Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA
Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA
Understanding CDM Methodologies - SuSanA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.6 .3 ACM0008<br />
Description of the current version of the methodology<br />
Only Methane<br />
from operating<br />
underground<br />
Mines<br />
Collection<br />
and Transport<br />
Equipment for<br />
CMM<br />
NMHC Emissions<br />
only covered if<br />
more than 1% of<br />
CMM Volume<br />
Baseline Scenario<br />
Options<br />
Ex-ante Projection<br />
of CMM must be<br />
available<br />
Emission<br />
Reduction based<br />
on Difference of<br />
GWP of unburnt<br />
and burnt<br />
Methane<br />
Engineering Study<br />
for Methane<br />
Demand in<br />
Baseline Scenario<br />
or Statistical<br />
Projection based<br />
on 5 Year Data<br />
Applicability conditions: ACM0008 (version 03) is applicable to projects<br />
that capture and destroy coal mine methane (CMM) and/or extract coal<br />
bed methane (CBM) before mining at currently operating or newly built<br />
underground coal mines. It is not applicable to closed mines or to utilization<br />
of CBM from seams that will not be mined in the foreseeable future.<br />
Project boundary: The spatial extent of the project boundary includes the<br />
equipment installed and used for the extraction, compression, and storage<br />
of CMM and CBM at the project site, and transport to an off-site user, as<br />
well as flares or engines for electricity/heat generation, and the power plants<br />
connected to the grid serving the coal mine. Only CBM wells that are within<br />
a three-dimensional “zone of influence” of the mined area are part of the<br />
project. Within the project boundary, project participants shall only account<br />
for CO 2<br />
emissions from the combustion of non methane hydrocarbons<br />
(NMHCs), if they represent more than 1% by volume of the extracted coal<br />
mine gas.<br />
Baseline scenario and additionality: The baseline scenario is the most<br />
economically viable or the lowest emissions-intensive of the following<br />
options: venting, flaring, heat and power generation or feeding into gas<br />
pipelines. The option chosen also should not face prohibitive barriers and<br />
must be technically feasible to handle CBM and CMM to comply with safety<br />
regulations. Data must be available to provide ex-ante projections of methane<br />
demand over the crediting period and must be disaggregated according to<br />
the phases of methane recovery (CBM prior to mining, underground premining<br />
CMM drainage, surface or underground post mining CMM drainage,<br />
drainage from sealed goafs before the mine is closed).<br />
Additionality of the project shall be demonstrated by application of the latest<br />
version of the “Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality”<br />
(additionality tool) to the selected baseline scenario.<br />
Emission reductions: Methane venting releases 21 t CO 2<br />
per t of methane<br />
whereas combustion only releases 2.75 t CO 2<br />
per t of methane. Emissions<br />
from flaring are calculated according to the “Tool to determine project<br />
emissions from flaring gases containing methane”. Methane oxidation<br />
factors are taken from the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National<br />
Greenhouse Gas Inventories as 99.5% for heat and power generation and<br />
98.5% for feeding into gas grids.<br />
Methane demand for heat generation in the baseline scenario has to be<br />
estimated on the basis of an engineering/economic study describing the<br />
current distribution system, identifying CMM/CBM users, their consumption<br />
rates, expected growth rates of users and gas grid expansion plans. If there<br />
is no information on the existing distribution system, a statistical projection<br />
based on CMM/CBM availability and thermal energy CMM/CBM usage rates<br />
over at least the past five years can be used. If less than five years of data are<br />
available, the maximum existing pipeline capacity will be used as proxy for<br />
demand.<br />
103