09.02.2014 Views

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.1.4 Leakage<br />

Unclear Definition<br />

of Leakage<br />

As with the concept of project boundary, a detailed explanation of how<br />

to approach leakage has not been provided by the EB. After identification<br />

of leakage sources one has to explain which sources are to be calculated,<br />

and which can be neglected 178 . This has led to inconsistencies across<br />

methodologies, with some methodologies requiring a full life-cycle analysis,<br />

whereas in other methodologies it was seen as sufficient if emissions of one<br />

process level upwards and downwards were taken into account.<br />

4.1.5 Monitoring, data sources and quality<br />

Requirements<br />

regarding Data<br />

Sources<br />

Data Vintages<br />

Accuracy of<br />

Measurements<br />

Standard<br />

Variables<br />

Baseline and<br />

Monitoring<br />

Methodology<br />

belong together<br />

Data are key to monitor emissions reductions and to apply a baseline<br />

methodology. They should be referenced with possible sources being official<br />

statistics, expert judgement, proprietary data, IPCC, commercial and scientific<br />

literature 179 . Data have to be SI units 180 . Vintages and spatial level have to<br />

be defined 181 . Regarding data vintages, it was discussed whether baseline<br />

parameters can be fixed ex-ante or have to be monitored ex post. “Ex post<br />

calculation of baseline emission rates may only be used if proper justification<br />

is provided. Notwithstanding, the baseline emission rates shall also be<br />

calculated ex-ante and reported in the draft <strong>CDM</strong>-PDD” 182 .<br />

Data have to be conservative, adequate, consistent, accurate and reliable. For<br />

some methodologies, accuracy played an important role, for example in the<br />

context of measurement of methane content of flare exhaust gas. Generally,<br />

monitoring of methane emissions has been more demanding than of other<br />

greenhouse gases.<br />

Frequency of data collection and quality assurance/control procedures<br />

have to be specified. In this context, the specifications of the monitoring<br />

plan are important which should “reflect good monitoring practice<br />

appropriate to the type of project”. A list of 56 standard variables has been<br />

specified 183 . Alternatively ISO or other standards can be used for variable<br />

name definitions. <strong>Methodologies</strong> should specify a priority order for use of<br />

alternative data if the preferred sources are not available 184 .<br />

A strong link between baseline and monitoring methodologies is to be<br />

provided 185 . If project participants want use different combinations of<br />

approved baseline and monitoring methodologies they have to get Meth<br />

Panel and EB approval. No one has ever asked for such approval as over<br />

time it has become clear that monitoring is intrinsically linked to the baseline<br />

methodology. The submission forms have been revised accordingly (see<br />

section 4.2)<br />

178<br />

EB 20, Annex 2<br />

179<br />

EB 8, Annex 1<br />

180<br />

EB 9, Annex 3<br />

181<br />

EB 8, Annex 1<br />

182<br />

EB 10, Annex 1<br />

183<br />

EB 24, Annex 16<br />

184<br />

EB 9, Annex 3<br />

185<br />

EB 10, Annex 1<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!