS OF DRAFT PLAN
APPROVAL AS NOTED IN D. ABOVE ARE CONSIDERED TO BE
MINOR.
F. THAT THE REMOVAL OF LANDS DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 AND 2,
AND BLOCK 7 (SITE TRIANGLE) FROM THE DRAFT APPROVED
PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND DRAFT PLAN OF
CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02, AS A REDLINE REVISION THERETO,
BE APPROVED.
G. THAT PLANNING STAFF FORWARD THE REVISED CONDITIONS OF
DRAFT PLAN APPROVAL TO THE APPLICANT, ITS AGENT, THE
YORK REGION DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNITY PLANNING
BRANCH OF THE TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNITY PLANNING
DEPARTMENT, AND TO ALL OTHER AGENCIES WHICH HAVE
IMPOSED THEIR RESPECTIVE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
2. INFORMATION:
APPLICANT:
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
FILE NUMBERS:
1 084466 Ontario Ltd . (c/o A & T Homes)
Gord Mahoney (Michael Smith Planning
Consultants; Development Coordinators Ltd .)
(Refer to Schedules '1' and '3')
Lots 6 to 11 , Block 16, Plan 69 and ,
Part of Lots 3 and 4, Block 15, Plan 69 and ,
Part of unnamed lane, Block 16, Plan 69 and ,
Part of High Street, Plan 69
33 High Street, Sutton
Roll Nos. 070-981 and 070-832
01.131 (PianofSubdivision-19T-07G01)
01.132 (Plan of Condominium -19CDM-07G02)
3. BACKGROUND I PROPOSAL:
On June 24, 2008, the Council of the Town of Georgina granted approval of the
above referenced draft plan of subdivision and draft plan of condominium to
permit 16 freehold townhouse dwelling units (fronting onto a private condominium
road) and 2 single family dwelling lots.

87
- Page 3 of Report No. PB-2013-0055 -
Pursuant to Section 51 (32) of the Planning Act, the following lapsing provision
was included as a notation at the bottom of the conditions of approval:
"PURSUANT TO THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O., 1990, AS AMENDED,
APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND PLAN OF
CONDOMINIUM SHALL LAPSE IF FINAL APPROVAL FOR
REGISTRATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN WITHIN THREE YEARS
AFTER THE DATE UPON WHICH APPROVAL TO THE PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION AND THE PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM WAS GIVEN,
UNLESS APPROVAL HAS BEEN SOONER WITHDRAWN OR THE
TOWN OF GEORGINA HAS EXTENDED THE DURATION OF THE
APPROVAL."
In accordance with Section 51(41) of the Planning Act, the decision of Council to
approve the draft Plan of Subdivision 19T-07G01 and draft Plan of Condominium
19CDM-07G02 was deemed to have been given on July 15, 2008, being the day
after the last day for appealing the decision of approval of the plans. Accordingly,
draft plan approval was scheduled to lapse on July 15, 2011 . However, Town
Council has since approved two extensions to these draft plans, the first from
July 15, 2011 to July 15, 2012 (Council Resolution No. C-2011-0285) and a
second extension from July 15, 2012 to July 15, 2013 (Council Resolution No. C-
2012-0275). A copy of the approved draft plans and current approved draft plan
conditions are attached as Schedules '3' and '4' respectively.
On April 2, 2013, the applicant's agent submitted a request for a further
extension to the draft plan approval review period, for a one (1) year timeframe,
from July 15, 2013 to July 15, 2014. The applicant has indicated that they are in
the process of clearing draft plan conditions and nearing registration of the plans.
Accordingly, an extension is needed in order to fulfill the conditions of draft plan
approval before the approval lapses (refer to Schedule '5').
4. DISCUSSION:
Section 51 (33) of the Planning Act permits approval authorities to extend the
duration of draft plan approval provided that the extension is given before the
approval lapses.
The request for extension of draft plan approval was circulated to Town
departments and those external agencies that imposed conditions of approval.
The request for extension of draft plan approval provides them an opportunity to
review their conditions and make changes if required.
The following internal departments and external agencies have provided
comments in response to the notice, as of the date of the writing of this report:

88
- Page 4 of Report No. PB-201 3-0055 -
Administrative Services Department:
Fire Department: No comments as of report preparation.
Municipal Law Enforcement Office: No comments or concerns
Tax Division: No taxation issues
Building Division: No further comments since last response (No objection)
Engineering Division: No objection
Operations Division: N/A
Georgina Heritage Committee: No objection to extension request. Separate
comments submitted on entrance feature (refer to Schedule '6')
Enbridge: No objection (refer to Schedule '7')
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority: No objection (refer to Schedule '8')
Ministry of Transportation: No objection
There were no unfavorable comments received from the circulated Town
departments and external agencies.
4.1 Proposed Changes to Conditions of Draft Plan Approval
Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. have requested minor changes to the existing
draft plan conditions, by letter dated May 2, 2013 (refer to Schedule '7').
The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority have also requested minor
changes to the existing draft plan conditions, by letter dated May 15, 2013 (refer
to Schedule '8').
During the review of preliminary design concepts for the community entrance
feature sign, staff began to have second thoughts about the suitability of this site
to host such a sign. In this regard, the sign's location, being beyond the road
allowances and at the far north/easterly edge of the sight triangle at the High
Street/Burke Street intersection, is a considerable distance from the sight lines of
the travelled portion of High Street. In staff's opinion, this specific location
coupled with the existing curve in the alignment of High Street, would result in a
sign that would not be as noticeable or prominent as it should be to motorists
travelling along High Street. The Town's Economic Development Officer, Karyn
Stone, concurs with the above, and believes that there are more appropriate
locations for a Sutton Community entrance sign to consider, such as at the

89
- Page 5 of Report No. PB-2013-0055 -
intersections of High Street and Highway 48. She further notes that this matter
will be examined more comprehensively through the Signage Strategy that is
currently underway.
Staff also advises that both the Downtown Sutton Merchant Association and The
Georgina Heritage Committee have been consulted and are in support of the
most recent design of the entrance feature, which is shown in Schedule '9'. It
should be noted however, that the Heritage Committee has requested that the
name on the sign feature include a reference to 'Historic Sutton', staff believe this
is a good suggestion, and recommend that the entrance feature sign wording be
amended to read as follows (or something similar):
"Highfield Landing in Historic Sutton"
In view of the above, staff is recommending that a revision be made to draft
Conditions Nos. 1, 15, 27 and 28 to no longer require Council's approval of a
Community Entrance Feature/Sign and that such conditions be changed to
reflect the requirement of a project specific entrance feature being located on the
Subject Land (i.e. not on a separate block to be dedicated to the Town) and that
such sign feature shall include reference to 'Historic Sutton'.
Comments received from the Downtown Sutton Merchant Association are
attached hereto as Schedule '1 0'
4.2 Proposed Changes to Draft Plans
On December 6, 201 0, the Committee of Adjustment approved Consent
applications in order to sever the two (2) residential lots, referenced as Lots 1
and 2 on the draft plans. Concurrently, the Committee approved a Consent
application for an easement for sanitary service of the two residential lots. It was
noted in the staff report (PB-201 0-0117) that the servicing easement would be
incorporated into a redlined revision of the draft plans. Subsequently, a fourth
consent application for an easement for storm water management was needed
over the easterly residential lot (referenced as Lot 1 on the draft plans), in favour
of the Subject Land and was approved on March 7, 2011 . The conditions of
consent approval for each of the above noted consents have been fulfilled , and
therefore, subject to the registration of the deed and plan, the residential lots
have been legally created and thus separated from the plan of
subdivision/condominium.
In this regard , with the above noted consents finalized in relation to the
severance of the residential lots from the lands affected by the draft plans, staff
recommend that the draft plans be amended accordingly. A copy of the draft M­
plan, now excluding the residential lots, and incorporating a servicing easement,
is attached hereto as Schedule '11 '.

90
-Page 6 of Report No. PB-2013-0055-
Consequently, staff is also recommending that draft Conditions Nos. 31 to 38, as
they relate to the heritage building located on Lot 2, be deleted. In this regard ,
staff note that comparable conditions are contained in a Consent Agreement now
registered against Lots 1 and 2.
If granted an extension, the applicant will be required to finalize all outstanding
conditions and obtain final approval for final plan registration by July 15, 2014, or
again seek Council's approval for a further extension to the draft plan approval.
5. CONCLUSIONS:
Staff are of the opinion that the applicant has made reasonable progress towards
fulfilling the conditions of draft plan approval and is moving toward final
registration of the proposed plans of subdivision and condominium. In
consideration of the above, staff supports the applicant's request for extension of
draft plan approval for an additional one (1) year timeframe, to lapse on July 15,
2014.
In addition, staff recommend that the existing draft plan conditions be revised as
noted in Section 4. above. A copy of the revised draft plan conditions, which
incorporate the proposed changes, and a copy of the revised draft plans are
attached hereto as Schedules '12' and '13'.
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Todd Evershed, MCIP, RPP
Planner
Velvet L. Ross, MCIP, RPP
Manager of Planning
Recommended by:
Approved by:
~W~rs ,~PI , MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning and Building
Ulhranf
Winanne Grant, B.A., AMCT, CEMC
Chief Administrative Officer
10 June 2013

91
CONTEXT MAP
~
,.:
8
E
U5
Cl>
~
Ill
_I
§
...
80
.0
:;;:
~
0
SCHEDULE '1'

92
Hlgn Str66t
,. ..... J
,-
SCHEDULE '2'

I
I
_j
~
LOT
I
~~~
wT 2 ···1 wr J
BLOCK
~ ~
LOT 4
RESIDE1TIAL --,..,.,,---- - ----,
1 LOT 12
/ PAI/r 4 f~-11.10$
KEY PLAN
I
~
I
li:! ~ I
J
I
,- ,
·I wr 1 I
I REGIS TEREO I
I
I
BLOCK
LOT 2
o:-..
I
I
I~
/ i
" -~
~
I ~
1/
I PROPOSED
COMMERCML
DEVELOPMENT
Subject to the conditions. if any. set rotth in our
leiter dated ::rvfl~ Zj ?OCfl
the drafc Plao is approved under Section Slof
1be Planning Act, R.S 0. 1990, this~
day of ;r"""e.. 2..0
"0
"0
...
0
t..<
r::: (!)
::I c.
(l)"'tt
N­
~~~~
~ ::I
No c...,
0(/)
cor::
C"
c.
:;::·
(ij'
(5"
:::::1
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
108U6e 0Mst1o UO .. An))nlo ~I" I T HcltnH)
Lots 610 11lrdl.llive. Bloc~ 16
Reg.stered Plan69
Part o1 Lots 3 and •. 8iodt" 15. Registered ~n 69
part of~ &ttne 8Jock 16, Regis1ered Plan fi9 end
pattdHighSn.t: A~Plln69
T~~o.ntt!Ona
93
(/)
"'tt(')
DJ
:::r:
c.cm
(1)0
..... c
or
..... m
N ~
~

I
I
_j
I
~I
~I ~
J
I
ROYAL CANADIAJ LEGION
LOT 2 '"I LOT J
~
,.,.
LOT 4
BLOCK
16
I
I
~ k
' I
i I
ll
CJ>
-., (")
Q) :::t
cern
CDc
NC
or
-m
N •
w
I - ...1 ~ - ---- - _ _ ___!___ ,,..;s -
- __.__,-- ~~~ ~~~~· ~ ~~
- ~ • ,. ~ I - -- ~ ~
~ S· • .- . s ' • - ·- ... ... ~--""- ~. ,.. ....,....._ ...
__ _ /)
7
LOT 5
("
I .... - . ~ I .:..:: ""· . --=- ~.. ,=;,;r·· - "7"":"' --· - .L - ,
k:_
,- ,
I LOT 1 I
I REGISTERED I
I
I
BLOCK
LOT 2
o::..-
RESIDE'fT!AL ~
1 LOT 12
/ PART 4 6$R- 1720$
PROPOSED COMMERC~L
DEVELOPMENT
Subject lo tbe conditions, i ( any. set forth in our ltttc:r
dated :::Tv..e. Z'l • 2.00!! lheclnJIPI31l istpproved
uodcr Se

95
Conditions of Draft Plan Approval -
Revised and Reissued June 26, 2012
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL AND THE RELEASE FOR
REGISTRATION OF DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND DRAFT PLAN
OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02:
1. Approval shall relate to Draft Plan of Subdivision 19T-07G01 and Draft Plan of
Condominium 19CDM-07G02, both dated March 5, 2005 (revised August 4, 2005,
August 11, 2005, September 27, 2005, December 19, 2006, and February 19,
2008) and prepared by Michael Smith Planning Consultants; Development
Coordinators Ltd. (Drawing Numbers 700-00 and 700-00-B), and incorporating the
following red-line revisions:
a) A block of land abutting Block 8, of a size and shape satisfactory to the
Director of Planning and Building, shall be shown and provided for the
purpose of accommodating landscaping and a community entrance feature;
b) An additional 2.0 metre widening, 30 metres in length, together with a 50
metre taper shall be shown and provided for the purpose of a northbound right
tum lane at the intersection of East Street and High Street, subject to final
confirmation from the Regional Municipality of York;
c) A revised cul-de-sac or turning circle shall be shown and provided to
accommodate the turning movements of all municipal emergency
equipment and waste/recycling vehicles, all to the satisfaction of the Town;
and,
d) A minimum of 7 visitor parking spaces shall be shown and provided.
Corporation of the Town of Georgina
2. The Owner shall finalize and complete the acquisition of Parts 1, 2, and 7 on
Reference Plan 65R-30797 from the Town of Georgina ("Town").
3. The lands within this draft plan of subdivision and draft plan of condominium
("subject lands") shall be appropriately zoned by a zoning by-law that has come
into force and effect in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act.
4. The Council of the Town of Georgina shall pass a by-law or resolution authorizing
the allocation of municipal water supply and sanitary sewage servicing capacity to
the subject lands in order to facilitate the proposed development.
Page 1 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 1 of 21

96
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
5. The Owner shall enter into a Development Agreement and agree to satisfy all
conditions, financial and otherwise, of the Town of Georgina; prior to final
approval, the Town shall confirm that the Development Agreement will be
registered by the municipality against the lands to which it applies, pursuant to the
Planning Act.
6. The private road within the draft plan of condominium shall be designed and
constructed by the Owner at his expense, all to the satisfaction of the Director of
Operations and Engineering for the Town.
7. The private road within the draft plan of condominium shall be named to the
satisfaction of the Town and the Regional Municipality of York Planning and
Development Services Department.
8. The dead-end private road within the draft plan of condominium shall be
terminated in a turning circle or other acceptable manner adequate for the turning
movements of all municipal emergency equipment and waste/recycling vehicles.
9. The Owner shall design and construct the private water distribution, sanitary
sewage collection and stormwater collection systems including all external
servicing required to connect the subject lands to the existing municipal system, all
to the satisfaction of the Director of Operations and Engineering for the Town.
10. The Owner shall design and reconstruct Burke Street to a full urban standard from
and including its intersection with High Street to the east limit of the subject lands
all at the Owner's expense and all to the satisfaction of the Director of Operations
and Engineering for the Town. The design and reconstruction of Burke Street shall
ensure a proper transition beyond the easterly limit of the subject lands between
the urban and remaining sub-urban road sections.
11 . The Owner acknowledges that the Town has retained transportation consultants to
undertake a comprehensive transportation analysis ("Study") as part of the
ongoing Sutton Secondary Plan Review Study. The Owner shall agree in the
Development Agreement to undertake, or financially contribute towards, any
improvements recommended in this Study that are associated with the proposed
development on the subject lands. In the event that a financial contribution is
required, the amount shall be determined by the Town in consultation with the
Owner.
Page 2 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 2 of 21

97
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19COM-07G02
12. The Owner shall submit complete and detailed engineering drawings and
accompanying reports, designed in accordance with the current Town Municipal
Development Design Criteria in effect at the time development occurs, for review
by the Director of Operations and Engineering for the Town and agree in the
Development Agreement to construct all works at the Owner's expense to the
satisfaction of the Director of Operations and Engineering for the Town.
13. The Owner shall convey to the Town any easements as may be required for water,
storm and/or sanitary sewer purposes, stormwater management or other
municipal utility purposes, without monetary consideration and free of all
encumbrances.
14. The Owner shall convey to the Town a 2.4 metre widening across the frontage of the
subject lands where they abut East Street, without monetary consideration and free
of all encumbrances.
15. The Owner shall convey to the Town a block of land abutting Block 8, of a size and
shape satisfactory to the Director of Planning and Building, for the purpose of
accommodating landscaping and a community entrance feature, without monetary
consideration and free of all encumbrances.
16. The Owner shall, at his expense, provide an overall lot grading and drainage plan
together with a Stormwater Management Report for review by the Director of
Operations and Engineering for the Town. The report shall deal with any external
contributing area as required .
17. The Owner shall submit a report prepared by a qualified professional outlining the
results of detailed site specific geotechnical and hydrogeological subsurface
explorations, respecting the installation of private services on the subject lands as
well as the construction of buildings, all to the satisfaction of the Town.
18. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement, in wording satisfactory to
the Town, to carry out or cause to be carried out the recommendations and
measures contained within the report approved under Condition No. 17 above.
19. The Owner shall prepare and submit a composite utility distribution plan in
consultation with all affected authorities to the satisfaction of the Town.
20. The Owner shall agree that it will permit any telephone or telecommunications
service provider to locate its plant within the proposed subdivision prior to the plan
Page 3 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 3 of 21

98
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
registration provided the telephone or telecommunications service provider has
executed a Municipal Access Agreement with the Town. The Owner shall ensure
that any such service provider will be permitted to install its plant so as to permit
connection to individual dwelling units within the development as and when each
dwelling unit is constructed .
21 . The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to display plans in its sales
office and identify in its sales literature any phases of development, the location of
private and utility infrastructure including but not limited to sidewalks, ponds,
transformers, pedestals, streetlights, mailboxes and lands for other development.
22. The Owner shall prepare and submit a detailed fence plan showing all required
fencing (e.g. decorative, privacy, acoustical, security) and sha!l agree in the
Development Agreement to erect and maintain such fencing, all to the satisfaction
of the Director of Operations and Engineering for the Town.
23. The Owner shall submit a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a qualified
professional for review and approval by the Town, and agree in the Development
Agreement to carry out or cause to be carried out the recommendations and
measures contained within the approved Tree Preservation Plan.
24. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement not to remove or damage
(leading to the destruction of) those trees identified in the approved Tree
Preservation Plan without the prior written approval of the Town of Georgina. The
Owner shall deposit a security in the form of a Letter of Credit, in an amount to be
determined by the Town of Georgina, to ensure compliance with the tree
preservation requirements.
25. The Owner shall satisfy all provisions of the Regional Forest Conservation By-law
and the Town's Development Design Criteria respecting the preservation and
protection of trees and vegetation. Where trees will be lost to development the
Owner shall agree to compensate the Town through additional planting in tree
compensation areas identified within the approved Master Landscaping and Tree
Planting Plan.
26. The Owner shall submit a detailed Master Landscaping and Tree Planting Plan
prepared by a qualified professional for review and approval by the Town, and
agree in the Development Agreement to carry out or cause to be carried out the
recommendations and measures contained within the approved Master
Landscaping and Tree Planting Plan, including landscaping, tree planting, and an
Page 4 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 4 of 21

99
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
automated subsurface irrigation system within the proposed community entrance
feature at the intersection of High Street (Y.R. 9) and Burke Street.
27. The Owner shall submit an Urban Design Report prepared by a qualified
professional for review and approval by the Council of the Town of Georgina, and
agree in the Development Agreement to carry out or cause to be carried out the
recommendations and measures contained within the approved Urban Design
Report, including the design and construction of a community entrance feature at
the intersection of High Street (Y.R. 9) and Burke Street.
28. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to construct, at his
expense, a community entrance feature within the block of land identified in
Condition No. 15 above. The Downtown Sutton Merchants Association and the
Georgina Heritage Committee will be consulted respecting the design of the
community entrance feature. In accordance with Condition No. 27 above, the
Council of the Town of Georgina shall be the final approval authority respecting the
design of the community entrance feature.
29. The Owner shall submit detailed architectural design plans and coloured
renderings for all proposed buildings within the development, and shall agree that
the architectural design and elevations will be compatible with the restored
heritage building. The architectural design plans and coloured renderings shall be
prepared by a qualified professional architect and approved by the Council of the
Town of Georgina.
30. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement that:
a) All development shall proceed in accordance with the detailed architectural
design plans and coloured renderings approved by the Council of the Town
of Georgina; and,
b) All building permit applications shall be accompanied by drawings that have
been stamped and signed by the consulting architect, certifying compliance
with the approved architectural design plans and coloured renderings.
Building permits will not be issued for applications that are not accompanied
by drawings which are stamped and signed by the consulting architect, or
for applications that are not in compliance with the approved architectural
design plans and coloured renderings.
31 . The Owner shall carry out a cultural heritage resource assessment to ensure the
Page 5 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 5 of 21

100
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
assessment and identification of appropriate treatment of built heritage and
archaeological resources, and further to mitigate any identified adverse impacts to
significant heritage resources to the satisfaction of the Town and the Ministry of
Culture. No demolition, grading, filling or any form of soil disturbances (excluding
the disturbance required to perform the archaeological assessment and to relocate
the existing heritage building onto Lot 2) shall take place on the subject lands prior
to the issuance of a letter from the Ministry of Culture to the Town indicating that all
matters relating to heritage resources have been addressed in accordance with
licensing and resource conservation requirements.
32. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to implement any
measures recommended by the cultural heritage resource assessment required in
Condition No. 31 above, to the satisfaction of the Town and the Ministry of Culture.
33. The Owner shall retain, protect and incorporate the existing heritage building on
the subject lands as part of this development proposal.
34. The Owner shall protect and conserve the existing heritage building on the subject
lands through the following means:
a) To maintain the heritage building in good and sound conditions at all times
prior to and during the development of the subject lands;
b) To secure and protect the heritage building from damage;
c) To erect a "No Trespassing" sign in a visible location on the property; and,
d) To install a 3 metre high fence around the perimeter of the heritage building
to protect the dwelling until the completion of construction within the
development or the commencement of long-term occupancy of the heritage
building.
35. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall implement the following measures to
protect the heritage building:
a) The Owner shall provide at his expense a legal survey of the heritage
building to facilitate the registration of the heritage designation on the
created/proposed lot;
b) The Owner shall permit the designation of the property under Part IV of the
Page 6 of 21
SCHEDULE '4 '
Page 6 of 21

101
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
Ontario Heritage Act; and,
c) The Owner shall provide a $25,000 Letter of Credit to ensure the
preservation of the existing heritage building . The Letter of Cred it shall be
retained for use by the Town and shall not be released until the following
has been addressed:
• construction and grading on the subject lands and adjacent lots, and
roads have been completed to the satisfaction of the Town;
• the heritage building has been connected to municipal services;
• the exterior restoration of the heritage building has been completed;
• the heritage building meets the basic standards of occupancy as
confirmed by the Town of Georgina Building Division; and,
• all other heritage requirements of the Development Agreement have
been completed.
36. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to preserve the existing
heritage building through the following means:
a) To provide and implement a traditional restoration plan for the heritage
building, for review and approval by the Town;
b) To complete the exterior restoration of the heritage building, connection of
all municipal services to the allocated lot (water, gas, hydro, cable,
telephone etc.) and ensure basic standards of occupancy as confirmed by
the Town of Georgina Building Division within two years of registration;
c) To ensure that the architectural design and elevations of all proposed
dwellings within the development are compatible with the restored heritage
building; and,
d) To ensure that the historic front of the heritage building retains a front yard
appearance, the type of fencing permitted shall be limited to a low
residential picket fence rather than privacy fencing, and shall be in
accordance with fence plan approved under Condition No. 22 above.
Page 7 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 7 of 21

102
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
37. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to provide notice and
commemoration of the heritage building by providing and installing at his expense
an interpretative plaque outlining the history of the heritage house in a publicly
visible location on the property. Details of the design and location of the plaque are
to be submitted for review and approval by the Town, in consultation with the
Georgina Heritage Committee.
38. The Owner shall include the following clause in a registered portion of the
Development Agreement and in all offers of purchase and sale with respect to Lot
2 in the draft plan of subdivision:
a) "Purchasers are advised that the existing building on this property is
designated pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act. Any proposed additions
or alterations to the exterior of the existing dwelling shall be subject to
review and approval of plans by the Town."
39 . The Owner shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by the municipaHy-retained
peer review consultants in relation to the peer review of submitted reports and
studies.
40. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement that no building permits will
be applied for or issued until the Town is satisfied that adequate road access,
municipal water supply, sanitary sewers, and storm drainage facilities are
available to service the proposed development.
41 . The Town of Georgina shall confirm in writing through a clearance letter that
Conditions 1 to 40 inclusive have been satisfied.
Regional Municipality of York
42. Prior to final approval, the Region shall confirm that adequate water supply and
sewage servicing capacity are available and have been allocated by the Town of
Georgina for the development proposed within this draft plan of subdivision or any
phase thereof.
43. The Owners shall agree in the Development Agreement that all unused wells shall
be decommissioned according to Ontario Regulation 903 prior to any construction
works occurring on the site.
44. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall have prepared, by a qualified professional
Page 8 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 8 of 21

103
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
transportation consultant, a functional transportation report/plan outlining the
required Regional road improvements for this subdivision. The report/plan,
submitted to the Transportation and Community Planning Department for review
and approval, shall explain all transportation issues and shall recommend
mitigative measures for these issues.
45 . Prior to final approval, the Owner shall provide a written undertaking, to the
satisfaction of the Transportation and Community Planning Department, that the
Owner agrees to implement the recommendations of the functional transportation
report/plan as approved by the Transportation and Community Planning
Department.
46. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall submit detailed engineering drawings, to
the Transportation and Community Planning Department for review and approval,
that incorporate the recommendations of the functional transportation report/plan
as approved by the Transportation and Community Planning Department.
Additionally, the engineering drawings shall include the subdivision storm drainage
system, erosion and siltation control plans, site grading and servicing, plan and
profile drawings for the proposed intersections, construction access and mud mat
design, utility and underground servicing location plans, pavement markings,
electrical drawings for intersection signalization and illumination design, traffic
control/construction staging plans and landscape plans.
4 7. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall provide drawings for the proposed servicing
of the site to be reviewed by the Engineering Department of the area municipality.
Three (3) sets of engineering drawings (stamped and signed by a professional
engineer), and MOE forms together with any supporting information shall be
submitted to the Transportation and Community Planning Department.
48. Prior to final approval, the location and design of the construction access for the
subdivision work shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Transportation and
Community Planning Department and illustrated on the Engineering Drawings.
49. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the
Transportation and Community Planning Department, that all existing driveway(s)
along the Regional road frontage of this subdivision will be removed as part of the
subdivision work, at no cost to York Region.
50. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the
Transportation and Community Planning Department, that elevations along the
Page 9 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 9 of 21

104
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
streetline shall be 0.3 metres above the centreline elevations of the York Region
roadway, unless otherwise specified by the Transportation and Community
Planning Department.
51 . Prior to final approval, the Owner shall submit drawings depicting the following to
the satisfaction of York Region staff:
a) All existing woody vegetation within the York Region road right of way;
b) Tree protection measures to be implemented on and off the York Region
road right of way to protect right of way vegetation to be preserved;
c) Any woody vegetation within the York Region road right of way that is
proposed to be removed or relocated. However, it is to be noted that tree
removal within York Region road right's of way shall be avoided to the
extent possible/practical. Financial or other compensation may be sought
based on the value of trees proposed for removal; and,
d) A planting plan for all new and relocated vegetation to be planted within the
York Region road right of way, based on the following general guideline:
Tree planting shall be undertaken in accordance with York Region standards as
articulated in the Streetscaping Policy and using species from the York Region
Street Tree Planting List. These documents may be obtained from the Forestry
Section. If any landscaping or features other than tree planting (e.g. flower beds,
shrubs) are proposed and included in the Development Agreement, they will
require the approval of the Town and be supported by a Maintenance Agreement
between the Town and the Region for Town maintenance of these features; any
such Maintenance Agreement should indicate that where the area municipality
does not maintain the feature to York Region's satisfaction, the area municipality
will be responsible for the cost of maintenance or removal undertaken by the
Region.
52 . Prior to final approval, the Owner shall engage the services of a consultant to
prepare and submit for review and approval, a noise study to the satisfaction of the
Regional Transportation and Community Planning Department and the Town of
Georgina recommending noise attenuation features.
53. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement, in wording satisfactory to
the Regional Transportation and Community Planning Department and the Town
Page 10 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 10 of 21

