COSIG CONFERENCE BROCHURE.pdf - Drexel University College ...
COSIG CONFERENCE BROCHURE.pdf - Drexel University College ... COSIG CONFERENCE BROCHURE.pdf - Drexel University College ...
Improving Assessment and Treatment Planning for David Mee-Lee, M.D. Persons Having Co-Occurring Disorders _____________________________________________________________________________ G. Case Consultation and Systems Issues There are many systems boundaries that work against effective continuity of care: • Excessive boundaries, exclusion, and territoriality - policy, funding and practice ignore and sacrifice the complexity of individual needs to achieve and maintain bureaucratic simplicity; continuity of care is nearly impossible under these circumstances. • Inadequate assessment and diagnosis - on an individual basis, addiction and mental illness are often not diagnosed; inadequate assessment of community needs affects system planning and development of services. • Lack of trained staff - the polarization of the mental health and addictions fields, historically, has resulted in knowledge gaps only now beginning to improve; lack of experience in both addiction and mental health fields results in fear and resistance to learn and broaden counseling knowledge • Inadequate array of services - dual diagnosis services either do not exist, or represent a few model programs; even in states where it is more of a priority, there are too many gaps. • Rigid funding streams - there still are inadequate resources, turf battles and reluctance to pool resources for training, research or service delivery. • Lack of a strong shared constituency - because there is little common ground between the addictions and mental health constituencies, the ability to influence policy and service delivery is greatly limited. • Limited dissemination of effective program models - too little is done to publicize what works in model programs; programs are too infrequently evaluated, or if evaluated, the findings are often not applied in future funding or program planning • Fragility - when barriers have been overcome, it is usually due to individual efforts that are too fragile and dependent on that person’s leadership; positive changes are therefore not sustained by basic structural changes in the mental health and addiction service systems. (Wayne Thacker, MSW., Leslie Tremaine, Ed.D: “Systems Issues in Serving the Mentally Ill Substance Abuser: Virginia’s Experience” Hospital and Community Psychiatry, Vol. 40, No. 10 pp. 1046-1049, Oct. 1989.) H. Gathering Data on Policy and Payment Barriers • Policy, payment and systems issues cannot change quickly. However, as a first step towards reframing frustrating situations into systems change, each incident of inefficient or in adequate meeting of a client’s needs can be a data point that sets the foundation for strategic planning and change • Finding efficient ways to gather data as it happens in daily care of clients can help provide hope and direction for change: 8 _____________________________________________________________________________ _
Improving Assessment and Treatment Planning for David Mee-Lee, M.D. Persons Having Co-Occurring Disorders _____________________________________________________________________________ PLACEMENT SUMMARY Level of Care/Service Indicated - Insert the level of care and/or type of service that offers the most appropriate level of care/service that can provide the service intensity needed to address the client’s current functioning/severity. Level of Care/Service Received - If the most appropriate level/service is not able to be utilized, insert the most appropriate placement/service available and circle the Reason for Difference between Indicated and Received Level/service Reason for Difference - Circle only one number -- 1. Level of care or Service not available; 2. Provider judgment; 3. Client preference; 4. Client is on waiting list for appropriate level/service; 5. Level of care or Service available, but no payment source; 6. Geographic inaccessibility; 7. Family responsibility problems e.g., no childcare; 8. Language; 9. Not applicable; 10. Not listed. COMMENTS: Stephen Stephen is 51 years old and is accompanied by his wife. He wants help, but is depressed. During his intake interview for this, his second DUI arrest, he looks disconsolate and he speaks in a monotone as he wonders if his wife will leave him. His alcohol use has resulted in alienation from his children, guilt feelings and his job may now be threatened, as he has been warned by his supervisor about his poor attendance and performance. Most of his friends drink, but none of them think he is an alcoholic. He has not had any previous addiction treatment other than DUI classes after his first DUI four years ago. He attended AA for six months on and off and did have a sponsor, but felt more and more that he wasn't as bad as others at AA and gradually stopped going. Stephen has been alcohol-free for three weeks. He has used cocaine (snorting) about three times per month over the past four years, but stopped two months ago. He has had no legal or financial problems related to cocaine. Stephen has continued on diazepam (Valium) 5 mg. qid which he has taken for five years to relax him because of mild hypertension. He has no other chronic physical problems but has lost 10 pounds weight over the past month and has been sleeping poorly. He wishes he could sleep and get away from all his problems but denies any organized suicidal plans and says he wants help. February 18 C.W. The following is a report on C.W. The consultation issue involved the question of whether primary alcohol dependence or primary psychiatric interventions were needed; and also recommendation for level of care and treatment plan given this patient’s three hospitalizations since age 15 with the current admission involving high risk suicidal behavior. CW is a 19 year-old, white, single, unemployed tire worker who was admitted 2/13 intoxicated on alcohol and also positive for marijuana in his drug screen. He was depressed and suicidal and had cut his chest; written “Die” on his chest; and taken an overdose of Prozac. 9 _____________________________________________________________________________ _
