07.02.2014 Views

MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

270 MANITOBA LAW JOURNAL|VOLUME <strong>36</strong> ISSUE 1<br />

material or use preservation tools, both freely and commercially<br />

available. 218 While some courts may admit screenshots or even printouts, it<br />

is far more reliable to capture original sources or generate a time stamped<br />

archive.<br />

Furthermore, changes in technology may provide an alternative to the<br />

“hand over the keys” approach when a court wishes to order full<br />

production <strong>of</strong> information. In the fall <strong>of</strong> 2010, Facebook introduced a<br />

feature that allows any user to archive and export their entire account into<br />

a handy backup in which all photographs, posts, and messages are saved. 219<br />

An order to export such an archive would in many cases be a more direct<br />

and efficient approach than one requiring a party to hand over passwords<br />

and account information to the court or opposing party.<br />

E. Ex Parte Motions and Adverse Inferences<br />

Courts are recognizing the challenge <strong>of</strong> preserving social networking<br />

evidence, since accounts are easily closed and photographs or statuses<br />

permanently deleted. As a result, they are beginning to grant motions<br />

designed to preserve information or impose adverse consequences on<br />

parties who appear to be deleting relevant information. For example, in<br />

Terry v Mullowney, the court drew an adverse inference against a plaintiff in<br />

a personal injury lawsuit after he shut down his Facebook account midlitigation,<br />

concluding he had likely posted incriminating evidence<br />

undermining his claim before deleting the account. 220<br />

The trend moving forward in e-discovery may be the use <strong>of</strong> ex parte<br />

motions prior to discovery. While parties have a general obligation to<br />

218<br />

There are a variety <strong>of</strong> ways that both social networking sites and the private sector<br />

provide solutions to discovery requirements. For example, Facebook has an archive<br />

function that allows a user to down load a copy <strong>of</strong> their entire pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Companies<br />

such as Hanzo Archives , have s<strong>of</strong>tware capable <strong>of</strong> backing up Facebook, Twitter, Linked and<br />

YouTube media. They also have useful tools for companies to integrate with<br />

enterprise backup solutions for automating preservation <strong>of</strong> content. There are other<br />

tools that exist for those looking to capture posts by other users. Some browsers, such<br />

as Apple’s Safari, allow users to save a webpage as a template and similar add-ons are<br />

available for Mozilla’s Firefox.<br />

219<br />

Craig Ball, “Facebook Feature Could Ease Cloud-Based EDD” (23 February 2011),<br />

online: <strong>Law</strong> Technology News .<br />

220<br />

Terry v Mullowney, 2009 NLTD 56, 285 Nfld & PEIR 19.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!