Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...
Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...
Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Beijing</strong> <strong>Olympics</strong> <strong>2008</strong>: <strong>Winning</strong> <strong>Press</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong><br />
75<br />
It seems as though the “strike hard” and “re-education” campaigns in Tibet following the<br />
expulsion from the territory of tourists and international media is a way of stepping up<br />
assimilation policies that have been threatening Tibetan culture and identity for centuries.<br />
In this perspective, it is important to credit the Tibetans for not targeting the Chinese<br />
people with their protests and demonstrations, but instead directing their anger at the<br />
Chinese political leadership. The monks who broke free to reach the international press on<br />
a guided tour to Labrang on April shouted, “We want human rights” and “We have no<br />
rights” and many said, “We are not against the <strong>Beijing</strong> <strong>Olympics</strong>, we are for the <strong>Beijing</strong><br />
<strong>Olympics</strong>.” Of course, these statements will never reach the Chinese public, at least not<br />
through the domestic media.<br />
Art. 35 in the Chinese Constitution reads: “Citizens of the People’s Republic of China enjoy<br />
freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession and of<br />
demonstration.” I have not much to add to this, except to question why these rights are<br />
not respected.<br />
For the more than 12 years that Voice of Tibet has been on the air, our transmissions<br />
have been targeted by systematic jamming by China. For years, we have protested these<br />
violations. But the International Telecommunication Union, a global institution under the<br />
UN umbrella that is responsible for regulating and overseeing international broadcasting<br />
law, tells us they are aware of the problem and that we have their moral support, but they<br />
can do nothing. They say, “It is a waste of time coming to us.”<br />
In the late 1990s, the Chinese authorities began understanding the popularity and impact<br />
of foreign short-wave radio broadcasts into Tibet. They responded in 2000 with what is<br />
called the XiXing project. Since then, hundreds of millions of dollars have been invested in<br />
improving their own ability to broadcast their own programs and to jam or block access to<br />
foreign broadcasts.<br />
There are two ways of blocking access to short-wave radio broadcasts, and our<br />
transmissions are targeted by both:<br />
• Jamming on top of Voice of Tibet’s registered frequencies, using high power<br />
transmitters outside the cities of Xian, <strong>Beijing</strong>, Kashi and Nanning. Most of the<br />
time, transmissions from two different locations target each and every Voice of<br />
Tibet transmission.<br />
• Local or “ground-wave” jamming using small transmitters in or outside more than<br />
100 cities and townships in Tibetan areas. These local jammers are very effective,<br />
but have a limited reach of about 20 kilometers in radius, depending on the<br />
topography of the area.<br />
The jamming transmissions do not stop at the border. The signals, containing a mix of<br />
dragon dance music, drums and noise, badly affect listening in India, Nepal and all the<br />
way to Europe.