11.02.2014 Views

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

En» I i FIRST COPY 141<br />

form is 'Aphel: IQ^nK iii 3 and 5; plK iv 6; imperfect <strong>of</strong> the causative:<br />

}3QV i 6; similarly, the initial Aleph is used in the reflexive forms with -t-:<br />

n*'^aDK iv 8. <strong>The</strong> third person plural feminine <strong>of</strong> the perfect has the ininflexional<br />

ending -a: H^'in iii 16; the same person in the imperfect ends<br />

with -an: ii 15. Note that the preformative is already that <strong>of</strong> the<br />

masculine form3;/- and not ti-y while the Palmyrene keeps the form tiqt'ldn:<br />

pnn in an inscription dated June A.D. 73.^ For these forms in the Byzantine<br />

and Medieval Judaeo-<strong>Aramaic</strong> dialects, see Dalman's Grammaty pp. 255<br />

and 266. <strong>The</strong> form <strong>of</strong> the perfect is attested once in the Genesis Apocryphon:<br />

V3±}W iQGenAp xxii 28.2<br />

So far as the vocabulary is concerned, note several expressions relating<br />

to magic and astrology in iv 1-4 and in particular the names <strong>of</strong> the fallen<br />

angels and <strong>of</strong> the archangels in iii 5-13 and [23] and iv 1-6; in addition,<br />

riD^a 'counsel, decision' iii 2, pT 'mysteries' iv 5.<br />

4QEn* seems to have been made from a very old copy, dating from the<br />

third century at the very least; note in this connection the instances <strong>of</strong> strictly<br />

consonantal orthography, as '^IPI in i i, and also a confusion in the forms <strong>of</strong><br />

letters: a Pe in the archetype has been read by error as a Yod, hence DVH<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> 0133 in ii 13. Elsewhere several orthographical and phonetic<br />

features have quite late characteristics, in particular instead <strong>of</strong> ''lY'X K^;<br />

4QEn* is perhaps a school-exercise, copied by a young scribe from the<br />

master's dictation. Without insisting too much on its date, or that <strong>of</strong> its<br />

archetype, it seems to me highly probable that this first copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enoch</strong>, as<br />

also 4QEn^ (see below, p. 165), contained only the first part <strong>of</strong> the book<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Enoch</strong>, corresponding to chapters 1-36 <strong>of</strong> the Ethiopic <strong>Enoch</strong>.<br />

In addition to the large group <strong>of</strong> fragments labelled i i-vi, there are seven<br />

little unidentified fragments, 4QEn* 2 to 8. For i i-iii, especially for the<br />

large fragment containing columns ii-iii, another good photograph is<br />

PAM 42. 227.<br />

4QEnMi—En. 1:1-6 (PI. I)<br />

* Ed. Chr. Dimant, Le sanctuaire de BaaU GLECS, vii (1954-7), 77-<br />

shamin d Palmyre, iii. Inscriptions, 1971, p. 37, * See the remarks <strong>of</strong> Kutscher, pp. lo-ii<br />

no. 24, 3; cf. A. Caquot, Comptes rendus du and note 48, p. 13 note 65, p. 34 Appendix 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!