09.02.2014 Views

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Information on any changes made to the measurement equipment<br />

(exchange, repair, etc);<br />

Detailed<br />

Information on all<br />

Distributed and<br />

Collected Lamps<br />

Complexity of<br />

Methodology<br />

prevents its<br />

Application<br />

Methane<br />

Recovery/<br />

Avoidance<br />

<strong>Methodologies</strong><br />

• Technical distribution losses of the grid. Instead of monitoring, a default<br />

value of 5% can be chosen<br />

Ex post<br />

• Household name, address, GPS data, applicable project area and date<br />

of return of old and distribution or sale of efficient light bulbs for all<br />

households participating in the project<br />

• Electricity consumption of sample and cross-check group households<br />

according to electricity invoices<br />

• Number and power rating of the returned and distributed lamps<br />

• Average grid voltage<br />

• Lamp electricity consumption/lamp utilization hours of each household<br />

in the baseline and project sample group. This has to be done within a<br />

period of three weeks.<br />

• Place and number of lamps found during spot checks in the household/<br />

in its living area and information on which lamps have been added or<br />

removed by the household since the last spot check<br />

• Status of households in the sample groups (moves etc.)<br />

• Scrapping of returned lamps, by an independent party<br />

• Data for calculation of Combined Margin according to ACM0002<br />

Challenges encountered in the application of the methodology<br />

It is unlikely that the methodology will ever be applied due to the complexity<br />

of monitoring requirements. Even the developers of the methodology are<br />

now using small-scale methodology AMS II.C, as the threshold of 60 GWh<br />

is sufficiently high to make projects viable. As AMS II.C has several gaps,<br />

monitoring concepts of AM 0046 are being used to operationalize AMS II.C.<br />

5.5 Methane Recovery/Avoidance<br />

5.5.1. <strong>Methodologies</strong> analyzed<br />

Large Scale<br />

Small Scale<br />

Small Scale<br />

ACM-0001 (version 6) “Consolidated baseline methodology for<br />

landfill gas project activities”<br />

AMS-III.D (Version 13) “Methane recovery in agricultural and agro<br />

industrial activities”<br />

AMS-III.E (Version 13) “Avoidance of methane production from<br />

biomass decay through controlled combustion”<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!