Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA
Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA
Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.1.4 Leakage<br />
Unclear Definition<br />
of Leakage<br />
As with the concept of project boundary, a detailed explanation of how<br />
to approach leakage has not been provided by the EB. After identification<br />
of leakage sources one has to explain which sources are to be calculated,<br />
and which can be neglected 178 . This has led to inconsistencies across<br />
methodologies, with some methodologies requiring a full life-cycle analysis,<br />
whereas in other methodologies it was seen as sufficient if emissions of one<br />
process level upwards and downwards were taken into account.<br />
4.1.5 Monitoring, data sources and quality<br />
Requirements<br />
regarding Data<br />
Sources<br />
Data Vintages<br />
Accuracy of<br />
Measurements<br />
Standard<br />
Variables<br />
Baseline and<br />
Monitoring<br />
Methodology<br />
belong together<br />
Data are key to monitor emissions reductions and to apply a baseline<br />
methodology. They should be referenced with possible sources being official<br />
statistics, expert judgement, proprietary data, IPCC, commercial and scientific<br />
literature 179 . Data have to be SI units 180 . Vintages and spatial level have to<br />
be defined 181 . Regarding data vintages, it was discussed whether baseline<br />
parameters can be fixed ex-ante or have to be monitored ex post. “Ex post<br />
calculation of baseline emission rates may only be used if proper justification<br />
is provided. Notwithstanding, the baseline emission rates shall also be<br />
calculated ex-ante and reported in the draft <strong>CDM</strong>-PDD” 182 .<br />
Data have to be conservative, adequate, consistent, accurate and reliable. For<br />
some methodologies, accuracy played an important role, for example in the<br />
context of measurement of methane content of flare exhaust gas. Generally,<br />
monitoring of methane emissions has been more demanding than of other<br />
greenhouse gases.<br />
Frequency of data collection and quality assurance/control procedures<br />
have to be specified. In this context, the specifications of the monitoring<br />
plan are important which should “reflect good monitoring practice<br />
appropriate to the type of project”. A list of 56 standard variables has been<br />
specified 183 . Alternatively ISO or other standards can be used for variable<br />
name definitions. <strong>Methodologies</strong> should specify a priority order for use of<br />
alternative data if the preferred sources are not available 184 .<br />
A strong link between baseline and monitoring methodologies is to be<br />
provided 185 . If project participants want use different combinations of<br />
approved baseline and monitoring methodologies they have to get Meth<br />
Panel and EB approval. No one has ever asked for such approval as over<br />
time it has become clear that monitoring is intrinsically linked to the baseline<br />
methodology. The submission forms have been revised accordingly (see<br />
section 4.2)<br />
178<br />
EB 20, Annex 2<br />
179<br />
EB 8, Annex 1<br />
180<br />
EB 9, Annex 3<br />
181<br />
EB 8, Annex 1<br />
182<br />
EB 10, Annex 1<br />
183<br />
EB 24, Annex 16<br />
184<br />
EB 9, Annex 3<br />
185<br />
EB 10, Annex 1<br />
35