MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

More documents

Recommendations

Info

284 MANITOBA LAW JOURNAL|VOLUME 36 ISSUE 1 suspensions have been upheld where threatening social networking videos have been produced in jest if they “materially and substantially disrupt the work and discipline of the school.” 282 VI. CONCLUSION This paper examined the legal issues related to discovering and utilizing evidence from social networks and looked at the ways courts have dealt with it in terms of both criminal and civil law. In criminal proceedings, investigators have tools to obtain evidence directly from the social networks when reasonable grounds exist. They must then proceed to prove the authenticity of the material as well as ensure that the probative value outweighs potential prejudice. In Canada, local investigations can be assisted by the Department of Justice to obtain the necessary court orders in the US. Defence lawyers faced with social networking evidence should be aware of issues regarding authentication, context and potential prejudice. In civil proceedings, parties are obligated to produce any evidence that is relevant to an issue which depends on the nature of the claim or the dispute. In litigation particularly, it is incumbent on counsel to advise their clients on the risks of using social networks, as well as their obligation to preserve relevant material even if it is adverse to their case. Anyone involved in a dispute should be aware that procedural fairness and the truth seeking process will generally outweigh personal privacy concerns, and courts have the power to compel individuals to uncover their digital lives to assist in dispute resolutions. Social networks have only been around a few years and the law in these areas will continue to grow. Some of the cases covered spring from misunderstandings of the private nature of a social network. Others are the result of a compulsion to seek attention despite the consequences. In large part, the use of social networking has resulted in traditional means of communicating inner secrets and private thoughts being displaced with keyboard strokes and chat transcripts. This paper is not intended to dissuade individuals from using social networks. From connecting long lost friends to helping overthrow dictators, the benefits of 282 OZ v Board of Trustees of Long Beach Unified School Dist, 2008 WL 4396895 (CD Cal).
Social Incrimination 285 new forms of communication are numerous. However, any form of social incrimination, public or private, may find itself admissible in a court.
Page 1 and 2:
2012 Volume 36 Number 1 A Review of
Page 3 and 4:
2012 Volume 36 Number 1 A Review of
Page 5 and 6:
Introduction and Issue Overview D A
Page 7 and 8:
Issue Overview and Introduction iii
Page 9 and 10:
Issue Overview and Introduction v T
Page 11 and 12:
Issue Overview and Introduction vii
Page 13 and 14:
Wrongful Convictions: Is It Proper
Page 15 and 16:
Wrongful Convictions 3 critical ele
Page 17 and 18:
Wrongful Convictions 5 convictions
Page 19 and 20:
Wrongful Convictions 7 A. The Morin
Page 21 and 22:
Wrongful Convictions 9 iii. not per
Page 23 and 24:
Wrongful Convictions 11 therefore k
Page 25 and 26:
Wrongful Convictions 13 I agree wit
Page 27 and 28:
Wrongful Convictions 15 to consider
Page 29 and 30:
Wrongful Convictions 17 concluded t
Page 31 and 32:
Wrongful Convictions 19 release on
Page 33 and 34:
Wrongful Convictions 21 The Forensi
Page 35 and 36:
Wrongful Convictions 23 Subsequentl
Page 37 and 38:
Wrongful Convictions 25 issues of c
Page 39 and 40:
Wrongful Convictions 27 hair micros
Page 41 and 42:
Wrongful Convictions 29 assertion d
Page 43 and 44:
Wrongful Convictions 31 however, we
Page 45 and 46:
Wrongful Convictions 33 On his revi
Page 47 and 48:
Wrongful Convictions 35 The philoso
Page 49 and 50:
Manitoba Hydro and Electricity Unde
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Taxonomie juridique des institution
Page 81 and 82:
Taxonomie 69 communautés de langue
Page 83 and 84:
Taxonomie 71 plusieurs soutiennent,
Page 85 and 86:
Taxonomie 73 Selon la thèse de la
Page 87 and 88:
Taxonomie 75 la communauté acadien
Page 89 and 90:
D’autre part, le paragraphe 4(3)
Page 91 and 92:
Taxonomie 79 Ces deux collèges ét
Page 93 and 94:
Taxonomie 81 Le paragraphe 16.1(2)
Page 95 and 96:
Taxonomie 83 La Loi reconnaissant l
Page 97 and 98:
Taxonomie 85 Le Collège militaire
Page 99 and 100:
Taxonomie 87 Monsieur le Président
Page 101 and 102:
Taxonomie 89 CMRSJ demeure au cœur
Page 103 and 104:
Taxonomie 91 normalement leurs étu
Page 105 and 106:
Taxonomie 93 officielles 110 . Ces
Page 107 and 108:
Taxonomie 95 IV. CATÉGORIE 2 : LES
Page 109 and 110:
Taxonomie 97 français afin de perm
Page 111 and 112:
Taxonomie 99 Le statut du français
Page 113 and 114:
Taxonomie 101 campus 152 et est ré
Page 115 and 116:
Taxonomie 103 collège de langue fr
Page 117 and 118:
Taxonomie 105 Le libellé de cette
Page 119 and 120:
Taxonomie 107 organismes désignés
Page 121 and 122:
Taxonomie 109 D. L’Université d
Page 123 and 124:
Taxonomie 111 L’équipe éditoria
Page 125 and 126:
Taxonomie 113 confié en 1965 207 .
Page 127 and 128:
Taxonomie 115 plus étrange puisque
Page 129 and 130:
La loi habilitante de l’Universit
Page 131 and 132:
Taxonomie 119 équivalente dans les
Page 133 and 134:
Taxonomie 121 Laurentienne ne prot
Page 135 and 136:
Taxonomie 123 3.7 Where the Provinc
Page 137 and 138:
Taxonomie 125 répondre aux besoins
Page 139 and 140:
Taxonomie 127 Enfin, l’Universit
Page 141 and 142:
Taxonomie 129 B. Certaines institut
Page 143 and 144:
Taxonomie 131 n’y bénéficie d
Page 145 and 146:
Taxonomie 133 L’entente permet à
Page 147 and 148:
Taxonomie 135 Le Campus d’Alfred
Page 149 and 150:
Taxonomie 137 protection juridique
Page 151 and 152:
Taxonomie 139 Catégorie 1 Catégor
Page 153 and 154:
Taxonomie 141 reliés ou qui avaien
Page 155 and 156:
The Trial Judge’s Four Discretion
Page 157 and 158:
The Trial Judge's Four Discretions
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Social Incrimination: How North Ame
Page 235 and 236:
Social Incrimination 223 on Faceboo
Page 237 and 238:
Social Incrimination 225 obtained a
Page 239 and 240:
Social Incrimination 227 authorship
Page 241 and 242:
Social Incrimination 229 convenient
Page 243 and 244:
Social Incrimination 231 enforcemen
Page 245 and 246: Social Incrimination 233 should suf
Page 247 and 248: Social Incrimination 235 prevents s
Page 249 and 250: Social Incrimination 237 the eviden
Page 251 and 252: Social Incrimination 239 arrest whe
Page 253 and 254: Social Incrimination 241 prosecutio
Page 255 and 256: Social Incrimination 243 used to re
Page 257 and 258: Social Incrimination 245 video with
Page 259 and 260: Social Incrimination 247 exaggerate
Page 261 and 262: Social Incrimination 249 showed tha
Page 263 and 264: Social Incrimination 251 3. Incrimi
Page 265 and 266: Social Incrimination 253 fortunate
Page 267 and 268: Social Incrimination 255 one of tho
Page 269 and 270: Social Incrimination 257 by judge a
Page 271 and 272: Social Incrimination 259 30.02(1) E
Page 273 and 274: Social Incrimination 261 Nova Scoti
Page 275 and 276: Social Incrimination 263 private Fa
Page 277 and 278: Social Incrimination 265 woman fell
Page 279 and 280: Social Incrimination 267 oversight
Page 281 and 282: Social Incrimination 269 an acciden
Page 283 and 284: Social Incrimination 271 preserve r
Page 285 and 286: Social Incrimination 273 followed a
Page 287 and 288: Social Incrimination 275 unconnecte
Page 289 and 290: Social Incrimination 277 that requi
Page 291 and 292: Social Incrimination 279 While ther
Page 293 and 294: Social Incrimination 281 issues aft
Page 295: Social Incrimination 283 University
Page 299 and 300: Pine Tree Justice: Punitive Damage
Page 301 and 302: Pine Tree Justice 289 “exemplary
Page 303 and 304: Pine Tree Justice 291 account of th
Page 305 and 306: Pine Tree Justice 293 $1,000,000 wa
Page 307 and 308: Pine Tree Justice 295 The difficult
Page 309 and 310: Pine Tree Justice 297 nature, punit
Page 311 and 312: Pine Tree Justice 299 B. Confusion
Page 313 and 314: Pine Tree Justice 301 damages. It w
Page 315 and 316: Pine Tree Justice 303 4. Analysis T
Page 317 and 318: Pine Tree Justice 305 respective de
Page 319 and 320: Pine Tree Justice 307 trial judge,
Page 321 and 322: Pine Tree Justice 309 court and pun
Page 323 and 324: Pine Tree Justice 311 in the absenc
Page 325 and 326: Pine Tree Justice 313 suffered? In
Page 327 and 328: Pine Tree Justice 315 denied even c
Page 329 and 330: Pine Tree Justice 317 for punitive
Page 331 and 332: Pine Tree Justice 319 I do not prop
Page 333 and 334: Pine Tree Justice 321 would thereby
Page 335 and 336: Pine Tree Justice 323 problem. It e
Page 337 and 338: Pine Tree Justice 325 VIII. APPENDI
Page 339 and 340: Pine Tree Justice 327 facts at tria
Page 341 and 342: C O M M E N T A R Y Leveling the Pl
Page 343 and 344: Levelling the Playing Field 331 the
Page 345 and 346: Levelling the Playing Field 333 [f]
Page 347 and 348:
Levelling the Playing Field 335 evo
Page 349 and 350:
Levelling the Playing Field 337 in
Page 351 and 352:
Levelling the Playing Field 339 fin
Page 353 and 354:
B O O K R E V I E W Dams of Content
Page 355 and 356:
Dams of Contention 343 puppet who i
Page 357 and 358:
Dams of Contention 345 A detailed s
Page 359 and 360:
Dams of Contention 347 Environment
Page 361 and 362:
Dams of Contention 349 could be con
Page 363 and 364:
C O M M E N T A R Y The “Great Wr
Page 365 and 366:
The “Great Writ” Reinvigorated?
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
C O M M E N T A R Y The DeLloyd Gut
Page 375 and 376:
Habeas Corpus, Legal History, and G
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
C O M M E N T A R Y Dueling Purchas
Page 397 and 398:
Dueling Purchase-Money Security Int
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
V. WHAT ARE PROCEEDS? Dueling Purch
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405:
show all

MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?