105
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
of Georgina, to implement the noise attenuation features as recommended by the
noise study and to the satisfaction of the Regional Transportation and Community
Planning Department and the Town of Georgina.
54. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement, in wording satisfactory to
the Transportation and Community Planning Department, that where berm, noise
wall, window and/or oversized forced air mechanical systems are required , these
features shall be certified by a professional engineer to have been installed as
specified by the approved Noise Study and in conformance with the Ministry of
Environment guidelines and the York Region Noise Policy.
55 . The following warning clause shall be included in a registered portion of the
Development Agreement with respect to the lots or blocks affected:
"Purchasers are advised that despite the inclusion of noise attenuation features
within the development area and within the individual building units, noise levels
will continue to increase, occasionally interfering with some activities of the
building's occupants".
56. Where noise attenuation features will abut a York Region right-of-way, the Owner
shall agree in the Development Agreement, in wording satisfactory to York
Region's Transportation and Community Planning Department, as follows:
a) that no part of any noise attenuation feature shall be constructed on or
within the York Region right-of-way;
b) that noise fences adjacent to York Region roads may be constructed on the
private side of the 0.3 metre reserve and may be a maximum 2.5 metres in
height, subject to the area municipality's concurrence;
c) that maintenance of the noise barriers and fences bordering on York
Region right-of-ways shall not be the responsibility of York Region; and,
d) that any landscaping provided on York Region right-of-way by the Owner or
the area municipality for aesthetic purposes must be approved by the
Transportation and Community Planning Department and shall be
maintained by the area municipality with the exception of the usual grass
maintenance.
57. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall provide a solicitor's certificate of title in a
form satisfactory to York Region Solicitor, at no cost to York Region with respect to
Page 11 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 11 of 21

106
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
the conveyance of the above noted lands to York Region.
58. Prior to final approval, York Region requires the Owner to submit to it, in
accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Protection Act and 0 .
Reg. 153/04 Records of Site Condition Part XV.1 of the Act (as amended), a Phase
I environmental site assessment prepared and signed by a qualified professional,
of the Owner's lands and more specifically of the lands to be conveyed to York
Region (the "Assessment"). Based on the findings and results of the Assessment,
York Region may require further study, investigation, assessment and delineation
to determine whether any remedial or other action is requ ired. The Assessment
and any subsequent environmental reports or other documentation prepared in
respect of the environmental condition of the lands to be conveyed must to be
addressed to York Region, contain wording to the effect that York Region shall be
entitled to rely on such reports or documentation in their entirety, and such reports
or documentation shall be satisfactory to York Region.
59. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall certify, in wording satisfactory to the
Transportation and Community Planning Department, that no contaminant,
pollutant, waste of any nature, hazardous substance, toxic substance, dangerous
good, or other substance or material defined or regulated under applicable
environmental laws is present at, on, in or under all lands to be conveyed to York
Region (including soils, substrata, surface water and groundwater, as applicable):
(i) at a level or concentration that exceeds the Environmental Protection Act 0 .
Reg. 153/04 full depth generic site condition standards applicable to the intended
use that such lands will be put by York Region at the time of conveyance or any
other remediation standards published or administered by governmental
authorities applicable to the intended land use; and (ii) in such a manner, condition
or emanating from such lands in such a way, that would result in liability under
applicable environmental laws. The Assessment, any subsequent environmental
reports or other documentation and the Owner's certification shall be done at no
cost to York Region.
60. The Owner shall agree, prior to the development approval, that access to Blocks 3
and 4 shall be via the internal road network. No direct access shall be permitted to
High Street.
61 . The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement, in wording satisfactory to
the Transportation and Community Planning Department, that the Owner will be
responsible for determining the location of all utility plants within York Region
right-of-way and for the cost of relocating, replacing, repairing and restoring any
Page 12 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 12 of 21

107
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
appurtenances damaged during construction of the proposed site works. The
Owner must review, or ensure that any consultants retained by the Owner, review,
at an early stage, the applicable authority's minimum vertical clearances for aerial
cable systems and their minimum spacing and cover requirements. The Owner
shall be entirely responsible for making any adjustments or relocations, if
necessary, prior to the commencement of any construction.
62. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall submit engineering plans for York Region's
approval that identify on the plans the Transit requ irements.
63. The Owner shall satisfy the Regional Municipality of York Transportation and
Community Planning Department that the services to be installed within or in
conjunction with the Plan will provide for sidewalks which meet the local
municipality's standards along the subject lands' frontage onto roadways that
have/will have transit services.
Existing YRT/GO transit services operate on the following roadway in the vicinity of
the subject lands:
• High Street
64. The Owner shall satisfy the Regional Municipality of York Transportation and
Community Planning Department that the services to be installed within or in
conjunction with the Plan will provide a concrete pedestrian access connection
from the internal roadway to Regional roadway as follows:
• From "internal road" to "High Street"
• Along High Street between Burke Street and East Street
The concrete pedestrian access connection shall meet the local municipality's
standards for sidewalks, provided such pedestrian access connection shall not be
a service to be assumed by the local municipality and shall be owned and
maintained by the Region or the Owner. The Development Agreement shall
provide that such pedestrian access connection shall be retained by the Owner
unless the Region (prior to final approval of the Plan) enters into an agreement with
the Owner providing ownership is to be transferred to the Region. The concrete
pedestrian access shall be provided at no cost to the Regional Municipality of York.
65. The Owner shall satisfy the Regional Municipality of York Transportation and
Community Planning Department that the services to be installed within or in
Page 13 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 13 of 21

108
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
conjunction with the Plan will provide the passenger standing area/shelter pad
identified below shall be installed to the satisfaction of the local municipality and
York Region Transit, provided that the Region shall, before such services are
included in the Development Agreement, confirm to the local municipality that all
such passenger standing area/shelter pad shall be owned and maintained by the
Region and that the local municipality shall have no responsibility for those,
notwithstanding that they may be included in the Development Agreement.
Subject to approval by YRT, passenger standing area and shelter pad shall be
provided at the following location:
.. ----·-
ON Street AT Street Location Standard Traffic Signal
Re_guest
High Street Burke Street NE YRT-1.03 N/A
-- ----
The passenger standing area/shelter pad shall be provided at no cost to York
Region and concurrent with construction of necessary sidewalks.
Landscaping should not interfere with the bus stops, passenger standing areas,
shelters or corner sightlines. Bus stops located in front of the employment areas
shall be incorporated into the landscape design.
The bus stop location determined during the design phase is subject to change.
Prior to construction of the passenger standing area/shelter pad, the consultant
shall confirm with YRT the final bus stop locations/requirements. The consultant is
to contact YRT facilities supervisor 905-762-2111 to confirm final details.
66. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall submit drawings showing, as applicable,
the sidewalk location, concrete pedestrian access, passenger standing area and
shelter pad to the satisfaction of York Region.
67. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to advise all potential
purchasers of the existing and future introduction of transit services in this
development as identified in Condition No. 63. This includes potential transit
routes, bus-stops and shelter locations. This shall be achieved through
distribution of information/marketing materials (YRT route maps, Future Plan
maps & providing YRT website contact information) at sales offices and
appropriate notification clauses in purchase agreements. The YRT route maps
and the Future Plan maps are available from YRT upon request.
Page 14 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 14 of 21

109
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
68. The Owner shall satisfy the Regional Municipality of York Transportation and
Community Planning Department that the services include illumination in
accordance with the local municipality's design standards along all streets which
have or will have transit services, sidewalks, pedestrian access and bus stop
locations.
69. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall agree that the following lands will be
conveyed to York Region for public highway purposes, free of all costs and
encumbrances, to the satisfaction of York Region Solicitor:
a) a widening across the full frontage of the site where it abuts High Street of
sufficient width to provide a minimum of 1 0 metres from the centreline of
construction of High Street;
b) a 15 metre by 15 metre daylight triangle at the northeast corner of High Street
and Burke Street, and a 15 metre by 15 metre daylight triangle at the
southeast corner of High Street and East Street;
c) a 0.3 metre reserve across the full frontage of the site, adjacent to the above
noted widening, where it abuts High Street and adjacent to the above noted
widenings; and,
d) an additional 2.0 metre widening, 30 metres in length, together with a 50
metre taper for the purpose of a northbound right tum lane at the intersection
of East Street and High Street, subject to final confirmation from the Regional
Municipality of York.
70. Prior to final approval, the Owners shall provide a copy of the duly
executed/approved local Development Agreement to the York Region
Transportation and Community Planning Department, outlining all requirements of
York Region.
71. The Owners shall enter into an agreement with York Region, agreeing to satisfy all
conditions, financial and otherwise, of the Regional Corporation; Regional
Development Charges are payable prior to final approval in accordance with
By-laws DC-0005-2003-050 and DC-0005(a)-2005-060.
72. The York Region Planning and Development Services Department shall advise
the Town of Georgina Planning and Building Department in writing through a
clearance letter that Conditions 42 to 71 inclusive have been satisfied.
Page 15 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 15 of 21

110
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
73. Prior to final approval and any major site alteration, the following shall be prepared
to the satisfaction of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority and the
Town of Georgina:
• A detailed Stormwater Management Report in conformity with provincial
(MOE), regional-watershed (LSRCA), and local standards and guidelines;
• A detailed Erosion Control Plan;
• A detailed Grading Plan; and,
• A Landscaping Plan for the stormwater pond.
74. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to carry out or cause to be
carried out the recommendations and measures outlined within the plans and
reports approved under Condition No. 73 above.
75. Prior to final approval and any site alteration, proper erosion and sediment control
measures must be in place. All stormwater management facilities and sediment
and erosion controls must be in place prior to the creation of impervious areas
such as roads and buildings.
76. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to engage a qualified
professional to certify in writing that the works were constructed in accordance with
the plans, reports and specifications, as approved by the Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority.
77. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall pay all development fees to the Lake
Simcoe Region Conservation Authority as required in accordance with the
LSRCA's Fees Policy, under the powers of the Conservation Authorities Act.
78. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall provide the following to the satisfaction of
the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority:
• A letter from the Owner's Planning Consultant detailing how each of the
conditions of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority have been met;
Page 16 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 16 of 21

111
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
• A copy of draft M-Pian; and,
• A copy of the Subdivision Agreement.
79. The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority shall advise the Town of
Georgina Planning and Building Department in writing through a clearance letter
that Conditions 73 to 78 inclusive have been satisfied.
Ministry of Transportation
80. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall submit to the Ministry of Transportation for
review and approval a Stormwater Management Plan and a Site Grading and
Servicing Plan, addressing the intended treatment of the calculated runoff.
81 . Prior to final approval, the Owner shall submit to the Ministry of Transportation for
review and approval a copy of a detailed Traffic Impact Study. The Traffic Impact
Study should include all traffic data used for the High Street Development located
south from Burke Street and east of High Street.
82. The Ministry of Transportation shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning and
Building Department in writing through a clearance letter that Conditions 80 and 81
have been satisfied.
Canada Post Corporation
83. The Owner and his Consulting Engineers shall agree to send 2 copies of the Utility
co-ordination plan/site plan to Patrick Brown, Delivery Planner- York Region, for
use in identifying the Community Mailbox location.
84. The Owner shall agree to include on all offers of purchase/rental agreement (if
applicable) and sale, a statement which advises the prospective purchaser that
mail delivery will be from a designated Community Mailbox.
85. The Owner shall be responsible for notifying the purchaser/renter of the exact
Community Mailbox locations prior to the closing of any home sale.
86. The Owner shall consult with Canada Post Corporation and the Town of Georgina
to determine suitable locations for the placement of Community Mailboxes and to
indicate these locations on the appropriate servicing plans.
Page 17 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 17 of 21

112
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T -07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
87. The Owner shall provide the following for each Community Mailbox site and
include these requirements on the appropriate servicing plans:
a) an appropriately sized sidewalk section (concrete pad) as per Canada Post
and municipal standards, to place the Community Mailboxes on;
b) any required walkway across the boulevard, as per Canada Post and
municipal standards; and,
c) any required curb depressions for wheelchair access.
88. The Owner shall agree to determine and provide a suitable temporary Community
Mailbox location(s), which may be utilized by Canada Post until the curbs,
sidewalks and final grading have been completed at the permanent Community
Mailbox locations. This will enable Canada Post to provide mail delivery to new
residents as soon as the homes are occupied.
89 . The Canada Post Corporation shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning and
Building Department in writing through a clearance letter that Conditions 83 to 88
inclusive have been satisfied.
Enbridqe Gas Distribution Inc.
90. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to co-ordinate the
preparation of an overall utility distribution plan to the satisfaction of all affected
authorities.
91 . The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement that streets are to be
constructed in accordance with the municipal standards.
92. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to grade all streets to final
elevation prior to the installation of the gas lines and provide the necessary field
survey information required for the installation of the gas lines, all to the
satisfaction of Enbridge Gas Distribution.
93. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement that all of the natural gas
distribution system will be installed within the proposed road allowances, therefore
easements will not be required.
94. Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning and
Page 18 of 21
SCHEDU LE '4'
Page 18 of 21

113
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
Building Department in writing through a clearance letter that Conditions 90 to 93
inclusive have been satisfied.
Rogers Communications Inc.
95. To reduce congestion in the boulevard right-of-way, the Owner shall utilize
joint-use trench construction to be shared by the shallow utilities, Hydro, Bell and
Rogers.
96. To ensure a comprehensive telecommunications installation that is designed to
harmonize with the other infrastructure and municipal services, the Owner shall
supply all related development drawings, including the Composite Utility Plans.
97. To ensure our rights of plant ownership and our ability to maintain our plant for the
future homeowners, the Owner shall be responsible for securing all necessary
easements I right-of-ways over condominium property at no expense to the
Utilities.
98. The Owner shall agree that all costs associated with plant relocations caused
directly or indirectly by this development shall be borne by the Owner.
99. The Owner shall enter into an agreement (Letter of Understanding) with Rogers
Communications Inc.
100. Rogers Communications Inc. shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning and
Building Department in writing through a clearance letter that Conditions 95 to 99
inclusive have been satisfied.
Bell Canada
101 . The Developer is hereby advised that prior to commencing any work within the
Plan, the Developer must confirm that sufficient wire-line
communication/telecommunication infrastructure is currently available within the
proposed development to provide communication/telecommunication service to
the proposed development. In the event that such infrastructure is not available,
the Developer is hereby advised that the Developer may be required to pay for the
connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication
infrastructure. If the Developer elects not to pay for such connection to and/or
extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure, the
Developer shall be required to demonstrate to the municipality that sufficient
Page 19 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 19 of 21

114
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
alternative communication/telecommunication facilities are available within the
proposed development to enable, at a minimum, the effective delivery of
communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services
(i.e., 911 Emergency Services).
102. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement, in words satisfactory to
Bell Canada, to grant Bell Canada any easements that may be required for
telecommunication services. Easements may be required subject to final servicing
decisions. In the event of any conflict with existing Bell Canada facilities or
easements, the Owner/Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of such
facilities or easements.
103. The Owner shall agree to provide Bell Canada a blanket easement for the common
element condominium.
104. Bell Canada shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning and Building Department
in writing through a clearance letter that Conditions 101 to 103 inclusive have been
satisfied.
ORIGINALLY ISSUED at the TOWN OF GEORGINA on the 24 1 h day of June, 2008.
REVISED and REISSUED at the TOWN OF GEORGINA on the 15th day of July, 2011 .
REVISED and REISSUED at the TOWN OF GEORGINA this 26 1 h day of June, 2012 .
. l/;;-~/
-·-·-, lf ,
·c___-;r\, i~ ............ ~_ --·--·
I I "----?-··~ ..
·Harold W. Lenters, M.Sc.PI, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning and Building
Town of Georgina
NOTE: PURSUANT TO THE PLANNING ACT, R.S .O., 1990, C.P.13, AS
AMENDED, APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND PLAN OF
CONDOMINIUM SHALL LAPSE IF FINAL APPROVAL FOR
REGISTRATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN BY JULY 15, 2013, UNLESS
Page 20 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 20 of 21

115
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
APPROVAL HAS BEEN SOONER WITHDRAWN OR THE TOWN OF
GEORGINA HAS EXTENDED THE DURATION OF THE APPROVAL.
Page 21 of 21
SCHEDULE '4'
Page 21 of 21

116
Planning Consultants;
Development Coordinators Ltd.
461 The Queensway South, Suite 3
Keswick, Ontario L4P 2C9
Tel. (905) 989-2588
Fax (905) 989-2488
info@msplanning.ca
www.msplanning.ca
April 2, 2013
Our File No. 700-00
Harold Lenters, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning and Building
Town of Georgina
26557 Civic Centre Road RR#2
Keswick, Ontario
L4P 3G1
Dear Mr. Lenters:
Re:
Request for Extension of Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval 19T -07GO 1 and
Draft Plan of Condominium Approval19CDM-07G02
1084466 Ontario Ltd. (c/o A & THomes)
33 High St. Part Lots 3 and 4, Block 15, RP 69;
Lots 6-11, Block 16, RP 69; Part of unnamed strip, Block 16, RP 69;
and Part of closed road allowance (High Street)
Town ofGeorgina, Region ofYork
On June 24th, 2008, the Town granted draft plan approval for the above noted development (plan
of subdivision and plan of condominium). A note at the bottom of the draft plan conditions states
the following:
PURSUANT TO THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O., 1990, AS AMENDED, APPROVAL OF TH1S
PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM SHALL LAPSE IF FINAL
APPROVAL FOR REGISTRATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN WITHIN THREE YEARS
AFTER THE DATE UPON WHICH APPROVAL TO THE PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND
THE PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM WAS GIVEN, UNLESS APPROVAL HAS BEEN SOONER
WITHDRAWN OR THE TOWN OF GEORGINA HAS EXTENDED THE DURATION OF
THE APPROVAL.
Subsequent extensions to both the draft plan of subdivision and draft plan of condominium were
granted on June 13 th, 2011 (CW-2011-0310) and June 25th, 2012 (C-2012-0275). The extension
granted on June 25t\ 2012, extends the approvals to July 15th, 2013.
The development is comprised of 16 freehold townhouse units and a common element
condominium for the private road and amenity space (See enclosed plan).
Our client has submitted, what it believes, will be the final submission to the Town of Georgina.
The submission included engineering drawings, landscape plans and a composite utility plan. It
is anticipated that the Town Engineering Department will be preparing a revised development
agreement based on the last submission to the Town. Our client is anxiously awaiting the revised
agreement so that it can be executed.
SCHEDULE '5'
Page 1 of 4

117
It should also be noted that Zoning By-law 500-2011-0004 was approved by Council on March
28 1 h, 2011. This by-law puts in place the site-specific provisions required to facilitate the
construction of the proposed 16 townhouses.
Our client is looking at registering the draft plans as soon as possible with construction to start
immediately after registration. With the expiration date of the draft plan approvals apJ'roaching
quickly, we respectfully request that the Town extend the period of time from July 15 , 2013 to
July 15th, 2014.
Finally, we enclose the prescribed fee of $3, 125.00.
Yours truly,
~7
Planning Consultant
Copy
Todd Evershed, Area Planner
Michael Baskerville, Manager of Engineering
Albert and Tony Ingoglia, Owners
enclosure
SCHEDULE '5'
Page 2 of 4

I()
- 'O:t
118
I
I
_j
LAN(
r-·~·
t;j l
wl
o::l
1- j
I Vll
:::> I I
I- I
-.J
'-"
~ ~I
Q ~ I I
Cl::
I
I
I 1
J!
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION R£SID£Nm' /
TO Bt CO!IIV'E'I"(D TO
AD..'AC£NT WID ~(R$ ~
------~~-~E~~~T--------------- --- ---
--- ---- ----...:....:::----=----=--=-- ;; 1:r;--.:....:=--=-- 14UQ-==-= ===--
0
PAI/K(TTC « PLAYGROUND ARO
LANOSCAPEO AREA
KEY PI.AN
SCHEDULE OF I.AND USES
I U)CIC lNIOI.ISt Ut«1'S AJIU.
1•l ShtJI ,.__, Jt.,.lt~ , Q.tlO ...
)•) r~T~- I t 0-loll ...
I e.- ~ C.ll'N
7•1 Slofl'o\TN...... c.o:r) ...
I ~ rw.- O.ootM
10 Q.lo!. lll.w- O..ocJ ,_
..... ~
OWNER'S AUTHORIZAllON
1
Subject
Lonas
==-a~~~~~=
MM~t*Ctwlt~fl'~ w w_...
.....\........ ~
;;;;;;--
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
~~w:~~:..~~
r.~lp .. .,..~~·--~~
•~'~~~~.,._1'1.
I..IO¥f. ""-"' lU.
o ..\0111....,.,_.,.-n
;;;;-
INFORt.'.AIION REOUIREO UNDER
SECTION 51(17) Of THE
PlANNING ACT
PROPOSED COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT
·- .,...,... ...,....,
..,.~
l . . ~.,,,.n~le~
,_,.,_ ... ~,loWI-
1 ::: t.~.:":
r•,_,., eo~..,..,.ID

