11.02.2014 Views

Trust Board papers November 2012 - Barking Havering and ...

Trust Board papers November 2012 - Barking Havering and ...

Trust Board papers November 2012 - Barking Havering and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Trust</strong>’s risk matrix <strong>and</strong> will populate the <strong>Trust</strong>’s Risk Register <strong>and</strong> be escalated in line with<br />

the <strong>Trust</strong>’s escalation process.<br />

4.6 RISK GRADING AND ACCEPTABLE / UNACCEPTABLE RISK<br />

4.6.1 Grading<br />

Once risks are identified, it is the policy of the <strong>Trust</strong> that they must be prioritised for full<br />

assessment <strong>and</strong> management by initially grading them, according to their impact <strong>and</strong> the<br />

likelihood that they will occur again in the future.<br />

The <strong>Trust</strong> has adopted a risk assessment matrix for grading all non-financial risks whether<br />

clinical, non-clinical or organisational. The matrix is set out in the <strong>Trust</strong>’s Risk Assessment Tool<br />

Kit, which can be found on the <strong>Trust</strong>’s Intranet. The grading matrix is attached in Appendix 1. It<br />

has four grades of risk - low, moderate, high <strong>and</strong> extreme, which are identified respectively by the<br />

four colours: green, yellow, orange <strong>and</strong> red.<br />

Incidents are also graded using the same matrix in accordance with the <strong>Trust</strong>’s Incident Reporting<br />

& SI Policy which can be accessed on the <strong>Trust</strong>’s intranet.<br />

4.6.2 Acceptable / Unacceptable Risk<br />

It is the policy of the <strong>Trust</strong> that control action is:<br />

• considered for all risks where the initial grading is more than green / low<br />

• implemented to reduce the residual risk after the action to green / low, unless the impact<br />

<strong>and</strong> likelihood of the risk is such that the burden of the available action is disproportionate<br />

to the reduction of risk to be achieved.<br />

Thus, risks graded low / green need to be revisited annually unless further concerns arise.<br />

Yellow <strong>and</strong> low orange (under a risk score of 9) represent increasing levels of risk <strong>and</strong> therefore<br />

require control action <strong>and</strong> review at intervals depending on the impact of the risk <strong>and</strong> the<br />

likelihood of recurrence as identified through risk assessment processes.<br />

Red represents extreme levels of risk which are by definition unacceptable <strong>and</strong> require control<br />

action <strong>and</strong> review at intervals to reduce them as far as reasonably practicable.<br />

4.7 ASSESSMENTS, CONTROL AND ACCEPTANCE OF RISK<br />

4.7.1. Assessment Process<br />

It is the responsibility of each Clinical Directorate Directors, Senior Nurses, Directorates General<br />

Managers/Managers, Clinical Leads, Nurse Consultants <strong>and</strong> Ward / Service Managers to ensure<br />

that the <strong>Trust</strong>’s risk assessment programme is implemented within their areas in accordance with<br />

this policy.<br />

Each Directorate must undertake risk assessments locally in accordance with the <strong>Trust</strong> Risk<br />

Assessment Tool Kit. Directorates have the responsibility to assess their clinical, environmental,<br />

health, safety, financial <strong>and</strong> performance related risks.<br />

The local management of risk will be carried out by various different groups of senior staff<br />

according to the grading of the risk identified but would have an overview in regards to mitigation<br />

<strong>Barking</strong>, <strong>Havering</strong> & Redbridge University Hospitals NHS <strong>Trust</strong> Page 16 of 40<br />

????????????? ??/??/???? Version ?? Issued ????

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!