11.02.2014 Views

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>of</strong> his son and <strong>of</strong> his grandsons, after which he will again be withdrawn<br />

from amongst them.^ Now, the three angels are the appointed guides <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Enoch</strong> according to the Book <strong>of</strong> Dreams. In 87: 3-4 'these three . . . carried<br />

me <strong>of</strong>f. .. and brought me up to a high place' (in order to behold the generation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the flood); in 90: 31 'these three . . . those who had first carried me<br />

<strong>of</strong>f . . . made me sit in the midst <strong>of</strong> the ewes' (for judgement). <strong>The</strong> first<br />

passage is preceded by a reference to the four white men who come from<br />

heaven and the three (others) with them (87: 2). This clearly refers to the<br />

list <strong>of</strong> seven archangels <strong>of</strong> En. 20, in which to the four archangels <strong>of</strong> 9: i<br />

(Mika'el, gari'el, Rafa'el, and Gabri'el; cf. ch. 10 = ch. 88 and 89: i) are<br />

added 'Cri'el, Ra*u'el, and Remiel. En. 81 is accordingly later than the<br />

year 164, the date <strong>of</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> the Book <strong>of</strong> Dreams; but it is earlier<br />

than the date <strong>of</strong> Jubilees, where, in 4: 24 (and also in the Hebrew fragment <strong>of</strong><br />

4Q which depends on it), we have called attention to the chronology <strong>of</strong> the<br />

teachings <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enoch</strong> to Methuselah as it is reflected in En. 81.<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> his discreet monotheism ('the sinners . . . will look upon the<br />

stars as gods', 80: 7), the author <strong>of</strong> the astronomical <strong>Enoch</strong> is not very far<br />

removed from the religious concepts <strong>of</strong> his age when he has the stars guided<br />

and the days and the months presided over, in the Egyptian and Phoenician<br />

manner, by the angels, as minor celestial beings. <strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> his knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

astronomy was very severely criticized by O. Neugebauer.^ It is true that<br />

this 'extremely primitive level <strong>of</strong> astronomy', as revealed in the descriptions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the phases <strong>of</strong> the moon and the doorways <strong>of</strong> heaven (Neugebauer, pp.<br />

51-8), and in the ratio 2: i for the length <strong>of</strong> days and nights (En. 72), scarcely<br />

allows <strong>of</strong> conclusions on the relative archaism <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> observation or<br />

on mutual influences. But the division <strong>of</strong> the horizon into 360 degrees, and<br />

even the ratio 2:1, certainly seem to come from a scholarly Babylonian milieu<br />

which popularized some elements <strong>of</strong> astronomical observations, <strong>of</strong> arithmetic<br />

and geometry—in short the Chaldaica <strong>of</strong> which Eupolemos speaks<br />

(above, p. 9). <strong>The</strong> essential interest <strong>of</strong> the author <strong>of</strong> Enastr is centred,<br />

however, on the ideal calendar, with days <strong>of</strong> weeks and festivals fixed in<br />

relation to the days <strong>of</strong> the months. He admires the beauty <strong>of</strong> his sacred<br />

arithmetic so much that he accuses the peoples and even the chiefs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stars (En. 80: 6) <strong>of</strong> not following this reckoning <strong>of</strong> heavenly origin.<br />

^ In V. 5 we must certainly read *and these and not *and these seven saints',<br />

three saints (brought me and set me down on ^ Orientalia, 1964, pp. 58-61 ('<strong>The</strong> Astrothe<br />

earth in front <strong>of</strong> the door <strong>of</strong> my house)', nomy <strong>of</strong> the Book <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enoch</strong>'); see below, p. 277.<br />

with the second group <strong>of</strong> Ethiopic manuscripts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!