in
119
I
I
_j
'-"''
l-"~
l t' w l
,_, o::l
Ull
_, I ~ I I '
I I
§I }2 ~! I 11 1
I
tl::
I
I
I
I i
Jl
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION
TO 8£ CON\'£.~ TO
AOJACOIT LAND O""'ERS
---===-=-===-=--=----=--- i11.6
~0'00"'11 !{!M'-OMI!O ~--;y--;o;j!~ ~------ ------
0
PAJIKCTTC de PU. YCROUND I.Rf:A
RESIDENTIAL
=-==--=-~---
I ~~t
I
II I I
II~
. }; ~~
0~/V~
-~ ---- # I t; I ~
~'· };~~~ ~
~~~- I ~ #~ I"
I '"~-
I
I I I "-
~~,-- G;y
"'ic~
I I
s,~~,
I
, ~~; .,"' A I I I I
PROPOSED COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT
~ ~I
z
~ C ALE :
10 20 30
OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION
==~~~i~ :
.... ~ w. o-.fl """ • .....,-.4t,.,. ... .. ~ ... -....:.
a.m.,._..,..,. ;;;;;-
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
~."::':~~~~~~e,~ .. ~~.
~~ \II tM ..)toe..., - · - _.w.,.
"""'~.....v,. ~,_ ...

120
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
C. C.: Todd Evershed, Planner
FROM :
The Georgina Heritage Committee
DATE: May 31,2013
SUBJECT:
Request for Comment - Entrance Feature - Draft Plan of Subdivision
(19T-07G01)- 33 High Street
At their meeting held on Thursday, May 16, 2013, the Georgina Heritage Committee
(GHC) reviewed the request for comment on the proposed entrance feature of draft plan
of subdivision 19T-07G01 as provided by staff. This review was conducted because the
named property is associated with 33 High Street which is listed on the Heritage
Register. The Committee members passed the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. GHC-2013-0033
THAT THE GEORGINA HERITAGE COMMITTEE HAS NO OBJECTION
TO THE ENTRANCE FEATURE OF DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
19T-07G01, AS PRESENTED, BUT REQUEST THE NAME INCLUDE A
REFERENCE TO 'HISTORIC SUTTON' AND THAT THIS BE
CIRCULATED TO COUNCIL AND APPROPRIATE STAFF.
If you require further information or clarification, please do not hesitate to contact the
Committee Services Coordinator.
SCHEDULE '6'

121
-aN BRIDGE
ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC.
500 Consumers Road
North York ON M2J 1P8
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 650
Scarborough ON M1K 5E3
TODD EVERSHED
PLANNER
TOWN OF GEORGINA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
26557 CIVIC CENTRE RD
R.R. 2
KESWICK ON L4P 3G1
Dear Sirs:
RE:
DRAFT PLAN APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION -19T-07G01
DRAFT PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM- 19TCDM-07G02
33 HIGH STREET: NIW CORNER OF HIGH STREET &
BURKE STREET,
SUTTON, TOWN OF GEORGINA
TOWN FILE NOs.: 01.131 & 01 .132
Enbridge Gas Distribution has no objections to the application as proposed.
At this time this is not a commitment by Enbridge Gas Distribution to service th is site, to
service this site by a given date or that there will be no costs for servicing this site.
The applicant is to contact the Enbridge Customer Connections Department at their
earliest convenience to discuss installation and clearance requirements for service and
metering facilities.
The applicant is to arrange for the installation of the gas plant prior to the
commencement of the asphalt paving or landscaping.
In the event that easements are required to service this development the applicant will
provide easements at no cost to Enbridge Gas Distribution.
The applicant is to provide a 2 metre by 2 metre exclusive use location for a regulator
station.
SCHEDULE '7'
Page 1 of 2

122
The requirements identified here within are subject to change. Enbridge Gas Distribution
retains the right to add, amend or remove conditions, or obtain easements to service this
application, at no cost to Enbridge Gas Distribution.
En bridge Gas Distribution requests that the following conditions be included in the
subdivision agreement.
The developer is responsible for preparing a composite utility plan that allows for the
safe installation of all utilities, including required separation between utilities.
Streets are to be constructed in accordance with composite utility plans previously
submitted and approved by all utilities.
The developer shall grade all streets to final elevation prior to the installation of the
gas lines and provide Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. with the necessary field survey
information required for the installation of the gas lines.
The developer shall provide current Town approved road cross-sections showing all
utilities in the configuration proposed for all of the street widths within the
development. The gas location must be a minimum of 0.6 metres from the street
line.
Yours truly,
JIM ARNOTT
Municipal Coordination Advisor
Distribution Asset Management
(416) 758-7901
(416) 758-4374- FAX
JA: rv
SCHEDULE '7'
Page 2 of 2

123
Lake Simcoe Region
conservation authority
A Watershed for Life
Sent by E-mail: tevershed@georgina.ca
May 15,2013
Mr. Todd Evershed, Planner
Town of Georgina
26557 Civic Centre Rd
Keswick, ON L4P 3G1
File No.: 01.131 & 01.132
IMS No.: PSDC384C23
Dear Mr. Evershed:
Re:
Request for Extension of Draft Plan Approval
Draft Plan of Subdivision (19T-07G01) & Draft Plan of Condominium (19CDM-07G02)
Applicant: 108446 Ontario Ltd. (cjo A & THomes)
33 High Street; NE Corner of High Street & Burke Street, Sutton
Town of Georgina, Region of York
The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) has reviewed the request for extension of draft
plan approval for the above-mentioned files. Please be advised that we have no objection this extension;
however, we do request the following amendments to the existing conditions of draft plan approval:
1. Please remove the following bullet under Condition 73, as there is no stormwater pond being proposed
for this site:
• A Laadseapiag Plan for the stof'ffi\vater poad.
Please send us a copy of your "Notice of Draft Plan Approval". Please reference the above file numbers in
all future correspondence.
Sincerely,
Sara Brockman
Development Planner
SB/ht
c: Mr. Gord Mahoney (Agent), Michael Smith Planning Consultants, e-mail: gord@msplanning.ca
Ms. Velvet Ross, Town of Georgina, e-mail: vross@georgina.ca
S:\Env Plan\Plan Appls\Subdivisions\Georgina\2013\PSDC384_19T07G01...A&THOMES_33HIGHST_RequestforExtension_Mayl513GEO.DOCX
120 Bayview Parkway, Box 282 I Tel: 905.895.1281 1.800.465.0437 I Web: www.LSRCA.on.ca
1
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 4X1 Fax: 905.853.5881 E-~-a . -"-"' " rnr-A -- - -
Proud winner of t he International Thiess Riverprize I Member of C SCHEDULE '8'

1;
(H
124
:;;
i d;i
~
.,
·hn l•x I 1 11!
~ xl l ~'l
~~·t
0
~-~.
J:
1- ,,,.
•'d'
::;~
1 ~ tUdl
"'!,
:1 II E! 5!•
1;
I
I
l
!i
If
); 1;
~ ~
!a ill
c:
a: "'
~
i ~
~~
3!
::::J
~
i
~ :!
f J
jq
.I - ~
E
~
! E li
i.::
~ ...J G. ~
{o;- ~ ~j !
I
I
l
Iii
8 1-+++H+H 8
I
I I
= =
I I
I I J
• J
I
il
I il
I
I I
I I
I
I I I
!
SCH EDULE '9'
Page 1 of 2

....
A & THomes
~=-=
....,.._ }-.!
:=..-• ~~=- "'- --r-•..., -=
~-:-.:--
en
"'00
I» :I:

126
MEMORANDUM
TO:
C. C.:
FROM:
DATE:
Todd Evershed, Planner
Karyn Stone, Economic Development Officer
Velvet Ross, Manager of Planning
Kelan Jylha, Business Retention and Expansion Coordinator
June 9, 2013
SUBJECT: Request for Comment - Entrance Feature - Draft Plan of Subdivision
(19T-07G01)- 33 High Street
At the Downtown Sutton Merchant's Association (DSMA) Board meeting held on
Thursday, May 16, 2013, the Board reviewed the request for comment on the proposed
entrance feature of draft plan of subdivision 19T-07G01 as provided by staff. This
review was conducted because the named property is located at the entrance to
Downtown Sutton and may impact the local businesses.
The Board discussed the entrance feature and concluded that it will be a nice addition
to the Downtown Sutton gateway. The Board liked the design and appearance of the
feature, but the Board was concerned that an entrance feature to the Village of Sutton is
now needed to ensure consistency of messaging. The Board was also interested in
exploring opportunities to use the feature or the land around the feature to help promote
Sutton Businesses and local festivals and events.
If you require further information or clarification, please do not hesitate to contact the
Business Retention and Expansion Coordinator.
SCHEDULE '10'

1'\...AN 851.1-
en
(")
:I:
m
c
c:
r
m
~
~
·~
~) ..
...
it
'
.,.
' /~ ,·
';.~? . /
,,. : r;;- ~ ';. ~ .It t;- ..,
"'~
'""'
.., -- I .,.r -·-~ ---- .....-. ·"" -- -- -- ,. ---- - -,
Ill',,(.. ""f/UIJ
/:{ (j(/ 'h uw- t ,.,'11-1 ·~~..,..
. . ''; ~\" I I /
I
U."J.r I)CJ • /
---- ·- _ __:-:-I"';::".-:."',......,,..,.. · \-.- ,. - •1"'• '"l.J; "V 1 /J.~ I
1
/ I"· · ···- · ·-···•· ----·\· I J
. --:. -;;_"' " \_/_-- ..... ~ . .. r•··· · • """' ""' , ,'\ /!""'.;: .:.;" ··~·~ ,',;I
---·--\l,,w _ --r- - !~ ~ ·-·--~-"=-·':"~... ' i ---· -~f"_>"" ' \' ::··: ·~~~ :· .~- ~~
\1 I, p,:JI" . ·- ··· ~
____ _! I ,Q''
1 I ,
1 I
I
'·"'··I ! ~,· ?
l; H/r.:s.'fH/1' ~
.· I ~·-··· !I
-·-
I ~- /'
-~- .... ~a.. "~ :~~·~
· ..,
.' ')' ;, .f) ' p .. r;· •• ur :o 7!
J· ~-. - 1 ..··:."
/
/
_.!'~ ...
~--- - - I I
I3LOCI< 4
HJY,.- .h
··-~ .,'­
p;_ ...:.\
-

128
Revised Conditions of Draft Plan
Approval- June 17, 2013
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL AND THE RELEASE FOR
REGISTRATION OF DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND DRAFT PLAN
OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02:
1. Approval shall relate to Draft Plan of Subdivision 19T-07G01 and Draft Plan of
Condominium 1 OCDM 07G02,-batA dated March 5, 2005 (last revised August 4,
2005, August 11 , 2005, September 27, 2005, December 19, 2006, and February
19, 2008)June 6, 2013) and Draft Plan of Condominium 19CDM-07G02 (last
revised June 10, 2013}aRG-both prepared by Michael Smith Planning Consultants;
Development Coordinators Ltd. (Drawing Numbers 700-00 and 700-00-B),....a:OO
incorporating the following red line revisions:.:.
a) A blocl( of land abutting Block 8, of a size and shape satisfactory to the
Director of Planning and Building, shall be shown and provided for the
purpose of accommodating landscaping and a community entrance feature;
b) An additional 2.0 metre widening, 30 metres in length, together vvith a 50
metre taper shall be shown and provided for the purpose of a northbound right
turn lane at the intersection of East Street and High Street, subject to final
confirmation from the Regional Municipality of York;
c) A revised cui de sac or turning circle shall be shown and provided to
accommodate the turning movements of all municipal emergency
equipment and waste/recycling vehicles, all to the satisfaction of the Town;
fffi€J.;
d) A minimum of 7 visitor parking spaces shall be shovm and provided .
Corporation of the Town of Georgina
2. The Owner shall finalize and complete the acquisition of Parts 1, 2, and 7 on
Reference Plan 65R-30797 from the Town of Georgina ("Town").
Page 1 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 1 of 23

129
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
3. The lands within this draft plan of subdivision and draft plan of condominium
("subject lands") shall be appropriately zoned by a zoning by-law that has come
into force and effect in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act.
4 . The Council of the Town of Georgina shall pass a by-law or resolution authorizing
the allocation of municipal water supply and sanitary sewage servicing capacity to
the subject lands in order to facilitate the proposed development.
5. The Owner shall enter into a Development Agreement and agree to satisfy all
conditions, financial and otherwise, of the Town of Georgina; prior to final
approval, the Town shall confirm that the Development Agreement will be
registered by the municipality against the lands to which it applies, pursuant to the
Planning Act.
6. The private road within the draft plan of condominium shall be designed and
constructed by the Owner at his expense, all to the satisfaction of the Director of
Operations and Engineering for the Town.
7. The private road within the draft plan of condominium shall be named to the
satisfaction of the Town and the Regional Municipality of York Planning and
Development Services Department.
8. The dead-end private road within the draft plan of condominium shall be
terminated in a turning circle or other acceptable manner adequate for the turning
movements of all municipal emergency equipment and waste/recycling vehicles.
9. The Owner shall design and construct the private water distribution, sanitary
sewage collection and stormwater collection systems including all external
servicing required to connect the subject lands to the existing municipal system, all
to the satisfaction of the Director of Operations and Engineering for the Town.
10. The Owner shall design and reconstruct Burke Street to a full urban standard from
and including its intersection with High Street to the east limit of the subject lands
all at the Owner's expense and all to the satisfaction of the Director of Operations
and Engineering for the Town. The design and reconstruction of Burke Street shall
ensure a proper transition beyond the easterly limit of the subject lands between
the urban and remaining sub-urban road sections.
Page 2 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 2 of 23

130
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
11 . The Owner acknowledges that the Town has retained transportation consultants to
undertake a comprehensive transportation analysis ("Study") as part of the
ongoing Sutton Secondary Plan Revievl Study. The Owner shall agree in the
Development Agreement to undertake, or financially contribute towards, any
improvements recommended in this Study that are associated with the proposed
development on the subject lands. In the event that a financial contribution is
required , the amount shall be determined by the Town in consultation with the
Owner.
-+-&.11. The Owner shall submit complete and detailed engineering drawings and
accompanying reports, designed in accordance with the current Town Municipal
Development Design Criteria in effect at the time development occurs, for review
by the Director of Operations and Engineering for the Town and agree in the
Development Agreement to construct all works at the Owner's expense to the
satisfaction of the Director of Operations and Engineering for the Town.
~1£.. The Owner shall convey to the Town any easements as may be required for water,
storm and/or sanitary sewer purposes, stormwater management or other
municipal utility purposes, without monetary consideration and free of all
encumbrances.
44.-13. The Owner shall convey to the Town a 2.4 metre widening across the frontage of the
subject lands where they abut East Street, without monetary consideration and free
of all encumbrances.
15. The Owner shall convey to the Tmvn a block of land abutting Block 8, of a size and
shape satisfactory to the Director of Planning and Building, for the purpose of
accommodating landscaping and a community entrance feature, without monetary
consideration and free of all encumbrances.
4&.-14. The Owner shall, at f:H.s-their expense, provide an overall lot grading and drainage
plan together with a Stormwater Management Report for review by the Director of
Operations and Engineering for the Town. The report shall deal with any external
contributing area as required.
Page 3 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 3 of 23

131
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
4-7-:-R_ The Owner shall submit a report prepared by a qualified professional outlining the
results of detailed site specific geotechnical and hydrogeological subsurface
explorations, respecting the installation of private services on the subject lands as
well as the construction of buildings, all to the satisfaction of the Town.
4-&:-16. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement, in wording satisfactory to
the Town, to carry out or cause to be carried out the recommendations and
measures contained within the report approved under Condition No. 4-7--15 above .
.:f.8.:.1L. The Owner shall prepare and submit a composite utility distribution plan in
consultation with all affected authorities to the satisfaction of the Town.
~.,. 18. The Owner shall agree that it will permit any telephone or telecommunications
service provider to locate its plant within the proposed subdivision prior to the plan
registration provided the telephone or telecommunications service provider has
executed a Municipal Access Agreement with the Town. The Owner shall ensure
that any such service provider will be permitted to install its plant so as to permit
connection to individual dwelling units within the development as and when each
dwelling unit is constructed.
ft 19. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to display plans in its sales
office and identify in its sales literature any phases of development, the location of
private and utility infrastructure including but not limited to sidewalks, ponds,
transformers, pedestals, streetlights, mailboxes and lands for other development.
n20. The Owner shall prepare and submit a detailed fence plan showing all required
fencing (e.g. decorative, privacy, acoustical, security) and shall agree in the
Development Agreement to erect and maintain such fencing, all to the satisfaction
of the Director of Operations and Engineering for the Town.
2J.:-21 . The Owner shall submit a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a qualified
professional for review and approval by the Town, and agree in the Development
Agreement to carry out or cause to be carried out the recommendations and
measures contained within the approved Tree Preservation Plan.
2+.22. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement not to remove or damage
(leading to the destruction of) those trees identified in the approved Tree
Page 4 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 4 of 23

132
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
Preservation Plan without the prior written approval of the Town of Georgina. The
Owner shall deposit a security in the form of a Letter of Credit, in an amount to be
determined by the Town of Georgina, to ensure compliance with the tree
preservation requirements.
&23. The Owner shall satisfy all provisions of the Regional Forest Conservation By-law
and the· Town's Development Design Criteria respecting the preservation and
protection of trees and vegetation. Where trees will be lost to development, the
Owner shall agree to compensate the Town through additional planting in tree
compensation areas identified within the approved Master Landscaping and Tree
Planting Plan.
&24. The Owner shall submit a detailed Master Landscaping and Tree Planting Plan
prepared by a qualified professional for review and approval by the Town, and
agree in the Development Agreement to carry out or cause to be carried out the
recommendations and measures contained within the approved Master
Landscaping and Tree Planting Plan, including landscaping, tree planting, and an
automated subsurface irrigation system within the proposed community
subdivision entrance feature at the intersection of High Street (Y.R. 9) and Burke
Street.
:2+.25. The Owner shall submit an Urban Design Report prepared by a qualified
professional for review and approval by the Council of the Town of Georgina, and
agree in the Development Agreement to carry out or cause to be carried out the
recommendations and measures contained within the approved Urban Design
Report, including the design and construction of a community subdivision entrance
feature at the intersection of High Street (Y.R. 9) and Burke Street.
2:&26. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to construct, at his
expense, a community subdivision entrance feature within the block Block 6ef
laRaas identified in Condition No. 15 aboveon the draft plan. The Downtown Sutton
Merchants Association and the Georgina Heritage Committee will be consulted
respecting the design of the community entrance feature. In accordance with
Condition No. ~26 above, the Council of the Town of Georgina shall be the final
approval authority respecting the design of the community subdivision entrance
feature, and shall incorporate appropriate textual reference to 'Historic Sutton', all
to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building for the Town.
Page 5 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 5 of 23

133
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
~27 . The Owner shall submit detailed architectural design plans and coloured
renderings for all proposed buildings within the development, and shall agree that
the architectural design and elevations will be compatible with the restored
heritage building. The architectural design plans and coloured renderings shall be
prepared by a qualified professional architect and approved by the Council of the
Town of Georgina.
6G..,28. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement that:
a) All development shall proceed in accordance with the detailed architectural
design plans and coloured renderings approved by the Council of the Town
of Georgina; and,
b) All building permit applications shall be accompanied by drawings that have
been stamped and signed by the consulting architect, certifying compliance
with the approved architectural design plans and coloured renderings.
Building permits will not be issued for applications that are not accompanied
by drawings which are stamped and signed by the consulting architect, or
for applications that are not in compliance with the approved architectural
design plans and coloured renderings.
31. The Owner shall carry out a cultural heritage resource assessment to ensure the
assessment and identification of appropriate treatment of built heritage and
archaeological resources, and further to mitigate any identified adverse impacts to
significant heritage resources to the satisfaction of the To•.vn and the Ministry of
Culture. No demolition, grading, filling or any form of soil disturbances (excluding
the disturbance required to perform the archaeological assessment and to relocate
the existing heritage building onto Lot 2) shall take place on the subject lands prior
to the issuance of a letter from the Ministry of Culture to the Town indicating that all
matters relating to heritage resources have been addressed in accordance with
licensing and resource conservation requirements.
32. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to implement any
measures recommended by the cultural heritage resource assessment required in
Condition No. 31 above, to the satisfaction of the Town and the Ministry of Culture.
Page 6 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 6 of 23

134
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
33. The Owner shall retain, protect and incorporate the existing heritage building on
the subject lands as part of this development proposal.
34. The Owner shall protect and conserve the existing heritage building on the subject
lands through the following means:
a) To maintain the heritage building in good and sound conditions at all times
prior to and during the development of the subject lands;
b) To secure and protect the heritage building from damage;
c) To erect a "No Trespassing" sign in a visible location on the property; and,
d) To install a 3 metre high fence around the perimeter of the heritage building
to protect the dwelling until the completion of construction within the
development or the commencement of long term occupancy of the heritage
building.
35. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall implement the following measures to
protect the heritage building:
a) The Owner shall provide at his expense a legal survey of the heritage
building to facilitate the registration of the heritage designation on the
created/proposed lot;
b) The O'tmer shall permit the designation of the property under Part IV of the
Ontario Heritage / 1 ,ct; and ,
c) The Owner shall provide a $25,000 Letter of Credit to ensure the
preservation of the existing heritage building. The Letter of Credit shall be
retained for use by tho Town and shall not be released until the following
has been addressed:
• construction and grading on the subject lands and adjacent lots, and
roads have been completed to the satisfaction of the Town;
• the heritage building has been connected to municipal services;
Page 7 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 7 of 23

135
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
• the exterior restoration of the heritage building has been completed;
• the heritage building meets the basic standards of occupancy as
confirmed by the Town of Georgina Building Division; and,
• all other heritage requirements of the Development Agreement have
been completed.
36. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to preserve the existing
heritage building through the follo 1 Ning means:
a) To provide and implement a traditional restoration plan for the heritage
building, for review and approval by the Town;
b) To complete the exterior restoration of the heritage building, connection of
all municipal services to the allocated lot (v.~ater , gas, hydro, cable,
telephone etc.) and ensure basic standards of occupancy as confirmed by
the Tovm of Georgina Building Division within two years of registration;
c) To ensure that the architectural design and elevations of all proposed
dwellings within the development are compatible with the restored heritage
building; and,
d) To ensure that the historic front of the heritage building retains a front yard
appearance, the type of fencing permitted shall be limited to a low
residential picket fence rather than privacy fencing, and shall be in
accordance with fence plan approved under Condition No. 22 above.
37. The Ovmer shall agree in the Development Agreement to provide notice and
commemoration of the heritage building by providing and installing at his expense
an interpretative plaque outlining the history of the heritage house in a publicly
visible location on the property. Details of the design and location of the plaque are
to be submitted for review and approval by the Tovm , in consultation with the
Georgina Heritage Committee.
38. The 0 1 uner shall include the following clause in a registered portion of the
Development Agreement and in all offers of purchase and sale \Nith respect to Lot
2 in the draft plan of subdivision:
Page 8 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 8 of 23

136
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
a-jf.L_"Purchasers are advised that the existing building on this property is
designated pursuant to the Onta#o Heritage Act. Any proposed additions
or alterations to the exterior of the existing dwelling shall be subject to
review and approval of plans by the Town."
~29 . The Owner shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by the municipally-retained
peer review consultants in relation to the peer review of submitted reports and
studies.
4-G-:30. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement that no building permits will
be applied for or issued until the Town is satisfied that adequate road access,
municipal water supply, sanitary sewers, and storm drainage facilities are
available to service the proposed development.
4+.-31. The Town of Georgina shall confirm in writing through a clearance letter that
Conditions 1 to 4-G-30 inclusive have been satisfied.
Regional Municipality of York
4--2-:-32. Prior to final approval, the Region shall confirm that adequate water supply and
sewage servicing capacity are available and have been allocated by the Town of
Georgina for the development proposed within this draft plan of subd ivision or any
phase thereof.
~33. The Owners shall agree in the Development Agreement that all unused wells shall
be decommissioned according to Ontario Regulation 903 prior to any construction
works occurring on the site.
#.34. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall have prepared , by a qualified professional
transportation consultant, a functional transportation report/plan outlining the
required Regional road improvements for this subdivision. The report/plan,
submitted to the Transportation and Community Planning Department for review
and approval, shall explain all transportation issues and shall recommend
mitigative measures for these issues.
Page 9 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 9 of 23

137
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
~35 . Prior to final approval, the Owner shall provide a written undertaking, to the
satisfaction of the Transportation and Community Planning Department, that the
Owner agrees to implement the recommendations of the functional transportation
report/plan as approved by the Transportation and Community Planning
Department.
4&.36. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall submit detailed engineering drawings, to
the Transportation and Community Planning Department for review and approval,
that incorporate the recommendations of the functional transportation report/plan
as approved by the Transportation and Community Planning Department.
Additionally, the engineering drawings shall include the subdivision storm drainage
system, erosion and siltation control plans, site grading and servicing, plan and
profile drawings for the proposed intersections, construction access and mud mat
design, utility and underground servicing location plans, pavement markings,
electrical drawings for intersection signalization and illumination design, traffic
control/construction staging plans and landscape plans.
4-7,.37. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall provide drawings for the proposed servicing
of the site to be reviewed by the Engineering Department of the area municipality.
Three (3) sets of engineering drawings (stamped and signed by a professional
engineer), and MOE forms together with any supporting information shall be
submitted to the Transportation and Community Planning Department.
4&:-38. Prior to final approval, the location and design of the construction access for the
subdivision work shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Transportation and
Community Planning Department and illustrated on the Engineering Drawings.
49-:-39. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the
Transportation and Community Planning Department, that all existing driveway(s)
along the Regional road frontage of this subdivision will be removed as part of the
subdivision work, at no cost to York Region.
W-AO. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the
Transportation and Community Planning Department, that elevations along the
streetline shall be 0.3 metres above the centreline elevations of the York Region
roadway, unless otherwise specified by the Transportation and Community
Planning Department.
Page 10 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 10 of 23

138
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
64-:-41. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall submit drawings depicting the following to
the satisfaction of York Region staff:
a) All existing woody vegetation within the York Region road right of way;
b) Tree protection measures to be implemented on and off the York Region
road right of way to protect right of way vegetation to be preserved;
c) Any woody vegetation within the York Region road right of way that is
proposed to be removed or relocated. However, it is to be noted that tree
removal within York Region road right's of way shall be avoided to the
extent possible/practical. Financial or other compensation may be sought
based on the value of trees proposed for removal; and,
d) A planting plan for all new and relocated vegetation to be planted within the
York Region road right of way, based on the following general guideline:
Tree planting shall be undertaken in accordance with York Region standards as
articulated in the Streetscaping Policy and using species from the York Region
Street Tree Planting List. These documents may be obtained from the Forestry
Section. If any landscaping or features other than tree planting (e.g. flower beds,
shrubs) are proposed and included in the Development Agreement, they will
require the approval of the Town and be supported by a Maintenance Agreement
between the Town and the Region for Town maintenance of these features; any
such Maintenance Agreement should indicate that where the area municipality
does not maintain the feature to York Region's satisfaction, the area municipality
will be responsible for the cost of maintenance or removal undertaken by the
Region.
~4 2. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall engage the services of a consultant to
prepare and submit for review and approval, a noise study to the satisfaction of the
Regional Transportation and Community Planning Department and the Town of
Georgina recommending noise attenuation features.
@.43. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement, in wording satisfactory to
the Regional Transportation and Community Planning Department and the Town
Page 11 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 11 of 23

139
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
of Georgina, to implement the noise attenuation features as recommended by the
noise study and to the satisfaction of the Regional Transportation and Community
Planning Department and the Town of Georgina.
e4:-44. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement, in wording satisfactory to
the Transportation and Community Planning Department, that where berm, noise
wall, window and/or oversized forced air mechanical systems are required, these
features shall be certified by a professional engineer to have been installed as
specified by the approved Noise Study and in conformance with the Ministry of
Environment guidelines and the York Region Noise Policy.
oo-A5. The following warning clause shall be included in a registered portion of the
Development Agreement with respect to the lots or blocks affected:
"Purchasers are advised that despite the inclusion of noise attenuation features
within the development area and within the individual building units, noise levels
will continue to increase, occasionally interfering with some activities of the
building's occupants" .
.e&:-46. Where noise attenuation features will abut a York Region right-of-way, the Owner
shall agree in the Development Agreement, in wording satisfactory to York
Region's Transportation and Community Planning Department, as follows:
a) that no part of any noise attenuation feature shall be constructed on or
within the York Region right-of-way;
b) that noise fences adjacent to York Region roads may be constructed on the
private side of the 0.3 metre reserve and may be a maximum 2.5 metres in
height, subject to the area municipality's concurrence;
c) that maintenance of the noise barriers and fences bordering on York
Region right-of-ways shall not be the responsibility of York Region; and,
d) that any landscaping provided on York Region right-of-way by the Owner or
the area municipality for aesthetic purposes must be approved by the
Transportation and Community Planning Department and shall be
maintained by the area municipality with the exception of the usual grass
maintenance.
Page 12 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 12 of 23

140
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
&7-:-47 ..
Prior to final approval, the Owner shall provide a solicitor's certificate of title in a
form satisfactory to York Region Solicitor, at no cost to York Region with respect to
the conveyance of the above noted lands to York Region ..
e-Eh48 .. Prior to final approval, York Region requires the Owner to submit to it, in
accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Protection Act and 0 ..
Reg .. 153/04 Records of Site Condition Part XV .. 1 of the Act (as amended), a Phase
I environmental site assessment prepared and signed by a qualified professional,
of the Owner's lands and more specifically of the lands to be conveyed to York
Region (the "Assessment") .. Based on the findings and results of the Assessment,
York Region may require further study, investigation, assessment and delineation
to determine whether any remedial or other action is required. The Assessment
and any subsequent environmental reports or other documentation prepared in
respect of the environmental condition of the lands to be conveyed must to be
addressed to York Region, contain wording to the effect that York Region shall be
entitled to rely on such reports or documentation in their entirety, and such reports
or documentation shall be satisfactory to York Region.
W-:-49. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall certify, in wording satisfactory to the
Transportation and Community Planning Department, that no contaminant,
pollutant, waste of any nature, hazardous substance, toxic substance, dangerous
good, or other substance or material defined or regulated under applicable
environmental laws is present at, on, in or under all lands to be conveyed to York
Region (including soils, substrata, surface water and groundwater, as applicable):
(i) at a level or concentration that exceeds the Environmental Protection Act 0 .
Reg. 153/04 full depth generic site condition standards applicable to the intended
use that such lands will be put by York Region at the time of conveyance or any
other remediation standards published or administered by governmental
authorities applicable to the intended land use; and (ii) in such a manner, condition
or emanating from such lands in such a way, that would result in liability under
applicable environmental laws. The Assessment, any subsequent environmental
reports or other documentation and the Owner's certification shall be done at no
cost to York Region.
Page 13 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 13 of 23

141
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
6-G-:-50. The Owner shall agree, prior to the development approval, that access to Blocks ~
1_and 4-.f.._shall be via the internal road network. No direct access shall be
permitted to High Street.
~.Q.L The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement, in wording satisfactory to
the Transportation and Community Planning Department, that the Owner will be
responsible for determining the location of all utility plants within York Region
right-of-way and for the cost of relocating, replacing, repairing and restoring any
appurtenances damaged during construction of the proposed site works. The
Owner must review, or ensure that any consultants retained by the Owner, review,
at an early stage, the applicable authority's minimum vertical clearances for aerial
cable systems and their minimum spacing and cover requirements. The Owner
shall be entirely responsible for making any adjustments or relocations, if
necessary, prior to the commencement of any construction.
~52 . Prior to final approval, the Owner shall submit engineering plans for York Region's
approval that identify on the plans the Transit requirements.
W,.53. The Owner shall satisfy the Regional Municipality of York Transportation and
Community Planning Department that the services to be installed within or in
conjunction with the Plan will provide for sidewalks which meet the local
municipality's standards along the subject lands' frontage onto roadways that
have/will have transit services.
Existing YRT/GO transit services operate on the following roadway in the vicinity of
the subject lands:
• High Street
~54. The Owner shall satisfy the Regional Municipality of York Transportation and
Community Planning Department that the services to be installed within or in
conjunction with the Plan will provide a concrete pedestrian access connection
from the internal roadway to Regional roadway as follows:
• From "internal road" to "High Street"
• Along High Street between Burke Street and East Street
Page 14 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 14 of 23

142
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
The concrete pedestrian access connection shall meet the local municipality's
standards for sidewalks, provided such pedestrian access connection shall not be
a service to be assumed by the local municipality and shall be owned and
maintained by the Region or the Owner. The Development Agreement shall
provide that such pedestrian access connection shall be retained by the Owner
unless the Region (prior to final approval of the Plan) enters into an agreement with
the Owner providing ownership is to be transferred to the Region. The concrete
pedestrian access shall be provided at no cost to the Regional Municipality of York.
e&.-55. The Owner shall satisfy the Regional Municipality of York Transportation and
Community Planning Department that the services to be installed within or in
conjunction with the Plan will provide the passenger standing area/shelter pad
identified below shall be installed to the satisfaction of the local municipality and
York Region Transit, provided that the Region shall, before such services are
included in the Development Agreement, confirm to the local municipality that all
such passenger standing area/shelter pad shall be owned and maintained by the
Region and that the local municipality shall have no responsibility for those,
notwithstanding that they may be included in the Development Agreement.
Subject to approval by YRT, passenger standing area and shelter pad shall be
provided at the following location:
ON Street AT Street Location Standard Traffic Signal
High Street Burke Street NE YRT-1.03 N/A
Request
The passenger standing area/shelter pad shall be provided at no cost to York
Region and concurrent with construction of necessary sidewalks.
Landscaping should not interfere with the bus stops, passenger standing areas,
shelters or corner sightlines. Bus stops located in front of the employment areas
shall be incorporated into the landscape design.
Page 15 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 15 of 23

143
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
The bus stop location determined during the design phase is subject to change.
Prior to construction of the passenger standing area/shelter pad , the consultant
shall confirm with YRT the final bus stop locations/requirements. The consultant is
to contact YRT facilities supervisor 905-762-2111 to confirm final details.
9&.56. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall submit drawings showing, as applicable,
the sidewalk location, concrete pedestrian access, passenger standing area and
shelter pad to the satisfaction of York Region.
9+.57. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to advise all potential
purchasers of the existing and future introduction of transit services in this
development as identified in Condition No. ~53 . This includes potential transit
routes, bus-stops and shelter locations. This shall be achieved through
distribution of information/marketing materials (YRT route maps, Future Plan
maps & providing YRT website contact information) at sales offices and
appropriate notification clauses in purchase agreements. The YRT route maps
and the Future Plan maps are available from YRT upon request.
e&:-58 . The Owner shall satisfy the Regional Municipality of York Transportation and
Community Planning Department that the services include illumination in
accordance with the local municipality's design standards along all streets which
have or will have transit services, sidewalks, pedestrian access and bus stop
locations.
~ 59 . Prior to final approval, the Owner shall agree that the following lands will be
conveyed to York Region for public highway purposes, free of all costs and
encumbrances, to the satisfaction of York Region Solicitor:
a) a widening across the full frontage of the site where it abuts High Street of
sufficient width to provide a minimum of 10 metres from the centreline of
construction of High Street;
b) a 15 metre by 15 metre daylight triangle at the northeast corner of High Street
and Burke Street, and a 15 metre by 15 metre daylight triangle at the
southeast corner of High Street and East Street; and ,
Page 16 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 16 of 23

144
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
c) a 0.3 metre reserve across the full frontage of the site, adjacent to the above
noted widening, where it abuts High Street and adjacent to the above noted
widenings
c) ; and,
d)
ej.QL_an additional 2.0 metro widening, 30 metres in length, together with a 50
metre taper for the purpose of a northbound right turn lane at the intersection
of East Street and High Street, subject to final confirmation from the Regional
Municipality of York.
+G-:-60. Prior to final approval, the Owners shall provide a copy of the duly
executed/approved local Development Agreement to the York Region
Transportation and Community Planning Department, outlining all requirements of
York Region.
++.QL The Owners shall enter into an agreement with York Region, agreeing to satisfy all
conditions, financial and otherwise, of the Regional Corporation; Regional
Development Charges are payable prior to final approval in accordance with
By-laws DC-0005-2003-050 and DC-0005(a)-2005-060.
-7-&.62. The York Region Planning and Development Services Department shall advise
the Town of Georgina Planning and Building Department in writing through a
clearance letter that Conditions 42-32 to -74--61 inclusive have been satisfied.
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
+J.:-63. Prior to final approval and any major site alteration, the following shall be prepared
to the satisfaction of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority and the
Town of Georgina:
• A detailed Stormwater Management Report in conformity with provincial
(MOE), regional-watershed (LSRCA), and local standards and guidelines;
• A detailed Erosion Control Plan; and.
• A detailed Grading Plan~.:.
Page 17 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 17 of 23

145
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
• A Landscaping Plan for the stormwater pond .
.f-4-,64. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to carry out or cause to be
carried out the recommendations and measures outlined within the plans and
reports approved under Condition No. -7-J.-63 above.
-7$.:65 . Prior to final approval and any site alteration, proper erosion and sediment control
measures must be in place. All stormwater management facilities and sediment
and erosion controls must be in place prior to the creation of impervious areas
such as roads and buildings.
+B-:-66 . The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to engage a qualified
professional to certify in writing that the works were constructed in accordance with
the plans, reports and specifications, as approved by the Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority.
1+.67. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall pay all development fees to the Lake
Simcoe Region Conservation Authority as required in accordance with the
LSRCA's Fees Policy, under the powers of the Conservation Authorities Act.
~68 . Prior to final approval, the Owner shall provide the following to the satisfaction of
the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority:
• A letter from the Owner's Planning Consultant detailing how each of the
conditions of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority have been met;
• A copy of draft M-Pian; and ,
• A copy of the Subdivision Agreement.
-7-9-:-69. The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority shall advise the Town of
Georgina Planning and Building Department in writing through a clearance letter
that Conditions -7-J.-63 to .:m-.68 inclusive have been satisfied.
Page 18 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 18 of 23

146
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
Ministry of Transportation
gg, 70. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall submit to the Ministry of Transportation for
review and approval a Stormwater Management Plan and a Site Grading and
Servicing Plan, addressing the intended treatment of the calculated runoff.
&:k.I.L_Prior to final approval, the Owner shall submit to the Ministry of Transportation for
review and approval a copy of a detailed Traffic Impact Study. The Traffic Impact
Study should include all traffic data used for the High Street Development located
south from Burke Street and east of High Street.
iQ;.72. The Ministry of Transportation shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning and
Building Department in writing through a clearance letter that Conditions 8G-70 and
84--71 have been satisfied.
Canada Post Corporation
&J.:. 73. The Owner and his Consulting Engineers shall agree to send 2 copies of the Utility
co-ordination plan/site plan to Patrick Brown, Delivery Planner- York Region, for
use in identifying the Community Mailbox location.
M-:-74. The Owner shall agree to include on all offers of purchase/rental agreement (if
applicable) and sale, a statement which advises the prospective purchaser that
mail delivery will be from a designated Community Mailbox.
g&,.75. The Owner shall be responsible for notifying the purchaser/renter of the exact
Community Mailbox locations prior to the closing of any home sale.
g.&..76. The Owner shall consult with Canada Post Corporation and the Town of Georgina
to determine suitable locations for the placement of Community Mailboxes and to
indicate these locations on the appropriate servicing plans.
g::j-,77. The Owner shall provide the following for each Community Mailbox site and
include these requirements on the appropriate servicing plans:
a) an appropriately sized sidewalk section (concrete pad) as per Canada Post
and municipal standards, to place the Community Mailboxes on;
Page 19 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 19 of 23

147
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
b) any required walkway across the boulevard, as per Canada Post and
municipal standards; and,
c) any required curb depressions for wheelchair access.
g&,.78. The Owner shall agree to determine and provide a suitable temporary Community
Mailbox location(s), which may be utilized by Canada Post until the curbs,
sidewalks and final grading have been completed at the permanent Community
Mailbox locations. This will enable Canada Post to provide mail delivery to new
residents as soon as the homes are occupied.
~79. The Canada Post Corporation shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning and
Building Department in writing through a clearance letter that Conditions 8a-73 to
8$r78 inclusive have been satisfied .
Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc.
f+G.:.80. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to co-ordinate the
preparation of aH overall composite utility distribution plan to the satisfaction of all
affected authorities.
9-+.81. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement that streets are to be
constructed in accordance with composite utility plans submitted and approved by
the municipal standardsall utilities.
9-b82. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement to grade all streets to final
elevation prior to the installation of the gas lines and provide Enbridge Gas
Distribution Inc. with the necessary field survey information required for the
installation of the gas lines, all to the satisfaction of Enbridge Gas Distribution.
~83. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement that all of the natural gas
distribution system will be installed within the proposed road allovvances, therefore
easements will not be requiredto provide current Town approved cross-section
showing all utilities in the configuration proposed for all of the street widths within
the development. The gas location must be a minimum of 0.6 metres from the
street line.
Page 20 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 20 of 23

148
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
94:-84. Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning and
Building Department in writing through a clearance letter that Conditions 00-80 to
Q.a.-83 inclusive have been satisfied.
Rogers Communications Inc.
9-&.-85. To reduce congestion in the boulevard right-of-way, the Owner shall utilize
joint-use trench construction to be shared by the shallow utilities, Hydro, Bell and
Rogers.
00-:-86. To ensure a comprehensive telecommunications installation that is designed to
harmonize with the other infrastructure and municipal services, the Owner shall
supply all related development drawings, including the Composite Utility Plans.
9+:-87. To ensure our rights of plant ownership and our ability to maintain our plant for the
future homeowners, the Owner shall be responsible for securing all necessary
easements I right-of-ways over condominium property at no expense to the
Utilities .
.g.&;88. The Owner shall agree that all costs associated with plant relocations caused
directly or indirectly by this development shall be borne by the Owner.
99-:89 . The Owner shall enter into an agreement (Letter of Understanding) with Rogers
Communications Inc.
-+GG-:-90. Rogers Communications Inc. shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning
and Building Department in writing through a clearance letter that Conditions Ba-85
to GQ-.89 inclusive have been satisfied.
Bell Canada
4G4-:-91. The Developer is hereby advised that prior to commencing any work within
the Plan, the Developer must confirm that sufficient wire-line
communication/telecommunication infrastructure is currently available within the
proposed development to provide communication/telecommunication service to
the proposed development. In the event that such infrastructure is not available,
Page 21 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 21 of 23

149
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
the Developer is hereby advised that the Developer may be required to pay for the
connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication
infrastructure. If the Developer elects not to pay for such connection to and/or
extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure, the
Developer shall be required to demonstrate to the municipality that sufficient
alternative communication/telecommunication facilities are available within the
proposed development to enable, at a minimum, the effective delivery of
communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services
(i.e., 911 Emergency Services).
~92. The Owner shall agree in the Development Agreement, in words
satisfactory to Bell Canada, to grant Bell Canada any easements that may be
required for telecommunication services. Easements may be required subject to
final servicing decisions. In the event of any conflict with existing Bell Canada
facilities or easements, the Owner/Developer shall be responsible for the
relocation of such facilities or easements.
~93 . The Owner shall agree to provide Bell Canada a blanket easement for the
common element condominium .
.:t-G4.-94. Bell Canada shall advise the Town of Georgina Planning and Building
Department in writing through a clearance letter that Conditions +G-4-91 to 4-Gd-93
inclusive have been satisfied.
ORIGINALLY ISSUED at the TOWN OF GEORGINA on the 24 1 h day of June, 2008.
REVISED and REISSUED at the TOWN OF GEORGINA on the 15th day of July, 2011.
REVISED and REISSUED at the TOWN OF GEORGINA this 26 1 h day of June, 2012.
REVISED and REISSUED at the TOWN OF GEORGINA this 24th day of June. 2013.
Harold W. Lenters, M.Sc.PI, MCIP, RPP
Page 22 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 22 of 23

150
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19T-07G01 AND
DRAFT PLAN OF COMMON ELEMENTS CONDOMINIUM 19CDM-07G02
Director of Planning and Building
Town of Georgina
NOTE:
PURSUANT TO THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O., 1990, C.P.13, AS
AMENDED, APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND PLAN OF
CONDOMINIUM SHALL LAPSE IF FINAL APPROVAL FOR
REGISTRATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN BY JULY 15, ~2014 ,
UNLESS APPROVAL HAS BEEN SOONER WITHDRAWN OR THE
TOWN OF GEORGINA HAS EXTENDED THE DURATION OF THE
APPROVAL.
Page 23 of 23
SCHEDULE '12'
Page 23 of 23

I
I
_j
ROYAL
...
CANADJAA~ LEGION
I
LOT 2 "i LOT J
LOT I
BLOCK
... ...
LOT 4
~
LOT 12
PART

•
4
~
RESIDENTIAL
I .I - ROYAL CANAD«N LEGION !
~oc-~~
I
~
~ . ___ . __
' 1 -- AOJI.ctHT LAHO -EllS ---..-..... . .
, ------- ---------~,_____ _
- - .-F-=-==:_-.-:---=-==----=--=-- --. ___
8i' :..·.1;· ~ ~ -· -~ ~
.... I (/):
~ I "1"1
~ I ~: .. ...
Yl .
~
J
I
en
""Co
Ill :I:
rom
I'D 0
....,c:
or
-m
N ..... -
(,.)
'l I~
Q: l · : · / "\
1-1 '
I
I
7
I
- . --~ --- '
MWUJ"OO'"W Tr:Jti/N-otfNCDLMIE'WAYTO/EaOSl'D - -- _ -- _ -- _ -- _ ---- --
PARKETTE: .t PLAYGROUND AREA
'!:~LOCK 7.
... :;"1-tG; ~~
.... ':..·.·_
Ill&....:....:...~ ------...:..____ LANDSCAPED AREA
,
I I
I
... 1, I
I
·.1
~LOC •' ~· (; , . · ~~ I ~~J-
·•·• ~ ·~ /4 I ~
;/; _/ k . 1
., / I

153
TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT NO. PB-2013-0056
FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF
THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JUNE 17, 2013
SUBJECT:
APPLICATION FOR DEEMING BY-LAW APPROVAL
ANATOL Y & IRINA BER
LOTS 22 & 23, PLAN 205
848 CRESCENT BEACH ROAD, CRESCENT BEACH
1. RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. THAT REPORT PB-2013-0056 PREPARED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION
DATED JUNE 17, 2013 RESPECTING AN APPLICATION FOR DEEMING BY­
LAW SUBMITTED BY ANATOL Y & IRINA BER, AS IT AFFECTS LOTS 22 &
23, PLAN 205, BE RECEIVED.
B. THAT COUNCIL APPROVE THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY ANATOLY &
IRINA BER TO DEEM LOTS 22 & 23, PLAN 205 NOT TO BE LOTS ON A
REGISTERED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTION
50(3) AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 50(4) OF THE PLANNING ACT,
R.S.O. 1990.
2. INFORMATION:
Owner:
Agent:
Property Description:
File Number:
Anatoly & Irina Ber
llya Ber
(refer to Schedules '1' through '4')
848 Crescent Beach Road, Crescent Beach
Lots 22 & 23, Plan 205
Roll #: 130-611
06.189
3. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
The subject property is located in Crescent Beach, south of Lake Drive East on
the west side of Crescent Beach Road, and is legally described as Lots 22 & 23
on Plan 205 (refer to Schedules '1' and '2'). A Plan of Survey submitted by the
applicant dated 1973 illustrates. that a bungalow straddles the common lot line
between Lots 22 & 23, Plan 205 (refer to Schedules '3' through '5'). In this

154
- Page 2 of Report No. PB-2013-0056-
regard, although the property would appear to function as one landholding, a
deeming by-law has not been passed by Council and registered on title to the
subject property, therefore in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act
Lots 22 & 23 are separately conveyable from one another.
The property is designated Serviced Lakeshore Residential Area on Schedule
'A', Land Use Plan, to the Town of Georgina Official Plan and is zoned
Residential (R) on Map 5 to Schedule 'A' of Zoning by-law No. 500; both of which
permit single family dwellings and accessory uses, buildings and structures.
4. DISCUSSION
The purpose of the subject application is to enable the owner of the subject
property to receive a building permit for a 4.27 metre X 7.32 metre (14ft. X 24ft.)
prefabricated storage shed which is to be placed on Lot 23, south of the existing
dwelling (refer to Schedules '5' and '6'). Pursuant to Zoning By-law No. 500, no
accessory building, structure or use shall be erected or established on any lot
until the main building to which it is to be accessory to has been erected.
Therefore, the owner has submitted a deeming application in order to deem Lots
22 & 23, Plan 205 not to be lots on a registered plan of subdivision for the
purposes of Section 50(3) and in accordance with Section 50(4) of the Planning
Act R.S.O. 1990. In this respect, Lots 22 & 23, Plan 205 would merge in title
under common ownership creating a single landholding, and would no longer be
separately conveyable.
Should Council approve the subject deeming application, the resultant parcel
would have a lot area of 1,702 square metres (.17 HA) and 30.48 metres (100ft.)
of frontage on Crescent Beach Road .
A site plan illustrating the location of the proposed shed, exterior elevations and
a cross-section provided by the agent are attached as Schedules '6' and '7'. Staff
have confirmed with the agent that in accordance with Zoning By-law No. 500,
the location of the proposed shed is to be within the southern interior side yard
and will not encroach into the front yard. In consideration of the foregoing and
upon review of the submitted plans, Staff advise that the proposed shed and
location of same, pursuant to approval of this application, would comply with the
provisions of Zoning By-law No. 500.
The agent has submitted a copy of the transfer deed indicating that the entire
landholding is held in common ownership, thereby permitting the by-law to be
registered on title. Once the Deeming By-law is registered on title, the subject
lots can no longer be conveyed separately from each other.
5. CONCLUSION:
In consideration of the above, Staff are satisfied that the subject application
conforms with Zoning By-law No. 500 and the Official Plan, and represents good

155
- Page 3 of Report No. PB-2013-0056-
planning. In this respect, Staff have no concerns with the subject deeming
application and recommend approval of same.
Should Council approve the subject application, Staff will bring forward the
subsequent By-law for Council's passing at the next Council meeting, being June
24, 2013.
Su?~
Tolek Makarewicz, B.U.R.PI.
Junior Planner
Reviewed by:
Velvet L. Ross, MCIP, RPP.
Manager of Planning
Approved:
-~
Harold W. Lenters, M.Sc.PI, MCIP, RPP.
Director of Planning and Building
Winanne Grant, B.A. AMCT, CEMC
Chief Administrative Officer
05 June 201 3

~ Island
""0(/)
;;oc
Oco
mm ""'c...
;;o(")
~-4
GoO

157
0
0
0 .
00 . .,. -
: . N.,:
tn
~ N ..
I
,
,
0
en
N
N
.
,
,
Cl
,.: - N
N
ID
.
,
I
I
I
1,._
1-:
I!
I
j,
\..~"' E.
s" o~E. ~O·oO
0
0
0
0 Cbo 0
0
0
0 t\J ci 0
0) 0 tv ~
on
t\J 0
t\J - 0
It)
t\J
I
- -,., OG
to-
5 ON
4 oo o-
'!)0 ·, "N
ciN
-
0
,.,
"' •
- -
-
..--
-
Q
((
0
cL.
0
0
0
0 \
"':>'
c
\) • 0
0
0
.,
...,
-
I ~0 •
~ 10 .. 0 I
m
0 . T 75 At ·
e,A ~ •
o o
L_ ___________________ '

011 ... tJ"' LVI\.1\ IIIU J f l..• .JJ
._, .... o:: . ""· .. ~ ~-" : . ~
158
:r~~~ -,
" /,., I ·~ 1.•,,
.,-;J,.,
.,
'c··. ,.. ,
·.:lrBs·
C.
t:-
.. t..:. f \{·-,.;
. A r ··-.
···: -!-··
''1:973
•• :#
.
•; ~. I ;,
:•,
r ,• ,. • '', ...' ·, : , ·,,
-~{.-:
,.··-·.
··
·.
...
. :.•:,
-~ ........
'5J'.
c·~-~-~---- ..
,.t.
. . ------
··:
:·_';i.~~ARlNG REFERENCE .
I .• . : .•..; : · ~;.: • •: • t ~ • .. • •
. ., .\ B~'grti\IJ's .: !IT .f!·· ojrrq~1111c
• ' '
.~na: dQrbi~d
~ .. 1i'~ifl; .. flf:o!~t~~r•i:I . Pf~n 2 as ·
;:· ·: :~Qt.{VE)';bR~S. C£~l'Tf-JCATE·
" :'·.· ~ ~~ t'fi'E S'{ 'CERTfF·Y l'HA.T ). • . ,. • ··
· :. ·. ,,_,~ · r,tJ.~;~ ,,,n -,;~~- ~u~--~!~ i?~~;cor.·, •.•. \. ~: fi!; o.(en9.r...;~I~ II!O!I · O. nole.d !'f io opportr>l ..,;,i iQno.t.~.J.'
-,~0:-·~/~u.l~ : ~~n · ,~o jn loof Gl*d ·.~clmol ·~·;.;~ ;t-n;;;;.i: ~'·' ·
l:·PJt'li:~ligllll!li ·~·~ i>~ ... verilloct:.; . . ' r~~~
:·. ~ ~· ~ .. \{.
·. 'Dill•'· · ~~~~ · ·. sJ;.:.Ov~r. · ,. ·:~·
:·.•.: ~-;,;::. P.o, 's'o~: ·39s 7'S.'Gt:h>'~"· wt,;;'i ~7.~: :s5:;i '~ ' .....
... ~ . .. •'. "':'' ..
..
..... · .,
SCHEDULE '3'

159
SCHEDULE '4'

160
SCHEDULE'S'

'" 1'\ l.J .. I... \Jl u \ t!IU /
-.:. ~ .........- ~-: : £ .... .. •.t.•l ..
161
•,
'C.lj£ ..
.. sct!V· ...... . . 't
:0; ··
. •· . -......... ..
.~........
... . . .........__
· ·:~
'·
'ro_ ·~ ' ·:.·
··. -.~". .D ·~· - · - ...
. -.. --.... ..... _
-·--..,

North
1
J,'" Country
L ~_Sheds
GENERAL NOTES
1. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ALL WORK ON THIS PROJECT
SHALL CONFORM TO LA TEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING:
~ NATIONAL BUILDING CODE
~ ONTARIO BUILDING CODE
- FARM BUILDING CODE
- OHSA REGULATIONS
- - -
2. DRAWING ARE NOT TO BE SCALED.
3 . NO CHANGES SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT THE ENGINEER'S
APPROVAL.
EXCAVATION ANQ BACKFILL;
l . SHEADS SHALL BEAR ON UNDISTURBED SOILS, ROCK OR
7/8 CLEAR FILL.
2. SLOPE GRADE TO DRAIN AWAY FROM BUILDING
162
LUMBER I TRUS5ES;
1. LUMBER GRADE:
SPF NO. l OR 2 OR BETTER
FRAMING
l. STUDS SHALL BE NAILED TO PLATES W/ 4 -31/4" NAILS
ANCOBAGE
1. TIE DOWN ANCHORS ARE NOT REQUIRED AT LOCATION WITH
LESS THAN A HOURLY WIND PRESSURE (1-IN-50 YEAR) 0.55kPa
~
1-
8.
J~
~
NOTE: NOT TO BE USED AS
HABITABLE SPACE.
Vl WADDELL /cur:NT N rth PROJECT NO. PR0J£CT
n
:I:
ENGINEERING LTD.
tJ Ill BAGGS CIUS. CflHBRIDGE ON
C >H. 5I9·267 .. 7119
r- o:.u". I -IJ66· :JIIII·96S9
m !HAIL. INFOOWAODELLENG.COH
~
f t.... Q .
/ '\~ 1
Country
I -~ Sheds
12-1944.3 COTTAGE STYLE STORAGE BARN
T.SSUE I DESCRIPTION
21.02.12 NOTES
1

163
@!'
COTTAGE STYLE
STORAGE BARN
scale: 1/4"=1 •
~
/tJ
0
-
llJ\
~
WADDELL CUE~T . .
~ ENGINEERING LTD. /1\.~0rth
NOTE: NOT TO BE USED AS
HABITABLE SPACE.
PROJECT NO.
PROJECT
12-1944.3 COTTAGE STYLE STORAGE BARN
:::~: gg I!IAGGs CRES. c.

--- ED
EAST .· ELEVATION
~ scale: 3/16"=1 • te'
scale:
50VTH ELEVATION
3/16" =1'
164
f f:
r'\r
-::r
r

N
-.-4
0\
N
ROOF RIDGE
TOP OF STUD WALL
APPLY 1 LAYER OF 5/8" PLYWOOD
TO EACH SIDE OF THE TRUSS
AS SHOWN . USE 3" SPIRAL NAILS
@3"0.C. IN 2
STAGGARED ROWS
TYPICAL ROOF CONSTRUCTION
- 40 YEAR AS HALT SHINGLES
- 1/2 PLYWOOD SHEATING
-2x4 WOOD TRUSS
cjw PLYWOOD GUESSETS
@ 16" o.c.
CONNECTION 4-3 SPIRAL NAILS,
TOE NAILED
1x4 SOFFET
f
(f)
('f)
~
:r­
:::r
("(
2x4 CROSS TIE @16"0 .C.@ 3.0kPa GROUND SNOW LOAD
2x4 CROSS TIE @32"0 .C. @ 2.5kPa GROUND SNOW LOAD
2x4 CROSS TIE @48"0 .C. @ 2.0kPa GROUND SNOW LOAD
MAXIMUM GROUND SNOW LOAD 3.0kPa
( 1 {' 0"
1.11
r-...
TYPICAL WALL CONSTRUCTION
-2x4 BOTTOM PLATE
-2x4 WOOD STUD FRAMING
@ 16" o.c.
- 2x4 DOUBLE TOP PLATE
-1/2 DURA-TEMP SIDING
OR
- 1/2 PLYWOOD C/W VINYL SIDING
165
5/8" P.T. PLYWOOD FLOOR
TOP OF FLOOR
2x4 FLOOR JOIST @ 16"0.C.
(f!J'
CROSS SECTION
scale: 3/8"=1'
5- 4x4 P.T. EQUAL SPACED
~
f--t:
0
-
Ill\
~
'AD DELL
/cu£NT
(/) iiNEERING LTD. ./~\~North
NOTE: NOT TO BE USED AS
HABITABLE SPACE.
g GGs CR6. CAH•RIDG£ ON I 1
Country DESCRIPTION
PRO.JECT NO.
PRO.JECT
12-1944.3 COTTAGE STYLE STORAGE BARN
m lf-247-6711f Sheds CROSS SECTION
C 1·1156-3U-f659 ..__ • ..:.: ··..:.: · ..;.. · '_;;__ _;__;;,___-..1.____-.J._______________
C L.. ZNFOOWADDII!I.lZNG. COH -"
r-
m
~
4

2x4 DOUBLE TOP PLATE
2x4 LINTEL
~~~~~~r---rt:lrt~---- 2x4 ROUGH SILL
NOTE: LINTEL COMFIRMED
BY ENGINEERING
CALCULATIONS
2x4 JACK STUD
166
2x4 BOTTOM PLATE
LINTEL DETAIL
~ scale: 3/8"=1'
"'IJ
~
I~
0
-
j

