Trust Board papers November 2012 - Barking Havering and ...
Trust Board papers November 2012 - Barking Havering and ...
Trust Board papers November 2012 - Barking Havering and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.0 PURPOSE<br />
1.1 Background<br />
This report has been produced predominantly for information regarding progress against<br />
agreed actions originally identified by the CQC following their formal investigation report in<br />
October <strong>and</strong> <strong>November</strong> 2011.<br />
The initial CQC assessment indicated that <strong>Barking</strong>, <strong>Havering</strong> <strong>and</strong> Redbridge University<br />
Hospitals NHS <strong>Trust</strong> had a history of poor performance under the previous regulatory<br />
framework. At the time of CQC registration, the <strong>Trust</strong> had a high number of ‘conditions’<br />
placed on it to require improvements in care. A series of unannounced inspections in 2010/11<br />
resulted in some of these being lifted, but also resulted in warning notices being issued to the<br />
trust (in March, June <strong>and</strong> July 2011) on staffing levels <strong>and</strong> maternity care.<br />
The CQC saw some evidence of improvements being made in response to these notices, but<br />
the <strong>Trust</strong>’s overall capacity to respond to the extent <strong>and</strong> level of CQC’s concerns was in<br />
question. Throughout this period, the CQC continued to receive information about poor quality<br />
care from patients <strong>and</strong> the public.<br />
This report will confirm the ‘journey’ the <strong>Trust</strong> has taken; the progress made; the current<br />
status of the report <strong>and</strong> its associated action plans <strong>and</strong> the recommendations requiring further<br />
work. It will also seek to outline the key ‘milestones’ which have been reached, which will<br />
demonstrate the continuous improvement of the organisation in addressing the CQC<br />
recommendations.<br />
1.2 Project Closure Status<br />
The CQC have advised the <strong>Trust</strong> that having reviewed the formal Action Plan, its evidence<br />
<strong>and</strong> supporting documentation, <strong>and</strong> given that the formal investigation has been completed,<br />
future monitoring of compliance would be undertaken as part of the normal routine service<br />
reviews. Hence the formal update report published by the CQC in June <strong>2012</strong>, the monitoring<br />
phase has developed into continued improvement being ‘Business as Usual’.<br />
This report is a project review <strong>and</strong> closure report. The original recommendations have either<br />
been met, or embedded into normal business, or have been superseded by other projects<br />
<strong>and</strong> initiatives which will deliver compliance against the CQC’s essential st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />
1.3 Summary of Actions required by the <strong>Trust</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />
The <strong>Board</strong> is asked:<br />
• To agree the formal closure of the <strong>Trust</strong>-wide CQC Action Plan,<br />
• To recognise the progress made since <strong>November</strong> 2011.<br />
• To recognise the progress made since June <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
• To formally recognise the need for monitoring <strong>and</strong> implementation of the plan <strong>and</strong> its<br />
recommendations, whilst in transition to ‘Business as Usual’<br />
2.0 CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND<br />
Following the imposition of registration conditions on the <strong>Trust</strong> in 2010, the CQC’s judgement<br />
was that continuing to tackle poor performance at the trust on a case-by-case basis was not<br />
going to address deep-seated issues around the quality of care at the <strong>Trust</strong>. As a result, the<br />
CQC took the decision to launch a full investigation into the quality of care provided by the<br />
trust at Queen’s Hospital <strong>and</strong> King George Hospital.<br />
Page 3 |<br />
26-Oct-12