09.02.2014 Views

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Submission of<br />

further Baseline<br />

Scenarios<br />

Two Requests for<br />

Revision by same<br />

Developer due to<br />

constant Changes<br />

in Baseline<br />

Situation<br />

New Combination<br />

of Accepted<br />

Scenario Elements<br />

Box 45: Issues related to the inclusion of new baseline scenarios<br />

Since the consolidation of ACM0006, several requests for clarification and<br />

revision have been submitted to the MP asking for the inclusion of new baseline<br />

scenarios in ACM0006. Only a handful of these are presented here as examples of<br />

classic requests. “Revision of ACM0006 to reflect a baseline scenario where heat<br />

generation occurs with both biomass and fossil fuels in boilers” 293 was submitted<br />

to the MP requesting the inclusion of a new combined baseline scenario where<br />

electricity generated would be supplied to the grid and heat would come from<br />

a combination of different sources, including a black liquor fired cogeneration<br />

plant, biomass heat boilers, and fossil fuel heat boilers. The MP recognized the<br />

project 294 met the basic eligibility requirements of ACM0006 and recommended<br />

including the new baseline scenario (scenario 16), leading to an EB decision to<br />

revise the methodology accordingly. Interestingly, the same project proponent<br />

later submitted a request for revision 295 after having realized that the combined<br />

baseline scenario it had requested did not apply anymore to the project’s<br />

situation. The proponent explained that heat was diverted to the project plant by<br />

one out of the five existing heat boilers on the project site (either fired by fossil<br />

fuels and/or biomass residues), and requested whether these pre-project boilers<br />

could be co-fired at times even after the implementation of the project activity.<br />

The MP argued that the electricity produced by the new biomass fired plant could<br />

reduce the necessity of using fossil fuel in these existing co-fired boilers, hereby<br />

displacing fossil fuel generated electricity. However, the methodological rationale<br />

of ACM0006 assumes that the increase in energy generation from biomass<br />

residues will contribute to displace fossil fuel generated electricity only from the<br />

grid and not from existing plants on the project site. Based on this premise, the<br />

MP rejected the request.<br />

Another interesting case arose from a request for clarification inquiring whether<br />

two combinations of baseline scenarios could be paired to suit the requirements<br />

of a project with two boilers and one turbo generator 296 . The MP reacted<br />

favorably to the request, arguing that though ACM0006 does not allow the<br />

combination of multiple baseline scenarios, the proposed project proved to be<br />

a rather unique case and that the approach proposed by the project proponent<br />

for monitoring and calculating emissions reductions was appropriate. Because of<br />

the particular character of the project, the MP did not recommend a revision to<br />

ACM006 but rather encouraged the project proponent to request a deviation.<br />

259260261262<br />

259<br />

See AM_CLA_0012<br />

260<br />

For more details about the underlying project, see NM0098 “Nobrecel Fossil-to-Biomass Fuel Switch Project in<br />

Brazil”.<br />

261<br />

See AM_REV_0048<br />

262<br />

See AM_CLA_0042<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!