167
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT NO. OED-2013-0032
FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JUNE 17, 2013
SUBJECT:
REDUCTION IN SPEED LIMIT
OLD SHILOH ROAD
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT REPORT NO. OED-2013-0032 DATED JUNE 17, 2013 WITH
RESPECT TO THE REDUCTION IN SPEED LIMIT ON OLD SHILOH
ROAD BE RECEIVED FOR INFORMATION.
2. THAT A BY-LAW BE PASSED TO AMEND THE TRAFFIC BY-LAW TO
ESTABLISH A 60 KILOMETRE PER HOUR SPEED ZONE ON OLD
SHILOH ROAD FROM VICTORIA STREET WEST TO BRIDGE NO. 4.
BACKGROUND:
In 2012, staff were contacted by a new resident with concerns about walking on the
road. The resident asked for a speed reduction from 70km/hr to 40km/hr. Further, the
resident compared Old Shiloh Road to Warden Avenue, Woodbine Avenue and Old
Homestead Road and spoke of speed reductions on those streets.
REPORT:
There are 17 properties located on this section of Old Shiloh Road. The Town has
reduced speed limits of a similar nature in front of properties on Catering Road (north of
Baldwin Road) and on Cryderman's Side Road (south of Baldwin Road) to 60km/hr.

168
2
It is recommended that a by-law be passed to amend the Traffic By-law to change the
speed limit from 70km/hr to 60km/hr at this location on Old Shiloh Road. As a result we
are anticipating a reduction in speed, reduced complaints and a safer neighbourhood.
Rm::
Robert Fortier, C.E.T. , CRS
Operations Manager
Dan Pisani, .Eng.
Director of L erations & Engineering
Approved by:
I A/ ~ vanf
Winanne Grant, B.A. , AMCT, CEMC
Chief Administrative Officer
RF/hay

169
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
IN THE
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
BY-LAW NUMBER 2013-
BEING A BY-LAW TO FURTHER AMEND SCHEDULE XXVIII
OF BY-LAW 2002-0046 (TR-1) A BY-LAW TO GOVERN AND
CONTROL PARKING AND TRAFFIC WITHIN THE TOWN OF
GEORGINA.
WHEREAS the Town Council deems it necessary to reduce the rate
of speed on Old Shiloh Road from Victoria Street west to Bridge No. 4.
NOW THEREFORE THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE
CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
THAT By-law No. 2002-0046 (TR-1) as amended is hereby further
amended by deleting therefrom Page 11 of Schedule XXVIII and
replacing same with Page 11 of Schedule XXVI II attached hereto.
Read a first, second and third time and finally passed this
2013.
day of June,
Robert A Grossi, Mayor
Yvonne Aubichon, Town Clerk

BY-LAW 2002-0046 (TR-1)
SCHEDULE XXVIII
Page 11
SPEED LIMITS
KILOMETRES PER HOUR
COLUMN 1 -HIGHWAY
COLUMN 2- ROAD OR PORTIOWOF ROAD
COLUMN 3- PRESCRIBED MAXIMUM RATE OF SPEED
Morning Glory Road
Mount Pleasant Trail
Mum's Avenue
Naselle Avenue
Natanya Boulevard
Nellie Avenue
Nida Drive
North Channel Drive
Northwood Road
Norval Road
Pefferlaw Road (YR 21) west to a point 340 metres 40
Glenwoods Avenue to McCowan Road 60
Park Road (YR 18) west to Joan Street 40
Ravenswood Drive east to Dalton Road 40
Church Street to Carrick Avenue 40
Metro Road (YR 78) east to end of road 40
Lake Drive east to end of road 40
The Queensway (YR 12) west to end of road 40
Golfview Crescent west to end of road 40
Metro Road (YR 78) north to Lake Drive 40
Old Homestead Road
Old Homestead Road
Old Shiloh Road
Metro Road (YR 78) to Lake Drive North 70
Lake Drive East to Metro Road (YR 78) 40
Park Road (YR 18) to West End 60
170
Old Shiloh Road
Old Shiloh Road
Old Shiloh Road
Old Shiloh Road
Orchard Beach Road
Osbourne Street
Paradise Drive
Park Road East
Park Road east to point 400 metres 70
400 metres east of Park Road to a point 1.2km east of Park
Road to Victoria Street 50
1.2km East of Park Road (YR 18) to Victoria Street (YR 82) 70
Victoria Street west to Bridge No. 4 60
Lake Drive east to Metro Road (YR 78) 40
Deer Park Drive south to Lake Simcoe 40
Lake Drive south to end of road 40
Park Road South north and east to Park Road North 40

171
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT NO. DES-2013-0005
FOR CONSIDERATION OF
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
OF JUNE 17, 2013
SUBJECT:
CLARIFICATION OF COUNCIL DIRECTION ON RESOLUTION NO. CW-
2013-0116
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. THAT REPORT NO. DES-2013-0005 PREPARED BY THE EMERGENCY
SERVICES DEPARTMENT DATED JUNE 17, 2013 RESPECTING
CLARIFICATION OF COUNCIL DIRECTION ON RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-
0116 BE RECEIVED; AND
2. THAT COUNCIL PROVIDE CLARIFICATION OF STAFF DIRECTION ON
REPORT DES-2013-003 'REGIONAL FIRE CONSOLIDATION'
BACKGROUND
The minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting of May 21 , 2013, indicate that
Councillor Smockum, seconded by Councillor Szollosy, put forth the following resolution:
"RESOLUTION NO. CW-2013-0116
That report No. DES-2013-0003 entitled 'Regional Fire Consolidation' be received and
referred to staff to report back to Council to identify the costs associated with part time
volunteer firefighters and the total costs."
DISCUSSION
Staff understanding of the discussions that took place on Report No. DES 2013-0003 on
May 21 , 2013 differs from the direction captured in Resolution No. CW-2013-0116.
Staff's interpretation of the discussions was that Council had referred the report back to
include an avenue for the review of fire response to EMS calls.

