09.02.2014 Views

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Technical line<br />

losses are to<br />

be included in<br />

calculation of<br />

Project Emissions<br />

but not in the<br />

Baseline Emissions<br />

Box 42: The consideration of technical line losses in the baseline<br />

An amendment of various small-scale methodologies was requested to account<br />

for technical line losses in cases where electricity is the baseline 289 . The request<br />

claimed that the baseline was not accurately estimated under AMS-I.C and that<br />

AMS-I.C was not consistent with all methodologies of category II that refer to<br />

AMS-I.D for the calculation of the grid emission coefficient. SSC WG 08 rejected<br />

this request explaining that the combined margin approach of AMS I.D was<br />

designed to estimate the emission factor of a hypothetical plant replaced by the<br />

project, and is therefore meant to estimate a counterfactual scenario.<br />

In response to a similar request 290 SSC WG 12 reiterated that <strong>CDM</strong> methodologies<br />

are meant to produce conservative estimates and accordingly, technical line<br />

losses should be included in the calculation of projects emissions and excluded<br />

from baseline emission calculations. Should it be possible to demonstrate that<br />

the project activity has no significant impact on the grid, then the calculation<br />

of baseline emissions could include a consideration for technical losses. In all<br />

other cases, a conservative approach to baseline emissions calculation should be<br />

adopted.<br />

255256<br />

Project Emissions<br />

Leakage<br />

Calculation, if<br />

Reuse of replaced<br />

Equipment<br />

PoA Leakage<br />

No Shift to Fossil<br />

Fuels elsewhere<br />

Project emissions are typically assumed to be zero.<br />

Leakage<br />

Leakage is to be considered if the energy generating equipment is transferred<br />

from another activity or if the existing equipment is transferred to another<br />

activity.<br />

Leakage under a PoA: There is a risk of leakage as the PoA may divert<br />

biomass residues from other uses, which may subsequently lead to an<br />

increase in emissions from fossil fuel combustion or other sources. If<br />

biomass residues are co-fired in the project plant, project participants shall<br />

demonstrate that the use of the biomass residues does not result in an<br />

increase in fossil fuels use or an increase in GHG emissions elsewhere.<br />

Monitoring<br />

Metering of<br />

Sample of Projects<br />

In cases where baseline emissions are calculated using the energy produced<br />

multiplied by an emission factor, monitoring shall be conducted by metering<br />

the energy produced by a sample of the systems.<br />

In the case of cogeneration projects, monitoring shall be done by metering<br />

the thermal energy and electricity generated.<br />

Systems<br />

generating less<br />

than 5 CERs/<br />

year only need to<br />

record Operating<br />

Hours<br />

If the emissions reduction per energy production system is less than 5 tonnes<br />

of CO 2<br />

a year monitoring shall consider:<br />

i. Recording annually the number of systems operating; and<br />

ii. Estimating the annual hours of operation of an average system.<br />

Projects using biomass or biomass and fossil fuel need to monitor the<br />

following additional items:<br />

255<br />

See SSC_71.<br />

256<br />

See SSC_115.<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!