- Page 696 and 697: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 699: W77: Treatment for Older Adult with
- Page 702 and 703: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 704 and 705: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 706 and 707: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 708 and 709: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 710 and 711: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 712 and 713: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 715: W81: The Pennsylvania COSIG Evaluat
- Page 718 and 719: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 720 and 721: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 723: W83: Beaver County Forensic COD Ini
- Page 726 and 727: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 728 and 729: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 730 and 731: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 732 and 733: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 734 and 735: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 737: W84: Improving Assessment and Treat
- Page 740 and 741: Improving Assessment and Treatment
- Page 742 and 743: Improving Assessment and Treatment
- Page 744 and 745: Improving Assessment and Treatment
- Page 748 and 749: Improving Assessment and Treatment
- Page 750 and 751: Improving Assessment and Treatment
- Page 752: Improving Assessment and Treatment
- Page 759 and 760: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 761 and 762: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 763 and 764: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 765 and 766: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 767 and 768: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 769 and 770: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 771: W86: Fairweather Lodge - An Evidenc
- Page 774 and 775: Housing, Employment, Social and Aut
- Page 776 and 777: Principle VI. Successful Lodges res
- Page 778 and 779: Fidelity to Autonomy Principles 1.
- Page 781: W87: Physical Disorders and Persons
- Page 784 and 785: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 787: W91: Collaborative Care for Concurr
- Page 790 and 791: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 792 and 793: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
- Page 795 and 796: COSIG Co-Occurring Disorders Confer
Improving Assessment and Treatment Planning for<br />
David Mee-Lee, M.D.<br />
Persons Having Co-Occurring Disorders<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________<br />
G. Case Consultation and Systems Issues<br />
There are many systems boundaries that work against effective continuity of care:<br />
• Excessive boundaries, exclusion, and territoriality - policy, funding and practice ignore and sacrifice the<br />
complexity of individual needs to achieve and maintain bureaucratic simplicity; continuity of care is nearly<br />
impossible under these circumstances.<br />
• Inadequate assessment and diagnosis - on an individual basis, addiction and mental illness are often not diagnosed;<br />
inadequate assessment of community needs affects system planning and development of services.<br />
• Lack of trained staff - the polarization of the mental health and addictions fields, historically, has resulted in<br />
knowledge gaps only now beginning to improve; lack of experience in both addiction and mental health fields results<br />
in fear and resistance to learn and broaden counseling knowledge<br />
• Inadequate array of services - dual diagnosis services either do not exist, or represent a few model programs;<br />
even in states where it is more of a priority, there are too many gaps.<br />
• Rigid funding streams - there still are inadequate resources, turf battles and reluctance to pool resources for training,<br />
research or service delivery.<br />
• Lack of a strong shared constituency - because there is little common ground between the addictions and mental<br />
health constituencies, the ability to influence policy and service delivery is greatly limited.<br />
• Limited dissemination of effective program models - too little is done to publicize what works in model programs;<br />
programs are too infrequently evaluated, or if evaluated, the findings are often not applied in future funding or<br />
program planning<br />
• Fragility - when barriers have been overcome, it is usually due to individual efforts that are too fragile and dependent<br />
on that person’s leadership; positive changes are therefore not sustained by basic structural changes in the mental<br />
health and addiction service systems.<br />
(Wayne Thacker, MSW., Leslie Tremaine, Ed.D: “Systems Issues in Serving the Mentally Ill Substance Abuser: Virginia’s Experience”<br />
Hospital and Community Psychiatry, Vol. 40, No. 10 pp. 1046-1049, Oct. 1989.)<br />
H. Gathering Data on Policy and Payment Barriers<br />
• Policy, payment and systems issues cannot change quickly. However, as a first step towards reframing frustrating<br />
situations into systems change, each incident of inefficient or in adequate meeting of a client’s needs can be a data<br />
point that sets the foundation for strategic planning and change<br />
• Finding efficient ways to gather data as it happens in daily care of clients can help provide hope and direction for<br />
change:<br />
8<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________<br />
_