172
-Page 2 of Report No. DES-2013-0005
CONCLUSION
Staff respectfully request that Council clarify that the focus of the staff report back was to
be the inclusion, in the proposed review, of fire response to EMS calls.
Steve Richardson , CMM Ill, Fire
Service Executive, CEMC
Director of Emergency Services I Fire Chief
Approved by:
1lilvanr
Winanne Grant, BA, AMCT, CEMC
Chief Administrative Officer

173
TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT NO. DAS-2013-0019
FOR CONSIDERATION OF
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COUNCIL
ON JUNE 17, 2013
SUBJECT: 2012 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE
GEORGINA PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT REPORT NO. DAS-2013-0019 DATED JUNE 17TH, 2013
REGARDING THE 2012 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE
GEORGINA PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD BE RECEIVED.
2. THAT COUNCIL ADOPT THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
THE GEORGINA PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD FOR THE 2012 FISCAL
YEAR.
REPORT:
The draft 2012 Audited Financial Statements of the Georgina Public Library Board
are attached for Council's approval. These Statements were prepared by Town
staff, and audited by the Town's appointed independent auditors, BOO Canada
LLP.
Town staff provide the necessary accounting and financial support to the Georgina
Public Library Board. Town staff have also prepared the draft 2012 Audited
Financial Statements for the Georgina Public Library Board and consolidated all
amounts within the Town's 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Town's 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the assets, liabilities,
revenues, expenditures and accumulated surplus, and includes the financial
activities of all boards and committees of Council. The Town's 2012 Consolidated
Financial Statements have been audited by BOO Canada LLP and the auditor has
expressed an opinion on the financial statements based on the audit.
The Chief Executive Officer of Georgina Public Library will also present the 2012
Audited Financial Statements to the Georgina Public Library Board for adoption.

174
- Page 2 of Report No. DAS-20 13-0019 -
The 2012 Audited Financial Statements of the Georgina Public Library Board will
be considered approved, following adoption by both the Georgina Public Library
Board and Town of Georgina Council.
Prepared and recommended by:
Darlene Carson- e nd, A.M.C.T.
Manager of Finance and Deputy Treasurer
Prepared and recommended by:
~
Rebecca Mathewson, CGA
Director of Administrative Services
and Treasurer
Approved by:
Winanne Grant, B.A., AMCT, CEMC
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachment: Georgina Public Library Audited Financial Statements 2012

175
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Public Library Board
Ftnandal Statements
For the year ended December 31 , 2012
Contents
Independent Auditor's Report
2
Ffnandal Statements
Statement of Finandal Position
Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus
Statement of Changes in Net Financial Assets
Statement of Cash Flow
Notes to the Financial Statements
3
4
5
6
7

176
Independent Auditor's Report
To the Chafr and Members of the Town of Georgfna Public Library Board, and Members of
Coundl of the Town of Georslna
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Public Library Board, which comprise the statement of financial position as at December 31, 2012, and the
statement of operations and accumulated surplus, statement of changes In financial assets and statement
of cash ftows for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other
explanatory Information.
Manasement's ResponslblHty for the Financial Statements
Management Is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these ffnandal statements In
accordance with Canadian public sector accounting standards, and for such Internal control as management
determines Is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's ResponslbUity
Our responsibility Is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted
our audit In accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that
we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit Involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures In the
financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, Including the assessment
of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making
those risk assessments, the auditor considers Internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair
presentation of the financial statements In order to design audit procedures that are appropriate In the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal
control. M audit also Includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the
reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained Is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, In all material respects, the financial position of
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina Public Library Board as at December 31, 2012 and the results of
Its operations and Its cash flows for the year then ended In accordance with Canadian public sector
accounting standards.
Other Matters
The financial statements of The Corporation of the Town of Georatna Public Lfbrary Board for the year
ended December 31, 2011 were audited by another auditor who expressed an unmodified opinion on June
25, 2012.
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
June 24, 2013
Newmarket, Ontario
2

177
DRAFT
Georgina Public Library Board
Statement of Financial Position
December 31 2012 2011
$ $
Financial assets
cash 290 290
Due from Town of Georgina (Note 3) 1,168,778 1,036,272
Accounts receivable 23,410 57,168
1,192,476 1,093,730
Liabilities
Accounts payable 141,947 145,993
Accrued liabilities 51,682 49,446
Deferred deposits 5,610 375
199,239 195,814
Net flnanclal assets 993,237 897,916
Non-flnanclal assets
Tangible capital assets (Note 5) 718,081 711,265
Prepaid expenses 81186 2.943
724,267 714,208
Accumulated surplus (Note 6) 1,717,504 1,612,124
See accompanying notes to the financial statements 3

178
DRAFT
Georgina Public Library Board
Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus
Year ended December 31 Budget 2012 2011
$ $ $
Revenues
Town of Georgina • operating grant 1,722,480 1,722,480 1,639,400
Province of Ontario • grant 62,580 62,584 62,588
York School Boards • purchase of service 38,250 38,250 38,226
Fines 28,200 29,004 25,549
Sales I Costs recovered 12,530 13,052 11,964
Room rental 13,200 9,513 12,316
Programs 4,000 5,573 5,201
Development charges earned 5,000 5,000 5,000
Donations & tundralsing 1,300 1,683 19,978
Miscellaneous grant 9,152
1,887,540 1,887,139 1,829,374
Expenses
Salaries & benefits 1,235,880 1,265,294 1,209,012
Amortization 178,718 167,661
Contracted services 175,910 162,952 150,546
Utilities 73,650 77,118 73,990
Consulting 29,479 17,633
Materials & supplies 22,400 23,218 22,435
Insurance 18,900 18,900 18,858
Freight I Postage 7,460 6,924 4,024
Travel I Education 5,400 6,557 6,493
Audit 4,400 4,514 4,381
Board Honorarium 3,500 3,217 3,750
Memberships 2,350 1,940 1,850
Equipment repairs 4,000 1,551 6,949
Bank charges 1,800 1,379 1,926
Fundralslng 1,220
Total expenses 1,555,650 1,781,759 1,690,728
Annual surplus 331,890 105,380 138,646
Accumulated surplus, beginning of year 1,612,124 1,473,478
Accumulated surplus, end of year 1,717,504 1,612,124
See accompanying notes to the financial statements 4

179
DRAFT
Georgina Public Library Board
Statement of Change In Net Financial Assets
Year ended December 31
Budget
2012
2011
$
$
$
Annual surplus
331,890
105,380
138,646
Acquisition of tangible capital assets
Amortization of tangible capital assets
{245,000)
178,716
265,606
(185,532)
178!716
98,564
(203,082)
167,661
103,225
Change in prepaid expenses
(3!243)
(2,821)
Change In net financial assets
265,606
95,321
100,404
Net financial assets, beginning of year
897,916
897,916
797,512
Net financial assets, end of year
1,163,522
993,237
897,916
See accompanying notes to the financial statements
5

180
DRAFT
Georgina Public Ubrary Board
Statement of Cash Flows
Year ended December 31 2012 2011
Cash provided by (used in)
$ $
Operating activities
Annual surplus 105,380 138,646
Amortization 178,716 167,661
Tangible capital assets- donated (2,075)
Changes in non-cash operating working capital
Accounts receivable 33,758 64,088
Due from Town of Georgina (132,504) (163,345)
Accrued liabilities (4,046) (4,223)
Accounts payable 2,236 3,315
Deferred deposits 5,235 (240)
Prep aids ~3,243} (2,821)
Cash provided by operating activities 185,532 201 ,006
Capital activities
Acquisition of tangible capital assets (185,532) (201,006)
Net change In cash
Cash, beginning of year 290 290
Cash, end of year 290 290
See accompanying notes to the financial statements 6

181
Georgina Public Library Board
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
1. Nature of operations
The Georgina Public Library Board (the •Library Board") is a local board of The Town of Georgina (the
"Town") deemed to be a public library established under the Public Libraries Acl The Library Board is
not subject to income taxes under Section 149(1) of the Income Tax Act (Canada).
2. Summary of significant accounting policies ~e;
The financial statements of the Library Board are the representation of manag~ ed In
accordance with local government accounting standards as recommended by e · Sector
Accounting Board ("PSAB") of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Acco:ta:~
Significant aspects of the accounting policies adopted by the
u
Library"''~ollows:
Accruslsccounting
Sources of financing and expenses are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. The accrual
basis of accounting recognizes revenues as they are eatila and measurable. Expenses are
recognized as they are incurred and measurable as a r~l~ipt of goods or services and the
creation of a legal obligation to pay. ·""
Non-financis/sssets
U
~
Non-financial assets are not available •t;s~rge existing liabilities and are held for use in the
provision of services. They have ~~ xtendlng beyond the current year, and are not intended
for sale in the ordinary course of o~.
Tangible capllal as ~ed at cost which Includes an amounts that are directly
attributable to acquis on, nstruction, development or bettennent of the asset. Tangible capital
assets received as con lions are recorded at their fair value at the date of receipt. The cost,
less residual val~ of the tangible capital assets is amortized on a straight-line basis over their
estimat~fullives as follows:
18ctlons
7 years
~ mputer hardware & software 4- 7 years
~ V Furniture & equipment 5- 20 years
~ne haW of lha annual amortlzaUon Is cllarged In the year ol acquisition.
Contributions of tanaible capital assets
Tangible capital assets received as contributions are recorded at their ralr value at the date of
receipt and also are recorded as revenue.
7

182
Georgina Public Library Board
Notes to the Financial Statements
Oecember31, 2012
2. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Revenue rscognltlon
Government grants are recognized when approved to the extent the related expenses have been
Incurred and collection can be reasonable assured.
User fees and other revenues are recognized when the services are performed or ~ ~re
delivered and there Is reasonable assurance of collection. ~ ~
Government transfers
A,~
mr
Government transfers are recognized in the financial statements as~
;
revnue ~~in which
events giving rise to the transfer occur, providing the transfers are aut ri , eligibility criteria
have been met, and reasonable estimates of the amount can be
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity ~· nadlan public sector accounting
standards requires management to make estimates a a mptlons that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contl~e~ sets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of re ues ~ expenses during the reporting period.
These estimates and assumptions are based on m e ent's historical experience, best knowledge
of current events and actions that the Library a ay undertake In the future. The principle
estimates used in the preparation of these fin tements include the useful life and valuation of
::::: asseb. -.1m~~ ~ ~eesUmams.
V
The Library Board Is an emplo~~er of the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System
(OMERS) which Is a §~' defined benefit pension plan. The Board of Trustees,
representing plan mem employers, Is responsible for overseeing the management of the
pension plan, including inv ent of assets and administration of the benefits. The Library Board
has adopted defined JX>ntri ution plan accounting principles for this Plan because insufficient
Information is availabll'"to apply defined benefit plan accounting principles. The Library Board records
as penslo~~nse the current service cost, amortization of past service costs and Interest costs
related to ~1Jti/Jemployer contributions to the Plan for past employee service.
~~
3~1vable from Town of Georgina
• Y.mount receivable from the Town of Georgina Is non-interest bearing and has no set terms of
repayment.
8

183
Georgina Public Library Board
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
4. Pension agreement
OMERS provides pension services to more than 428,947 active and reUred members and
approximately 968 employers. Each year an independent actuary determines the funding status of
OMERS Primary Pension Plan (the Plan) by comparing the actuarial value of invested assets to the
estimated present value of all pension benefits that members have earned to date. The most recent
actuarial valuation of the Plan was conducted at December 31, 2012. The results of this valuation
disclosed total actuarial liablilties of $69,122 million In respect of benefits accrued for serv~lth
actuarial assets at that dale of $59,198 million indicating an actuarial deficit of $9,92 if n.
Because OMERS is a multi-employer plan, any pension plan surpluses or deficit~ oint
responsibility of Ontario municipal organizations and their employees. As a result,th does
not recognize any share of the OMERS pension surplus or deficit. A.
Contribution rates range from 8.3% to 12.8% depending on the level of earn~~ng the year
$65,659 (2011 - $61,398) was contributed to OMERS by the Library B f ~V't services.
9

184
Georgina Public Library Board
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
5. Tangible capital assets
2()12
Computer
Library
HardwareJ
#2
Collection Furniture Sof\ware
Cost
Balance, beginning of year $ 1,097,304 $ 167,654 $ 87,791 $ 1,352,749
Add: Additions during the year
174,487 - 11,045
Less: Disposals during the year
(82.160) - 60
Balance, end of year
1.189.631 167.654 98.836 121
Accumulated amortization
Balance, beginning of year
Add: Amortization during the year
Less: Amortization on disposals
Balance, end of year
489,380 83,185 - ~ 641,484
164,395 6 ,~ 178,716
(82.160) ~ - (82.160)
571.615 76.885 738.040
Net book value $ 618,016 $ $ 21 ,951 $ 718,081
~;o~ Fumitt.fe
Cost • ~~
Balance, beginning of year ~V $ 988,326 $ 156.436
Add: Additions during the year~ 177,327 11 ,218
Less: Disposals during the year C68.349l -
Balance, end of year v
1.097.304
167.654
2011
Computer
Hardware/
Software
Total
$ 73,254 $ 1,218,016
14,537 203,082
(68,349)
87,791 1.352.749
Accumulated amortlzatlf2
Balance, beginning of year 408.430 74,250
Add: Amortization during e year 149,299 8,935
Less: Amortizatlo~n disposals (68.349)
Balance, ee~r 489.380 83.185
Net book v~ $ 607,924 $ 84,469
59,492 542,172
9,427 167,661
{6§,34~)
68,919 641,484
$ 18,872 $ 711,265
"'~~
10

185
Georgina Public Library Board
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31,2012
6. Accumulated surplus
2012 2011
Consists of:
Reserves set aside by the Ubrary Board
Capital reserve
Future expenditure reserve
Salary adjusbnent reserve
Surplus
Invested in tangible capital assets
Accumulated surplus
$ 22,325 $ J11.p67
9:·~:: li~
999,42h..~
A..~~, 711.265
0~ $1,612.124
~0
u~
·eJ
~~
~
11

186
TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT NO. DAS-2013-0021
FOR CONSIDERATION OF
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COUNCIL
ON JUNE 17,2013
SUBJECT: 2012 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE
TOWN OF GEORGINA TRUST FUNDS
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT REPORT NO. DAS-2013-0021 DATED JUNE 17TH, 2013
REGARDING THE 2012 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE
TOWN OF GEORGINA TRUST FUNDS BE RECEIVED; AND
2. THAT COUNCIL ADOPT THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
THE TOWN OF GEORGINATRUST FUNDS FOR THE 2012 FISCAL YEAR.
REPORT:
The draft 2012 Audited Financial Statements of the Town of Georgina Trust Funds
are attached for Council's approval. These Statements were prepared by Town
staff, and audited by the Town's appointed independent auditors,
BOO Canada LLP.
Prepared and recommended by:
Darlene Carson- 1 deb
Manager of Finance and Deputy Treasurer
Prepared and recommended by:
~~
Rebecca Mathewson, CGA
Director of Administrative Services
and Treasurer
Approved by:
Winanne Grant, B.A. , AMCT, CEMC
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachment: Town of Georgina Trust Funds Audited Financial Statements 2012

187
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Trust Funds
Financial Statements
For the year ended December 31, 2012
Contents
Independent Auditor's Report
2
Ffnandal Statements
Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus 3
Statement of Cash Flows 4
Notes to the Financial Statements 5

188
Independent Auditor's Report
To the Members of The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of The Corporation of the Town of Georatna -
Trust Funds, which comprise the statement of financial position as at December 31, 2012, and the
statement of operations and accumulated surplus and statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and
a summary of significant accounting pollcfes and other explanatory Information.
Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management Is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements In
accordance with Canadian publfc sector accounting standards, and for such Internal control as management
determines Is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility Is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted
our audit In accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that
we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perfonn the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit Involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures In the
financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, Including the assessment
of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making
those risk assessments, the auditor considers Internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair
presentation of the financial statements In order to design audit procedures that are appropriate In the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's Internal
control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the
reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the ffnanclal statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained fs sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
audit opinion.
Opinion
lri our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, In all material respects, the financial position of
The Corporation of the Town of Georgfna - Trust Funds as at December 31, 2012 and the results of Its
operations and Its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Canadian publfc sector accounting
standards.
Other Matters
The financial statements of The Corporation of the Town of Georgina -Trust Funds for the year ended
December 31, 2011 were audited by another auditor who expressed an unmodified opinion on June 25,
2012.
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
June 24, 2013
Newmari

The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Trust funds
Stll18mMrt of Flnonclal POfllllon
o-ber31,2012
Bliar Hal
Cemelefy
Pa~
Cent Fund
$
Cooke'a
Cemet&uy
PllfPIItual
Cent Fund
$
.Johnson Famit
Cemataty
PllfiMIIUal
Ca111Fund
$
Keswick
Cemetery
Partual
Cent Fund
$
8oanflng
Home
Contract
~
$
2012 2011
$ $
DRAFT
Aaselll
lnveslmen1Satc:ost(No1112) 398,534 12,283 2.000 29,143 - 441,910 400,011
Al:couniS recelvabla 12.018 (50} - - 11,968 13,918
Due from Town ol Georgina • • - • 85.329 15.32! 65.329
Total Flnanelal Aaaeta 410,552 12.233 2.000 29,143 85.329 53t,2ST 481,2.58
~
l'lMII:M lalhll PnMico INola 4)
Totaii.JabDIUea
Acc:umullded Swplua
410.552 12,233
85,329 15,3311 85,329
85,329
2,000 29,143 453,928 413,929
Stalament of Opel'lltlons and Accumulated Swplua
YNI' ended Decemllet 31,2012
R-
Saleolplots 12,348 620 29,143 - .U,111 16.320
lnl8nlsl earned 8,090 50 - - 8,140 8.909
Gain (lo!s) on 1nvea1ment5 (2, 160) - • • 12, 160) 3.688
18.278 670 - 29.143 - 48,091 29.917
Expondllwu
Paid ~-
ID Cemelllfy Bo8ld
Reoavment to Ptovince
8.092
8,092
8,012
8,092
224
8,906
73
9,203
189
Annualaurplua
10,186
670
29,143
39,ttl
19,714
Fund b!llanca, beGinning of Ylllll'
400,386
11.563
2,000
413,929
394.215
Fund N~~Me . and of year
410.552
12.233
2.000 29,143
453.t28
413,929
The accompanying nola "" an inlllgral part of these financial swtemenla •
...

190
DRAFT
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Trust Fund
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Year ended December 31
2012
2011
cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in):
Operating activities
Annual surplus
$
$
19,714
Changes in non-cash Item balances
Accounts receivable
Due from Town of Georgina
Loan receivable
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Cash provided by operating activities
1,950
41,949
83,669
(85,329)
201
18,255
lnvestng activities
Increase in investments
Cash provided by used in) investing activities
Net change In cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
(41,949)
(41,949)
(18,255)
(18,255}
The accompanying notes are an Integral part of these financial statements.
4

191
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Trust Funds
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31,2012
1.
2.
3.
Accounting policies
The financial statements of The Corporation of the Town of Georgina Trust Funds are the
representation of management prepared In accordance with policies prescribed for Ontario
municipalities by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs. Since precise determination of many assets and
liabilities Is dependent upon future events, the preparation of periodic financial statements
necessarily involve the use of estimates and approximations. These estimates have been mp;rt,
using careful judgments.
Sources of financing and expenses are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. 6 ~
The accrual basis of accounting recognizes revenues as they become available a4~ble;
expenses are Incurred as they are incurred and measurable. ~~~~
Revenues on the cemetery lots are recognized upon transfer of tit!~~
lnv

192
TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT NO. DAS-2013-0022
FOR CONSIDERATION OF
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COUNCIL
ON JUNE 17, 2013
SUBJECT: 2012 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE BRIAR HILL
CEMETERY BOARD
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT REPORT NO. DAS-2013-0022 DATED JUNE 17TH, 2013
REGARDING THE 2012 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE
BRIAR HILL CEMETERY BOARD BE RECEIVED.
2. THAT COUNCIL ADOPT THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
THE BRIAR HILL CEMETERY BOARD FOR THE 2012 FISCAL YEAR.
REPORT:
The draft 2012 Audited Financial Statements of the Briar Hill Cemetery Board are
attached for Council's approval. These Statements were prepared by Town staff,
and audited by the Town's appointed independent auditors, BOO Canada LLP.
Prepared and recommended by:
Darlene Carson- 1 de nd, A.M.C.T.
Manager of Finance and Deputy Treasurer
Prepared and recommended by:
~?!!:ftith ~
Rebecca Mathewso , CGA
Director of Administrative Services
and Treasurer
Approved by:
Winanne Grant, B.A. , AMCT, CEMC
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachment: Briar Hill Cemetery Board Audited Financial Statements 2012

193
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Briar Hill Cemetery
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended December 31, 2012
Contents
Independent Auditor's Report
2
Consolidated Ftnandal Statements
Statement of Ffnandal Position
Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus
Statement of Cash Flow
3
4
5
Notes to the Finandal Statements 6

194
Independent Auditor's Report
To the Members of Brfar Htll Cemetery
We have audited the accompanying consolidated ftnandal statements of Brfar Htll Cemetery, which
comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as at December 31, 2012, and the consolidated
statement of operations and accumulated surplus, and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year
then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory lnfonnatlon.
Management's Responslblltty for the Flnanctal Statements
Management Is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial
statements In accordance with Canadian public sector accounting standards, and for such Internal control
as management detennlnes Is necessary to enable the preparation of the consolidated financial statements
that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsfbutty
Our responsibility Is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit In accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those
standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material
misstatement.
An audit Involves perfonnlng procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures In the
consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, Including
the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due
to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers Internal control relevant to the
entity's preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements In order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate In the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on
the effectiveness of the entity's Internal control. An audit also Includes evaluating the appropriateness of
accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained Is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, In all material respects, the financial
position of Briar Hill Cemetery as at December 31, 2012 and the results of Its operations and Its cash flows
for the year then ended In accordance with Canadian public sector accounting standards.
Other Matters
The financial statements of Briar Htll Cemetery for the year ended December 31 , 2011 were audited by
another auditor who expressed an unmodified opinion on June 25, 2012.
Chartered Accountants. Licensed Public Accountants
June 24, 2013
Newmart

DRAFT
BRIAR HILL CEMETERY
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
Care & Maintenance Trust
December31 General Fund Fund Total
2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011
$ $ $ $ $ $
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents 34,082 47,766 - - 34,082 47,766
Short4enninvesbnen~ - - 398,534 386,598 398,534 386,598
Accounts receivable . 61102 - . . 61102
34,082 53.868 398,534 386,598 432,616 440,466
Liabilities
lnterfund payable (receivable) 12,018 13,768 (12,018) (13,768)
Accoun~ payable 782 4.067 - - 782 41067
12,800 17,835 (12,018) (13,768) 782 4,067
Accumulated surplus 21,282 36,033

nDAJ=T
BRIAR HILL CEMETERY
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus
Care & Maintenance Trust
Year ended December 31 General Fund Fund Total
\
2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011
$ $ $ $ $
--$
Revenue
Burial charges 37,933 47,117 - - 37,933 47,117
Sale of plots 21,623 30,650 - - 21,623 30,850
Comer stones 1,890 2,700 - - 1,890 2,700
Municipal grant - Operating 2,137 1,500 - - 2,137 1,500
Interest - - 11,429 12.230 11,429 12,230
Gain (loss) on disposal of Investments - - (2,1150) 3,688 (2,160) 3,688
Miscellaneous 66 23 - - 68 23
Total ravanue 63,849 82,190 9,269 15,918 72,918 98,108
Expenditures
Caretaking 58,147 50,675 - 58,147 50,675
Cemetery care 7,756 6,714 - 7,756 6,714
Office and miscellaneous 3,854 7,456 - 3,854 7,456
Committee honorariums 2,250 3,500 - 2.250 3,500
AdminlstraUon fees - - 3,339 3,324 3,338 3,324
Professional fees 2,137 1,500 - 2,137 1,500
Total expenditures 74,144 69,845 3,339 3,324 77,483 73,169
196
Annual surplus (deficit) (10,495) 12,345 5,930 12,594 (4,566} 24,939
Accumulated surplus, beginning of year 36,033 29,432 400,366 382,028 436,399 411,460
lnterfund transfers (Note 4) {4,256) - {5,744) 4,256 5.744
Accumulated surplus, end of year 21,282 36,033 410,552 400,366 431,834 436,399
"'"
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

197
DRAFT
BRIAR HILL CEMETERY
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Year ended December 31
2012 2011
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in):
$ $
Operating activities
Annual surplus (deficit) (4,565) 24,939
Changes in non-cash item balances
Accounts receivable 6,102 (1,159)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (3!285} 2,881
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities (1,748) 26,661
Investing activities
Increase in Investments f11,936} ~16,258}
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities (11,936) (16,258)
Net change In cash and cash equivalents (13,684) 10,403
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 47,766 37,363
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 341082 47,766
The accompanying notes are an Integral part of these consolidated financial statements 5

198
BRIAR HILL CEMETERY
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31,2012
1. Summary of significant accounting policies
The consolidated financial statements of the Briar Hill Cemetery (YCemetery") are the representations of
management prepared In accordance With accounting standards, as recommended by the Public Sector
Accounting Board

199
BRIAR HILL CEMETERY
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31,2012
3. lnterfund transfers
lnterfund transfers are as follows:
Sale of plots- continuing care
Markers
$ 8,700 $
3,648
12,348
10,800
3.850
14,650
Less: maintenance expenses (8,092) (8.906) ~
$ 4,256 $ 5,7~
,o
u"'­
·eJ
~~
~
~~
0~
7

200
TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT NO. DAS-2013-0023
FOR CONSIDERATION OF
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COUNCIL
ON JUNE 17, 2013
SUBJECT: 2012 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE TOWN OF
GEORGINA BOARDS AND COMMITTEES {UNAUDITED)
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT COUNCIL RECEIVE REPORT NO. DAS-2013-0023 DATED
JUNE 17rH, 2013 REGARDING THE 2012 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
THE TOWN OF GEORGINA BOARDS AND COMMITTEES (UNAUDITED);
AND
2. THAT COUNCIL ADOPT THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE 2012 FISCAL YEAR FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING BOARDS
AND COMMITTEES:
• BELHAVEN COMMUNITY HALL BOARD (ATTACHMENT #1)
• EGYPT COMMUNITY HALL BOARD {ATTACHMENT #2)
• PORT BOLSTER COMMUNITY HALL BOARD (ATTACHMENT #3)
• UDORA COMMUNITY HALL BOARD (ATTACHMENT #4)
• COOKE'S CEMETERY BOARD (ATTACHMENT #5)
• KESWICK CEMETERY BOARD (ATTACHMENT #6).
REPORT:
Town staff have prepared the 2012 Financial Statements for each of those boards
and committees that are under the control of Council and which are accountable to
the Town for the administration of their financial affairs and resources.
Where the financial statements of a municipality and a local board are
consolidated, the municipality may require the local board to be audited as if it
were part of the municipality, in which case the auditor of the municipality is not
required to provide a separate opinion with respect to the statements of the local
board (Section 296(12) Municipal Act, 2001).
The Town's 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the assets, liabilities,
revenues, expenditures and accumulated surplus, and includes the financial
activities of all boards and committees of Council. The Town's 2012 Consolidated
Financial Statements have been audited by the Town's independent auditor,

