COSIG CONFERENCE BROCHURE.pdf - Drexel University College ...

COSIG CONFERENCE BROCHURE.pdf - Drexel University College ... COSIG CONFERENCE BROCHURE.pdf - Drexel University College ...

drexelmed.edu
from drexelmed.edu More from this publisher
09.02.2014 Views

DRAFT – Community Based and Recovery oriented Housing Options for individuals with Serious Mental Illness or co-occuring disorders. Need – to provide housing to individuals with mental illness in their own home communities, through application of flexible and creative housing strategies which support and enhance Recovery. Issues • Stable, affordable safe, decent and sanitary housing is a major component of a successful recovery for individuals suffering from a serious mental illness (SMI) or a co-occurring mental illness and substance abuse disorder (COD) . There is a great need for the Office of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (OMHSAS) to concentrate simply on housing issues for the population of persons in the state who are affected by serious mental illness, or co-occurring disorders of serious mental illness and substance abuse. Studies have shown that persons who are satisfied with their housing and have a stable secure place of their own are more compliant with therapy, tend to have fewer and shorter inpatient stays and generally have more successful recovery. • Housing is an issue because it is expensive, and most persons with SMI or COD have limited incomes. Recently many if not most persons with a disability who rely on SSI have been priced out of the private rental market in many areas. Safe decent affordable housing for low-income persons, a group which includes many disabled individuals, is disappearing in areas with strong economies, and in which the rental subsidies offered by the government have not kept pace with real rental costs. -Concept - Housing should be separated from services. This concept requires that we develop a new focus on: how we provide housing services to individuals with SMI and COD; the process we use to move persons out of mental hospitals into community residential settings; and also how we use residential services in the community to prevent long-term hospitalization. This new focus demands that we complete a full paradigm shift from the 1970's oriented protective, custodial view of housing and services for persons with SMI or COD; to a concept of recovery and informed consumer choice, of both housing options and supportive services. -Background – Residential services, in the Community Residential Rehabilitation Services (CRRS) and Long Term Structured Residences (LTSR’s) funded and licensed by the OMHSAS, are attached to specific housing sites, and are ranked according to the staffing needs presented by the level of severity of the consumer’s illness and the need to provide care and supervision. Most of the residential services funded through the OMHSAS, including CRRS and LTSR’s, have not traditionally been considered permanent housing for the individual. The housing sites are meant to be transitional residences, in which training, rehabilitation and supportive services are offered on site and in connection or coordination with other community treatment services that are included in the individual’s mental health treatment plan. Where a mental health consumer lives is based on what level of staffing and support he needs, similar to the state 1

hospital. The CRRS and LTSR’s were developed to be short term (1-3 years) treatment and housing, in which staff worked with individuals placed there to assist in the recovery process, help with community integration and prepare residents to move in a timely fashion from the staffed setting into more independent and permanent housing. -Problems with the current CRRS and LTSR services – Consumer perspective • Moving, changing residences is very difficult for people, as is the lack of a feel of permanency when frequent moves are required. Persons with serious mental illness are subject to great stress as a direct result of the upheaval associated with a change of residence, which can occur as treatment needs change, and persons must be transferred to a new location. Some of the persons living in CRR’s form attachments with their housemates, and want to be able to call home the actual CRR site where they have been placed. Nevertheless they may be required to move to a new site and develop relationships with new housemates as their need for treatment intensity changes. • The current linear CRRS, LTSR model fails to provide housing choices for individuals with serious mental illness. If a person needs the services and supports that accompany or are interwoven into the residence, the person must live where the County MH/MR Program and it’s provider agencies have located the residences, in the CRR which provides the level of service most needed for that person. Some consumers really don’t want to live with other persons with mental illness, but would prefer to choose their own roommates or housemates; and some don’t want to live with anyone, but are happier and more productive when living alone. -Problems with the current CRRS and LTSR services – Administrative concerns • The current model only works when individuals can continue to move to the least restrictive housing alternative, from state hospital through the levels of CRRS (or LTSR’s), into supported or totally independent living (linear progression). Many consumers who are ready to move from residential treatment facilities to their own private housing frequently must remain in CRRS with minimum to moderate levels of staffing, not because they still require the level of service/support offered in the CRRS, but because there is no available affordable safe decent sanitary housing available in the community into which the resident can move. Or if housing is available, the necessary supports which make community housing a viable alternative, such as crisis residential services, mobile psych rehab and dedicated housing support caseworkers are not readily available within the County's service array. In effect, some residents continue to receive a level of staff support which is not needed, but must be provided due to the treatment model of the CRRS, in order to continue to be housed. • In other instances persons are placed in residential settings including CRRS and LTSR’s because some level of staff supervision is guaranteed. Such placements 2

hospital. The CRRS and LTSR’s were developed to be short term (1-3 years) treatment and<br />

housing, in which staff worked with individuals placed there to assist in the recovery process,<br />

help with community integration and prepare residents to move in a timely fashion from the<br />

staffed setting into more independent and permanent housing.<br />

-Problems with the current CRRS and LTSR services – Consumer perspective<br />

• Moving, changing residences is very difficult for people, as is the lack of a feel of<br />

permanency when frequent moves are required. Persons with serious mental<br />

illness are subject to great stress as a direct result of the upheaval associated with<br />

a change of residence, which can occur as treatment needs change, and persons<br />

must be transferred to a new location. Some of the persons living in CRR’s form<br />

attachments with their housemates, and want to be able to call home the actual<br />

CRR site where they have been placed. Nevertheless they may be required to<br />

move to a new site and develop relationships with new housemates as their need<br />

for treatment intensity changes.<br />

• The current linear CRRS, LTSR model fails to provide housing choices for<br />

individuals with serious mental illness. If a person needs the services and<br />

supports that accompany or are interwoven into the residence, the person must<br />

live where the County MH/MR Program and it’s provider agencies have located<br />

the residences, in the CRR which provides the level of service most needed for<br />

that person. Some consumers really don’t want to live with other persons with<br />

mental illness, but would prefer to choose their own roommates or housemates;<br />

and some don’t want to live with anyone, but are happier and more productive<br />

when living alone.<br />

-Problems with the current CRRS and LTSR services – Administrative concerns<br />

• The current model only works when individuals can continue to move to the least<br />

restrictive housing alternative, from state hospital through the levels of CRRS (or<br />

LTSR’s), into supported or totally independent living (linear progression). Many<br />

consumers who are ready to move from residential treatment facilities to their<br />

own private housing frequently must remain in CRRS with minimum to moderate<br />

levels of staffing, not because they still require the level of service/support<br />

offered in the CRRS, but because there is no available affordable safe decent<br />

sanitary housing available in the community into which the resident can move. Or<br />

if housing is available, the necessary supports which make community housing a<br />

viable alternative, such as crisis residential services, mobile psych rehab and<br />

dedicated housing support caseworkers are not readily available within the<br />

County's service array. In effect, some residents continue to receive a level of<br />

staff support which is not needed, but must be provided due to the treatment<br />

model of the CRRS, in order to continue to be housed.<br />

• In other instances persons are placed in residential settings including CRRS and<br />

LTSR’s because some level of staff supervision is guaranteed. Such placements<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!