07.02.2014 Views

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Beijing</strong> <strong>Olympics</strong> <strong>2008</strong>: <strong>Winning</strong> <strong>Press</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong><br />

26<br />

the voices of the reformers. After the Tiananmen massacres, the draft was completely<br />

abandoned. That is why today, the various levels of power can exert pressure on<br />

journalists with total impunity.<br />

<strong>Freedom</strong> of the press and human rights constitute the most serious problem now facing<br />

China. At the approach of the Olympic Games, all Chinese who have suffered oppression<br />

hope to be able to use this occasion to seek justice; the international community hopes<br />

that the Chinese government will improve the situation of the press and human rights in<br />

line with the pledge made in 2001. But the Chinese authorities see these internal and<br />

external pressures as “politicization of the Olympic Games.” Unhappily, counterattacking<br />

these criticisms by repressing freedom of the press only underlines this contradiction.<br />

Today, the Chinese press industry is increasing at the same pace as the economy as a<br />

whole. In 2005, it represented one seventh of the world’s press industry. Otherwise, the<br />

industry has unhappily not changed since the epoch of Mao Zedong.<br />

The director of the Central Publicity Department (formerly the Central Propaganda<br />

Department) was promoted to the Politburo at the Communist Party’s 14h Congress.<br />

It is no longer possible today to control the press by increasing the number of posts in the<br />

propaganda bureaus. Instead, the Publicity Department and the General Administration of<br />

<strong>Press</strong> and Publications (GAPP) have recruited a large number of press review officials, and<br />

the provincial and local bureaus have done the same. The press review officials are<br />

generally retired senior officials who are paid for their work and required above all to be<br />

politically “reliable.”<br />

In general, they write one report a month, or more if the situation demands. These<br />

reports are used by the Publicity Department and the GAPP as sources for articles in<br />

Xinwen Yueping (Review of the News), a publication of whose tone and language recall<br />

those of the Cultural Revolution. The affair of Bing Dian (Freezing Point), which caught the<br />

attention of the international community, began in fact with an article that appeared in<br />

Xinwen Yueping.<br />

China is the only country in the world that practices such censorship of the press and of all<br />

publishing outlets, as shown by the surprising number of such press review officials.<br />

During times of crisis, the media have no right of initiative and are obliged to carry only<br />

information from the official agency Xinhua. That is how the Publicity Department has<br />

managed to extend its control over the press and publications aacross the country.<br />

This system is a hundred times more perverse than the one in Prussia that even Marx<br />

criticized in his time. Let us give some other examples: in March 2007, the economic<br />

magazine Caijing appeared with a cover-page interview with the jurist Jiang Ping, which<br />

stated that “the General Affairs Office of the Central Committee had decreed that the law<br />

on property should be adopted by the National People’s Congress.” The Publicity<br />

Department, in a fit of fury, ordered all copies of the magazine to be withdrawn from sale,<br />

and that a new cover be substituted at the magazine's expense.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!