09.02.2014 Views

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Industrial Gas<br />

<strong>Methodologies</strong><br />

5.3 Decomposition of industrial gases HFC-23 and N 2<br />

O<br />

5.3.1 <strong>Methodologies</strong> analyzed<br />

Large Scale<br />

Large Scale<br />

Large Scale<br />

AM0001 (version 5) “Incineration of HFC waste streams”<br />

AM0021 (version 1) “Baseline methodology for decomposition<br />

of N2O emissions from existing adipic acid production plants”<br />

AM0034 (version 2) “Catalytic reduction of N2O inside the<br />

burner of nitric acid plants”<br />

5.3.2 Basic concept<br />

Chemical<br />

Production<br />

releases strong<br />

Greenhouse Gases<br />

Emissions<br />

Reduction<br />

through thermal<br />

Decomposition<br />

All three methodologies deal with the “end-of-pipe” decomposition of<br />

industrial gases HFC-23 (Fluoroform) or N 2<br />

O (Nitrous oxide). The gases are<br />

un-wanted by-products from production plants of the chemical industry and<br />

have a very high Global Warming Potential (1t N 2<br />

O = 310 t CO 2<br />

eq. and HFC-<br />

23 = 11,700 t CO 2<br />

eq.). This makes decomposition of such gases the most<br />

attractive <strong>CDM</strong> projects in the market with costs of CER generation ranging<br />

from 0.1 – 0.5 €/CER.<br />

All three methodologies assume that in the absence of the <strong>CDM</strong> project,<br />

HFC-23/ N 2<br />

O emissions would have been released to the atmosphere via the<br />

stack of the plant. Therefore, the common and most important rationale of<br />

the methodologies is that emission reductions are the difference between<br />

the emissions of the gas from the plant before (baseline emissions) and after<br />

implementation of the decomposition facility (project emissions) and adjusted<br />

for potential indirect emissions due to the project.<br />

ER y<br />

= EF bl,y<br />

X Prod bl,y<br />

X GWP - PE y<br />

- Leakage<br />

Emission<br />

Reductions<br />

Basel<br />

Emission<br />

factor of<br />

baseline<br />

Baseline<br />

amount of<br />

industrial<br />

gas<br />

production<br />

Global<br />

warming<br />

potential<br />

of<br />

industrial<br />

gas<br />

Direct<br />

emissions of<br />

the project<br />

(e.g. fuel<br />

combustion<br />

or industrial<br />

gas still<br />

released)<br />

Indirect<br />

emissions<br />

due to the<br />

project<br />

<strong>Methodologies</strong><br />

only applicable<br />

for existing<br />

Capacity<br />

Baseline emissions (expressed in HFC-23 or N 2<br />

O) are determined by<br />

multiplying a historic emission factor (t HFC-23 or t N 2<br />

O/ per t of HCFC-22<br />

or adipic acid or nitric acid produced) with the amount of production of the<br />

chemical product after installation of the destruction facility. The plant output<br />

eligible for calculation of baseline emissions is capped at historic production<br />

levels to ensure the environmental integrity of such <strong>CDM</strong> projects. For the<br />

same reason, greenfield chemical production plants are not allowed to use<br />

the approved methodologies (see Box 21).<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!