Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...
Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...
Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Beijing</strong> <strong>Olympics</strong> <strong>2008</strong>: <strong>Winning</strong> <strong>Press</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong><br />
94<br />
From the beginning of its <strong>Olympics</strong> bid, China set high expectations. Promises made by<br />
government officials and Olympic organizers were influential in <strong>Beijing</strong>'s successful bid. An<br />
official commentary by the Xinhua news agency complimented the International Olympic<br />
Committee for its foresight in awarding the Games to China, a country that seven years<br />
later “will be home to a stable society, a prosperous economy and a well-off population.”<br />
It added, “the country's transportation and environmental situation will be greatly<br />
improved, and the cause of democracy and rule of law will continually advance.”<br />
In February 2001, <strong>Beijing</strong>'s Deputy Mayor, Liu Jingmin, a top Olympic official, said, “By<br />
applying for the <strong>Olympics</strong>, we want to promote not just the city's development, but the<br />
development of society, including democracy and human rights.” Liu added that a<br />
victorious bid would “help us establish a more just and harmonious society, a more<br />
democratic society, and help integrate China into the world.” Wang Wei, secretary general<br />
of the <strong>Beijing</strong> bid committee, pledged that the government “will give the media complete<br />
freedom to report when they come to China.”<br />
These promises represent a range of commitments to the International Olympic<br />
Committee, the Chinese people, and the international community, including commitments<br />
on human rights, social and economic development, and press freedom. Yet, since then,<br />
the Chinese authorities have changed their tune, stressing “sovereignty” and that the<br />
“Games are only about competition and athletes.”<br />
The Executive Vice President of the <strong>Beijing</strong> Organizing Committee, Jiang Xiaoyu, said in<br />
March <strong>2008</strong>: “As [International Olympic Committee President] Jacques Rogge said, the<br />
Games is solely a sporting gala that shouldn't be linked with politics.”<br />
On protests along the Olympic torch relay route in Athens, Wang Wei stated: “We are here<br />
to celebrate the Olympic spirit, not to come to a political debate.” Reflecting historical<br />
amnesia, the International Olympic Committee, corporate sponsors, and even foreign<br />
governments are echoing this official Chinese line. With the billions of dollars already<br />
invested in or expected as profit from the Games, it is clear that changing the rules midgame<br />
has become rhetorically, and politically, acceptable.<br />
<strong>Beijing</strong>'s responsibilities as host city<br />
The <strong>Beijing</strong> Games must be judged within the broad framework of official representations<br />
and promises, domestic law, and the host's ongoing international obligations - including<br />
human rights obligations and the Olympic Charter. <strong>Beijing</strong>'s Olympic-specific obligations<br />
are set forth clearly in the (still not publicly available) host city contract and the 2002<br />
<strong>Beijing</strong> Olympic action plan.<br />
While <strong>Beijing</strong>'s actual bid candidacy file is not publicly available, the model candidacy file<br />
from the International Olympic Committee's manual for candidate cities for the <strong>2008</strong><br />
<strong>Olympics</strong> indicates the types of commitments <strong>Beijing</strong> addressed. These include<br />
information, representations, and guarantees regarding: