11.02.2014 Views

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

184 THE BOOKS OF ENOCH En*^ I i<br />

describing the death <strong>of</strong> the Lawgiver and mentioning his inspired successor,<br />

Joshua (Deut. 34: 9). In the same manner the compiler <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Enoch</strong>ic<br />

Pentateuch, perhaps an erudite scribe <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Qumran</strong> scriptorium living<br />

about the year 100 B.C., added chapters 106-7, which resume the beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Book <strong>of</strong> Noah, the pseudepigraphical sequel to <strong>Enoch</strong>'s antediluvian<br />

wisdom.<br />

If we now collate these conclusions with the literary-critical research<br />

carried out over the last one and a half centuries, we shall observe, without<br />

surprise, that the exegetes <strong>of</strong> the Ethiopic <strong>Enoch</strong>, Charles included, were at<br />

fault in their tendency to cut up, to vivisect, one might say, the book <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Enoch</strong> into independent pieces <strong>of</strong> writing composed at widely different<br />

periods. Nevertheless, certain general observations are more or less confirmed<br />

by the facts we have established from the study <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Qumran</strong><br />

texts. Thus as early as 1845 Krieger correctly demonstrated that the Book <strong>of</strong><br />

Parables (En. 37-71) forms a separate piece <strong>of</strong> work dating from a more recent<br />

period than the rest <strong>of</strong> the Apocrypha. In 1852 Liicke dated En. 1-36 and<br />

72-108 between the years 166-160 B.C., changing this immediately, under the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> Ewald, to the years 135-105. Dillmann, who also dated En. 1-36<br />

and 72-105 to the period <strong>of</strong> John Hyrcanus, proved that chapter 108 is the<br />

most recent <strong>of</strong> all the additions to the primitive work <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enoch</strong>, but saw it as<br />

'imbued with Essene doctrines'.<br />

4QEnb xitns n^^S7 nnr i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!