201
- Page 2 of Report No. DAS-2013-0023 -
BOO Canada LLP and the auditor has expressed an opinion on the consolidated
financial statements. BOO has not performed a separate audit nor expressed an
opinion on the financial statements of the Town of Georgina Board and
Committees.
Prepared and recommended by:
Prepared and recommended by:
'!Uv,ffx, ~~
Rebecca athewson, CGA
Director of Administrative Services
and Treasurer
Approved by:
Winanne Grant, B.A., AMCT, CEMC
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachment: Town of Georgina Boards and Committees Financial Statements 2012 (Unaudited)

202
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
BELHAVEN COMMUNITY HALL BOARD
Statement of Financial Position
Year ended December 31, 2012
DAS-2013-0023
ATTACHMENT# 1
2012
ASSETS
Current
Cash $ 24,980
Accounts receivable
TOTAL ASSETS $ 24!980
2011
$ 16,754
2,423
$ 19 177
LIABILITIES AND RESERVES
Current
H.S.T. payable $ 1,720
Insurance payable 358
2,078
Reserve for surplus funds-
Balance at beginning of year 17,706
Transfer from revenue fund 5,196
22,902
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND RESERVES $ 24!980
$ 1,220
252
1,471
14,080
3,626
17,706
$ 19 177
see accompanying notes
Page 1

203
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
BELHAVEN COMMUNITY HALL BOARD
Statement of Operations and Fund Balance
Year ended December 31 , 2012
2012 2011
REVENUES
Revenues raised by the Hall Board
Hall rentals $ 12,818 $ 11 ,449
Interest Eamed 525
Donations 79
Miscellaneous 95
13,422 11 ,544
Town grants
Operating 12,177 12,156
Capital 3,199
12,177 15,355
TOTAL REVENUES $ 25,599 $ 26,899
EXPENDITURES
Expenses paid by the Hall Board
Contracted services $ 5,850 $ 5,925
Bu ilding repairs and maintenance 824 1,069
Telephone 533 520
Supplies 494 355
Donations 49
Expenses paid by the Town
7,702 7,918
Building repairs and maintenance 6,477 5,260
Insurance 2,490 2,490
Gas 2,218 2,585
Hydro 1,402 1,517
Internal Maintenance 115
Contracted services 3,503
12,702 15,355
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 20,403 $ 23,273
EXCESS OF REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURE
(EXPENDITURES OVER REVENUE) 5,196 3,626
Transfer (to) from reserve (5,196) (3,626)
FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR
see accompanying notes Page 2

204
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
BELHAVEN COMMUNITY HALL BOARD
Notes to the Financial Statements
Year ended December 31, 2012
The Belhaven Community Hall Board surpervises the general operation and maintenance of the Belhaven
Community Hall. The Committee has the authority to establish the rental fees for the Hall and enforce
them . These fees must be submitted for review and approval of Town Council. All Committee member
appointments are subject to the confirmation of Town Council by by-law.
1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. The financial statements of the Belhaven Community Hall Board of the Corporation of the Town
of Georgina are the representation of management and are prepared in accordance with local
government accounting standards established by the Public Sector Accounting Board ("PSAB")
of the Canadian lnstitue of Chartered Accountants.
B. The financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. Under the
accrual method of accounting, revenue is recognized when earned and expenses are recorded
when incurred.
Page 3

205
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
BELHAVEN COMMUNITY HALL BOARD
Notes to the Financial Statements
Year ended December 31, 2012
The Belhaven Community Hall Board surpervises the general operation and maintenance of the Belhaven
Community Hall. The Committee has the authority to establish the rental fees for the Hall and enforce
them. These fees must be submitted for review and approval of Town Council. All Committee member
appointments are subject to the confirmation of Town Council by by-law.
1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. The financial statements of the Belhaven Community Hall Board of the Corporation of the Town
of Georgina are the representation of management and are prepared in accordance with local
government accounting standards established by the Public Sector Accounting Board ("PSAB")
of the Canadian lnstitue of Chartered Accountants.
B. The financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. Under the
accrual method of accounting, revenue is recognized when earned and expenses are recorded
when incurred.
Page3

206
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
EGYPT COMMUNITY HALL BOARD
Statement of Financial Position
Year ended December 31 , 2012
DAS-2013-0023
ATTACHMENT# 2
2012
ASSETS
Current
Cash $ 4,285
Accounts receivable 254
TOTAL ASSETS $ 4,539
2011
$ 7,681
412
$ 8,093
LIABILITIES AND RESERVES
Current
Rental deposits $ 825
Accounts payable 31
Reserve for surplus funds
Balance at beginning of year 6,853
Transfer (to) from revenue fund {3,169)
855
3,684
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND RESERVES $ 4,539
$ 1 '195
45
1,240
9,672
(2,819)
6,853
$ 8,093
see accompanying notes
Page 1

207
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
EGYPT COMMUNITY HALL BOARD
Statement of Operations
Year ended December 31, 2012
2012 2011
REVENUES
Revenues raised by the Hall Board
Hall rentals and special events $ 10,796 $ 20,330
Donations 3,135 550
13,931 20 ,880
Town grants
Operating 22,067 33,534
Capital 1,018
22,067 34,551
TOTAL REVENUES $ 35,998 $ 55,432
EXPENDITURES
Expenses paid by the Hall Board
Contracted services $ 7,648 $ 10,544
Donations 2,910 5,333
Special events & permits 3,880 3,988
Supplies 1,196 1,691
Building repairs and maintenance 676 917
Telephone 598 910
Bank charges 191 316
17,100 23 ,699
Expenses paid by the Town
Hydro 11,374 14,630
Building repairs and maintenance 6,593 11 ,588
Contracted services 4,234
Insurance premiums 4,100 4,100
22,067 34,551
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 39,167 $ 58 ,251
EXCESS OF REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES
(EXPENDITURE OVER REVENUE) (3,169) (2,819)
Transfer (to) I from reserve 3,169 2,819
FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR
see accompanying notes
Page2

208
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
EGYPT COMMUNITY HALL BOARD
Notes to the Financial Statements
Year ended December 31 , 2012
The Egypt Community Hall Board surpervises the general operation and maintenance of the Egypt
Community Hall. The Committee has the authority to establish the rental fees for the Hall and enforce
them. These fees must be submitted for review and approval of Town Council. All Committee member
appointments are subject to the confirmation of Town Council by by-law.
1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. The financial statements of the Egypt Community Hall Board of the Corporation of the Town of
Georgina are the representation of management and are prepared in accordance with local
government accounting standards established by the Public Sector Accounting Board ("PSAB")
of the Canadian lnstitue of Chartered Accountants.
B. The financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. Under the
accrual method of accounting, revenue is recognized when earned and expenses are recorded
when incurred.
Page3

209
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
PORT BOLSTER COMMUNITY HALL BOARD
Statement of Financial Position
Year ended December 31, 2012
DAS-2013-0023
ATIACHMENT # 3
2012
ASSETS
Current
Cash $ 2,386
Accounts Receivable 227
TOTAL ASSETS $ 2,613
$
$
2011
4,229
39
4,268
LIABILITIES AND RESERVES
Current
Insurance payable $ 58
58
Reserve for surplus funds-
Balance at beginning of year 4,058
Transfer from (to) revenue fund (1,502)
2,556
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND RESERVES $ 2,613
$
$
211
211
3,996
62
4,058
4,268
see accompanying notes
Page 1

210
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
PORT BOLSTER COMMUNITY HALL BOARD
Statement of Operations
Year ended December 31, 2012
2012 2011
REVENUES
Revenues raised by the Hall Board
Fundraising $ 2,352 $ 1 '161
Hall rentals 2,254 $ 2,914
Donations 278 568
Miscellaneous 150
5,034 4,643
Municipal grants
Town of Georgina- operating 12,209 15,888
Township of Brock -capital 4,078
Town of Georgina - capital 3,978
20,265 15,888
TOTAL REVENUES $ 25,299 $ 20,531
EXPENDITURES
Expenses paid by the Hall Board
Fundraising $ 4,032 $ 1,631
Telephone 860 831
Snowplow 840 840
Donations 745 875
Supplies 60 205
Bullding repairs and maintenance 100
Miscellaneous 99
6,536 4,581
Expenses paid by the Town
Capital expenditures 8,056
Building repairs and maintenance 6,199 6,541
Hydro 2,938 3,357
Insurance premiums 2,080 2,080
Gas 864 1,584
Internal maintenance 128 985
Contracted services 1,341
20,265 15,888
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 26,801 $ 20,468
EXCESS OF REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES
(EXPENDITURES OVER REVENUE) (1,502) 62
Transfer (to) from from reserve 1,502 (62)
FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR
see accompanying notes Page 2

211
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
PORT BOLSTER COMMUNITY HALL BOARD
Notes to the Financial Statements
Year ended December 31 , 2012
The Port Bolster Community Hall Board surpervises the general operation and maintenance of the Port
Bolster Community Hall. The Committee has the authority to establish the rental fees for the Hall and
enforce them. These fees must be submitted for review and approval of Town Council. All Committee
member appointments are subject to the confirmation of Town Council by by-law.
1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. The financial statements of the Port Bolster Community Hall Board of the Corporation of the
Town of Georgina are the representation of management and are prepared in accordance with
local government accounting standards established by the Public Sector Accounting Board
("PSAB") of the Canadian lnstitue of Chartered Accountants.
B. The financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. Under the
accrual method of accounting, revenue is recognized when earned and expenses are recorded
when incurred.
Page3

212
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
UDORA COMMUNITY HALL BOARD
Statement of Financial Position
Year ended December 31, 2012
DAS-2013-0023
AITACHMENT#4
2012
2011
ASSETS
Current
Cash and investments
TOTAL ASSETS
$ 15,448
$ 15,448
$ 10,011
$ 10 011
LIABILITIES AND RESERVES
Current
H.S.T. payable
Damage deposits
Insurance payable
$ 3,884
1,800
1,044
6,728
$ 2,573
6,835
525
9,934
Reserve for surplus funds-
Balance at beginning of year
Transfer from (to) revenue fund
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND RESERVES
78
8,643
8,721
$ 15,448
2,274
(2, 197)
78
$ 10,011
see accompanying notes
Page 1

213
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
UDORA COMMUNITY HALL BOARD
Statement of Operations and Fund Balance
Year ended December 31, 2012
2012 2011
REVENUES
Revenues raised by the Hall Board
Hall rentals $ 22,925 $ 11,703
Donations 545 25
Special events 400 1,500
23,870 13,228
Municipal grants
Town of Georgina 35,090 76,469
Township of Uxbridge 7,500 7,500
42,590 83 ,969
TOTAL REVENUES $ 66,460 $ 97,196
EXPENDITURES
Expenses paid by the Hall Board
Contracted services $ 12,164 $ 12,107
Building repairs and maintenance 1,772 192
Telephone 668 691
Other supplies 473 614
Equipment 140 1,820
Miscellaneous 10
15,227 15,424
Expenses paid by contributing municipalities
Building repairs and maintenance 22,744 62,953
Hydro 8,506 8,282
Internal maintenance 6,590 1,763
Insurance premiums 3,069 6,590
Contracted services 1,681 4,380
42,590 83,969
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 57,817 $ 99,393
EXCESS OF REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES
(EXPENDITURES OVER REVENUE) 8,643 (2, 197)
Transfer (to) from reserve (8,643) 2,197
FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR
see accompanying notes
Page2

214
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
UDORA COMMUNITY HALL BOARD
Notes to the Financial Statements
Year ended December 31, 2012
The Udora Community Hall Board surpervises the general operation and maintenance of the Udora
Community Hall. The Committee has the authority to establish the rental fees for the Hall and enforce
them. These fees must be submitted for review and approval of Town Council. All Committee member
appointments are subject to the confirmation of Town Council by by-law.
1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. The financial statements of the Udora Community Hall Board of the Corporation of the Town of
Georgina are the representation of management and are prepared in accordance with local
government accounting standards established by the Public Sector Accounting Board ("PSAB")
of the Canadian lnstitue of Chartered Accountants.
B. The financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. Under the
accrual method of accounting, revenue is recognized when earned and expenses are recorded
when incurred.
Page3

COOKE'S CEMETERY
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
Care & Maintenance Trust
December 31, 2012 General Fund Fund
Total
DRAFT
2012 2011 2012 2011
$ $ $ $
2012
$
2011
$
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents 11,311 9,277 - -
Short-term investments - - 12,283 11,413
Accounts receivable 2,707 2,441 - -
14,018 11 ,718 12,283 11,413
11 ,311
12,283
2,707
26,301
9,277
11,413
2,441
23,131
Liabilities
lnterfund payable (receivable} (50) (100} 50 (150)
Accounts payable 54 54 - -
4 (46} 50 (150)
Accumulated surplus 14,014 11 ,764 12,233 11 ,563
-
54
54
26,247
(250)
54
(196}
23,327
215
w
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
l>c
~)>
l>Vl
(")'
:I:~
s:~
m,
zo
-40
#~
U1

COOKE'S CEMETERY
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus
Care & Maintenance Trust
Year ended December 31 , 2012 General Fund Fund Total
r'DAI:T
2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011
-$-
$ $ $ $ $
Revenue
Municipal grant- Operating 3,070 1,188 - - 3,070 1,188
Sale of plots 1,200 4,150 - 1,670 1,200 5,820
Burial charges 1,114 350 - - 1,114 350
Miscellaneous 200 335 50 - 250 335
Total revenue 5,584 6,023 50 1,670 5,634 7,693
Expenditures
Caretaking 1,503 3,708 - - 1,503 3,708
Committee honorariums 640 - - - 640
Office and miscellaneous 392 885 - 93 392 978
Cemetery care 179 - - - 179
Total expenditures 2,714 4,593 - 93 2,714 4,686
216
Annual surplus 2,870 1,430 50 1,577 2,920 3,007
Accumulated surplus, beginning of year 11,764 11,234 11,563 9,986 23,327 21,220
lnterfund transfers (Note 4) (620) (900) 620 - - (900}
Accumulated surplus, end of year 14,014 11,764 12,233 11 ,563 26,247 23,327
.::.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

217
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
COOKE'S CEMETERY BOARD
Notes to the Financial Statements
Year ended December 31, 2012
The Cooke's Cemetery Board is appointed by Council pursuant to the provisions of the Cemeteries
Act to deal with matters related to the operation of the cemetery.
The Board reserves full and complete control and management of the land, buildings, plantings,
roads, utilities, books and records of the cemetery and complete authority to administer its by-laws,
which have been adopted for the improvement and upkeep of the cemetery, to keep it a becoming
and respectful place for the burial of the dead, in accordance with the Cemeteries Act.
1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. The financial statements of the Cooke's Cemetery Board are the representation of
management and are prepared in accordance with local government accounting standards
established by the Public Sector Accounting Board ("PSAB") of the Canadian Institute of
Chartered Accountants.
B. The financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. Under
the accrual method of accounting, revenue is recognized when earned and expenses are
recorded when incurred.
2. CARE AND MAINTENANCE FUND
The purpose of the Care and Maintenance Fund is to provide for the continuing care and
maintenance of the cemetery.
At December 31, 2012, $50 (2011 $150) in excess contributions was paid to the Trustee of
the Care and Maintenance Fund.

KESWICK CEMETERY
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus
DRAFT
Care & Maintenance Trust
Year ended December 31, 2012 General Fund Fund
Total
2012 2011 2012 2011
-$-
$ $ $
Revenue
Burial charges 6,880 5,375 - -
Sale of plots 4,752 5,316 - -
Interest 477 -
Total revenue 12,109 10,691 -
2012
$
6,880
4,752
477
12,109
2011
$
5,375
5,316
10,691
Expenditures
Cemetery care 9,036 9,563 -
Committee honorariums 1,526 1,861 - -
Miscellaneous 104 145 - -
Total expenditures 10,665 11,569 - -
Annual surplus 1,444 (878) - -
9,036
1,526
104
10,665
1,444
9,563
1,861
145
11,569
(878)
218
Accumulated surplus, beginning of year - - 25,375 -
25,375
lnterfund transfers (Note 4) - 878 3,768 -
3,768
878
Accumulated surplus, end of year 1,444 (0) 29,143
30,587
(0)
""'
l>o
~)>
l>Vl
nN
::I:o
s: ....
m\f
zo
-!0
#~
en
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

219
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
KESWICK CEMETERY BOARD
Notes to the Financial Statements
Year ended December 31, 2012
The Keswick Cemetery Board is appointed by Council pursuant to the provisions of the Planning Act
to deal with matters related to the operation of the cemetery.
The Board reserves full and complete control and management of the land, buildings, plantings,
roads, utilities, books and records of the cemetery and complete authority to administer its by-laws,
which have been adopted for the improvement and upkeep of the cemetery, to keep it a becoming
and respectful place for the burial of the dead, in accordance with the Cemeteries Act.
1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A
The financial statements of the Keswick Cemetery Board are the representation of
management and are prepared in accordance with local government accounting standards
established by the Public Sector Accounting Board ("PSAB") of the Canadian Institute of
Chartered Accountants.
B. The financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. Under
the accrual method of accounting, revenue is recognized when earned and expenses are
recorded when incurred.
2. CARE AND MAINTENANCE FUND
The purpose of the Care and Maintenance Fund is to provide for the continuing care and
maintenance of the cemetery.
At December 31, 2012, $29,143 (2011 $nil) was owed to the Trustee of the Care
and Maintenance Fund representing unremitted funds.
DRAFT

220
TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT NO. DAS-2013-0024
FOR CONSIDERATION OF
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COUNCIL
ON JUNE 17TH, 2013
SUBJECT:
AUDITED 2012 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT REPORT NO. DAS-2013-0024 REGARDING THE AUDITED 2012
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BE RECEIVED.
2. THAT COUNCIL ADOPT THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF
GEORGINA FOR THE 2012 FISCAL YEAR (ATTACHED).
REPORT:
Town of Georgina 2012 Financial Statements
The draft Audited 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements of the Town of
Georgina are attached for Council's review and approval.
Town management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of
the financial statements in accordance with the Municipal Act, 2001 and the
Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB) of Canada standards. PSAB
determines the standards for financial and other performance information
reported by the public sector. Town management is also responsible for
internal controls as necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated
financial statements that are free from material misstatement.
BOO Canada LLP Chartered Accountants, appointed by Council as
independent auditors on September 24, 2012, have audited the Town's 2012
Consolidated Financial Statements and expressed their opinion within the
Independent Auditor's Report that prefaces the financial statements. BOO
Canada LLP has also reported to Council regarding their audit through
correspondence that has been placed on today's agenda.

221
- Page 2 of Report No. DAS-2013-0024 -
ANALYSIS:
2012 Accumulated and Annual Surplus/(Deficit)
The Town's consolidated accumulated surplus represents the Town's net
assets, being the sum of net financial and non-financial assets. At the end of
the year 2012, the Town's accumulated surplus totalled $357,093,113 as
identified on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and summarized
in Table 1 below.
Table 1-2012 Accumulated Surplus
Component
Tangible capital assets
Reserves set aside for specific purposes by Council
Operating fund surplus
Capital fund deficit
Debt- Willow Beach water and sewer
Employee future benefits - unfunded
Total 2011 Accumulated Surplus
2012 Year
End Balance
$
353,407,244
21,469,085
184,663
(2,678,508)
(12,658,732)
(2,630,639)
357,093,113
The year over year change in the accumulated surplus/( deficit) of $1,774,063
reflects the consolidated annual deficit, as indicated in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus. This decrease is
comprised of several amounts as summarized in Table 2 below.
It is important to note that the deficit of $1,774,063 occurs since the Town's
annual investment in its reserve funds and tangible capital assets was less than
the annual amortization (depreciation) of its tangible capital assets.

222
- Page 3 of Report No. DAS-2013-0024 -
Table 2-2012 Annual Deficit
Source
Operating Fund (from $196,085 to $184,663)
Capital Fund (from -$3,673,482 to -$2,678,508)
Capital money set aside for Mortgage Payable
Reserve Funds
Net Debt Change
Net Investment in Tangible Capital Assets
Amortization of Tangible Capital Assets
Employee Future Benefits Payable
Total 2012 Annual Deficit
Change in
Fund and
Debt
Balances
$
(11 ,422)
994,974
1,450,000
1,517,215
(176,698)
4,370,514
(1 0,224,588)
305,982
(1,774,063}
As noted in Table 2 above, the 2012 operating surplus is $184,663. The
Town's approved 2013 Budget includes provisions for the prior year (201 2)
annual operating surplus in the amount of $200 thousand and the amount of
$184,663 will be carried forward to 2013 from the prior year.
The 2012 Capital Fund Balance reflects a deficit of $2,678,508. This deficit
reflects those capital projects that are not yet completed and will be funded from
development charges and Federal/Provincial grants, as well as specific capital
projects that have been completed and are to be funded by future tax levy
revenues (internal borrowings) as provided for in the approved 2013 Budget.
Budget Variances
The Consolidated Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus contains
the actual revenues and expenditures for the fiscal year and the budgeted
amounts which are not audited.
It is important to note that the "budgeted" amounts are stated in accordance
with PSAB and do not include inter-fund transfers, such as contributions to and
draws from reserves. Note 3 to the Financial Statements provides a
reconciliation of the Town's approved 2012 Budget to the Budget as stated in
the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus.

223
- Page 4 of Report No. DAS-2013-0024 -
Budget variances evident on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and
Accumulated Surplus are primarily due to capital investments that have been
expensed, since they are not "tangible" capital assets, such as studies and
minor capital items. Many of these amounts will be offset by equivalent
revenues or transfers from reserve funds.
Tangible Capital Assets
As reported on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Accumulated
Surplus, in 2012 the Town expensed a "net loss on disposal of tangible capital
assets" in the amount of $855,383. This loss reflects the residual of the
sale/disposal proceeds of the asset less the net book value of the asset.
Table 3 below provides a breakdown of those transactions comprised within the
net loss.
Table 3- Net Loss on Disposal of Tangible Capital Assets
Transaction
Joe Dales Pump Stn trsfr to Region
Kin Hall parking demolition
Sidewalks reconstruction
Vehicles traded-in
Equipment traded-in
Egypt Hall -destroyed by fire
Land (subd entrance to abutting landowners)
Net Loss of Disposal of Tangible Capital Assets
Loss On
Disposal
$
(569,382)
(1 ,446)
(544)
42,832
6,025
(199,837)
(133,031)
(855,383)
Schedule 1 of the Town's Audited 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements
includes a Summary of Tangible Capital Assets by Asset Category.
At the end of the 2012 fiscal year, the historical cost of the Town's tangible
capital assets is $462.1 million. Of this cost, $108.7 million is the portion of the
cost that represents the service life of the tangible capital assets that has
already been consumed and amortized as an expense. In 2012, the Town's
annual amortization expense was $10.2 million. The remainder of
$354.3 million (Net Book Value) is to be amortized in future years and it is this
amount that is shown on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
As noted on Schedule 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements, Summary of
Tangible Capital Assets by Asset Category, the Town had capital work-inprocess
totalling $21 ,555 at the end of the 2012 fiscal year. This amount

224
- Page 5 of Report No. DAS-2013-0024 -
reflects the capital project for the rehabilitation of six bridges that was still in the
pre-construction stage.
Cash Flow and Liquidity
The Town's cash and temporary investments of $24.8 million reflect a increase
of approximately $5.0 million during the 2012 fiscal year, as detailed in the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. That portion of the Town's total cash
and temporary investments that is restricted with respect to their use is
$412.8 thousand as described in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. This amount reflects cash amounts that must be spent in
accordance with Planning Act and Development Charges Act provisions, as
well as the Federal Gas Tax Agreement.
Taxes receivable at December 31 , 2012 was 8% of the total annual taxes billed,
considerably lower than 2011 at 9.7%. This decrease is primarily attributable to
active collection efforts and may be partly attributable to the slow recovery of a
weak economic climate. The Town's Treasury staff continue to monitor the
level of taxes receivable and provide personal assistance to taxpayers through
individual payments plans. The reduction in taxes receivable balances
improves the Town's cash flow position.
Long Term Debt Position
Note 13 of the Consolidated Financial Statements includes a summary of the
Town's long term debt. At the end of the 2012 fiscal year following principal
payments of $1 .3 million, the Town held long term debt obligations totalling
$12.7 million for the W illow Beach servicing project that will be recovered from
water/wastewater local improvement levies against benefitting properties.
In 2012, the Town made the final principal and interest payments in full
satisfaction' of long term debt related to the Ice Palace Redevelopment.
Also in 2012, the Town purchased a parcel of land on Lake Drive and fully
funded the acquisition through discretionary and obligatory reserves. The Town
also entered into a mortgage agreement with the vendor. The balance of
mortgage payable in the amount of $1,450,000 is included in the total long term
debt reported on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
CONCLUSION:
This report presents the Town's Audited 2012 Consolidated Financial
Statements for adoption and provides information to Council regarding the
Town's financial activities and its financial position for the 2012 fiscal year. The

225
- Page 6 of Report No. DAS-2013-0024 -
Town's Accumulated Surplus has decreased from $358.9 million to
$357.1 million in 2012.
Prepared and Recommended by:
Prepared and Recommended by:
Darlene Carson- 1 de and, A.M.C.T.
Manager of Finance and
Deputy Treasurer
Rebecca Mathewson, CGA
Director of Administrative Services
and Treasurer
Approved by:
Winanne Grant, B.A., AMCT, CEMC
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachment: Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the Town of Georgina for
the 2012 Fiscal Year

226
The Corporation of the
Town of Georgina
Consolidated Finandal Statements
For the year ended December 31, 2012
Contents
Independent Auditor's Report
2
Consolidated Ffnandal Statements
Statement of Financial Position
Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus
Statement of cash Rows
Statement of Changes tn Net Finandal Assets
Notes to the Finandal Statements
4
5
6
7
8-23
Schedule 1· Tangible Capital Assets - Summary by Asset Category 24-25
Schedule 2 - Segment Disclosures 26·28

227
Independent Auditor's Report
To the Mayor and Coundlors of The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
We have audited the accompanying nnancial statements of The Corporation of the Town of
Georgina which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as at December 31,
2012, and the consolidated statement of operations and accumulated surplus, consolidated
statement of cash flows and consolidated statement of changes fn net financial assets for the
year then ended December 31, 2012, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other
explanatory information.
Management's ResponstbUity for the Consolidated Ftnandal Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated
financial statements in accordance w1th Canadian public sector accounting standards, and for
such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of
consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on
our audit. We conducted our audit tn accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are f(ee from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and
disclosures In the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the
auditor's judgment, Including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the
consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair
presentation of the consolidated financial statements fn order to design audit procedures that
are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated
financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
ffnancfal position of The Corporation of the Town of Georgina as at December 31, 2012 and the
results of its operations, changes in net assets, and its cash flows for the year then in accordance
with Canadian publfc sector accounting standards.
2

228
Other Matters
The consolidated finandal statements of The Corporation of the Town of Georgina for the year
ended December 31, 2011 were audited by another auditor who expressed an unmodified opinion
on June 25, 2012. As part of our audit of the 2012 consolidated finandat statements we also
audited the adjustments described in Note 2 that were applied to amend the 2011 financial
statements. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied.
We were not engaged to audit, review or apply any procedures to the 2011 consolidated financial
statements other than with respect to the adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an
opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2011 consolidated ffnandat stat ements taken as a
whole.
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
June 24, 2013
Newmarket, Ontario
3

229
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
December 31
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 6)
Taxes receivable
Water and sewer charges receivable
Accounts receivable (Note 7)
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 8)
Deferred revenue - obligatory reserve funds (Note 9)
Employee future benefrts payable (Note 10)
Long-term debt (Note 13)
Net Financial Assets
Non-financial assets
Inventory held for own use
Prepaid expenses and deposits
Tangible capital assets (Note 14 and Schedule 1)
Accumulated surplus (Note 16)
2012
$
24,757,335
5,684,3n
2,101,943
1,886,648
34,430,303
11,804,700
3,245,227
2,630,639
14,108,734
31,789,300
2,641,003
254,452
790,414
3531407,244
354,4521110
35710931113
2011
(restated • see
Note 2)
$
18,908,719
6,643,285
2,008,950
3,093,890
30,654,845
13,200,093
2,115,147
2,936,581
13,932,036
32,183,857
(1,529,012)
235,380
899,490
359,261,318
360,396,188
358,8671176
Commitments, contractual obligations and contingencies (Note 15)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 4

