11.02.2014 Views

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE EPISTLE OF ENOCH 49<br />

was to survive as an archaism for some time after the year 100 B.C., for<br />

example, in Nabataean. <strong>The</strong> orthography <strong>of</strong> En*^, which was copied from<br />

a written model in an orthography similar to that <strong>of</strong> iQIs* and iQS, likewise<br />

points towards the year 100 B.C. On the other hand, literary analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the work will scarcely provide us with the chronological details which it was<br />

thought could be found in it.<br />

Commentators on this part <strong>of</strong> the Ethiopic <strong>Enoch</strong> conjecture that the<br />

author was a pious Pharisee who denounces the Sadducaean party as being<br />

penetrated with Hellenistic influences and enjoying the support <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Hasmonaean princes; on this supposition he wrote after Hyrcanus' split with<br />

the Pharisaic party, most probably during the reign <strong>of</strong> Alexander Jannaeus,<br />

or possibly under the successors <strong>of</strong> Alexandra. But the central motif <strong>of</strong> the<br />

work is quite clearly the economic differentiation <strong>of</strong> poor and rich, which is<br />

treated as approximately equivalent to the ethical discrimination <strong>of</strong> 'righteous'<br />

and 'sinners'. <strong>The</strong> latter are flatly accused <strong>of</strong> idolatry (99: 6-9; cf. 91: 9<br />

and 104: 9), which is quite unthinkable with regard to the Sadducaeans and<br />

the Hasmonaeans, whatever might be their supposed transgressions in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the Mosaic law according to Pharisaic (or, we should add, Essene)<br />

interpretation. <strong>The</strong> appropriate framework for the denunciations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Enoch</strong>ic writer is, in my opinion, the milieu <strong>of</strong> a prosperous Greek city<br />

where the Jews live as an economically 'under-developed' minority. Naturally,<br />

at the very heart <strong>of</strong> such an Israelite community there would occur splits<br />

between the 'Orthodox' and the Hellenizers, 'who transgress the eternal<br />

covenant' {hiaarpicfyovres TTJV alcoviov (aycoviov MS.) hiaOrjKriVy 99: 2), and 'who<br />

scorn the foundation and the eternal heritage <strong>of</strong> their fathers' {oi e^ovOevovvres<br />

rrjv 0e/x[eAt]co(Ttv KOL rrjv KX7ipovo[JLla[v rcov Trajrcpcov avrcov rrjv (XTT* alwvoSy 99:<br />

14). <strong>The</strong> rich sinners trample the righteous poor under foot and oppress them<br />

continually (95: 7; 96: 5, 8; 103: 9-15; 104: 3). It may be doubted if 'the<br />

princes' <strong>of</strong> the Ethiopic version at 103: 14 represents the original reading;<br />

what corresponds to it in the analogous text <strong>of</strong> 104: 3 in CM is pia^<strong>of</strong>ievcov.<br />

Occasionally there comes a day <strong>of</strong> affliction brought about by the sinners<br />

when the righteous must shelter from the persecution <strong>of</strong> the wicked (96: 2),<br />

a day <strong>of</strong> terrible anguish when the sinners afflict and keep (meaning?) the<br />

righteous in fire (/cat (f>vXd^7ir[€] avrovg ev irvpeiy 100: 7). All this scarcely<br />

seems to go beyond the bounds <strong>of</strong> commercial and artisan rivalry in a town<br />

and an occasional 'pogrom', caused, moreover, indirectly by the military<br />

adventures <strong>of</strong> a Hyrcanus or a Jannaeus against the towns, the ethnarchs,<br />

and the Greek kings.<br />

8261616 E

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!