07.02.2014 Views

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Beijing</strong> <strong>Olympics</strong> <strong>2008</strong>: <strong>Winning</strong> <strong>Press</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong><br />

75<br />

It seems as though the “strike hard” and “re-education” campaigns in Tibet following the<br />

expulsion from the territory of tourists and international media is a way of stepping up<br />

assimilation policies that have been threatening Tibetan culture and identity for centuries.<br />

In this perspective, it is important to credit the Tibetans for not targeting the Chinese<br />

people with their protests and demonstrations, but instead directing their anger at the<br />

Chinese political leadership. The monks who broke free to reach the international press on<br />

a guided tour to Labrang on April shouted, “We want human rights” and “We have no<br />

rights” and many said, “We are not against the <strong>Beijing</strong> <strong>Olympics</strong>, we are for the <strong>Beijing</strong><br />

<strong>Olympics</strong>.” Of course, these statements will never reach the Chinese public, at least not<br />

through the domestic media.<br />

Art. 35 in the Chinese Constitution reads: “Citizens of the People’s Republic of China enjoy<br />

freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession and of<br />

demonstration.” I have not much to add to this, except to question why these rights are<br />

not respected.<br />

For the more than 12 years that Voice of Tibet has been on the air, our transmissions<br />

have been targeted by systematic jamming by China. For years, we have protested these<br />

violations. But the International Telecommunication Union, a global institution under the<br />

UN umbrella that is responsible for regulating and overseeing international broadcasting<br />

law, tells us they are aware of the problem and that we have their moral support, but they<br />

can do nothing. They say, “It is a waste of time coming to us.”<br />

In the late 1990s, the Chinese authorities began understanding the popularity and impact<br />

of foreign short-wave radio broadcasts into Tibet. They responded in 2000 with what is<br />

called the XiXing project. Since then, hundreds of millions of dollars have been invested in<br />

improving their own ability to broadcast their own programs and to jam or block access to<br />

foreign broadcasts.<br />

There are two ways of blocking access to short-wave radio broadcasts, and our<br />

transmissions are targeted by both:<br />

• Jamming on top of Voice of Tibet’s registered frequencies, using high power<br />

transmitters outside the cities of Xian, <strong>Beijing</strong>, Kashi and Nanning. Most of the<br />

time, transmissions from two different locations target each and every Voice of<br />

Tibet transmission.<br />

• Local or “ground-wave” jamming using small transmitters in or outside more than<br />

100 cities and townships in Tibetan areas. These local jammers are very effective,<br />

but have a limited reach of about 20 kilometers in radius, depending on the<br />

topography of the area.<br />

The jamming transmissions do not stop at the border. The signals, containing a mix of<br />

dragon dance music, drums and noise, badly affect listening in India, Nepal and all the<br />

way to Europe.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!