Analysis and Applications of Design Structure Matrix, Domain ... - MIT
Analysis and Applications of Design Structure Matrix, Domain ... - MIT
Analysis and Applications of Design Structure Matrix, Domain ... - MIT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
achieving functions. A medium-level DSM may focus more on the program level, <strong>and</strong><br />
still a detailed DSM may focus on the project <strong>and</strong> task level. All <strong>of</strong> these DSMs can have<br />
tremendous value to making the total organization work well, yet as previously discussed,<br />
identifying the context <strong>of</strong> the DSM is critical to informing the assumptions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
resulting analysis.<br />
Summary <strong>of</strong> DSMs<br />
In summary, the DSM is a matrix consisting <strong>of</strong> nodes <strong>and</strong> relations <strong>of</strong> a single domain.<br />
The DSM can be utilized for both the social <strong>and</strong> technical domains, yet traditionally has<br />
not addressed the system interactions with the environment since the matrix is flat. DSM<br />
does not allow clear representation <strong>of</strong> multiple relations or time evolutions, but can be<br />
very useful in intra-domain analysis which will be discussed later in this paper.<br />
<strong>Domain</strong> Mapping <strong>Matrix</strong> (DMM)<br />
Eppinger, <strong>and</strong> many other researchers in product development <strong>and</strong> management research,<br />
recognized that the analysis <strong>of</strong> the single-domain interaction patterns leads to “learning<br />
about the particular product development situation <strong>and</strong> how to improve.” Meanwhile,<br />
comparing patterns across the domains (multi-domain interactions) allows assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
“effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>and</strong> organization to develop the particular product.”<br />
(Eppinger 2002) Although his framework only included three domains (Product,<br />
Process, <strong>and</strong> Organization), the realization <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> the multi-domain<br />
interactions has pushed the conceptualization <strong>of</strong> DSMs.<br />
Building upon the DSM literature, Danilovic <strong>and</strong> Browning (2007) present a framework<br />
that distinguishes the single- <strong>and</strong> multi- domain interactions using DSM <strong>and</strong> <strong>Domain</strong><br />
Mapping Matrices (DMM). The DMM examines the interactions across domains: the<br />
rows represent nodes <strong>of</strong> one domain, while the columns represent nodes <strong>of</strong> another<br />
domain. Unlike the DSM, the DMM is an mxn rectangular matrix since the rows <strong>and</strong><br />
columns are not identical. By combining both DSM <strong>and</strong> DMM methodologies, the<br />
analysis results are enriched, providing an exp<strong>and</strong>ed view <strong>of</strong> the system.<br />
The early research is largely focused on product development systems, identifying five<br />
domains important to the examination <strong>of</strong> product development projects. These domains<br />
include “the goals domain the product (or service, or result) system; the process system<br />
(<strong>and</strong> the work done to get the product system); the system organizing the people into<br />
departments, teams, groups, etc.; the system <strong>of</strong> tools, information technology solutions,<br />
<strong>and</strong> equipment they use to do the work; <strong>and</strong> the system <strong>of</strong> goals, objectives, requirements,<br />
<strong>and</strong> constraints pertaining to all the systems.” (Danilovic <strong>and</strong> Browning 2007) Figure 2<br />
depicts a generalized view <strong>of</strong> the DSM/DMM representation.<br />
6 <strong>of</strong> 31