Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Monitoring Monitoring ex ante of Baseline Scenario Plant, Grid Emissions Factor and Emissions from Biomass Burning Monitoring ex post of Biomass used differentiated according to Types, Transportation Ex ante: Depending on the combined baseline scenario, the following parameters should be monitored ex-ante to determine the emissions that would arise without the project: • The quantity of electricity (in MWh) produced by the grid or by less efficient plants (than the project power plant) fired with the same biomass residues as the project prior to the implementation of the project. • The CO 2 emission factor of the electricity displaced by the project. • The emissions reductions due to the displacement of heat (measurements directives vary depending on which baseline scenario is applicable). • Emissions due to the uncontrolled burning of anthropogenic sources of biomass residues (if applicable to the chosen combined baseline scenario). Ex post: The following parameters should be monitored continuously or periodically (as specified in ACM0006) upon the commissioning of the project: • Quantity of biomass residues by type combusted in the project plant during any given year; • Quantity of biomass residues by type that has been transported to the project site • during any given year; • Moisture content of the biomass residues; • Quantity of dry biomass residue combusted by all power plants at the project site during any given year; • CH 4 emission factor for the combustion of the biomass residues (if CH 4 emissions are accounted for in the baseline); • Average round trip distance (from and to) between the various biomass residues supply sites and the project site; • Number of round trips to transport the biomass to the project site; • Average loads of biomass residues brought to the power plant; • Fuel consumption of the trucks used to transport the biomass residues to the project site; • Average CO 2 emission factor of the trucks used to transport the biomass residues to the project site; • Quantity of electricity consumed by the project during any given year; • CO 2 emissions factor of the grid during any given year; • Quantity of fossil fuel combusted by the project power plant during any given year; • Quantity of fossil fuel combusted for other purposes than the project during any given year; • The CO 2 emission factor of the fossil fuel used for the project; 118
• Quantity of steam diverted from adjacent boilers to operate the project power plant; • Average net efficiency of the steam plants from where steam is diverted to feed the project power plant; • Net quantity of electricity produced by the project power plant during any given year; • Quantity of electricity produced by the fossil fuel fired captive power plants on the project site as identified in the baseline scenario; • Quantity of electricity produced by power plants fired by the same biomass residue at the project site, including the project power plant and all previously existing power plants; • Quantity of heat generated by the project power plant in any given year; • Total quantity of heat in all cogeneration power plants fired by the same biomass residue at the project site, including the project power plant and all previously existing cogeneration power plants; • Net calorific value of all biomass residues used by the project; • Net calorific value of the fossil fuel used; • CH 4 emission factor for the uncontrolled burning of the biomass residues used by the project activity (if applicable); • Average net efficiency of the boiler that would generate heat had the project activity not occurred; • CO 2 emission factor of the most carbon intensive fossil fuel used in the host country; • CO 2 emission factor for the fossil fuel used by the captive power plant identified in the baseline scenario (if applicable) Availability of Biomass Residues to be monitored Additionally, project proponents must provide evidence that the biomass residues used by the project would not be collected or utilized in the absence of the project. Proponents must also be able to assess the quantity of biomass residues being used in the project’s region, the total quantity of biomass residues available, and whether or not there is a supply surplus of a sufficient size to satisfy the project’s needs. 119
Page 1 and 2:
Understanding CDM Methodologies A g
Page 3:
Introduction The success of the Cle
Page 7 and 8:
1. Introduction Climate Change is a
Page 9 and 10:
Aim of Guidebook This guidebook wil
Page 11 and 12:
Special Status of the Marrakech Acc
Page 13 and 14:
Small Scale Thresholds over Time Cr
Page 15 and 16:
Transparency, Conservativeness, Con
Page 17 and 18:
Role of DOEs - Absence of Accredita
Page 19 and 20:
Figure 2: The CDM project cycle CER
Page 21 and 22:
EB Decision Making and the Role of
Page 23 and 24:
While COP/MOP has provided that Lar
Page 25 and 26:
Verification Regarding verification
Page 27 and 28:
3. Barrier analysis, with the aim t
Page 29 and 30:
Rejections due to Lack of Additiona
Page 31 and 32:
4. Methodologies Methodology Case L
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 9: Fuel switch family tree M
Page 35 and 36:
Interpretation of top 20% in Approa
Page 37 and 38:
4.1.4 Leakage Unclear Definition of
Page 39 and 40:
Top-down Methodology Development fo
Page 41 and 42:
Table 4: Methodology revisions 2005
Page 43 and 44:
5. Key elements and application of
Page 45 and 46:
Two Methodologies added Nitric Acid
Page 47 and 48:
Methodological Concept Power Genera
Page 49 and 50:
Box 13: Exclusion of immaterial par
Page 51 and 52:
Build Margin Build Margin: newest P
Page 53 and 54:
Box 16: OM/ BM calculation where th
Page 55 and 56:
Project Emissions With the exceptio
Page 57 and 58:
Applicability Conditions Grid has t
Page 59 and 60:
Leakage Leakage: Transfer of Equipm
Page 61 and 62:
Box 20: Sufficient natural gas supp
Page 63 and 64:
• Option 3: The emission factor o
Page 65 and 66:
Industrial Gas Methodologies 5.3 De
Page 67 and 68:
No Additionality Problem Another co
Page 69 and 70: In a second step, it is tested whet
Page 71 and 72: Determination of the Emission Facto
Page 73 and 74: Baseline scenario and additionality
Page 75 and 76: Box 27: Ensuring accuracy of measur
Page 77 and 78: 5.4.2 Basic concept Emissions Reduc
Page 79 and 80: Default Cogen Plant Efficiency 90%
Page 81 and 82: 5.4.4 AMS-II.D Project Description
Page 83 and 84: 5.4.5 AM0046 This methodology warra
Page 85 and 86: • Information on any changes made
Page 87 and 88: Displacement of Natural Gas in Pipe
Page 89 and 90: Landfill gas capture and flaring ac
Page 91 and 92: Ex post: The main parameters that n
Page 93 and 94: Box 31: Deviation of monitoring met
Page 95 and 96: Box 32: Measurement of the flare ef
Page 97 and 98: Expanding of Applicability Conditio
Page 99 and 100: Seven-Step Procedure for Measuremen
Page 101 and 102: Project boundary Transport of Waste
Page 103 and 104: Biomass Leakage: Proving that there
Page 105 and 106: 5.6 .3 ACM0008 Description of the c
Page 107 and 108: • Methane used for electricity an
Page 109 and 110: Applicability conditions Definition
Page 111 and 112: or retrofit. This baseline holds fo
Page 113 and 114: • For biomass-fired projects, a s
Page 115 and 116: A handful of projects have submitte
Page 117 and 118: Submission of further Baseline Scen
Page 119: Heat only Projects Baseline Scenari
Page 123: Published by the Department for Env
show all

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?