11.02.2014 Views

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SEVENTH COPY 255<br />

to quote here (along with my restorations) some phrases from 4Q390,<br />

which is probably another copy <strong>of</strong> the same pseudo-Ezekiel. <strong>The</strong> author <strong>of</strong><br />

this text, like the author <strong>of</strong> the Testament <strong>of</strong> Levi in <strong>Aramaic</strong>, is primarily<br />

interested in the destinies <strong>of</strong> the Aaronic priesthood. <strong>The</strong> repeated transgressions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Sons <strong>of</strong> Aaron deliver them up automatically into the power<br />

<strong>of</strong> the wicked angels: maDB^an ^DN'?^ nann t>m^ 390 I 11; ^DX'pa T2<br />

•na t>m^ maDu^an 2 i 7; Dna '7S7^'?3 n'ra^aa ''n[n]i 2 i 4. <strong>The</strong> beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the reckoning <strong>of</strong> the ten jubilees coincides with the 'destruction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Land', in all probability the fall <strong>of</strong> the kingdom <strong>of</strong> Judah: ''S7''32?n<br />

yiKTl ]3in^ I 7-8 determinative <strong>of</strong> the era, as is usual in the dates <strong>of</strong><br />

documents). <strong>The</strong> jubilees are divided into weeks <strong>of</strong> years, again as in the<br />

Testament <strong>of</strong> Levi. Thus in 2 i 4: Xinn b2V[2 lUH U^W 171212?, 'a Week <strong>of</strong><br />

years in this jubilee'; in 2 i 6: D''S732? ITl^y 'two Weeks' (and not 'seventy<br />

years'; defective form <strong>of</strong> dual s'bu'ainiy as in Lev. 12: 5; cf. fS722?, plural,<br />

in Ens i iv 25); in i 2-3: [Xinn ] 7]W 0^X722; [0^22? ]l]nnX ''32 T'pf<br />

n[an]2 pnnX ''32 1^2?ai, '(power win pass) into the hands <strong>of</strong> the Sons<br />

<strong>of</strong> Aaron during [two] Weeks <strong>of</strong> years (and not 'seventy years') [in this<br />

jubilee] and the Sons <strong>of</strong> Aaron will have dominion over them (sc. over<br />

Israel)'.<br />

A similar era <strong>of</strong> ten jubilees, whatever its point <strong>of</strong> departure, is referred to<br />

by the author <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Qumran</strong> pesher, ^ the interest <strong>of</strong> which is centred on the<br />

person <strong>of</strong> Melchisedek regarded as 'himmlische Erlosergestalt'. At line 7 <strong>of</strong><br />

the fragment we find 'the first Week <strong>of</strong> the jubilee, after nine jubilees, . . .<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> the tenth jubilee'.<br />

This apocalypse <strong>of</strong> jubilees was altered in a most original way by the<br />

author <strong>of</strong> the Epistle <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enoch</strong> (En. 93: 3-10+91: 11-17 and 4QEn» i iii<br />

23-5 and iv 11-26). He replaces the ten jubilees by the ten weeks <strong>of</strong> years<br />

and compresses the history <strong>of</strong> the world, starting from Adam, into seven<br />

Weeks, hence into one complete jubilee, no doubt drawing on the jubilee<br />

<strong>of</strong> jubilees which includes the sacred history from Adam up to the revelation<br />

at Sinai, according to the author <strong>of</strong> the book <strong>of</strong> Jubilees. A great theological<br />

innovation made by our <strong>Enoch</strong>ic author, in line with the thinking <strong>of</strong> the<br />

writer <strong>of</strong> the Book <strong>of</strong> Dreams, and one which was to be exploited later by<br />

Christian thinkers, is the idea <strong>of</strong> progressive development applied to the<br />

eschatological era; it is subdivided into three Weeks. No serious evidence<br />

exists to disprove that the author <strong>of</strong> this apocalypse <strong>of</strong> Weeks is the same<br />

* Edited by A. S. Van Der Woude, Oudtesta- see Milik, Journal <strong>of</strong> Jewish Studies, xxiii<br />

mentische Studien, xiv (1965), 354-73, pls. 1-2; (1972), 96-109.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!