09.02.2014 Views

COSIG CONFERENCE BROCHURE.pdf - Drexel University College ...

COSIG CONFERENCE BROCHURE.pdf - Drexel University College ...

COSIG CONFERENCE BROCHURE.pdf - Drexel University College ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>COSIG</strong> Co-Occurring Disorders Conference, Hershey PA, May 15-17, 2006<br />

Nine Essential Features of ACT<br />

Controlled Act Research<br />

1. Services provided in the community, most frequently in<br />

the client’s living environment.<br />

2. Assertive engagement with active outreach.<br />

20<br />

17<br />

ACT better than Standard<br />

ACT not better than Standard<br />

3. High intensity of services.<br />

15<br />

4. Small caseloads.<br />

5. Continuous 24-hour responsibility.<br />

6. Team approach (the full team takes responsibility for all<br />

clients on the caseload).<br />

Number of Studies<br />

10<br />

5<br />

6<br />

8<br />

7 7<br />

5<br />

7. Multidisciplinary team, reflecting integration of services.<br />

8. Close work with support systems.<br />

9. Continuity of staffing.<br />

0<br />

Time in<br />

Hospital<br />

3<br />

Housing<br />

Stability<br />

Quality of<br />

Life<br />

Client<br />

Satisfaction<br />

1<br />

Adapted from Substance Abuse Treatment for Persons With Co-Occurring Disorders TIP, 2005b<br />

Sacks, S. & Osher, F. 2003. [original reference to follow]<br />

Percent inRemission<br />

Fidelity Improves Outcomes<br />

*** If current & subsequent points = 1 then the current score = 1<br />

Assessment Figure Points 1. Percent Baseline of 6 Participants mo. 12 mo. in Stable 18 mo. Remission 24 mo. 30 for mo. High-Fidelity 36 mo. ACT<br />

Hi-Fidelity Programs (E; 0n=61) 19.67vs. Low-Fidelity 26.23 29.51 ACT Programs 37.7 42.62 (G; n=26). 55.74<br />

Low-Fidelity 0 3.85 3.85 7.69 7.69 15.38 15.38<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

to structure<br />

more flexible activities<br />

shorter meetings &<br />

activities<br />

more staff guidance<br />

Modified TC<br />

Key Modifications<br />

to process<br />

fewer sanctions<br />

engagement<br />

emphasis<br />

to elements<br />

accent on orientation &<br />

instruction<br />

individualized task<br />

assignments<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Baseline 6 mo. 12 mo. 18 mo. 24 mo. 30 mo. 36 mo.<br />

McHugo, et al., 1999<br />

more staff<br />

responsibility as role<br />

models<br />

individually paced<br />

progress in program<br />

flexible criteria for<br />

moving to next stage<br />

Adapted from Substance Abuse Treatment for Persons With Co-Occurring Disorders TIP, 2005b<br />

live-out re-entry<br />

(aftercare) essential<br />

engagement emphasis<br />

throughout<br />

activities proceed at a<br />

slower pace<br />

counseling to assist use<br />

of community<br />

Summary<br />

Outcomes baseline vs 2-year follow-up<br />

The Modified TC is<br />

more flexible<br />

less intense<br />

more individualized<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

Modified TC 2<br />

TAU<br />

The quintessential elements remain<br />

peer self-help<br />

community-as-method<br />

Adapted from Substance Abuse Treatment for Persons With Co-Occurring Disorders TIP, 2005b<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

Drug<br />

Use<br />

De Leon, G., Sacks, S., et al. 2000.<br />

Alcohol<br />

# of<br />

Drugs<br />

Employment<br />

Drug<br />

Use<br />

Alcohol<br />

# of<br />

Drugs<br />

Employment<br />

baseline<br />

2-year<br />

follow-up<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!