MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

robsonhall.ca
from robsonhall.ca More from this publisher
07.02.2014 Views

284 MANITOBA LAW JOURNAL|VOLUME 36 ISSUE 1 suspensions have been upheld where threatening social networking videos have been produced in jest if they “materially and substantially disrupt the work and discipline of the school.” 282 VI. CONCLUSION This paper examined the legal issues related to discovering and utilizing evidence from social networks and looked at the ways courts have dealt with it in terms of both criminal and civil law. In criminal proceedings, investigators have tools to obtain evidence directly from the social networks when reasonable grounds exist. They must then proceed to prove the authenticity of the material as well as ensure that the probative value outweighs potential prejudice. In Canada, local investigations can be assisted by the Department of Justice to obtain the necessary court orders in the US. Defence lawyers faced with social networking evidence should be aware of issues regarding authentication, context and potential prejudice. In civil proceedings, parties are obligated to produce any evidence that is relevant to an issue which depends on the nature of the claim or the dispute. In litigation particularly, it is incumbent on counsel to advise their clients on the risks of using social networks, as well as their obligation to preserve relevant material even if it is adverse to their case. Anyone involved in a dispute should be aware that procedural fairness and the truth seeking process will generally outweigh personal privacy concerns, and courts have the power to compel individuals to uncover their digital lives to assist in dispute resolutions. Social networks have only been around a few years and the law in these areas will continue to grow. Some of the cases covered spring from misunderstandings of the private nature of a social network. Others are the result of a compulsion to seek attention despite the consequences. In large part, the use of social networking has resulted in traditional means of communicating inner secrets and private thoughts being displaced with keyboard strokes and chat transcripts. This paper is not intended to dissuade individuals from using social networks. From connecting long lost friends to helping overthrow dictators, the benefits of 282 OZ v Board of Trustees of Long Beach Unified School Dist, 2008 WL 4396895 (CD Cal).

Social Incrimination 285 new forms of communication are numerous. However, any form of social incrimination, public or private, may find itself admissible in a court.

284 MANITOBA LAW JOURNAL|VOLUME <strong>36</strong> ISSUE 1<br />

suspensions have been upheld where threatening social networking videos<br />

have been produced in jest if they “materially and substantially disrupt the<br />

work and discipline <strong>of</strong> the school.” 282<br />

VI. CONCLUSION<br />

This paper examined the legal issues related to discovering and<br />

utilizing evidence from social networks and looked at the ways courts have<br />

dealt with it in terms <strong>of</strong> both criminal and civil law. In criminal<br />

proceedings, investigators have tools to obtain evidence directly from the<br />

social networks when reasonable grounds exist. They must then proceed to<br />

prove the authenticity <strong>of</strong> the material as well as ensure that the probative<br />

value outweighs potential prejudice. In Canada, local investigations can be<br />

assisted by the Department <strong>of</strong> Justice to obtain the necessary court orders<br />

in the US. Defence lawyers faced with social networking evidence should<br />

be aware <strong>of</strong> issues regarding authentication, context and potential<br />

prejudice.<br />

In civil proceedings, parties are obligated to produce any evidence that<br />

is relevant to an issue which depends on the nature <strong>of</strong> the claim or the<br />

dispute. In litigation particularly, it is incumbent on counsel to advise<br />

their clients on the risks <strong>of</strong> using social networks, as well as their<br />

obligation to preserve relevant material even if it is adverse to their case.<br />

Anyone involved in a dispute should be aware that procedural fairness and<br />

the truth seeking process will generally outweigh personal privacy<br />

concerns, and courts have the power to compel individuals to uncover<br />

their digital lives to assist in dispute resolutions.<br />

Social networks have only been around a few years and the law in<br />

these areas will continue to grow. Some <strong>of</strong> the cases covered spring from<br />

misunderstandings <strong>of</strong> the private nature <strong>of</strong> a social network. Others are<br />

the result <strong>of</strong> a compulsion to seek attention despite the consequences.<br />

In large part, the use <strong>of</strong> social networking has resulted in traditional<br />

means <strong>of</strong> communicating inner secrets and private thoughts being<br />

displaced with keyboard strokes and chat transcripts. This paper is not<br />

intended to dissuade individuals from using social networks. From<br />

connecting long lost friends to helping overthrow dictators, the benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

282<br />

OZ v Board <strong>of</strong> Trustees <strong>of</strong> Long Beach Unified School Dist, 2008 WL 4396895 (CD Cal).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!