11.02.2014 Views

Trust Board papers November 2012 - Barking Havering and ...

Trust Board papers November 2012 - Barking Havering and ...

Trust Board papers November 2012 - Barking Havering and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TRUST BOARD MEETING<br />

5 September <strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>Board</strong> Room, <strong>Trust</strong> Headquarters, Queen’s Hospital<br />

Points <strong>and</strong> Questions raised by members of the Public<br />

at the above <strong>Trust</strong> <strong>Board</strong> meeting<br />

Question:<br />

In reference to the Maternity Services<br />

Update report <strong>and</strong> the transfer of<br />

women to other <strong>Trust</strong>s with the change<br />

in boundaries, Mr Skillman asked if<br />

patient choice was taken into account<br />

when transferring women, as this had<br />

been highlighted when the Survey was<br />

undertaken regarding the closure of<br />

Maternity Services at King George<br />

Hospital (the vast majority of women<br />

had confirmed in the Survey that they<br />

wanted to give birth at KGH). He was<br />

concerned that there would not be any<br />

patient choice whatsoever if the<br />

proposals came to fruition.<br />

Response/Action:<br />

The Chief Executive confirmed that<br />

there would be a choice for women <strong>and</strong><br />

this would be managed by the GPs.<br />

The <strong>Trust</strong> would want women to be<br />

delivering their babies as close to home<br />

as possible, but it needed to be open<br />

<strong>and</strong> honest about its capacity issues, to<br />

ensure it was running a safe service. It<br />

was acknowledged that the proposal did<br />

take away some choice for women.<br />

Mr Skillman raised the point that the<br />

number of deliveries at the <strong>Trust</strong> had<br />

been discussed at the recent Overview<br />

& Scrutiny Committee meeting with<br />

Heather Mullin, as they differed from<br />

the number the <strong>Trust</strong> was reporting<br />

between Queen’s <strong>and</strong> the Midwifery<br />

Led Unit (MLU). Mr Skillman noted that<br />

an escalation plan was in place, but he<br />

wanted confirmation that the <strong>Trust</strong> was<br />

not going backwards, that it had<br />

everything under control, it was not<br />

going to have problems again with the<br />

service <strong>and</strong> that the figures were not<br />

going to change.<br />

Mr Moloney confirmed that for this year<br />

the <strong>Trust</strong> was expecting to deliver just<br />

over 9k <strong>and</strong> the plan for the next<br />

financial year was approximately 8k,<br />

when taking into account activity from<br />

Outer North East London PCTs <strong>and</strong><br />

some women from Essex.<br />

Mr Moloney also confirmed that the<br />

figures were not changing, as Heather<br />

Mullin would have been referring to<br />

KGH not running a maternity service at<br />

all (the <strong>Trust</strong> could deliver 2,500 at<br />

KGH).<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> <strong>Board</strong> Meeting (Part I) 5 September <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!