PERF RMANCE 04 - The Performance Portal - Ernst & Young
PERF RMANCE 04 - The Performance Portal - Ernst & Young
PERF RMANCE 04 - The Performance Portal - Ernst & Young
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> distribution equity effect<br />
<strong>The</strong> assessment of the client’s distribution<br />
equity, however, revealed key areas which<br />
seemed to explain the reasons behind the<br />
underperformance.<br />
1. Network strategy<br />
Mapping the quality of the distribution<br />
chain with market share revealed a<br />
mismatch in the nature and type of dealers<br />
deployed in specific markets. For example,<br />
“ While only partway<br />
through<br />
implementation,<br />
the client<br />
witnessed a 50%<br />
increase in its<br />
market share.”<br />
some high-performing dealers had been<br />
allocated less attractive markets (see<br />
Figure 5a and 5b).<br />
In order to improve strategic deployment, a<br />
detailed review was required of the client’s<br />
existing network, with implementation<br />
plans for each category of dealer (see<br />
Figure 6).<br />
Figure 5a. Mapping districts in MP based on market<br />
potential vale and “cost to serve”<br />
Figure 5b. Mapping of districts in MP based on quality of network<br />
presence<br />
22<br />
21<br />
25<br />
23<br />
24<br />
Chambal<br />
26 27<br />
38<br />
Malwa 1<br />
20<br />
32<br />
28<br />
2<br />
2<br />
9 13 17 19<br />
9<br />
29 37<br />
33 33<br />
4<br />
CMP 18<br />
14<br />
30<br />
40<br />
5<br />
7 10<br />
6<br />
34<br />
36<br />
15<br />
31<br />
16<br />
35<br />
8<br />
11<br />
12<br />
39<br />
EMP<br />
Excellent Good Decent Poor Dealer present and<br />
above threshold sales<br />
Dealer present and<br />
below threshold sales<br />
Dealer with less than<br />
4 billing in 6 months<br />
Vacant territory