09.02.2014 Views

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Option 3: The emission factor of the technology (and fuel) identified as the<br />

most plausible baseline scenario, calculated as follows:<br />

(tCO 2<br />

/MWh) baseline<br />

= (tCO 2<br />

/GJ) baseline<br />

/ η baseline<br />

X 3.6 (GJ/<br />

MWh)<br />

Baseline Emissions<br />

per Unit Power<br />

Fuel Emission<br />

Coefficient<br />

Energy<br />

Efficiency<br />

of the<br />

Technology<br />

(in Fraction)<br />

Conversion<br />

Factor from<br />

MWh to GJ<br />

Note: The fuel emission coefficient should be based on national average fuel data,<br />

if available. Otherwise, the IPCC default values can be used.<br />

Choice repeated<br />

at each Update of<br />

Crediting Period<br />

Project Emissions:<br />

Fuel burned by<br />

Project<br />

Leakage: Lifecycle<br />

Emissions of Fuel<br />

used<br />

The baseline emission factor determination will be made once at the<br />

validation stage based on an ex-ante assessment for the first crediting<br />

period and once again at the start of each subsequent crediting period (if<br />

applicable). If either option 1 (BM) or option 2 (CM) are selected, they will be<br />

estimated ex-post, as described in ACM0002.<br />

Project Emissions<br />

The project activity is on-site combustion of fossil fuel (mainly natural gas)<br />

to generation power. Therefore, the project emissions are calculated as the<br />

product of the amount of fossil fuel consumption and the CO 2<br />

emissions<br />

coefficient of the corresponding fossil fuel.<br />

Leakage<br />

Project participants shall consider the following sources of leakage when<br />

applying the methodology:<br />

• “Fugitive CH 4<br />

emissions associated with fuel extraction, processing,<br />

liquefaction, transportation, re-gasification and distribution of natural<br />

gas used in the project plant” minus “fugitive CH 4<br />

emissions from fossil<br />

fuels (e.g. coal or oil type) 252 used in the grid in the absence of the project<br />

activity”; and<br />

• In the case LNG is used in the project plant: CO 2<br />

emissions from fuel<br />

combustion/ power consumption associated with the liquefaction,<br />

transportation, re-gasification and compression into a natural gas<br />

transmission or distribution system.<br />

Emissions factors used should be derived from reliable and accurate national<br />

data; if those are not available, default values for different regions can be<br />

used. Where total net leakage effects are negative, project participants<br />

should assume the leakage as zero.<br />

252<br />

The upstream fugitive CH4 emissions of coal power generation depend on the coal source (i.e. underground<br />

or surface mines). In case of oil power generation, the upstream fugitive CH4 emissions should include oil<br />

production, transport, refining, and storage.<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!