Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA
Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA
Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 2: The <strong>CDM</strong> project cycle<br />
CER Issuance<br />
by <strong>CDM</strong> Executive<br />
Board<br />
Methodology<br />
Development<br />
PDD Development<br />
Verification and<br />
Certification<br />
by Designated<br />
Operational Entity<br />
<strong>CDM</strong><br />
Project Cycle<br />
Approval<br />
by DNAs<br />
Monitoring<br />
by project participants<br />
Registration<br />
by <strong>CDM</strong> Executive<br />
Board<br />
Validation<br />
by Designated<br />
Operational Entity<br />
Need for<br />
approved Baseline<br />
and Monitoring<br />
Methodology,<br />
otherwise<br />
New<br />
Methodology<br />
Submission<br />
Revision<br />
of Existing<br />
<strong>Methodologies</strong><br />
Validation of PDD<br />
by DOEs<br />
The project cycle starts with the submission of a new baseline and<br />
monitoring methodology if no methodology approved by the EB exists for<br />
the project type 101 . These methodologies have to be developed by project<br />
participants 102 . A new methodology submission has always to be submitted<br />
together with a Project Design Document (PDD) describing the application of<br />
the methodology to a project 103 . As frequently new methodologies have been<br />
developed without having a sufficiently developed project, project developers<br />
have resorted to developing a PDD for a fictitious project (“dummy”).<br />
Approved methodologies can be revised at any time but the revisions do not<br />
apply to projects that have been registered earlier as long as their crediting<br />
period is not renewed 104 . This means that several versions of a baseline<br />
methodology can be in use at the same time depending on the registration<br />
date of projects. Once approved, methodologies are a public good. This<br />
and the high risk of rejection has led to a reluctance of the private sector to<br />
develop methodologies as this can be very costly.<br />
Once a PDD has been written, it is submitted to a DOE for validation 105 ,<br />
which then published it for public comments The DOE checks whether the<br />
PDD fulfils the <strong>CDM</strong> requirements 106 , especially with regards to eligibility<br />
of host country to participate 107 , local stakeholder comments 108 , analysis<br />
of environmental impacts 109 , correct use of an approved baseline and<br />
monitoring methodology 110 and existence of an approval letter of all<br />
countries involved in the project 111 . A monitoring plan has to describe<br />
collection and archiving of all relevant data necessary to determine baseline<br />
101<br />
Ibid., para 37 (e)<br />
102<br />
Ibid., para 45 (a)<br />
103<br />
Ibid.,para 38<br />
104<br />
Ibid., para 39<br />
105<br />
The key elements of a PDD are defined in Appendix B to decision 3/CMP.1<br />
106<br />
Annex to decision 3/CMP.1, para 35<br />
107<br />
Ibid., para 37 (a)<br />
108<br />
Ibid., para 37 (b)<br />
109<br />
Ibid., para 37 (c)<br />
110<br />
Ibid., para 37 (e)<br />
111<br />
Ibid., para 40 (a)<br />
17