PERF RMANCE 04 - The Performance Portal - Ernst & Young

PERF RMANCE 04 - The Performance Portal - Ernst & Young PERF RMANCE 04 - The Performance Portal - Ernst & Young

performance.ey.com
from performance.ey.com More from this publisher
13.02.2014 Views

“ When cultural awareness training focuses on communication barriers, the foundation for a high-performing intercultural team is missing.” Phase 1 — Intercultural awareness In our example, to make both the Japanese and German group more open to negotiating and reconsidering their work expectations, the first step is to raise awareness of the differences and the inner logics of both cultures. This is best demonstrated through concrete work examples from the collaboration of this specific team, enabling the Germans to understand that their Japanese colleagues are used to a continuous exchange of information about their work within the team. Consequently, the desire to discuss work on a micro-level does not signal a lack of ability. The Japanese learn that, for Germans, teamwork does not necessarily mean working together intensively to develop a result, but that it may mean putting together the results produced by individual performers into one piece — like a puzzle. Clearly, different underlying values and expectations can easily be misinterpreted as differences in the style of communicating: “Germans are snippy and arrogant,” “Japanese ask way too much.” If we only address the communication, we will not reach the real sources of misunderstanding: Germans value individual performance, Japanese favor working in a group. Once this is clarified, communication misunderstandings are turned into understandable outcomes based on different perspectives, values and behaviors. Initially, the goal is not to understand the other culture fully, but rather to accept that each culture has a valid logic. Team members need to understand that, for the team to perform effectively, new and different conclusions must be drawn about collaboration. This might sound simplistic but, depending upon the cultural origins of the team members, this realization can be a significant step. The team is now ready for change. Phase 2 — Shared performance system Germans have a different idea of performance than Japanese. Germans strive for self-monitoring: transparent goals and consequences, discretionary decisions and minimal oversight. The Japanese strive for group membership: group goals and consequences, decisions based on consensus, lots of mutual support and close interaction. These cultural differences have a strong impact on the team. If there is little agreement about what performance should look like, it is hard to work together cohesively. Performance is influenced by a number of factors, from goals, feedback and consequences, to resources available and the role of management. Each of these

Making a world of difference factors is viewed differently in different cultures. Thus, various expectations can exist about feedback, consequences and the like, and how they should be designed. After we have raised team awareness in Phase I, we now need to reach a shared understanding. The PerformanceSystem.mapping tool captures all these factors and makes them visible (see Figure 1). The performance system — all relevant factors influencing performance and their interrelationships — is transparent and understandable. Now each element can be discussed and understood, offering a systematic and systemic approach to clarifying different views and negotiating solutions. Everyone can see where different expectations are coming from. This is particularly helpful since most of us are not aware of why we do certain things. We have absorbed our cultural behaviors since infancy. As we learn about others and ourselves, we gain a bit of distance and it becomes easier to accept different perspectives. Once the different expectations are understood through the elements in the performance system, the team starts to negotiate a shared performance system. They ask: which rules or procedures will be helpful? Do we want group goals or individual goals? How are we going to share information? The team starts to function. 27

“ When cultural<br />

awareness<br />

training<br />

focuses on<br />

communication<br />

barriers, the<br />

foundation for a<br />

high-performing<br />

intercultural team<br />

is missing.”<br />

Phase 1 — Intercultural awareness<br />

In our example, to make both the<br />

Japanese and German group more open<br />

to negotiating and reconsidering their<br />

work expectations, the first step is to<br />

raise awareness of the differences and<br />

the inner logics of both cultures. This is<br />

best demonstrated through concrete work<br />

examples from the collaboration of this<br />

specific team, enabling the Germans to<br />

understand that their Japanese colleagues<br />

are used to a continuous exchange of<br />

information about their work within the<br />

team. Consequently, the desire to discuss<br />

work on a micro-level does not signal a<br />

lack of ability. <strong>The</strong> Japanese learn that, for<br />

Germans, teamwork does not necessarily<br />

mean working together intensively to<br />

develop a result, but that it may mean<br />

putting together the results produced by<br />

individual performers into one piece — like<br />

a puzzle.<br />

Clearly, different underlying values<br />

and expectations can easily be<br />

misinterpreted as differences in the style of<br />

communicating: “Germans are snippy and<br />

arrogant,” “Japanese ask way too much.”<br />

If we only address the communication,<br />

we will not reach the real sources of<br />

misunderstanding: Germans value<br />

individual performance, Japanese favor<br />

working in a group. Once this is clarified,<br />

communication misunderstandings are<br />

turned into understandable outcomes<br />

based on different perspectives, values<br />

and behaviors.<br />

Initially, the goal is not to understand the<br />

other culture fully, but rather to accept<br />

that each culture has a valid logic. Team<br />

members need to understand that, for<br />

the team to perform effectively, new and<br />

different conclusions must be drawn about<br />

collaboration. This might sound simplistic<br />

but, depending upon the cultural origins of<br />

the team members, this realization can be a<br />

significant step.<br />

<strong>The</strong> team is now ready for change.<br />

Phase 2 — Shared performance<br />

system<br />

Germans have a different idea of<br />

performance than Japanese. Germans<br />

strive for self-monitoring: transparent goals<br />

and consequences, discretionary decisions<br />

and minimal oversight. <strong>The</strong> Japanese<br />

strive for group membership: group goals<br />

and consequences, decisions based on<br />

consensus, lots of mutual support and<br />

close interaction.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se cultural differences have a<br />

strong impact on the team. If there<br />

is little agreement about what<br />

performance should look like, it is hard<br />

to work together cohesively.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> is influenced by a number<br />

of factors, from goals, feedback and<br />

consequences, to resources available and<br />

the role of management. Each of these

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!