11.02.2014 Views

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

i64 THE BOOKS OF ENOCH En»> i<br />

SECOND COPY (4QEn^ Pis. VI-IX)<br />

Skin light brown, reddish or blackened in places, fairly thick and stiff; surface<br />

granular and <strong>of</strong>ten shiny, slightly damaged or else flaking in places; back<br />

black and flaking.<br />

Ink watery and at times faded. Guide-lines barely visible or missing; space<br />

between lines i cm on average.<br />

<strong>The</strong> original scroll is now reduced to several small fragments <strong>of</strong> parchment,<br />

belonging to the first four and the sixth columns <strong>of</strong> the manuscript. Each<br />

column contained twenty-eight lines <strong>of</strong> the text (col. ii: twenty-nine lines).<br />

<strong>The</strong> beginning is missing, except for one letter. <strong>The</strong>re was either one column<br />

<strong>of</strong> very long Unes <strong>of</strong> writing or one column and a half as in En\ Reconstructed<br />

height <strong>of</strong> the written surface, 26*5 cm; upper margin i(?) cm, lower margin<br />

2 cm (i ii); height <strong>of</strong> the scroll approximately 30 cm; other codicological<br />

details in the table below:<br />

Leaf Col. Letters<br />

per line<br />

Width<br />

<strong>of</strong> col.<br />

Sections<br />

<strong>of</strong> text<br />

Text<br />

preserved<br />

Sigla <strong>of</strong><br />

fragments<br />

<strong>Fragments</strong><br />

on plates<br />

I i En. 1: 1-5:9 4QEn^ I i 8 En^ I c<br />

ii 43 9*5 cm 5:9-8: I En. 5:9-6:4; ii 1-8, a-o<br />

6:7-8: I 15-29<br />

iii 49 II 8: 2-10: 5 8:2-^:4 iii 1-16 p-fV<br />

iv 13 10: 5-22 lo: 8-12 iv 5-12<br />

2 [V 10: 22-14: 2 ]<br />

vi 43 9-5 14: 2- 14:4-6 vi 5-10<br />

<strong>The</strong> writing <strong>of</strong> En^ is rather archaic, probably dating from the early Hasmonaean<br />

period; cf. Cross, p. 137, fig. i, line 7 (175-125 B.C.), and p. 138,<br />

fig. 2, line I (175-150 B.C.) and line 2 (125-100 B.C.). <strong>The</strong> Nun has here the<br />

medial form and a final form, whilst the Kaph and the Pe have only one form,<br />

viz. medial; this palaeographical characteristic recurs in the semi-cursive<br />

alphabets <strong>of</strong> <strong>Qumran</strong>: Cross, p. 149, fig. 4, line i (150-100 B.C.) and line 2<br />

(100-50 B.C.). Our manuscript doubtless goes back to the first half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

second century, or perhaps more exactly to the middle <strong>of</strong> the century.<br />

<strong>The</strong> orthography <strong>of</strong> En^ is 'classicar and relatively *fuir. <strong>The</strong> article is<br />

marked by Aleph: XD^S ii 7; XDOD and ii 27; X^mD ii 28; )X'in iii 15;<br />

X^'TS? iv 6; Xni&nn'? ii 19; Kni&lpa iii 16; final Aleph also in the proper<br />

name <strong>of</strong> an angel, KTrT'att? iv 9, as against 7\'\T\^W in iii i and in En*. Aleph<br />

marks the final -e: KTIti^ iv 7. <strong>The</strong> final -a <strong>of</strong> the infinitives is marked by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!