230
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus
Year ended December 31
2012 2011
Budaet Actual Actual
(restated- see
Note 2)
$ $ $
Revenues
Taxation available for municipal purposes 32,627,880 32,780,116 31,479,154
User fees and service charges 6,562,870 6,446,038 5,995,532
Government grants and contributions (Note 11) 1,483,650 m,a11 8,828,158
Anes, penalties and Interest 1,323,200 1,121,241 1,176,569
Ucenses and permits 840,200 679,076 859,845
Investment Income 276,020 345,551 320,430
Revenue from other municipalities 771,540 941,746 485,825
Developer and customer contributions 171,058 2,075
Other 104,ns 106,722
Developer contributions earned 995,000 995,000 5,400,093
Rents and concessions 119,500 90,938 68,767
Donations 27.800 37,436 25,832
Total revenues 45,007,660 44,490,856 54,749,002
Expenses
Recreation and cultural services 12,288,733 12,707,570 12,300,436
Protection to persons and property 7,953,921 8,062,607 7,933,456
Transportation services 9,406,786 10,037,654 9,642,293
General government 5,007,231 5,037,956 5,669,619
Environmental services 7,168,986 6,890,045 7,043,746
Planning and development services 2.406,551 2,340,707 1,478,647
Health services 21,800 92,675 ·167,135
Social and family services 198,870 240,322 250,985
Total expenses 44,450,878 45,409,536 44,486,317
Netrevenues(expenses) 556,782 (918,680) 10,262,685
Loss on disposal of tangible capital assets (855,383) (24,184)
Annual surplus (deficit) 556,782 (1,774,063) 10,238,501
Accumulated surplus, beginning of year,
as previously stated 358,867,176 350,030,316
Prior period adjustment (Note 2) (1,401,641)
Accumulated surplus, beginning of year, 358,867,176 348,628,675
Restated
Accumulated surplus, end of year 35710931113 35818671176
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 5

231
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Year ended December 31
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in):
2012 2011
(restated - see
Note 2)
$ $
Operating activities
Annual surplus (deficit) (1,n4,063) 10,238,501
Amortization expense 10,224,588 10,168,575
Loss on disposal of tangible capital assets 855,383 24,184
Changes in non-cash item balances
Taxes receivable 958,908 1,198,194
Water and sewer charges receivable (92,992) 36,876
Accounts receivable 1,207,242 1,845,126
Inventory held for own use (19,072) (18,356)
Prepaid expenses 109,076 (819,500)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (1,395,394) 3,948,190
Deferred revenue - obligatory reserve funds 1,130,080 ( 4,201,126)
Employee future benefits payable (305,942} 2661659
Cash provided by operating activities 10,897,814 22,687,323
Capital activities
Acquisition of tangible capital assets (5,381,868) {16,549,124)
Proceeds on disposal of tangible capital assets 155!971 71,162
Cash provided by capital activities (5,225,897) (16,477,962)
Financing activities
Principal repayment on long-term debt (1,273,302) (1 ,213,636)
Mortgage payable 1,450,000
Cash provided by financing activities 176,698 (1,213,636)
Net change In cash and cash equivalents 5,848,615 4,995,725
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 18,908,719 13,912,994
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 24 1 757 1
335 181908,719
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6

232
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Consolidated Statement of Changes In Net Financial Assets
Year ended December 31
2012 2012 2011
Budget
(restated - see
Note 2}
$ $ $
Annual surplus (deficit) 556,782 i1 1 n4 1 0&3) 10:238.501
Acquisition of tangible capital assets (6,939,400) (5,381,868) (16,549,124)
Proceeds on disposal of tangible capital assets 155,971 71 ,162
Loss on disposal of tangible capital assets 855,383 24,184
Amortization of tangible capital assets 10,224,588 10,224,588 10,168.575
3,285.188 5,854,074 (6,285,203)
Changes In inventory held for use {19,072) {18,356)
Changes In prepaid expenses 1091078 {819,500l
90,004 {837,856l
Change In nat financial assets 3,841,970 4,170,015 3,115,442
Net debt. beginning of year {1 ,529,012} {1.52910121 {4.644,454}
Net financial assets (debt), end of year 21312.958 2,641,003 i1 1529 1 012l
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 7

233
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31. 2012
The Town of Georgina (the "Town•) is a lower-tier municipality in the Region of York (the "Region•), Province of
Ontario, Canada. It conducts its operations guided by the provisions of provincial statutes such as the Municipal
Act, Municipal Affairs Act and related legislations.
1. Summary of significant accounting policies
The consolidated rmancial statements of the Town are the representation of management and have been
prepared In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for local governments as
recommended by the Public Sector Accounting Board ("PSAB") of the Canadian Institute of Chartered
Accountants.
Significant accounting policies adopted by the Town are as follows:
Reporting entity
These consolidated financial statements reflect the financial assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses,
changes In accumulated surplus and changes in net assets of the reporting entity. The reporting entity is
comprised of all organizations, local boards and committees accountable for the administration of their
fmancial affairs and resources, to the Town, and which are owned or controlled by the Town. Accordingly,
the following are consolidated In these financial statements:
Belhaven Community Hall Board
Egypt Community Hall Board
Port Bolster Community Hall Board
Udora Community Hall Board
Georgina Public Library Board
Briar Hill Cemetery Board
Cooke's Cemetery Board
Keswick Cemetery Board
All material inter-entity transactions and balances are eliminated on consolidation.
The operations of the school boards and the Region are not reflected in the Town's financial statements
except to record any resulting receivable or payable balance with the Town at year-end.
Trust funds and their related operations administered by the municipality are not consolidated, but are
reported separately in the "Trust Fund Statement of Continuity" and "The Trust Fund Balance Sheet ~ .
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of cash on hand and cash held In financial Institutions and
temporary investments with maturities of three months or less.
8

234
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
1. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Accrual accounting
Revenues are recorded on the accrual basts of accounting, whereby revenues are recognized as they are
earned and measurable. Expenses are recognized in the period goods and services are acquired and a
liability is Incurred or transfers are due.
Non-financial assets
Non-financial assets are not available to discharge existing liabilities and are held for use in the provision of
services. They have useful lives extending beyond the current year, and are not intended for sale in the
ordinary course of operations.
Tangible capital assets
Tangible capital assets are recorded at cost, which Includes all amounts that are directly attributable to
acquisition, construction, development or betterment of an asset. The cost, less residual value, Is
amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives as follows:
Land Improvements
Buildings and building components
Transportation network (includes roads, sidewalks, bridges
and structures, street lights, etc.)
Vehicles
Machinery and equipment
Information technology
Library collection
Pumping stations
Sanitary sewer
Storm sewer
Water linear
Years
12-100
15-50
10-50
5-20
5-40
3-7
7
20-100
70-100
50.100
70-100
Assets are amortized in the year of purchase or in-service date. Annual amortization is charged in the
year of acquisition for pooled assets. Assets under construction are not amortized until the asset is
available for productive use, at which time they are capitalized.
The Town has a capitalization threshold of $20,000 for all assets In the general category and $50,000
for all assets In the infrastructure category (except land improvements which have a threshold of
$20,000). Individual assets of lesser value are expensed, unless they are pooled because, collectively,
they have slgnlflcant value. Examples of pools are computer systems, library collection, and
streetlights. The Town's threshold for pooled assets Is $20,000. The Library pools all of their assets
and their capitalization threshold is $10,000.
9

235
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31 2012
1. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued}
Contribution of tangible cao!tal assets
Tangible capital assets received as contributions are recorded al their fair value at the date of receipt,
and that fair value is also recorded as revenue.
Interest capitalization
Interest Is capitalized during the period of construction whenever external debt is issued to finance the
constructlon of tangible capital assets.
Leases
Leases are classified as capital or operatlng leases. Leases which transfer substantially all of the
beneflts and risks incidental to ownership of property are accounted for as capital leases. All other
leases are accounted for as operating leases and the related lease payments are charged to expenses
as Incurred.
Employee future benefits payable
Vacation entitlements are accrued for as entitlements are earned.
The Town accrues for its obligations under other ruture employee programs and the related costs. The
Town has adopted the following accounting policies:
- The cost of the benefits earned by employees Is actuarially determined using the projected benefit
method prorated on service and management's best estimate of retirement ages of employees and
expected health care and dental costs.
- The present value of the cost of providing employees with other Mure benefit programs Is expensed
when employees earn these entitlements through service.
- Net actuarial gains and losses related to the employee benefits are amortized over the estimated
average remaining useful life of the employees.
Pension Plan
The Municipality Is an employer member of the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS),
which is a multi-employer, defined benefit pension plan. The Board of Trustees, representing plan
members and employers, Is responsible for overseeing the management of the pension plan, Including
investment of assets and administration of the benefits. The Municipality has adopted defined contribution
plan accounting principles for this Plan because insufficient information is available to apply defined benefit
plan accounting principles. The Municipality records as pension expense the current service cost,
amortization of past service costs and interest costs related to the future employer contributions to the Plan
for past employee service.
10

236
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Dec~ber31.2012
1. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Deferred revenue - obligatory reserve funds
Deferred revenues represent user charges and fees which have been collected but for which the related
services have yet to be performed. These amounts will be recognized as revenues in the fiscal year the
services are performed. The Town receives development charges and cash-in-tieu of parkland under the
authority of provincial legislation and Town by-taws. These funds, by their nature, are restricted In their use
and, until applied to specific capital works, are recorded as deferred revenue. Amounts applied to
qualifying capital projects are recorded as revenue in the fiscal period they are expended.
Reserves and reserve funds
Certain amounts, as approved by the Town Council, are set aside in reserves and reserve funds for future
operaUng and capital purposes. Transfer to/from reserves and reserve funds are an adjustment to the
respective fund when approved.
Revenue recognition
Taxes are recognized as revenue in the year they are levied.
Charges for sewer and water usage are recorded as user fees. Connection fee revenues are recognized
when the connection has been established.
Sales of service and other revenue is recognized on an accrual basis.
Investment Income
Investment income eamed is reilorted as revenue In the period eamed. Investment Income eamed on
development charges (obligatory reserve funds) is added to the fund balance and forms part of the deferred
revenue balance.
Government transfers
Government transfers include entitlements, transfers under shared cost agreements, and grants. Revenue
is recognized for unconditional entitlements and grants In the period received or receivable. Revenue is
recognized for conditional entitlements and grants In the period the associated expense Is incurred.
Revenue Is recognized for transfers under shared cost agreements in the period the costs are incurred.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Canadian public sector accounting standards
requires management to make esUmates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporUng period. The principle estimates used In
the preparation of these financial statements include the useful life and valuation of tangible capital assets.
Actual results could differ from these estimates.
11

237
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31 2012
1. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Budget figures
Budget figures have been reclassified for the purposes of these financial statements to comply with PSAB
reporting requirements. The approved operating and capital budgets are reflected on the consolidated
statement of operations. The budgets established for capital Investment In tangible capital assets are on a
project-oriented basis, the costs of which may be carried out over one or more years and, therefore, may
not be comparable with current year's actual expense amounts.
2. Prior period adjustment
Management has restated the consolidated financial statements for the comparative year to reclassify the
gas tax from accumulated surplus to deferred revenue and expense items that were previously capitalized.
The Impact of these restatements is as follows:
Statement of Financial Position
2011
Increase In deferred revenue
Decrease In tangible capital assets
Decrease In accumulated surplus, December 31 , 2011
$1,954,163
(534,278)
$ 2.488,441
Statement of Operations
Decrease In revenue
Govemment grants and contributions
Investment income
(533,599)
(18,923)
Total decrease in revenue
(Increase) In expenses
Transportation services
Decrease in annual surplus, December 31 , 2011
Decrease in opening surplus, January 1, 2011
(552,522)
(534,278)
$ (1,086,800)
$ (1,401,641)
12

238
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December31, 2012
3. Budget reconcllfatlon
The authority of Council is required before monies can be spent by the Municipality. Approvals are given in
the form of an annually approved budget. The budget approved by Council differs from the budget In the
consolidated statement of operations as the Council approved budget has been adjusted to account for
material changes due to PSAB reporting requirements.
Council approved budget:
Operating fund
Capital budget
Capital budget carried over from previous years
Total Council approved budget
Less: Consolidation adjustments
Less: PSAB adjustments
Less: Tangible capital assets capitalized
Less: Proceeds from long term debt
Add: Amortization expense
Adjusted budget per consolidated statement of operations
4. Trust fund
Revenue
$
43,078,710
1,296,000
632,950
45,007,660
45,007,660
Expenses
$
52,795,810
8,588,070
61,383,880
(15,245,540)
(2,907,110)
(7,729,300)
(1,275,640)
10,224,588
44,450,878
The Trust fund administered by the Town amounting to $539,257 (2011 - $499,258) is presented in a
separate financial statement of trust balances and operations. As such balances are held in trust by the
Town for the benefit of others, they are not included in the Town's consolidated statements of financial
position or operations.
13

239
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31 2012
5. Operations of school boards and the Region of York
During 2012, requisitions were made by the district school boards and the Region, requiring the Town to
collect property taxes and payments in lieu of property taxes on their behalf. The amounts collected and
remitted are summarized as follows:
School boards
Region of York
2012
$
14,374,110
23,5n,215
37,951,325
2011
$
14,308,469
22,902,375
37,210.844
6.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are segregated as follows:
Restricted- obligatory reserve funds (refer to Note 9)
Unrestricted and undesignated
2012
$
412,n4
24,344,561
2011
$
160,984
18,747,735
24.757.335
18,908,719
7.
Accounts receivable
Government entities
Trade and other receivables
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts
2012
$
1,495,003
4871177
1,982,180
(95,532)
2011
$
2,695,582
470,522
3,166,104
(72.214)
1,8881648
3,093,890
8.
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Trade payables and accruals
School boards
Region of York
Interest on long-term debt
Payroll
2012
$
7,455,481
28,516
2,553,965
155,173
1,611a565
2011
$
10,023,934
43,321
1,748,139
172,534
1,212,165
11.804.700
13,200,093
14

240
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31,2012
9. Deferred revenue • obligatory reserve funds
Development charge reserve funds
Subdivider contributions
Recreational land dedicated under the Planning Act
Gas tax grant
Continuity of obligatory reserve funds
Balance at the beginning of the year
Development charge collections
Gas tax grant
Investment income
Tangible capital assets acquisitions and construction
Balance at the end of the year
2012
$
16,890
103,366
292,518
2,832,453
3,245,227
2012
$
2,115,147
1,238,251
1,298,964
47,559
(1,454,694)
3,245,227
2011
$
(931 ,503)
102,372
990,115
1,954,163
2,115,147
2011
$
6,316,272
596,371
1,298,964
68,998
~6. 165.458~
2,1151147
10. Employee future benefits payable
Under the provisions of certain employee benefits plans, an employee who has achieved the appropriate
factor as determined by OMERS, Is eligible for a retirement pension from OMERS, and is under the age of
65 years will be provided with extended health coverage (drug, vision and dental plan). The Town
contributes 1 00% of the insurance premium obligated under this plan.
Actuarial valuations for accounting purposes are performed every three years using the projected benefit
method prorated on services. The most recent actuarial valuation report was prepared as at December 31,
2010, and updated to December 31, 2012.
The accrued benefits liability as at December 31 is as follows:
Employee other future benefits
Vacation pay
2012
$
1,264,273
1,366,366
2,630,639
2011
$
1,232,771
1,703,810
2,936.581
15

241
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December31, 2012
10. Employee future benefits payable (continued)
Total other benefit payments to retirees during the year were $.66,271(2011 - $40,307). The plan is
unfunded and requires no contributions from employees. The employee other future benefits liability at
December 31 Is as follows:
Accrued benefits obligation
Unamortized actuarial gain
2012
$
1,186,413
n,aeo
2011
$
1,143,720
89,051
Employee future benefits payable
The continuity of the employee other future benefits liability is as follows:
Balance, beginning of the year
Annual amortization of actuarial gains
CUrrent period service cost
Interest cost
Benefits paid for the period
Balance, end of the year
Significant assumptions used are as follows:
Expected average remaining service life In years
Employees future benefits payable as at December 31
Interest (discount) rate
Benefits cost for the year ended December 31
Interest (discount) rete
Dents/ costs
Health costs
- Initial rate
- Rate declines to
-Year that the rate reaches the rate It Is assumed to remain at
1,264,273
2012
$
1,232,n1
(11,191)
52,131
56,833
(66,271)
1,264,273
2012
14.7
5%
5%
4%
8%
5%
2017
1,232,771
2011
$
1,180,380
(11 ,191)
49,649
54,240
(40 , 307~
1,232,771
2011
14.7
5%
5%
4%
6%
5%
2017
16

242
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31 2012
11 . Government grants and contributions
Federal
Provincial
2012
$
508,332
269,545
m.sn
2011
$
4,671,321
4,156,837
8,828,158
12. Insurance coverage
The Town Is self Insured for Insurance claims up to $10,000 for property, liability, automobile, Councillor's
accident, and volunteers for any individual claim and for any number of claims arising out of a single
occurrence. Claim costs during the year amounted to $58,418 {2011 - $59,933).
The Town has made provisions for reserves for self insurance for claims under the limits noted above to be
used for those claims that exceed the sum provided for in the annual budget. These reserves are reported
In the accumulated surplus under reserves set aside by the Council. As at December 31, 2012 these
reserves had an adverse balance of $57,040 {2011 - adverse balance of $136,240).
13. Long-term debt
The long-term debt issued in the name of the Town, has been approved by by-law. The annual principal
and interest payments required to service these debts are within the annual debt repayment limit prescribed
by the Mlnistfy of Municipal Affairs and Housing. The balance of long-term debt reported on the
consolidated statement of financial position is made up of the following:
Pu~ose Bm.rui Ma1Ydti in 2012
$
Willow Beach water and sewers 4.76% 2026 12,658,734
Ice Palace redevelopment 5.25% 2012
2011
$
13,283,036
649,000
Mortgage payable 0.00% 2018 1,450,000
1411081734
13,932,036
Principal repayments for each of the next five years and thereafter are due as follows:
$
2013
901 ,588
2014
938,597
2015
968,844
2016
1,003,439
2017
1,039,698
2018 and thereafter
9,256,568
14,108,734
17

243
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
O~ber31 , 2012
13. Long-term debt (continued)
The Town is contingently liable for the tile drainage loans as at December 31, 2012 of $5,315 (2011 -
$7,681 ). As the responsibility for payment of principal and Interest charges for tile drainage loans have
been assumed by Individuals, It Is not recorded on the consolidated statement of financial position.
Interest expense on long-term debt amounted to $641 .275 (2011 - $702,761 ). Interest paid during the year
is $658,478.
Of the $14,108,7341ong-term debt (2011 • $13,932,036) certain principal payments do not represent
a burden on general Town revenue, as they are to be recovered in Mure years from other sources.
The total long-term debt is to be recovered from the following:
General revenues
Water/Wastewater user charges
2012
$
12,658,734
12,658,734
2011
$
649,000
13,283,036
13,932,036
In 2012, the Town purchased a parcel of land and fully runded the acquisition through discretionary and
obligatory reserves. The Town also entered into a mortgage agreement with the vendor, bearing Oo/o
interest.
The balance of mortgage payable in the amount of $1,450,000 Is reported on the consolidated statement
of financial position.
18

244
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December31, 2012
14. Tangible capital assets
Schedule 1 provides Information on the cost and accumulated amortization of tangible capital assets of the
Town by major asset category.
Assets under construction
Assets under construction and other capital work in progress having a value of $21,555 (2011 - $1,988,881)
have not been amortized. Amortization of these assets will commence when the assets are put into
service.
Contributed tangible capital assets
Contributed tangible capital assets have been recognized at fair market value at the date of contribution.
The value of contributed assets received during the year is $171,058 (2011 - $2,075), which Includes
contribution from developers In the amount of$ nil (2011 - $ nil).
19

245
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31 , 2012
15. Commitments, contractual obligations and contingencies
Commitments
The Town has entered into lease agreements for vehicles, office equipment and safety equipment. The
aggregate minimum payments under these leases over the next two years are as follows:
$
2013 18,543
2014 1,640
Contractual obligations
The Town has the following contractual obligations at December 31, 2012:
20.183
a) Commitment on a purchase of land or approximately $1,315,000. As at December 31, 2012 the
outstanding commitment was $815,000 (less a $500,000 deposit paid In fiscal 2012) which is to
be financed by cash and a vendor mortgage.
b) The Town also entered Into a multiple-year contract for delivery of services with respect to waste
collection. The total purchase commitment from such contract amounted to approximately
$1,368,363 of which expenses of approximately $95,000 were outstanding as at December 31,
2012.
Contingencies
The Town is subject to a number of legal proceedings. Although, the amount of its exposure with respect to
these matters cannot be determined, the Town's management believes that the ultimate disposition of
these matters will not have a material impact on Its consolidated financial position. No amount has been
recorded in these financial statements related to any liability which may arise relative to these legal
proceedings.
20

246
The Corporation ofthe Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December31 2012
16. Accumulated surplus
The accumulated surplus Is comprised of the following:
Reserves set aside for specific purposes by Council
Equipment replacement
Recreation and cultural programs and facilities
Working capital
Waste disposal
Health services
Roadways
Protective inspections
General government
Insurance
Planning and development
Contingencies
Parks
Libraries
Green Initiatives
Acquisition of capital assets
Cemeteries
Waste disposal - landfill site
Land sale proceeds
Repayment of water and sewer debentures
Water and sewer system capital expenditures
Allocation fees
Total reserves
Surpluses
Invested In tangible capital assets (Schedule 1)
Less: amount financed by long-term debt (Note 13)
Operating deficit
Employee Mure benefits (Note 10)
Total surpluses
Accumulated surplus
2012 2011
$ $
3,837,990 2,784,733
74,719 62,958
905,273 985,673
23,345 23,345
78,761 89,762
150,002 150,002
232,336 288,508
904,020 905,561
(57,040) (136,240)
355,226 355,226
1,807,263 1,945,923
7,072 7,072
40,390
332,840 274,500
8,503,464 8,369,120
62,898 56,098
100,000 100,000
22,894 580,443
1,229,239 701,188
2,816,391 2,407,998
42 1
000
21,469 1
085 19 1 951,870
353,407,244 359,261,318
(14,108,734) (13,932,036)
(1,043,843) (3,4n,395)
(2,630 1
639) (2 1
936 1
581)
335,624,028 336,915,306
357 1
093 1
113 358.8671176
21

247
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31,2012
17. Pension agreements
OMERS provides pension services to more than 428,947 active and retired members and approximately
968 employers. Each year an Independent actuary determines the funding status of OMERS Primary
Pension Plan (the Plan) by comparing the actuarial value of Invested assets to the estimated present
value of all pension benefits that members have earned to date. The most recent actuarial valuation of
the Plan was conducted at December 31, 2012. The results of this valuation disclosed total actuarial
liabilities of $69,122 million In respect of benefits accrued for service wlth actuarial assets at that date
of $59,198 million indicating an actuarial deficit of $9,924 mtltfon. Because OMERS is a multf·employer
plan, any pension plan surpluses or deficits are a joint responslbfllty of Ontario municipal organizations
and their employees. As a result, the Town does not recognize any share of the OMERS pension surplus or
deficit.
Contributions In 2012 ranged from 8.3% to 13.9% {2011 - 7.4% to 14.1%) depending on the proposed
retirement age and level of earnings. As a result $1,378,064 (2011 - $1,205,372) was contributed to
OMERS for current year services.
18. Segmented Information
The Town provides a range of services to its ciUzens. For management reporting and stewardship
purposes, aU operations are organized and reported by the service they supply.
Town services are provided by departments and their activities are reported ·see Schedule 2. For each
reported segment, revenues and expenses represent both amounts that are directly attributable to the
segment and the amounts that are allocated on a reasonable basis. The accounting policies used in these
segments are consistent with those followed in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements as
disclosed in Note 1.
The following services have been separately disclosed in the segmented information.
Fire & emergency services
This department is responsible for maintaining and enhancing public safety through emergency
management planning, prevention and public education programs, enforcement and emergency response.
Protective inspectiOn and control
Services Include Building Inspection, Municipal Law Enforcement, Animal Control, Weed Control and Fence
Viewers and Livestock.
22

248
The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31 2012
18. Segmented information {continued)
Rosds, sidewalks, bridges and public works
Public Works is responsible for the Town's infrastructure. This includes the safety and maintenance of the
Town's roads, sidewalks, bridges, street lights, traffic control devices, and the school crossing guard
program.
Water, wastewater and solid waste
This segment consists of water, wastewater and solid waste. Responsibilities include the distribution of
drinking water and the collection of waste water. It also includes the collection of household waste and
recycling.
Leisure programs, events and facilities
This segment includes all leisure programs, activities, events and cultural services to Its residents. It also
Includes all leisure facilities (including arenas, pool, youth centres and community halls), parks and open
spaces. Cemetery management is also included as it Is not considered material enough to warrant a
separate segment.
Ubrary services
The Library serves the members of the public In their leisure, Informational and cultural quests. Library
Services reports to the Library Board and is therefore a separate segment.
Planning & development
This department manages urban development for business interests, environmental concerns, heritage
matters and local neighborhoods.
Corporate governance and management
All support staff and services are Included here such as Town Council, Office of the GAO, Municipal
Treasurer, Finance, Treasury, Information Technology, Purchasing, Clerks and Human Resources.
Taxation revenue
The Town's primary source of funding for Its operations is achieved through property taxes levied against
property owners.
23

The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Tangible Capital Assets - Summary by Asset Category
December 31, 2012
Schedule1
Cost
2 0 1 2
Accumulated Amortization
Opening Additions/
Closing Opening Amortization
Closing
Disposals
Disposals
Balance Betterments Balance Balance Expense Balance
Net Book
Value
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
General
Land 30,025,721 1,989,932 (134,500} 31 ,881,153 - 31,881,153
Building 35,027,393 656,802 (346,540} 35,337,655 9,343,292 951,601 (146,703) 10,148,190 25,189,465
Machinery and equipment 10,129,780 684,090 (279,508) 10,534,362 3.431,352 580,078 (183,840) 3,827,590 6,706,772
Vehicles 6,022,574 616,934 (244,645) 6,394,863 3,725,608 589,206 (234,670) 4,080,144 2,314,719
Information technology 1,432,446 189,001 (358,571) 1,262,876 959,798 227,464 (358,571) 828,691 434,185
Library collections 1,097,304 174,487 (82,1601 1,189,631 489,380 164,395 (82,160) 571,615 618,016
83,735,218 4,311,246 (1,445,924) 86,600,540 17,949,430 2,512,744 (1,005,944) 19,456,230 67,144,310
Infrastructure
Land 14,842,660 14,842,660 - - - - 14,842,660
Land Improvements 22,642,348 445,134 (58,536) 23,028,946 8,722,881 958,735 (57,090) 9,624,526 13,404,420
Transportation networks 142,781,893 1,862,814 (9,070) 144,635,637 41,058,337 4,312,425 (8,526) 45,362,236 99,273,401
Pumping stations 10,583,562 (815,000} 9,768,562 3,387,850 279,841 (245,616) 3,422,075 6,348,487
Sanitary sewer assets 82,750,973 35,783 82,786,756 13,691,655 925,014 14,616,669 68,170,087
Storm sewer assets 29,462,751 132,264 29,595,015 3,234,058 399,480 3,633,538 25,961,477
Water linear assets 70,757,375 27,675 70,785,050 11,705,854 836,349 12,542,203 58,242,847
373,821,582 2,503,670 (882,606) 375,442,626 81,800,635 7,711,844 (311,232) 89,201,247 286,241,379
249
Assets under construction 1.454,803 {1.433,0481 21,555 . - - - 21,555
Total capital assets 459,011,383 5,381,868 (2,328,530) 462,064,721 99,750,065 10,224,588 (1,317, 176) 108,657,477 353,407,244
N
~

