PERF RMANCE 04 - The Performance Portal - Ernst & Young
PERF RMANCE 04 - The Performance Portal - Ernst & Young
PERF RMANCE 04 - The Performance Portal - Ernst & Young
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
On which level to innovate?<br />
We identified three key levels of technology<br />
innovation: platform, design or component<br />
(Figure 3).<br />
• A platform innovation is an underlying<br />
technological level that relies on a<br />
unique scientific principle, distinctly<br />
different from other principles, to<br />
achieve some function. For example,<br />
in the display monitor category, we<br />
identified four different technologies:<br />
CRT, LCD, plasma, and OLED. Each of<br />
these uses a distinct scientific principle<br />
for forming an image on a screen. For<br />
any technology, firms can use a variety<br />
of design innovations.<br />
• A design innovation is a layout or linkage<br />
of parts to achieve some function. For<br />
example, a flash drive stores data as a<br />
charge in a capacitor to compact its size<br />
relative to a hard drive, though both<br />
are based on the principle of magnetic<br />
memory. At the same time, a variety of<br />
component innovations may be used on<br />
any platform or design.<br />
• A component innovation is one that<br />
uses new parts or materials to achieve<br />
some function. For example, a fuel cell<br />
could use hydrogen or methanol to<br />
generate electricity.<br />
“ Companies<br />
have a tough<br />
time keeping up<br />
with technological<br />
change and<br />
selecting the right<br />
technologies for<br />
their products.”<br />
Innovation occurs almost constantly at the<br />
level of designs and components. Indeed,<br />
day-to-day competition often occurs at<br />
these two levels. Platform innovations are<br />
less frequent, but when they do occur,<br />
they have the potential to transform<br />
markets and cause upheaval among<br />
firms. <strong>The</strong> great danger to firms is to be<br />
so immersed in design and component<br />
innovation as to miss the change in a<br />
technological platform. For example, Sony’s<br />
pre-occupation with improving its CRT<br />
television sets with Trinitron technology<br />
perhaps led it to miss the oncoming<br />
revolution in flat screen LCD televisions.<br />
Samsung invested heavily in the latter<br />
technology so that Sony had to license<br />
technology from Samsung and enter into<br />
an alliance in order not to miss out on the<br />
new generation televisions.<br />
This discussion suggests that companies<br />
have a tough time keeping up with<br />
technological change and selecting the<br />
right technologies for their products. That<br />
is one reason we have used our data to<br />
develop a more systematic framework of<br />
analysis for these decisions. Our framework<br />
has the advantage of not using after-thefact<br />
definitions of technologies based on<br />
their effects, as do the terms radical or<br />
disruptive technologies.<br />
Figure 3. Three key levels of technology innovations<br />
Level of technology<br />
innovation<br />
Definition<br />
Examples in display monitor<br />
technologies<br />
Platform Unique scientific principle CRT, LCD, plasma, OLED<br />
Design<br />
Linkage or layout within 5”, 25”, 45” size in LCDs<br />
same scientific principle<br />
Component<br />
Material or content within<br />
same scientific principle<br />
Glass, plastic in LCDs