The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Tangible Capital Assets· Summary by Asset Category
December 31, 2012 Schedule 1
2 0 1 1
Cost
Accumulated Amortization
Net Book
Opening Additions/ Disposals/ Closing Opening Amortization Closing
Disposals
Value
Balance Betterments Transfers Balance Balance Expense
Balance
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
General
Land 30,025,721 - - 30,025,721 - - - 30,025,721
Building 27,977,862 7,049,531 - 35,027,393 8,399,099 944,193 - 9,343,292 25,684,101
Machinery and equipment 6,503,586 3,812,527 (186,333) 10,129,780 2,918,294 649,936 (136,880) 3,431,352 6,698,428
Vehicles 5,866,978 395,596 (260,000) 6,022,574 3,454,062 524,849 (253,323) 3,725,608 2,296,966
lnformaUon technology 1,290,908 373,080 (231,542) 1.432,446 872,612 318,728 (231 ,542) 959,798 472,648
Library collections 988,326 177,327 (68,349) 1,097,304 408,430 149,299 {68,349) 489,380 607,924
72,673,381 11,808,061 (746,224) 83,735,218 16,052,517 2,587,007 (690,094) 17.949.430 65,785,788
Infrastructure
Land 13,938,552 904,108 - 14,842,660 - - - - 14,842,660
Land Improvements 12,662,723 10,052,070 (72.4;45) 22,642,348 7,827,943 946,469 (51,531) 8,722,881 13,919,467
Transportation networks 140,489,432 2,343,988 (51,507) 142,781,893 36,833,039 4,256,502 (33,204) 41,058,337 101 ,723,556
Pumping stations 10,474,909 108,653 ~
10,583,562 3,087,541 300,309 - 3,387,850 7,195,712
13,691,655 69,059,318
Sanitary sewer assets 82,689,262 61,711 - 82,750,973 12,766,875 924,780 -
Storm sewer assets 28,419,471 1,043,280 - 29,462,751 2,835,989 398,069 - 3,234,058 26,228,693
Water linear assets 70,351,005 406,370 - 70,757,375 10,952,415 753,439 - 11,705,854 59,051 ,521
359,025,354 14,920,160 (123,952) 373,821,562 74,303,802 7,581,568 (84,735} 81,800,635 292,020,927
250
Assets under construction 11,633,700 (10,179,097) - 1,454,603 - - - - 1,454,603
Total capital assets 443,332,435 16,549,124 (870,176) 459,011 ,383 90,356,319 10,168,575 (774,829) 99,750,065 359,261,318
N
V'l

The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Segment Disclosures
Year Ended December 31, 2012
Schedule2
Protective Inspection & Roads, Sidewalks,
Consolidated Fire & Emersencl Control Bridges & Public Works
2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Revenun
Taxation 32,780,116 31 ,479,154
Grants 777,8n 8.828,158 - - 8,495 16,991 3,915 32,066
User fees and service charges 6,446,039 5,995,531 21,080 24,391 80,080 102,518 409,760 355,924
Ucenses, permits and rent no,o14 928,613 - 19,686 645,875 824,965
Fine, penalties and interest 1,082,221 1,157,646 - . 165,428 162,013
Other 216341590 6,359,900 - 550,000 251,735 219,340 1091744 1,095
Total revenues 44,490,858 54.749.002 21,080 594,077 1,151,812 1,325,827 523,419 389,085
Expenses
Salaries and wages 22,033,809 20,884,627 4,861,130 4,664,750 1,904,285 1,863,724 2,874,910 2,639,960
Interest on long-term debt 641,275 702,761
Materials. good and supplies 2,681,028 3,809,245 209,194 240,417 117,642 114,467 569,732 1,722,474
Contracted and general services 9,483,380 7,879,119 265,152 270,819 382,445 404,429 2,13

The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Segment Disclosures
Year Ended December 31, 2012
Schedule2
Water, Wastewater & Solid Leisure Programs, Events
Waste & Facilities Lib~ Services Planning & Develo~menl
2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Revenues
Taxa lion
Grants . 711,950 46,640 7,050,646 1,785,064 1,706,485 30,652 1,216
User fees and service charges 3,080,382 2,965,188 2,377,026 1,998,052 61,387 69,475 230,358 203,765
Ucenses, permits and rent . - 90,938 23,529
Ane, penalties and Interest . - . - 29,004 25,549
Other 308,314 {296,721) 1,114,176 5,518.067 6,279 6,150 297,8011
Total revenues 3,368,896 3.380.417 3,828,780 14.590,294 __ 1,681,734 1,807,659 558,816 204,981
Expenses
Salaries and wages 1,033,086 1,068,217 5,887,061 5,051,029 1,268,233 1,212,119 1,272,165 1,133,000
Interest on long-term debt 616,383 645,550 24,892 57.211
Materials, good and supplies 265,207 405,109 1,378,066 1,181,491 87,129 93,703 18,727 23,302
Contracted and general services 2,386,347 2,278,904 1,872,810 2,356,478 240,896 210,214 985,322 250,738
Rents and Rnancial 20,268 108.857 26,613 39,087 1,379 1,927
External transrers 7,000 7,000 1,820,635 1,759,157 . - 39,712 54,686
Amortization 2,561,756 2,487,396 2,152,031 2.129.487 201,302 188,786 24,781 7,956
Other . - - - - - -
Total expenses 6,890,045 7,001,033 12,964,108 12,573.940 1,798,939 1,706.749 2,340,707 1.469.682
252
Net revenues (expenses) (3,521,349) (3,620,616) _!9,335,328) 2,016,354 82,795 100,910 (1,781,891) (1 ,264,701)
....,
N

The Corporation of the Town of Georgina
Segment Disclosures
Year Ended December 31, 2012
Schedule2
Revenues
Taxallon
Grants
User fees and setVice charges
Ucenses, pennlts and rent
Fine, penalties and Interest
Other
Total revenues
Corporate Govemance &
Mana&!ment
2012 2011
$ $
. .
625,592 948,204
205,988 276,218
33,200 60.433
887,790 970,084
546,538 381,969
__;299,083 2.616.908
Taxation Revenue
Elimination
2012 2011 2012 2011
$ $ $ $
32,780,116 31,479,154
. . (1,722,480} (1,639,400)
32,780,118 31,479.154 (1,722,480) (1.639,4!)0)
Expenses
Salaries and wages
lntl!fesl on long-tenn debt
Materials, good and suppUes
Contracted and general services
Rents and financial
External transfers
Amortization
Other
Total expenses
3,332,939 3,251 ,828
15,331 28,282
1,195,472 1,488,1n
120,143 390,055
. .
374,071 476,899
. 266,661
5,0371956 5,901,902
. - (1,722,480) (1,639,400)
- - l1 ,722,480l ~1.639,400!
253
Netrevenue(expenses}
(2,738,873} (3.284,994)
32,780,116 31.479,154
N
00

254
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT NO. DAS-2013-0025
FOR CONSIDERATION OF
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
ON JUNE 17TH' 2013
SUBJECT:
PROPOSED COUNCIL/COMMITTEE STRUCTURE AND
PROCEDURAL BY-LAW UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT REPORT NO. DAS-2013-0025 DATED JUNE 17, 2013 ENTITLED
PROPOSED COUNCIL/COMMITTEE STRUCTURE AND PROCEDURAL BY­
LAW UPDATE BE RECEIVED BY COUNCIL;
2. THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PROCEED TOWARDS
IMPLEMENTATION OF A HYBRID COUNCIL/COMMITTEE MEETING
STRUCTURE WITH AN IMPLEMENTATION TARGET OF FALL 2013;
3. THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PREPARE AND PRESENT FOR
CONSIDERATION, AN UPDATED PROCEDURAL BY-LAW;
4. THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE STAFF TO NOTIFY THE PUBLIC OF INTENT TO
IMPLEMENT CHANGES TO THE COUNCIL/COMMITTEE STRUCTURE,
RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS AND REPORT SAME FOR COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION BEFORE IMPLEMENTATION.
PURPOSE:
This report speaks to procedural reform proposed to improve the political and administrative
processes. As stated in a similar report received by the council of the Town of Whitchurch­
Stouffville, "Procedural by-laws are fluid documents which evolve over time. They are amended
in order to achieve efficiencies, incorporate best practices and reflect changing needs." The
Town of Georgina, like the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, is experiencing a time of "changing
needs".
BACKGROUND:
The Municipal Act requires municipalities to have Procedural Bylaws to govern the calling, place
and proceedings of meetings. The Town's procedural by-law was adopted in 2002, and
amended in 2004, 2006 and 2007.
Given the growth period for which we are preparing, it is necessary to undertake a review of all
Town processes to ensure we are positioned to best deal with the growing business at hand.

255
Page 2 of Report No. DAS-2013-0025-
In anticipation of increased volume of reports and matters before Council over the next few
years, staff have investigated the best practices of other municipalities and provide the following
report for consideration.
Council should be commended on the fact that the Town's current practices already reflect
several streamlining initiatives; such as,
o
o
o
o
REVIEW:
By-laws being read in one motion
Unwritten motions which expedite the process
Televised or streaming of meetings for public information
Consentagenda
Staff have reviewed the various Council/Committee structures available for consideration. The
approaches taken vary broadly. Municipalities appear to individually consider what works
effectively for their community needs and demands. Listed below are four of the most
commonly used structures:
1. Council with Standing Committees i.e.: Finance, Planning
This is the most cumbersome and politically/administratively time consuming structure.
Adopting this method would not achieve the current goals of the corporation. Staff does not
recommend this structure and therefore have not provided further detail.
2. Council with Committee of the Whole (COWl/General Committee
With this structure it is intended that informal discussion be encouraged at COW with
recommendations forwarded to Council for ratification. This system is most effective when
all reports and recommendations are heard at the COW level and ratified at Council. With a
high volume of approval demands this system becomes less effective in meeting the needs
of the Town.
3. Council meetings only
This is the most streamlined approach; however, it could be assessed as being too
progressive. In this format the informality of Committee discussion is eliminated and public
participation could be diminished because of intimidation of only being able to delegate in a
formal setting; therefore, staff does not recommend this structure at this time.
4. Hybrid Approach
This structure sees the collapse of Council and Committee of the Whole into one meeting,
one agenda, one set of minutes.
o
o
The Clerk of the Town of Whitchurch-Stoufville indicated that they have tried a
number of procedures over the years, but this current hybrid structure (in existence
since 2008) is by far the most efficient system they have had.
In a recent training session attended by the Georgina Clerk, the Committee in
Council structure was discussed and immediately a former staff member of

256
Page 3 of Report No. DAS-2013-0025 -
o
Whitchurch-Stouffville indicated that she had worked within this structure in
Whitchurch-Stouffville and spoke very favorably to the hybrid approach.
The parliamentarian facilitating the session also indicated that municipalities are
finding efficiencies in the hybrid approach.
Pros of the Hvbrid approach:
• The process is progressive
• The agenda format is simple allowing ease of public understanding
o One standard agenda format (refer to draft- Attachment #1)
• The confusion of what items go to which meeting is eliminated, the agenda process is
more co-ordinated
• Navigating the website to find agendas keep it like it is far easier than the current
system
• The hybrid approach is simply a formalization of the approach the Town is already
following. In a true Council/COW structure staff reports are only channeled to COW
meeting; however, to deal with volume of reports and to expedite turn-around times,
staff have been channeling reports directly to Council meetings
• Allows for addendums to only be permitted in genuinely urgent situations
• Customer service will be enhanced by eliminating ratification delay
• To accommodate specific matters, reports can be scheduled to a day or night meeting;
therefore, increasing transparency, accountability and accessibility
• Allows Council to deal with increasing volume of business
• Allows reports and ratification of decisions to be considered weekly rather than biweekly;
therefore, increasing productivity of the Town's business and approval frequency
• Allows greater immediacy of decision making and disposition of matters
• Currently "Council" meetings are only held at night. The Hybrid approach sees Council
meetings alternating between day and night times (assuming that the existing 9:00
am/7:00pm schedule is maintained) ; thereby, accommodating residents who are not 9
to 5 oriented and increasing access at the public to "Council" meetings
• Allows Council to continue to deliberate and speak to matters in an informal manner
prior to ratification by Council
• Increased productivity of meetings should allow us to move to three (3) meetings per
month, which will allow for one (1) week per month for much needed staff time to do
project work.

257
Page 4 of Report No. DAS-2013-0025 -
Perceived Cons of the Hvbrid Approach
o
The democratic process may be perceived to be compromised
Definitions of democracy-
1. government by the people, in which the supreme power is vested in the people and
exercised directly by them through or by their elected agents through a free electoral
system
2. A state of society characterized by formal equality and privileges
3. A system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a
state, typically through elected representatives: a system of parliamentary
democracy
4. A system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a
state, typically through elected representatives.
The six (6) principles of democracy are still upheld under the hybrid approach:
i. All members are equal-they have equal rights and responsibilities.
ii.
iii.
iv.
The organization is run with impartiality and fairness. The rules are applied
equally and fairly to all and not just a few. There is no favoured group within
the organization that will get preferential treatment or who considers itself
above the law.
Ideas come from the members and are presented to the assembly to decide
upon. Everyone gets the right to present ideas, speak to these ideas, and
vote on the ideas, not just a select group.
The majority rules but the rights of the minority and absent members are
protected.
v. Everything is accomplished in the spirit of openness, not secrecy. Members
have the right to know what is going on within the organization by attending
meetings, inspecting the official records and receiving notices and reports
from committees, officers, and boards.
vi.
Leaders come from the people through an election process which is fair and
not slanted so a favored group can control the organization. When a leader's
term of office ends, he or she returns to the people. A hierarchy of power
doesn't exist; it is shared equally. All members have the right to be
considered for office.
o
Sober second thought - one might argue that the reflective time between introduction,
recommendation and decision making on an agenda item is reduced; however, it is
offset by an earlier distribution time of the agenda, well in advance of the meetings, so
that Council have increased advanced contemplation time to present their position for
debate, if necessary, at the meeting.
The opportunity for sober second thought may appear to be missing with the change in
structure; however, the ability to defer to another meeting is always a very viable option.

258
Page 5 of Report No. DAS-2013-0025 -
o
Loss of Tradition - as indicated earlier in this report, progress is necessary to improve
the political and administrative processes and reflect changing needs. While the
fundamental core of the Council/Committee structure remains, it is merely evolving to be
more in line with the requests, needs and wants of the community. Therefore, staff
believes that tradition is not lost and that the democratic process remains and, in fact, is
enhanced through this proposal.
Other Considerations:
• The timing of delivery and posting of agendas
o
o
o
o
Staff is proposing a five (5) calendar day delivery and posting of agendas prior to the
meeting versus the 3 or 4 that has become commonplace. Administratively, in order to
achieve a 5-day delivery of an agenda prior to the meeting, it will be necessary that staff
reports are submitted to the CAO at least 2 weeks (14 days) prior to the meeting date.
Agenda delivery greater than five days prior to the meeting would delay the processing
of Town business and defeat the goals of the structure change.
Earlier delivery allows longer review time for Council
Allows public to review, research, and contact their representative or Town staff to
submit comment - allows for best quality input from residents before Council make
decisions
Improved timelines increases citizen information and input
• Rogers have notified that they will provide day time coverage; thus increasing public
awareness due to televised coverage of all meetings
• The current by-law to delegate routine powers to Staff could be expanded to include minor
approvals where parameters have been defined, ultimately enhancing customer service
through more expedient approvals and reducing the workload at Council meetings. Staff
will bring forward a subsequent report with recommendations regarding the Town's
delegation by-law.
Procedure Bviaw considerations:
Should Council wish to proceed with the structure change, staff will prepare and submit a report
with a revised Procedure By-law in support of the change. This report would also speak to
Procedure By-law amendments requested recently by members of the public. Some procedural
highlights are as follows:
• Closed session would remain at the end of the meeting, so as to accommodate the public
who wish to attend or view the televised open session.
• Rescind versus reconsider - in Section 7.26 (b) of the existing procedural by-law
"reconsider'' and "rescind" have been used interchangeably. This requires correction, as
rescind is to make void; whereas, reconsider is to consider again, especially with intent to
alter or modify a previous decision; not interchangeable.
• Public input - It is customary for Council as elected officials to seek information from the
public to make informed decisions; therefore, increased opportunities for public input and
citizen engagement can be achieved through the following:

259
Page 6 of Report No. DAS-2013-0025-
o
o
o
Early Distribution of Agendas - which would allow for the public to contact their
representative on agenda items prior to the meeting and similarly for Council to gain
input from their constituents prior to discussions at the Council table
Speakers to Items on the Agenda - while there is no evidence that a request to speak
has ever been denied, this would formalize the ability for a member of the public to give
notice of request to address Council on an agenda item. The public member would be
heard at the time the matter is considered by Council, and would not be listed as a
separate Deputation on the agenda. (refer to attached procedures from the Town of
Whitchurch-Stouffville - Attachment #2)
Summary Highlights of the business conducted at the Council meeting- this information
posted to the website following the Council meeting would further inform the public of
Council business (please note this practice has commenced)
o Council Representatives - the public also has the option to contact their Council
representative to voice their opinion.
• Communications/feedback form - can be made available at the reception desk, posted on
the website and also available, as requested, through staff. Once received by the Town
office the form would be directed to the appropriate department and/or Council for response.
• Transparency and Accountability - the principles of Transparency and Accountability
under The Municipal Act would be upheld with the above-noted recommendations.
• Duration of deputations - of the municipalities researched the average allotted time for
deputations was 5 minutes; however, Council always has the option to waive the rules of
procedure to permit a longer time, but should clearly state the extended time allowed when
granting the time extension.
• Presentations
o
o
o
The time limit for a public presentation would be ten (1 0) minutes and may be
extended at Council's discretion by a majority vote of Council members present at
the time of the presentation.
Presentations invited by the Town or Council; such as, government or agency
representatives, etc. should be given a reasonable time limit established at the
discretion of Council.
Consultants whose services are engaged by the Town, and staff presentations would be
heard at the time the staff report is presented. The Clerk, when advised by staff, would
list the consultant on the agenda index with the staff report. Absence of the consultant's
name from the agenda index would not preclude them from presenting.
• Adjournment time - research indicated that the average time for a meeting curfew is four
(4) hours, which is within the parameters set in our current by-law with an adjournment time
of 11:00 p.m. Day time meetings could be a little less restrictive to be more in line with
business hours and loss of productivity due to fatigue would be of lesser concern than in an
evening meeting.

260
• Electronic Agenda - Staff recommends implementation of an electronic agenda in order to
streamline and expedite delivery. The electronic agenda can be implemented through
software that permits Council and staff to write comments directly onto the document for
ease of access during the meeting. The agenda can be displayed on screen for ease of
reference by the gallery and other viewers. Staff will bring forward a subsequent report with
recommendations to Council regarding electronic agenda implementation.
• Financial considerations - Time and supplies are the obvious cost savings to be realized
under the hybrid approach. Less obvious is the potential for reduction in overtime when
specific staff need only attend one meeting. The immeasurable financial gain would be in
only dealing with a matter once and responding accordingly to the public.
NEXT STEPS:
Staff will notify the public of the intent to implement the structural change, receive comments,
and report same for Council consideration before implementation. The implementation target for
the new Council/Committee Structure and accompanying Procedure By-law being Fall 2013.
CONCLUSION:
As stated in the Whitchurch-Stouffville report "the proposed consolidation of the Council meeting
structure (hybrid approach) will simplify the administration of meetings and make it easier for
residents to understand Council's decision making process".
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed system will best serve the current needs of Council, the
public and staff. Should the demand for a high volume of reports diminish in the future, the
Council/COW structure could be reinstated if desired by Council.
Prepared by:
Page 7 of Report No. DAS-2013-0025-
~~GY'-
Yvo e Aubichon, CMM iii, CiviO
Town Clerk
Prepared by:
ifa/ku:tJ ~~
Kebecca Mathewson, vGA
Director of Administrative Services
and Treasurer
Prepared and Approved by:
W(llvnnr
Winanne Grant, BA, AMCT, CEMC
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachments:
1. Draft- proposed agenda format
2. Sample -proposed procedure for speakers to items on the agenda

261
DAS-2013-0025, ATTACHMENT #1
SAMPLE AGENDA FORMAT
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
COUNCIL AGENDA
TOWN OF
GEORGINA
xXDATExxxx, xx 2013
7:00P.M.
Council Chambers, 26557 Civic Centre Road, Keswick, ON
Chair: Mayor Grossi
1. CALL TO ORDER- MOMENT OF MEDITATION
2. ROLL CALL
3. COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
4. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM ITEMS
5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
6. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND NATURE
7. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
8. BUSINESS ARISING FROM MINUTES
9. DEPUTATIONS
10. PRESENTATIONS
11. RESOLUTION TO MOVE INTO COUNCIL IN COMMITTEE
11.1 DETERMINATION OF REPORTS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA REQUIRING SEPARATE
DISCUSSION
11.2 ADOPTION OF REPORTS ON CONSENT AGENDA NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE
DISCUSSION
11.3 CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA REQUIRING SEPARATE
DISCUSSION
*All reports inserted here
12. RECONVENE TO COUNCIL FROM COUNCIL IN COMMITTEE

262
13. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS FROM COUNCIL IN COMMITIEE
"That all reports on the agenda, with the exception of the reports that have been deferred,
deleted, or listed for separate discussion, be approved and the recommendations contained
therein be adopted."
14. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND LOCAL BOARDS
15. COMMUNICATIONS
15.1 General information Items
15.2 Disposition
16. MOTIONS/NOTICES OF MOTION
17. REGIONAL BUSINESS
18. OTHER BUSINESS
19. BY-LAWS
20. CLOSED SESSION, IF REQUIRED
Motion to move into closed session of Council
Motion to reconvene to open session of Council and Report on matters discussed in closed
session
21. CONFIRMATORY BY-LAW
22. MOTION TO ADJOURN

0 J ->o.._mp e_ ~p~\e-\-
PARTICIPATING AT COUNCIL
MEETINGS
Communication between residents,
Council and Town staff is a critical part of
developing an effective and open
municipal government. You are
encouraged to attend and provide your
feedback at meetings of Council.
This pamphlet outlines how you can
participate at meetings of Council.
Council Meetings
Council is responsible for governing the
affairs of the Town of Whitchurch­
Stouffville. Composed of the Mayor and
six Ward Councillors, Council is elected to
serve a four year term.
Council Meetings are held in the Council
Chambers, 111 Sandiford Drive,
Stouffville, usually on:
1st Tuesday of each month: 7:00 pm.
3rd Tuesday of each month: 3:00 pm.
Public Hearings 7:00 pm (if required)
Please confirm meeting dates and times
on the Town Council Calendar
www.townofws.calcalendars.asp
The Council Chambers is wheelchair
accessible. Disabled parking is available.
Assistive Hearing Devices are available
for use upon request.
How can I participate in a Council
Meeting?
The public may participate as a Speaker
or as a registered Delegation.
Speakers are welcome at Council
meetings and may address Council
regarding any report on the agenda.
Shortly after the Council meeting is called
to order, the Mayor or Chair will ask the
audience if they wish to speak to any
items on the agenda and to indicate their
name. When the item of interest is
Gonsidered, the Mayor or Chair will call
upon the Speaker to address their
'~oncerns or provide their feedback.
:Speakers will be allotted five (5)
minutes.
You are encouraged to seek answers to
·your questions through Town staff, prior to
the meeting. Information brought to staff's
attention prior to the meeting will help to
inform Council's decisions.
Delegations are individuals or groups
'Nho have registered to speak to Council
on a particular matter. Please note that
delegations will not address:
• Items addressed in Town staff reports;
• Reconsideration of Council decisions
(6 months from time of Council decision
must lapse before reconsideration);
o Proclamations; or
• Matters before a Town tribunal.
MOO\Brochure Welcome to a Meeting
The delegation registration form is
available online at www.townofws.ca or in
person at the Clerk's Department and
must be received by 12:00 noon on the
Monday seven business days before the.
date of the Council. A copy of your
presentation or speakers notes should be
included with your registration form.
The delegation spokesperson may
speak for not more than a total of eight
(8) minutes or total of ten (10) minutes
for groups of five (5) or more.
What is the difference between a
Speaker and a Delegation?
Speakers address reports included in the
Council agenda. Pre-registered
Delegations address items of interest to
the municipality, unrelated to the Council
agenda. Generally, Delegations are more
formal and may have materials prepared
for distribution to Council.
I cannot attend Council Meetings. How
can I provide my feedback?
You may provide your feedback by
contacting a member of Town staff or
through your Ward Councillor.
Call the Town's Customer SeNice: 905-
640-1900 or 1-855-642-TOWN (8696) for
further information and to learn the name
and contact information for your Ward
Councillor.
263
~c
~~
n.:.,
:J:o
5 .....
m':'
zo
..... 0
'll:l:il
~

264
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA
REPORT CA0-2013-0012
FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JUNE 17, 2013
SUBJECT: BRANDING PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
1. RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. THAT REPORT CA0-2013-0012 PREPARED BY THE COMMUNICATIONS
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISIONS AND DATED JUNE 17,
2013, RESPECTING AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC
CONSULTATION AND INPUT INTO THE BRANDING STRATEGY BE
RECEIVED.
B. THAT COUNCIL DIRECT STAFF TO HOLD THREE (3) DESIGN
CHARRETTES WITH MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO CREATE LOGO
CONCEPTS AND ADVERTISE THESE CHARRETTES THROUGH ALL
AVAILABLE MEANS, INCLUDING OUTREACH TO LOCAL
ORGANIZATIONS.
C. THAT STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL WITH THE OUTCOMES OF THE
DESIGN CHARRETTES.
D. THAT COUNCIL DIRECT STAFF AND THE DESIGN CONSULTANT,
SUBSEQUENT TO THE DESIGN CHARRETTES AND REPORTING TO
COUNCIL, TO HOLD TWO (2) FOCUS GROUPS TO REVIEW THE
PUBLICLY-CREATED DESIGNS AND THE TOP THREE CONSULTANT­
GENERATED DESIGNS WITH THE GOAL OF IDENTIFYING THE TOP SIX
(6) LOGO DESIGNS AND ADVERTISE THESE FOCUS GROUPS
THROUGH ALL AVAILABLE MEANS.
E. THAT UPON CONCLUSION OF FOCUS GROUPS, THE CONSULTANT BE
DIRECTED TO PREPARE THE TOP SIX (6) DESIGNS AS DETERMINED
BY THE FOCUS GROUPS FOR CONSIDERATION BY COUNCIL AND THE
SUBSEQUENT STREET AND ONLINE TESTING (WEB SURVEY).
F. THAT STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL WITH THE TEST RESULTS.
2. PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to present to Council an option for a revised branding
process methodology.

265
-Page 2 of Report No. CA0-2013-0012-
3. BACKGROUND:
On June 3, 2013, at the meeting of the Committee of the Whole, Council was
presented a report on the level of creative input and public engagement
undertaken to date with respect to the Branding Strategy. This report also
presented the designs provided by the consultants and the public's feedback on
these designs and taglines. In response, Council indicated that they were not
satisfied with the level of public engagement and creative input received to date
and further, were not satisfied with any of the consultant designs submitted to
date. In summary, Council wished to see a change in the project's methodology
using a more ground-up, community-oriented approach.
The intent of branding Georgina is to concisely define the municipality's promises
to stakeholders and to subsequently deliver upon those promises to all
stakeholders. This process will establish the foundation which is needed for
ensuring consistency in all messaging and assist the Town in marketing its assets
to a broader audience.
4. DISCUSSION:
In response to Council's concerns, staff propose that design charrettes be held
within the community to draw on local creative talent to develop logo concepts.
Staff recommend that three separate charrettes be held to ensure that the
opportunity to participate is extended to all members of the community.
Focus groups will then be held to evaluate the designs created by the community
and the top three consultant-generated designs with the intent to refine the number
of designs to six. The top six designs as selected by the focus groups along with
any comments made will then be forwarded to the consultant to prepare for
Council consideration and subsequent street testing and evaluation through a web
,..,, ............. : ..... ,... .. ,..~,.. .. +n irlo.n+if" +ho n••hli,...'C" nraforrc.rl ,-.hoif"o ~h:aff \Mill n:~nnrt h::u"':k tn
>:JUIVVY Ill UIU'I:i'l LV IUVIILIIJ LIIV fJUIJIIV~ f'-'1._,,...,,,._...._. ...,,, IV'-'• ._,L...._,, .... .,, ,....,t'...,'"' ..,..,....,,~ ...,
Council with the test results.
5. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The financial impact resulting from the proposed methodology is expected to be
minimal and will be accommodated within existing budgets.
6. CONCLUSION:
Staff believe that the revised project methodology will satisfy Council's desire to
see increased community creative development while ensuring that the objectives
of the project are met. Staff will provide updates throughout the remaining stages
of the project to ensure that Council is informed of the project's progress.

266
-Page 3 of Report No. CA0-2013-0012-
Prepared by:
/~.Y~~
4ordan Redshaw -·
Communications Coordinator
Recommended by:
~" .,,. d:tauo
Approved by:
lll!)ranr
Winanne Grant, B.A., AMCT, CEMC
Chief Administrative Officer